Margaret, evidently you and I are sluts, and so are the majority of women who live in this country. Well good for us. I have always said that well-behaved women rarely make history. I have also said that Rush Limbaugh is a big fat pig. Pigs and sluts. Sadly, that’s what this has all boiled down to.
In 2008, the Democratic Party had a tough decision to make. Would we give America its first female President or would we give American its first African-American President? Would we turn the corner on sexism in this country or racism? Would we finally rise above hate and bigotry and make a statement that we truly are the land of the free? Either way, we would profoundly change the world for the better. And that we did. At the same time, over in the Republican camp, that party was trying to decide if you could see Russia from Sarah Palin’s kitchen window.
This year the Republicans have another tough decision to make as well. Will they decide that Mormonism is a cult or will they decide that women who use birth control are sluts? It’s a tough call. But either way we will profoundly change the definition of just how stupid is stupid. God Bless America.
Margaret, the Republicans had a meeting about birth control and didn’t include a single woman – kind of like the Catholic Church but without the funny hats. It’s like inviting Rush Limbaugh to a Jenny Craig convention or like Sarah Palin calling a family meeting and forgetting to bring the early pregnancy test sticks. Why bother?
I’ll bet you a dollar to a donut that most of the Republican men at that meeting have a bottle of Viagra in their medicine cabinet. Why is it so hard to understand that birth control makes for better healthcare for women? And honestly why is it so hard to see that Rush is a college drop out drug addict who – like most addicts – will say anything for a buck. As entertainment that’s comedy gold, but his being a powerful Republican spokesperson ought to tell you just how low the Republican Party has sunk. You just can’t make this kind of bullshit up.
I wish November would get here already so Obama can go back to fixing what’s wrong with this country.
I mean it. Really.
(You can now follow Helen on Twitter @HelenPhilpot)
Margaret and Helen 
Hi there, I want to subscribe for this webpage to get
most recent updates, so where can i do it please help out.
LikeLike
By: tlumacz z angielskiego na polski on October 8, 2014
at 10:42 AM
Hi there to all, it’s in fact a pleasant for me to pay a quick visit this website,
it consists of priceless Information.
LikeLike
By: Nelly on October 6, 2014
at 3:18 AM
Good day! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form?
I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having problems finding one?
Thanks a lot!
LikeLike
By: tower of saviors hack on October 5, 2014
at 2:31 AM
After looking into a handful of the blog posts on yoiur web page, I
seriously appreciate your technique of blogging.
I added it to my bookmark webpage list aand will be checking back
in the near future. Take a look at my website as well
and tell me how you feel.
LikeLike
By: online electronic stores with credit rent on October 3, 2014
at 11:38 PM
Hi there! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering if
you knew where I could locate a captcha plugin for my comment
form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one?
Thanks a lot!
LikeLike
By: foosball table Size on October 2, 2014
at 1:12 PM
Hi, its good post on the topic of media print, we all be familiar with media is a fantastic source of information.
LikeLike
By: uberstrike generator download on September 20, 2014
at 1:43 PM
Do you have any video of that? I’d like to find out some additional information.
LikeLike
By: Pure Select Reviews on September 19, 2014
at 12:44 PM
I am not sure where yyou are getting your info, but great topic.
Ineeds to spend some time learningg much more or understandring more.
Thabks for magnificent information I was looking for this
information forr myy mission.
LikeLike
By: best skincare treatment products on September 19, 2014
at 2:44 AM
It’s very simple to find out any matter on web as compared to textbooks, as I found this piece of
writing at this site.
LikeLike
By: http://drugstoredir2014.com on September 16, 2014
at 9:28 AM
Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after looking at many of the posts I realized it’s new to me.
Anyways, I’m certainly happy I came across it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!
LikeLike
By: ヴィヴィアンウエストウッド 時計 on August 20, 2014
at 5:22 AM
Very quickly this web site will be famous among all blogging viewers, due to
it’s good articles
LikeLike
By: Google adwords agency pricing on July 29, 2014
at 1:55 AM
Aside from that denver accident lawyer mortality is also a great aid.
Motor vehicle accidents can include cars, trucks, motorcycles, and the associated measurements.
Even you can contact experienced car accident, automobile accidents.
LikeLike
By: http://gudangsim.com/blog/?author=122 on July 3, 2014
at 9:55 PM
The residential properties in Ahmedabad are high in demand
as the increasing migrating population is congregating into the city for jobs.
Moving Office – Land from Massachusetts to New Hampshire I needed a new law firm to represent
the company. Typically this is seen as commercial activity on the street level, and apartments or
condos up above.
LikeLike
By: โกดังให้เช่า on June 18, 2014
at 1:20 AM
First of all I would like to say awesome blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if
you do not mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself
and clear your head prior to writing. I’ve had a difficult time clearing my mind in getting my ideas out there.
I truly do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes tend to be lost simply just
trying to figure out how to begin. Any ideas or hints? Kudos!
LikeLike
By: Alibris Coupon Code on June 9, 2014
at 7:52 AM
Hello to all, since I am in fact keen of reading this web site’s
post to be updated regularly. It includes good information.
LikeLike
By: what is the best coffee for espresso machines on May 30, 2014
at 9:27 AM
You will get the info concerning the kinds of Minecraft mods along with other information at.
Minecraft is really as of now in beta development
stage but you can change this based on how much RAM you want to install this.
Many gaming communities encourage this and I myself do as well.
LikeLike
By: Comment Avoir Un Minecraft Compte on May 20, 2014
at 1:13 AM
Impact resistant windows offer homeowners the advantage of
protection in every season, as well as sound
reduction, higher thermal efficiency, and even UV protection. If the nails of
the roof need repair then they should be mended immediately as
you never know when hurricanes can attack. You can’t blame anyone else for anything in your life but you.
LikeLike
By: Salt Lake City roll up steel doors on May 16, 2014
at 8:24 AM
Thanks a lot for sharing all of the amazing information!
I’m looking forward to going over more posts!
LikeLike
By: www.enhancedonlinenews.com on May 12, 2014
at 5:41 PM
I truly got into this article. I found it to be interesting as well as packed with special points
of view. I like to read material that makes me think. Many thanks for writing this great content.
LikeLike
By: vigrxsideeffects224.tumblr.com on May 8, 2014
at 7:51 PM
This info is worth everyone’s attention.
Where can I find out more?
LikeLike
By: Federico on May 8, 2014
at 6:54 AM
There is a month-to-month subscription plan that allows you to purchase games for as much as 80% off the regular price.
Apart from shopping use, groceries, drug stores, fast food chains,
and even services offered locally are also covered by coupons Montreal thereby
giving us more flexibility to stretch our budget.
My whole life was one big paper chase, going after degree after degree.
LikeLike
By: Http://Www.Facebook.Com/Zyngapokerhacknew on May 8, 2014
at 5:10 AM
NOTE: The affluent attribute being honest with all people as the most important characteristic in their businesses, tied with being well disciplined.
Thats the main reasons people dont usually set out to catch the Blue cat fish.
Uh oh Floe, hang on there — the chunk of ice shrinks.
LikeLike
By: www.Youtube.com on May 8, 2014
at 3:44 AM
Due to revolution in the use of cell phones, the
telecom sector has also expanded very rapidly.
Prices in phones drop all the time as technology advances.
Also, it is important to buy papers that are still sealed specifically if you don’t want your fingerprints everywhere over the
paper.
LikeLike
By: The Sims Freeplay For Android Free Download on May 6, 2014
at 6:02 AM
Start applying the first coat of sealer in one direction and then apply the second coat in
the opposite direction. This is especially true if
you are riding alone, which is not encouraged, so that someone will be able to find you if you become
injured. Asphalt is extremely durable and can be used for
both low and high traffic conditions.
LikeLike
By: asphalt 8 airborne free download on May 5, 2014
at 8:33 AM
s Spoken Word and her website offers products to help Christians use Bible scriptures
in every day living finding the secret power of
god. especially for warmer water baits and through into the autumn time.
The company’s promising logo is “A New Game Every Day.
LikeLike
By: Tarah on May 1, 2014
at 7:55 PM
) It stimulates the immune system with very high levels of beta-carotene (4 Milligram.
Players must use the candy bar names listed to write a story
about the bride and groom’s wedding night. The Ptarmigan, a plant-eating bird that thrives
in the northern tundra, dons white feathers that not only hide them from their
enemies, but with the white long feathers that grow over the feet
and legs and down to the toes, it gives them warmer gear to survive in the frigid temperatures.
LikeLike
By: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEGg0FPDv58 on May 1, 2014
at 7:38 PM
With countless acne products available it can be difficult
to figure out which medication would work best for you.
– Life cycle changes such as the onset of puberty when the body starts producing male sex hormones.
Some of these ingredients include, vitamin A, selenium, chromium,
green tea, fish oils, and probiotics.
LikeLike
By: best face wash for acne on May 1, 2014
at 6:45 PM
Hello, I enjoy reading through your post. I
wanted to write a little comment to support you.
LikeLike
By: how to start your own website on May 1, 2014
at 2:38 PM
In our times, such paper dolls are a little bit individual.
you prefer (from role playing games, first person shooters,
strategy games to. Cybernetic internet surgery games
for children have been made to assist them in advancing
their hand & eye synchronization plus train them more on the human make-up.
LikeLike
By: Leopoldo on April 30, 2014
at 11:24 PM
My Partner And I just recently set up our steam
shower unit, finest item we’ve got a hold of in a long while, the little ones and family members love
it, cannot see us moving back to traditional showers anymore
LikeLike
By: Aqualusso Steam Shower on April 30, 2014
at 9:11 AM
Also, a clean carpet makes a home much more desirable and ensures a sale more readily.
Tile cleaning and grout cleaning requires the need
of oxygen bleach. Various Vancouver Carpet Cleaning BC companies will give you the top support or a low cost
carpet cleaning service.
LikeLike
By: david's carpet cleaning alexandria va on April 28, 2014
at 7:25 PM
This is very interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post.
Also, I’ve shared your website in my social networks!
LikeLike
By: meilleur mmorpg gratuit on April 25, 2014
at 4:15 AM
During World War II, the team played over 30 international games between September 1939 and November
1942, when national team games was suspended as
most players had to join the armed forces.
If they get away because you have to wait a while before you get to try again.
Military families also fall in this group and so do trade workers such as plumbers and electricians.
LikeLike
By: Cash Top Eleven on April 16, 2014
at 2:43 PM
What’s up, this weekend is pleasant in support of me, as this
occasion i am reading this enormous educational paragraph here at my house.
LikeLike
By: home improvement nomad on April 13, 2014
at 5:29 PM
Hello! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog.
Is it very difficult to set up your own blog?
I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick.
I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not
sure where to begin. Do you have any points or suggestions?
Cheers
LikeLike
By: GPS Watch on April 9, 2014
at 8:38 AM
It’s actually a nice and helpful piece of info. I am happy that you just
shared this useful information with us. Please keep us up to
date like this. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
By: clash of clans hacker on March 22, 2014
at 7:41 PM
Howdy exceptional blog! Does running a blog similar to this take
a large amount of work? I’ve absolutely no knowledge of programming however I
was hoping to start my own blog in the near future.
Anyways, if you have any ideas or techniques
for new blog owners please share. I know this is off topic nevertheless I just needed to ask.
Thanks!
LikeLike
By: Ashlee on March 21, 2014
at 2:01 AM
Heya i’m for the primary time here. I found this board and I in finding It really
useful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to
provide something again and help others such as you aided me.
LikeLike
By: les vivants telecharger on March 19, 2014
at 1:43 AM
Hello to every one, the contents existing at this website are truly remarkable for people
knowledge, well, keep up the nice work fellows.
LikeLike
By: je m'appelle hmmm telecharger on March 18, 2014
at 11:54 PM
I blog frequently and I seriously thank you for your information.
This article has really peaked my interest. I am going to book mark your website and keep checking for new details about
once per week. I opted in for your RSS feed
as well.
LikeLike
By: best cookware brands on March 16, 2014
at 5:09 AM
Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked submit my
comment didn’t show up. Grrrr… well I’m not writing all that
over again. Regardless, just wanted to say fantastic
blog!
LikeLike
By: best drip coffee maker on March 16, 2014
at 3:47 AM
Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iphone and
tested to see if it can survive a 25 foot drop, just so
she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now broken
and she has 83 views. I know this is completely off topic but I had to share it with someone!
LikeLike
By: windshield wiper reviews on March 15, 2014
at 12:31 PM
It’s perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be
happy. I have read this post and if I could I want
to suggest you few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you
could write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read
more things about it!
LikeLike
By: vietnam war girl on March 13, 2014
at 10:42 PM
Hello There. I discovered your weblog the use of msn.
That is a really neatly written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to
learn more of your useful information. Thank you for the post.
I will definitely comeback.
LikeLike
By: weight loss kick start on March 10, 2014
at 7:56 PM
The few glimpses of Smaug at the beginning and the end were very nicely done.
Martin’s A Song of Fire and Ice, and more recently the Hunger Games.
Well, with his extended Hobbit trilogy, we’re getting our wish,
and, as the saying goes, we should have been careful.
LikeLike
By: The hobbit Kingdoms of middle earth hack chips on March 10, 2014
at 8:48 AM
This piece of writing is in fact a pleasant one it helps new web people, who are wishing for blogging.
LikeLike
By: news channel 3 weather on March 6, 2014
at 8:02 PM
You go ladies!!!!
LikeLike
By: occupybostonradio on May 29, 2012
at 3:36 PM
Nagic stole that line from someone who recently kicked his arse. Just saying,
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 26, 2012
at 10:34 PM
I bought alcohol today. I wasn’t required to provide identification. Turns out they don’t care who I am! Who knew? They just want evidence I’m of a certain age and my face tells all the story they need.
Step round the flaming straw man. Teh straw, it burns.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 26, 2012
at 10:33 PM
anonymous you really are a nasty piece of work. Why don’t you put your tinfoil hat on and post somewhere else.
LikeLike
By: Terri in NY on May 18, 2012
at 6:44 PM
Check mate.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 8:06 PM
Didnt realize we were in a middle school argument. Whose on first worked for Abbot and Costello, not so much here. We can continue this after you graduate.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 7:55 PM
Focus, please. I asked you first. How does extending equal rights to one group take away from the group that already has them?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 5:43 PM
We can try one question at a time to help keep you on track, Lets start with how you think the separation of church and state applies here.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 4:58 PM
Did you go to school in the US? I’d heard the US education system had flaws. I didn’t realize it was so pervasive. Civics, the law, logic, history, spelling and grammar all seem to be a problem for you. Is there any recourse in your country for the way you have been shortchanged?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 4:37 PM
I’m not sure where you’re trying to go but I’m pretty sure it’s away from explaining how extending equal rights to a group of people hurts the rights of a different group of people who already have them.
Are you saying some people are more equal than others?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 4:31 PM
I disagree.The argument is that they are wrong BECAUSE it comes from a religious perspective. The fact they are being called religions makes this absolutely clear.
As far as separation of church and state. Could you explain to me how you think this applies here?
Go after, in the U.s. anyways is to peruse, to seek out. The phrase is readily defined if you google it.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 3:38 PM
Sorry. Equivalency OR hypocrisy.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 11:42 AM
There is no equivalency of hypocrisy there, though.
Group A is seeking a fundamental right for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (ref Declaration of Independence) and equality (ref Bill of Rights). Group B is attempting to deny them those rights based on religious beliefs, which contradicts separation of church and state.
If Group A gets those rights, what right of Group B does that violate? Also, too, please define “go after”.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 11:40 AM
Anon their ability to go after the things they believe in for no other reason that their beliefs come from their religion. People like elsie complaint about what is being done by gays and lesbians is exactly what she and others like her are doing to religious people. I find that to be hypocritical.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 11:19 AM
I’m sorry, nagic. I read her post and her post doesn’t answer my question about what you said. What civil rights of religious people are being trounced and attacked? Thank you.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 11:12 AM
Anon read By: elsie09 on May 11, 2012
at 5:32 AM
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 9:46 AM
Please explain what civil rights of religious people are being trounced and attacked. Thank you.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 11, 2012
at 9:37 AM
elsie09
I would ask you to consider the hypocrisy of your argument on this subject. In fighting for the rights of gays and lesbians, you are trouncing and attacking the rights of the religious people.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 8:59 AM
Here’s the bottom line:
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights,
Here’s the bottom line Obama HAS voted away your civil rights, more than once, and is attempting to do so again as we speak.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 11, 2012
at 8:56 AM
How’s the corporate welfare system working out? Thank you, JP Morgan Chase.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 11, 2012
at 6:07 AM
A new post over at Jim’s blog this week:
http://www.stonekettle.com/2012/05/love-and-war.html
***
“…I have yet to hear any opposition to same-sex marriage that doesn’t, sooner or later (usually sooner), invoke somebody’s God. Because the simple truth of the matter is that when you strip away all the bullshit, what it comes down to is a bunch of selfish b*st*rds attempting to force their religious beliefs on the rest of us.
“In the United States, if you can’t frame your argument without invoking your religion, you don’t in point of fact actually have an argument, you’re just being an asshole…”
“Here in America, denying any legally consenting pair of adults the right to marry because it’s against the tenets of somebody’s Bronze Age belief system is no different whatsoever than snatching random citizens off the street and forcing them to join your church. Denying gay people the right to marry because Christians don’t like it is no different whatsoever from Muslims demanding that pork be outlawed nationwide and that all American women should have to go about with their faces covered. It’s absolutely no different from American Catholics demanding that nobody can eat meat on Fridays because some senile old pedophile in a pointy hat says it makes Jesus cry. The only, the only, time that religion should have any bearing on anybody’s civil rights is if it affects you directly, i.e. if you don’t agree with same-sex marriage because you believe that two thousand years ago some wild-eyed hippy with delusions of grandeur and a pocket full of magic fairy dust said it was bogus, dude, fine, then you have the absolute right not to marry anybody of the same sex as yourself – but that’s as far as it goes. You don’t get to tell the rest of us what to do. Period. And don’t start in with that Christian morality bullshit either, or I will spend the next ten posts describing numerous examples of your religion’s endless immoral hypocrisy in intimate detail – and we’ll start with the aforementioned guy in the pointy hat.
“Here’s the bottom line:
If a bunch of religious nuts can vote away your fundamental civil rights, then your rights are not self-evident, inalienable, or endowed by God. Quod erat demonstrandum.
“It’s really just this simple: if men can dictate your civil rights based on their religious and/or political beliefs, then God isn’t the all powerful deity he claims to be and any rights he supposedly endows are worthless trash, or the founding principles of the United states – i.e. the promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all citizens – are utter and complete bullshit, or (and here’s a thought) you are wrong.
“Want to take a guess as to which is more likely?….”
***
(BTW, I altered one word in that quote because I suspect that it is probably on Matthew’s short list of a few forbidden words here. Of course, Jim Wright didn’t hesitate to write the word in its original form.)
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on May 11, 2012
at 5:32 AM
Hypocrite, Integrity? and just plain STUPIDITY!!! Got to love those Conservatives.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/colbert-mocks-hannity-buying-obama-hater-j
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 10, 2012
at 8:27 PM
Who is Mitt Romney? The truth about the auto bailout and Mittens!! Mitt is such a bad liar.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/jennifer-granholm-takes-mitt-romney-task-c
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 10, 2012
at 7:32 PM
Isnt that your motto Delurk? You are probably the biggest hypocrite ;Ive had the displeasure of meeting. on here. You talking anything integrity and doing what you preach is like a rapist standing up for women’s rights.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 10, 2012
at 6:16 PM
‘Red State Socialism’ graphic says GOP-leaning states get lion’s share of federal dollars
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/26/blog-posting/red-state-socialism-graphic-says-gop-leaning-state/
Hear the roar – do as I say, not as I do! Apparently it’s just crap that it’s a Liberal thing.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 10, 2012
at 5:45 PM
alaskapi
An awfully lengthy answer for a simplistic act on the part of Puppet. Her silence after the fact speaks volumes.
You said: Since you didn’t say what your math prof would disagree with I can’t answer to that and I’m not sure it matters here.
And again you had said: As mathematics is not authored or owned as other works are, it is rather silly to talk about plagarizing an equation- especially one no one laid claim to as their own…eh?
This is to which my answer was pointed at and that my Prof would object to.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 10, 2012
at 9:01 AM
ahh the dynamic duo of talking and saying nothing. Welcome back poolman..glad to see no additional IQ points have been wasted on you. Thanks for your remarkable contribution as always.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 10, 2012
at 8:32 AM
I had already pegged the hydra.
It would be one who was relegated to the trash bin and who you were threatened with being remembered at Christmas. Seems bitter about the trash bin though.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 10, 2012
at 12:19 AM
It depends on what a win constitutes, farsight.
And the
whinerwinner is…Tex and his nagic hydra. 😀
LikeLike
By: poolman on May 9, 2012
at 11:50 PM
poolman, I take it we have a winner here???
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 9, 2012
at 9:25 PM
nagic-
the 4 places I found that question with the formula form
and the specific parameters to solve it within were all presentations of the question for assistance in solution by others. No presentation was made by any of the 4 questioners that this included original work of their own and given that they were all asking for assistance solving the problem itself, it is not likely they would claim ownership of the idea behind the form.Matter of fact, it set me to wondering if they were doing homework and wanted help …
PFesser is correct as to what constitutes academic and professional plagarism- it is taking someone else’s work, be it lazy, inept, or intentional and passing it off as one’s own work. Included in that notion is that one benefits in some way that is measurable- passing a class, a job raise, honors, prestige, whatever.
I don’t think an attempt was made in cutting and pasting a question posed in multiple places by functionally anonymous commenters to solve a specific math problem is taking someone else’s work . It isn’t work in any meaningful or useful sense of the word.
Plagarism in mathematics is certainly possible and great battles have been waged over the years there. Newton and Leibniz and the calculus being one of the biggest.
One fellow says Descartes was under fire too
http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/Physics/PhyNet/Optics/Refraction/Rainbows.html
Einstein has been heavily criticized, there are many more.
Some like the vindication of Leibniz after his death, when cooler heads looked at all the information, point to the necessity of being very careful with getting too huffy about inventing/discovering in mathematics and solid , solid peer review of everything and everyone involved being necessary to establish original authorship -insofar as possible.
Once you move into our more modern notions of how to handle intellectual property most especially copyright and patent- the whole thing gets much murkier as relates to mathematics. With very few exceptions formulas may not be patented themselves, though they may be a portion of the reasoning and proof of why the thing, process, whatever should be/was granted patent. Copyrighting a formula is skinky too and there are a lot of ifs ands or buts as to what constitutes a copyrightable formula.
Since you didn’t say what your math prof would disagree with I can’t answer to that and I’m not sure it matters here.
i still say this whole upset dealie here has nothing to do with intellectual property and everything to do with folks slinging barbs in ill temper.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 9, 2012
at 9:16 PM
And as usual, you would be wrong, Cynthia. It’s the story of your miserable existence, from birth to death.
I haven’t been to this sh!t hole in months. Looks like Lurch is still propagandizing after another Tuesday night ass kicking with a happy face, you’re your typical whining self and Juneau is still sucking plagiarizing hind teat. Still as reprehensible as ever.
You think I’m going to post as anonymous and not take credit for you not being able to find both massive butt cheeks with your nasty, grubby little hands after I slap your nasty ass? Didn’t I teach you anything last time you slithered off? Now you’ve gone and hurt my feelings. 😥
Good Lawd. Somebody here believes that JimmieJoe at Stone Head Kettle is brave and doesn’t suffer fools easily? 😯 That wannabee Rambo goon is the biggest coward on the internet, and with those ghastly personal pictures, possibly the ugliest too. Talk about a superficial crowd. I’m shocked the blog isn’t accompanied by a needed laugh track. I’ve seen modern art pieces that look better than that croaking potato peeler, make believe soldier. What did he carry? A stick in his mouth?
No fear, Helen. He is. Obama is going to be frogmarched to the curb in about six months, and kicked in the bony ass back to ACORN community organizer, providing the perfect fix for the country – even the libs here. Thanks for staying afoot!
LikeLike
By: Tex Taylor Rides Again&trade!; on May 9, 2012
at 8:24 PM
narrow minded and of no importance……kind of like another minister……rev Wright
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on May 9, 2012
at 8:03 PM
Who is Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson and why would anyone want to make a post about this guy? He is one narrow minded individual of no importance.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 9, 2012
at 3:22 PM
Helen! Your next post could practically write itself! Get a load of this tool!!
Fox News contributor laments ‘mistake’ of letting women vote
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 9, 2012
at 2:58 PM
My math Professor vehemently disagrees with you Pi. mathematical equations are the basis for many of today’s inventions and are considered intellectual property. One of the products i sell uses a mathematical formula based in hydrodynamics that we have patented.
LikeLike
By: nagic on May 9, 2012
at 10:39 AM
So Pfesser…who’d you vote for?????
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2141657/Texas-INMATE-gets-40-cent-votes-Obama-West-Virginia-primary.html
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on May 9, 2012
at 10:19 AM
No PFesser- those Buicks are discrete and individual Buicks amongst a total of Buicks so that logic doesn’t track as relates to a specific equation with a request to solve it within specific parameters which appears multiple times across the “tubes” and other locations,
My own search of the equation was for ownership of the equation- I will defer to anyone who is a better searcher who can find a source that claims ownership of that particular “function of the form f(x)=a+bcos(cx) that is tangent to the line y=1 at the point (0,1), and tangent to the line y=x+3/2-pi/4 at the point (pi/4, 3/2).”
Plagarism of mathematical work IS a different beastie on many fronts- to insist that credit be made for some unnamed commenter on physicsforums or yahoo answers who is asking for a solution stretches it too far by any measure.
Within the context of previously offered theories and proofs offered by nagic , the whole thing is nothing more than an ill-tempered swipe at ill tempered theories and proofs. Period.
You are welcome to see it however you like but I do not see the way it was presented as a claim of ownership of the question- merely a slapback , good, bad, or in between- merely a slapback.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 9, 2012
at 8:41 AM
Mitt Romney saved GM (General Motors) and also killed Osama Bin Laden!
Stephen Colbert did the research, so it must be true?
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/jon-stewart-takes-rights-cognitive-dissona
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 9, 2012
at 7:48 AM
AlaskaPi, I enjoyed your math comments. Once upon a time I was a math geek. I, too, see beauty in math. You don’t very often talk to people who “get” that. Usually you just get looks of concern for your mental health. 😀 I have forgotten a lot but still remember enough to be able to impress the kids when they need help. Moving from math to arithmetic… I found this interesting. Lots of assumptions I wouldn’t yet make but I’m not a poll wonk.
The 2012 Election Is Obama’s To Win — Just Look At The RCP Electoral Map
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougschoen/2012/05/08/the-2012-election-is-obamas-to-win-just-look-at-the-rcp-electoral-map/
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 9, 2012
at 5:26 AM
Pi opined:
“As mathematics is not authored or owned as other works are, it is rather silly to talk about plagarizing an equation- especially one no one laid claim to as their own…eh?”
Nonsense. Baloney is a funny thing; no matter how thin you slice it, it’s still baloney. All anyone had to do is say is, disclaimer: this is not my problem, instead of implying authorship and having the solution at hand. The best thing, when you get caught with your pants down is to say, “sorry” and move on.
“That particular equation and its solution is all over the internet- yes. And in textbooks and likely on many a chalkboard.”
So? By that logic, if you steal a Buick, it’s OK because there are a LOT of Buicks?
“You want to get ticked about an irritated swipe at a commenter’s intelligence, fine., but what’s up with trying to make something else out of it?”
I made it out to be dishonesty. That it is.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 9, 2012
at 4:52 AM
I see NC made it official: no gay marriage
Bloody backwoods goobers.
In WV we used to say, “Thank God for Mississippi.”
Add North Carolina to that.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 9, 2012
at 4:43 AM
So tell me, NOP, what is YOUR solution to your problem? It will be interesting to see if you make the same mistake (which means you simply plagarized the whole thing) or if you have a real solution.
—————–
PFesser-
As mathematics is not authored or owned as other works are, it is rather silly to talk about plagarizing an equation- especially one no one laid claim to as their own…eh?
That particular equation and its solution is all over the internet- yes. And in textbooks and likely on many a chalkboard
You want to get ticked about an irritated swipe at a commenter’s intelligence, fine., but what’s up with trying to make something else out of it?
My own calculus is 40 years behind me as is the linear algebra and the whole schtick. Wonderful beautiful stuff- most of which I can’t remember anymore… sigh. I loved vector calculus- that I remember, the math I don’t 🙂
I really truly loved watching elegant solutions fall right out of calculus problems- the mathematical study of change- especially on the heels of studying the ever messy riemann sum stuff- yarg!!!! bleah!
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 8, 2012
at 10:48 PM
What is the result austerity budgets during an economic downturn? Answer: Sinking economies where the few get richer and the middle class gets crushed.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/sen-bernie-sanders-backlash-austerity-and-w
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 8, 2012
at 9:48 PM
As always, Rachel is right on the money JunJ. I would just love to give that woman a big hug! Thanks for the post.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 8, 2012
at 9:46 PM
MITT ROMNEY – Mr. Etch a sketch
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 8, 2012
at 8:47 AM
FORWARD! I like that.
Probably lifted from Captain Smith. Allegorical, too.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 8, 2012
at 7:05 AM
Interesting: Anderson Cooper caught, as one poster put it, in a random act of journalism.
I didn’t think he had it in him – at least not in *that* sense of the word.
You go, boy !
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 8, 2012
at 6:56 AM
“FORWARD”
Stonekettle Station has a new post up:
A snippet:
“Forward.
I probably wouldn’t have gone with Forward myself. In my mind it’s not really as inspiring as the campaign’s previous one word slogan, Hope. Plus, the word hope only has one syllable, forward has two and the campaign risks loosing the undecided vote with such a lengthy message. If they were going to use a direction as a campaign slogan, for the majority of Americans it probably would have been better if they just grunted and pointed (of course pointing is fraught with risk too, you don’t want to get caught gesturing towards Canada, or worse Mexico. You know, on second thought, never mind).”
http://www.stonekettle.com/2012/05/omg-nazis-nazis-everywhere.html#comment-form
From Jim Wright, he who truly knows how to hand someone his ass. He has absolutely no tolerance for trolls! One in particular!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 7, 2012
at 10:42 PM
Wow 14,000+ in an 18,000 capacity at the May 5 Obama rally in Ohio!!!
There are liars out there who would have you think differently!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 7, 2012
at 9:15 PM
PFesser
Considering who we are dealing with I assumed deceit out of the gate. I copied and pasted the problem into Google and bam it came up. I copy and pasted the answer to see what her response would be. Not surprising Puppet and others went dead silent…guess you can be embarrassed even online.
After I do this sales call I will sit down and work it out.or at least attempt it. I kept all my math books from college so I am sure I can rush up real quick. Give Puppet time to lick her wounds.
Rutherford’s is a heady group. Rather enjoying this brand of conversation. It is a shame we cannot have that level of dialog on here to get the Liberal perspective. Life affords me the luxury of having the time to engage a great many people in discussions on political topics. I am sad to report this blog is not an isolated pocket of closed mindedness. Even 1 on 1 or in small group settings, the Liberals I speak with almost immediately shut down, or rather than answer a question directly, ask personal questions(ie answer a question with a question) that in most would consider somewhat rude to ask of someone.
I am very fascinated how this group mentality seems almost universal. I have and am spending a good deal of time trying to find what brings this out in people of this political bent. People I have known for years that I have considered to be very normal, level headed individuals seem to change almost instantaneously before my eyes the first time i question a political belief. My current hypothesis at the moment is the media. I have to believe for this to be so pervasive that only something like the media could facilitate this kind of group mindset.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 7, 2012
at 8:23 AM
anon –
notice the crickets re: exposing NOP’s little puzzle as having been plagarized. As you might have gathered, not too many math majors in this little corner of heaven; I criticise myself for not having suspected it right out of the box. I still want to work on it when I get a chance; I am stuck on the expansion of cos (nx). I think I’ll just substitute cos (Q) and see where that goes. My math is pretty rusty.
re: Rutherford’s – tough bunch, but I would say good guys all. Couple of gals too – educated and smart and tough also. Put on your big-boy pants; it gets rough, but there’s no whining there; it’s a nice change of pace.
re: Krugman’s formula for fixing the economy. I have probably read a lot more Krugman than you have, JJoe, since I have a subs to the NYTimes. His formula is, simply put, more of the same that Obama and his minions have been doing for the past four years – print more money. The Bernank and others have printed in those four years an additional quantity of money twice that already existing since the Republic began. (for you math majors, NOP, that means he has tripled the money supply).
The Chicago school of Econ predicts that such shenanigans will lead to tremendous inflation, with the de-facto transfer of YOUR savings to the government as your money becomes less valuable. Instead of manning-up and stopping the digging that put us in the hole, we are digging faster. It also predicts a very long period of high unemployment. Fortunately, we don’t know what the inflation rate or unemployment really is, since the govt has changed how they report it in order to not worry anybody.
Good plan.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 7, 2012
at 7:00 AM
More Mittens!!!! With respect and admiration – of course.
http://rackjite.com/?p=9344
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 7, 2012
at 1:05 AM
Who is Mittens Romney? Time to take a look.
http://rackjite.com/?p=9347
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 7, 2012
at 12:03 AM
Interesting choice by Hussein Obama considering his championing the so called war on women. Obama Launches Campaign with Alleged Wife-Abuser Sherrod Brown
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/03/Sherrod-Brown-Divorce-Obama
And in other news….As the economy continues to slowly recover, the number of available jobs is much lower than the number of people looking, prompting young adults to move back in with their parents in numbers not seen in decades. Rebecca Jarvis and Jeff Glor speak with Jack Otter and Dr. Jennifer Hartstein about the trend’s impact on the people involved — and the economy. Guess this is one way to keep families together. Keep them so broke they cannot afford to live apart.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 6, 2012
at 7:57 PM
A sign of things to come. Hussein Obama is in trouble. But we already knew that.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/05/obama-empty-arena
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 6, 2012
at 7:45 PM
They are terrorizing the towns because Obama sold them guns.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 6, 2012
at 7:40 PM
I just talked to a fellow who spent a month in Mexico visiting family. He said the drug cartels are terrorizing the towns. His family was quite afraid. Legalize pot and help stop the drug cartels and their terror campaign against the people of Mexico.
Farsight: Funny: I might spend a few days up to a week in the Tacoma, Puyallup, Friday Harbor area visiting relatives this summer.
Here is a link from Paul Krugman on how to fix the economy.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 6, 2012
at 6:31 PM
5 Special Interest Groups That Help Keep Marijuana Illegal
1.) Police Unions
2.) Private Prisons Corporations
3.) Alcohol and Beer Companies
4.) Pharmaceutical Corporations
5.) Prison Guard Unions
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/155269/5_special_interest_groups_that_help_keep_marijuana_illegal/
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 6, 2012
at 3:04 PM
My husband LOVED it too farΔ. And I must admit, for not being my kind of movie, I enjoyed it as well.
Fingers crossed M&H post again soon. There is a lot of fertile stuff out there that would make for a great post!
Enjoy your day everyone. xo
LikeLike
By: lori on May 6, 2012
at 12:39 PM
‘Avengers’ Box Office: $200 Million Opening Weekend Breaks Records
Great entertaining movie. My wife and I went to see this yesterday. If you want to be thoroughly entertained and like action adventure movies, I highly recommend this movie. My wife and I agree with the Rotten tomatoes score of 94. For movies like this we go to a fantastic theater in Gig Harbor Washington. All DLP projectors with stadium seating. We saw it in 3D but might have actually preferred it in 2D.
Howard Downey Jr. has grown into an incredible actor. He alone is worth the price of admission!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 6, 2012
at 11:41 AM
Time to educate each other!! Here is a good report explaining, quite well, how the 50 wealthiest are paying off politicos to give the Billionaires – Billions in tax relief. (The middle class pick up the tab for these tax cuts btw.)
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/cenk-uygur-why-occupy-wall-street-movement
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 6, 2012
at 10:41 AM
Ha ha. I’ll Have Another
http://satiricalpolitical.com/2012/05/06/mitt-romney-gaffe-kentucky-derby-ill-have-another/
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 6, 2012
at 10:39 AM
and fyi I am checking out the Rutherford’s blog. Just viewing for the moment to get a feel for what the group is like,.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 6, 2012
at 10:33 AM
PFesser, I really think all of this is just a defense mechanism. Maybe Ive given these ladies too much credit and maybe they really have nothing to offer other than the rhetoric handed down to them by their husbands. I had given them credit for the ability to think on their own and offer up their own point of view. Maybe I was to hasty in that assumption.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 6, 2012
at 10:31 AM
And the conversation again focuses on the troll. See how easy that is!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 6, 2012
at 10:14 AM
Ah yes, when all else fails, refer to the accurate portrayal of troll behavior as bullying…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 6, 2012
at 10:07 AM
Deja poo – that feeling you’ve heard this crap before.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 6, 2012
at 7:31 AM
Back on the “troll” thing again, huh? Good Lord; you can’t even have a good discussion without the little-girl cliques tittering in the corner, pointing at whomever they have picked out as the patsy for today’s bullying. Welcome back to fifth grade.
anon – as I have said, if you want some adult conversation, join me at Rutherford’s.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 6, 2012
at 3:05 AM
Shit. I was looking up the expansion of cos (nx) and ran across NOP’s little puzzle. Lifted straight off the Internet. Shame on you. You didn’t strike me as a math aficionado, somehow; now I have learned something else, too, haven’t I?
Those kinds of shenanigans take all the fun out of a good puzzle.
However, interestingly, it appears to me that the Internet solution has an error in it; have to check on that after work today (yes, I work weekends too, so I can pay for all “Julia’s” government largesse).
So tell me, NOP, what is YOUR solution to your problem? It will be interesting to see if you make the same mistake (which means you simply plagarized the whole thing) or if you have a real solution.
The algebra ball is in your corner.
Cordially,
Jim
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 6, 2012
at 2:56 AM
“You cannot negotiate with people who say what’s mine is mine and what’s yours is negotiable.” JFK
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 10:43 PM
Live Funny or Die, what a hoot!
http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/87be7156f5/republicans-get-in-my-vagina?rel=player
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:55 PM
Tina Fey says it well:
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:49 PM
The difference between the 2 hopefuls in one graphic:
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:46 PM
Love me some Ellen:
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:42 PM
Senator Barbara Boxer WOW tweets:
http://front.moveon.org/the-war-on-women-in-6-simple-tweets-from-sen-barbara-boxer/
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:40 PM
In the words of Bruce Banner: I don’t think we should be focusing on Loki. That guy’s brain is a bag full of cats. You can smell crazy on him.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:27 PM
Sent before ready:
I don’t even know how to empathize with the mindset and driving force behind such needy behavior.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 7:03 PM
I notice you have been doing a very good job of it JJ. I do understand what compelled before.
It is really sort of sad to see someone so overtaxed at self-validation. I don’t even know how to empathize!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 6:58 PM
Farsight So very true. Even Karl Rove and his group have specific rules for going onto blogs to disrupt. I am thinking ignore them.
Helen: A new post please!!!!
http://www.theyoungturks.com/story/2011/8/26/151725/396/Diary/TACTICS-FOR-EFFECTIVE-CONSERVATIVE-BLOGGING-By-Karl-Rove
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 5, 2012
at 6:39 PM
“As to what to do about trolls, Rule 14 sets out the guidelines quite clearly. If the troll is acting with malice, then by arguing you give them exactly what they want: If the troll is acting with sincerity, then arguing will only exasperate yourself. You can present all the data you wish, point to all the examples you want to, and it won’t convince them of anything. They’ll lawyer your words to say what they want them to say.
They already know they are right. It doesn’t matter how.
So when in doubt, remember this simple rule.
In the woods: Don’t feed the bears.
Online: Don’t feed the trolls.”
The Link:
http://uwire.com/2012/04/23/column-online-trolls-cannot-be-argued-with-rationally-dont-even-try/
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 5:37 PM
“I believe that most trolls are sad people, living their lonely lives vicariously through those they see as strong and successful.
Disrupting a stable newsgroup gives the illusion of power, just as for a few, stalking a strong person allows them to think they are strong, too.
For trolls, any response is ‘recognition’; they are unable to distinguish between irritation and admiration; their ego grows directly in proportion to the response, regardless of the form or content of that response.
Trolls, rather surprisingly, dispute this, claiming that it’s a game or joke; this merely confirms the diagnosis; how sad do you have to be to find such mind-numbingly trivial timewasting to be funny?
Remember that trolls are cowards; they’ll usually post just enough to get an argument going, then sit back and count the responses (Yes, that’s what they do!).”
Read the whole article here:
http://lumberjocks.com/topics/37181
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 5:24 PM
What Powers A Troll?
http://bichaunt.org/Trolls/Troll04.html#02
Sound familiar?
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 5:17 PM
Another state with a firm grasp on reality…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/05/medical-marijuana-connecticut_n_1483670.html
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 5:12 PM
Montana takes on CITIZENS UNITED!! They make a very good case too.
http://mtcowgirl.com/2012/05/04/schweitzer-talks-montanas-fight-against-citizens-united-on-hardball/
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 5, 2012
at 2:29 PM
Happy Cinco De Mayo. Oh Boy, The Right Wingers probably will ask for my card because i said that. Sheriff Joe, please forgive me. Don’t Lock me up please.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/chris-matthews-blasts-mitt-romney-taking-s
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 5, 2012
at 11:49 AM
Bottom line is you ladies have no credibility..zero. Everyone knows you cannot hold an honest argument. You are here to push a socialist Liberal agenda. You have predetermined conclusions to everything you talk about and lack the integrity to see if your ideas hold up to scrutiny.
Others are content to let it slide and keep to themselves what they really think about you. I however like to point out deceit and lies very openly and will continue to do so as long as you refuse to have an honest back and forth discussion on the topics you chose to chime in on. Here is a simple rule to follow. If you dont want to talk about it..dont comment. IF you chose to comment on it.. be prepared to talk about the things YOU CHOOSE to talk about. We call that civility where I come from.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 11:33 AM
Not cranky at all Cynthia…just calling a spade a spade. Just like I knew Delurk would chime in right after you because thats how the kitchen hens nest works. IF anyone cares and I am sure they dont…they will see an organized effort on the part of your group and they will denote a pattern. When you are getting handed your ass…and you go off subject…and you chime in again off subject…Delurk or lori chimes in right after you lending their support to your meaningless commentary. Like I said you are all very predictable.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 11:26 AM
Happy Cinco De Mayo Kentucky Derby Supermoon Day
(Must be this Supermoon that is making every one such cranky pants.)
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 5, 2012
at 11:23 AM
Cynthia you can characterize it any way you like. The facts are you come in yammering like you you know what you are talking about…I bust you in your lies,,,then you chose not to talk about it anymore. This has occurred more than a dozen times. I call it handing you your ass because beyond your initial statement that I am sure you borrowed from someone else, you can never carry a conversation on any further. Sorry dear but you are a second rate hack and everyone knows it. Step up or move along,,I could really care less. Just proves me right in my belief Liberals can never back up their ideology in on honest intellectual conversation because they know they will loose.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 11:01 AM
Getting hard to load this stupid thread. Time for a new post!
Cynthia, you are soooo funny and perfectly nailed it. Thanks for the laugh.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 5, 2012
at 11:00 AM
“Hand me my ass”
Anonymous, Sweetheart you have a great sense of humor and a fantastic imagination!
Bless your little heart. It is a shame you choose to waste this talent with your obsessive/compulsiveness toward touting the alleged superiority of the Republican species, attempting to degrade Liberals, finding fault with President Obama and making an arrogant, pathetic fool of yourself.
I do not answer to you or debate with you. I am here to rattle your cage once in awhile and watch you pinball around it. It is such fun and so predictable and I know it may be wrong but Obama makes me do it.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 5, 2012
at 10:45 AM
Actually, anon, I think it is VERY telling that NOP thinks a calculator is necessary to solve this little problem.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 5, 2012
at 10:21 AM
Great WSJ article on “Julia” – Obama’s composite fictitious girlfriend, who spends her life living on other people’s work – except, that is, during her thirties and forties, when she should be in her productive years, paying taxes for all those programs that she has lived on – and will live on – at the expense of others. The narrative is strangely silent for those years. She just “decides to have a baby” – no mention of a husband – and of course the welfare state pays for her irresponsibility.
I think Mssr. Obama has made a serious, serious mistake with this little construct. It perfectly frames his socialist vision for America.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304743704577382170789179442.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 5, 2012
at 10:12 AM
Puppet, what is the purpose of this exercise that you would want to see a picture of my calculator and for me to detail the work?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 10:12 AM
How can I check your math, if you don’t show your work, including calculator. It hasn’t been that long, that you forgot you must show your work now has it?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 5, 2012
at 9:25 AM
Isn’t anon? But the only thing is I am pretty sure Pffer is a self identified Libertarian. Please don’t mix him up with us liburls. We like to keep our pool clean 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on May 5, 2012
at 9:19 AM
It is a shame all these Libs would rather insult an internet stranger than discuss honestly the problems we face.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 9:10 AM
Pwnd!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 5, 2012
at 8:59 AM
Sorry to hear that Pffer, brushing your teeth in the morning must be hell for you!
LikeLike
By: lori on May 5, 2012
at 8:30 AM
“you must be the most charming man that walks the face of the earth!”
No, I just don’t suffer fools gladly. Call it a fault.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 5, 2012
at 8:26 AM
its been quite some time but y= 3/2 – (1/2)cos(2x) Feel free to check my math Puppet.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 5, 2012
at 7:54 AM
Why I do declare Pffer, you must be the most charming man that walks the face of the earth!
Your charm is only surpassed by your fantastic sense of humor!
Wowwww.. such a catch.. ❤
LikeLike
By: lori on May 5, 2012
at 7:36 AM
It’s not an arithmetic problem; it’s an algebra problem, and upon inspection will probably require a little calculus to calculate the tangent slope. God, America must be the only place on the planet where people brag about their ignorance.
Doesn’t look too tough; I’ll give it a shot after I get home from work later.
Film at 11
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 5, 2012
at 7:26 AM
I don’t know nuttin bout no ARITHMETIC prblms but I sure have heard bad things bout that tangent guy.
Pi you b right smart to stay away from him!
LOL LOL
Enjoy your day all.. xo
LikeLike
By: lori on May 5, 2012
at 7:14 AM
Cynthia –
Here’s a line out of your article on the coal-fired plants:
“Riedinger said low natural gas prices and upcoming EPA regulations on coal power could phase out the nation’s coal plants.” I worked in the coal industry for a while and the regulations on mining and burning coal simply have raised the cost beyond reach. Gas is cheap right now because of a tremendous increase in supply, driven by an expectation of huge regulations on coal, which of course has turned out to be right.
Not that I really care; coal has caused nothing but misery for my home state, WV; I would like to see it all disappear, except for that required to make steel.
I personally think that modern-generation nuclear plants hold the key to our future. As an engineer I can tell you that no technology is 100% proof against every natural disaster and that every means of generating electrical power has its drawbacks. The “green” technologies (at least now and in the forseeable future) have too low an energy density to be cost-effective. Nuclear is not my area of expertise but from my reading I gather that the latest-gen GE and Siemens plants would have withstood the Japanese earthquake with no loss of radiation with a wide margin of safety. Thorium-based nuclear power has a great potential also, I’m told; I do not know why the govt is not promoting them; I guess because they do not produce weapons-grade fissile material as a by-product. (but I TRUST my govt)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 5, 2012
at 6:17 AM
NOP-
keep Pi out of anything to do with that “tangent”
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 4, 2012
at 10:26 PM
And now for something different, Annoy wants to solve a little math problem for us, and here it is have at it Annoy. Find a function of the form f(x)=a+bcos(cx) that is tangent to the line y=1 at the point (0,1), and tangent to the line y=x+3/2-pi/4 at the point (pi/4, 3/2).
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 4, 2012
at 9:42 PM
Some things never change ad nauseum!!!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 4, 2012
at 8:56 PM
Cynthia…you are the one who made it personal when I handed you your ass. You made a bad argument. You made a purposefully deceitful argument. I busted you, and you denigrated yourself. You had all kinds of things to say until I proved you wrong, now look at you.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 8:15 PM
Just the opposite. It is nice when your subjects lend themselves over so easily to prove my every word thereby giving me ever increasing credibility. I appreciate you all hold so true to yourselves. It makes you very predictable.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 8:11 PM
Donna, poor old Orly’s been smacked down in court again. She’s a train wreck and a half, no? And Ted the Turd Nugent… oh my word! Spectacular splintering, that guy!
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 4, 2012
at 7:38 PM
Write 100 times in long hand the following:
I must remember to only color between the lines and only use the black or white crayon.
I must remember this blog belongs to Anonymous and I MUST obey his rules.
I must remember if I do not obey, Anonymous’ tightie whities will get in a bunch and make him very, very cranky.
I must remember not to make him cranky.
Peace.
heh, heh, heh,
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 7:23 PM
Someone certainly is befuddled, and it isn’t us fellow M&Hers.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 4, 2012
at 7:08 PM
Let us test the theory posed at By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 4:11 PM
Theory: “Have you noticed each time facts are presented that blows their ideology out of the water, the subject turns to the poster, the person presenting the information, the source, or is dropped entirely. But never do they actually try to take on the information directly”
Proof 1 of Theory: By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 4:47 PM
Proof 2 of Theory: By: delurkergurl on May 4, 2012
at 5:53 PM
Conclusion: It seems the Theory has been proven conclusively yet again. Thanks for your participation.
This hens nest, like almost all other Liberals, are ideas people. They like tossing around all these nifty ideas of fairness, and green energy, and the new American Dream of government programs. But the moment you ask them to look past the surface of their ideas, the conversation on topic ends, and they get personal .Its the act of intellectually inept and desperate individuals. Funny thing is, if they are so sure their way is the right way, why do 100% of them refuse to have any form of discussion? In my experience this has always been the actions of the most dishonest people I have had the displeasure of meeting.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 6:37 PM
Oh I don’t know, Cynthia… Tex is far too clever to post as Anonymous. The cowardly ‘Anonymous’ handle isn’t as brave and intelligent as making up some-other-fake-nick. Perhaps it’s someone who recently rediscovered Tex and parrots his way instead of thinking for himself – like a Becker, yanno?
Looks like Mitt (Or should I call him Willard? Is that the way these days?) really stepped in it by shooting off his mouth about things he knows nothing of with respect to the Guangcheng situation. Good thing he put so many disclaimers in his strident disdain for the President that he can etch-a-sketch on this too.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 4, 2012
at 5:53 PM
lori – Yes it’s President Obama’s new Foreign Policy. That will teach Japan to build a better car. Whose says he not tough! Wait til you see what he has in store for Russia if they start messing with us.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 5:00 PM
“Class dismissed”
Me thinks Tex has honored us with his fantastic personality once again. That explains the love fest, eh?
Ass Dismissed.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 4:47 PM
Just watched that video PFesser. What I find interesting is how this hens nest wont touch anything with posted facts especially that involves math. Have you noticed each time facts are presented that blows their ideology out of the water, the subject turns to the poster, the person presenting the information, the source, or is dropped entirely. But never do they actually try to take on the information directly. This is why we know we are dealing with dishonest people with nefarious intentions.
Reality check folks…Reagen style.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 4:11 PM
Cynthia
Let me see if I read you correctly. I was talking about solar power, and you spent a second rant talking about nuclear….and you didnt change the subject? What the f*ck kind of crack are you smoking?
Again little miss…the technology in Japan didnt fail. They had a major natural disaster.
“The plant was built on the shore”
Again not the failing of technology, human choice, good or bad.
“GE plans did not have sufficient technology to avoid destruction or to contain the radiation”
It was a 9.0 earthquake. Human beings dont have the technology to defend against this. What hubris to think that we are greater than nature. This is not a failing of the technology but a failing of your flawed logic to grasp our limitations. Or more to the point you being used to dealing with people much more stupid than you are and you are getting sloppy.
9.0 Quake, largest to hit that region in an estimated 1200 years. The quake was so great it was felt more than 2000km away. It moved the island of Honshu 2.4 meters. The tsunami that followed was estimated moving at a speed of 800km an hour, thats the speed of a commercial jet liner. Shortly thereafter they recorded 4 more aftershocks that rated 6.0, 6.1, 6.1 and 7.2 in magnitude.
Cynthia…class dismissed.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 3:48 PM
Love love love it!
The Life of Julia..
What I love more? The repubs reaction to it!
WTG Obama (team) !
http://www.barackobama.com/life-of-julia
LikeLike
By: lori on May 4, 2012
at 3:11 PM
LOL LOL Cynthia.. tickled me..
LikeLike
By: lori on May 4, 2012
at 2:39 PM
“when we tried to find a place to put all those used up batteries?”
“We are just against relying on a technology that is not yet ready. But please do call us only after you have solved it.”
“Problem is you and your ilk want to implement it before the solution exists……We are just against relying on a technology that is not yet ready.”
I was not changing the subject but expanding on it. (I believe there was an Obama earthquake off the coast of Japan that caused the Obama tsunami that destroyed the nuclear power plant.)
The plant was built on the shore according to GE plans did not have sufficient technology to avoid destruction or to contain the radiation which is now drifting across the US. And the US has no solution to a disaster of this nature or less either.
Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant was build 35 miles north up the Hudson from the city. An accident there could cause more damage than WTC did. There is a push to build more of these plants yet we have to idea how to prevent a disaster or deal with one.
The best we have is to place this nuclear waste in barrels and place inside a mountain and hope we are long gone before the barrels start leaking. IMO we have a better chance figuring how to recycle the batteries than recycling nuclear waste.
Personally I have come to expect very little from you.
Pfesser – an article on coal fired power plants.
http://www.theithacajournal.com/article/20120503/NEWS01/205030377/AES-Cayuga-shut-down-since-March?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 2:25 PM
Well Cynthia that is the kind of dishonest argument I have come to expect from you. By that I mean to (A) Change the subject and (B) Misrepresent the facts.
Japan’s problem was not because the technology failed, it was because they suffered one of the largest earthquakes in their history, I believe some solar panels were knocked out as well in the quake, do you want to call them a failure based on that?
PFesser
It is not a question if he understands the effects his policy will have or not have, he considers it collateral damage for his primary goal, that being the war on the wealthy. As I have said hundreds of times, Liberals classify us into sub groups. In this case rich and poor. By vilifying the rich and going after them he gains the admiration…ie votes…of the poor. Look at my post from above. He has been campaigning more than all previous Presidents since Nixon combined. His first responsibility is to himself and ensuring his continued stay in power to affect his agenda to deconstruct our country and turn it into his socialist vision.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 12:53 PM
“Problem is you and your ilk want to implement it before the solution exists……We are just against relying on a technology that is not yet ready.”
Oh, like nuclear power plants some are so fond of building in this country. If you have a solution to this problem; Japan is waiting for a call from you. And the US West Coast well… Mid Section and East Coast would like to listen in to the call, as well.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on May 4, 2012
at 12:30 PM
http://www.moneyteachers.org/Mitt+Romney+Economic+Plan.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 4, 2012
at 12:23 PM
anon – Have you seen the YouTube video where Krauthammer pwns Obama on the “Buffett Rule?”
The purpose of taxation is to raise revenue so the government can carry out certain jobs. It is not for social engineering, or promoting an idealogy, or getting re-elected by pandering to class envy. Look at Obama’s answer during the debate with Hillary – he is shown that every time the capital gains rate goes up, government receipts from it go down, and vice-versa. His response? I want to raise it for “fairness” even though I know it will hurt the economy.
Unbelievable. Just unbelievable. Where do we get these goobers who have no understanding of how the money is actually made that they want to confiscate for all their pet social projects?
Oh, I forgot. We get them in Chicago. Their experiences in real-life economics come from “community organizing.” Feh.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 4, 2012
at 12:04 PM
Problem is you and your ilk want to implement it before the solution exists. What you fail to realize is that Republicans are not against cleaner forms of energy. We are just against relying on a technology that is not yet ready. But please do call us only after you have solved it.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 11:54 AM
Ane the solar industry is well aware of the problem, that is why they are working on solutions now, not waiting 20 more years until the end of life of the majority of solar batteries. http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/solar-panel-recycling-460810
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 4, 2012
at 11:40 AM
Solar Power is not as clean as you might think. Can you imagine the ecological damage if our country went solar (as if it could, technology isn’t there) when we tried to find a place to put all those used up batteries?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 11:03 AM
Now is the time for clean energy. http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Solar-Power-Plant-Tower-Energy,news-14225.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 4, 2012
at 10:38 AM
Heh PFesser I posted that video a few days back on this page.
As for Obama on coal I remember this statement he gave on it.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 9:48 AM
Along that line, West Virginia has always been a Democratic stalwart, however their new Democratic senator, Joe Manchin, has withheld support for Obama. I don’t know the particulars, but apparently he feels that the Obama administration has nearly destroyed the coal industry; the EPA recently passed a rule that makes it impossible to open up a new coal-fired powerplant; coal, of course, is WV’s primary product. (How do government agencies pass laws without anybody voting on it, anyway?)
Man, we need some hopey-changey in the worst way. This time for real.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 4, 2012
at 9:33 AM
anon – have you seen the video, “If I Wanted America to Fail?”
It’s a little skewed but I think it would be fair to say that it makes some very valid points.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 4, 2012
at 9:27 AM
A very disturbing piece of legislation. It is good to see some Democrats standing up for whats right. I wonder if you all are still behind Husein Obama on this?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/03/obama-trade-congress-buy-american_n_1475277.html?ncid=webmail1
This for me is the final nail in the coffin. Obama does not have this countries best interest at heart. His only goal is to deconstruct all of the things that made this country great.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 4, 2012
at 9:10 AM
The Middle Class and poor are being robbed by the 1%. This is a very interesting video exposing why the wealthiest are giving millions to Super Pacs! THEY GET A PAY OFF OF MANY MORE MILLIONS OR BILLIONS by electing crooks who vote in tax reduction laws which benefit the wealthiest.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/cenk-uygur-why-occupy-wall-street-movement
It would also be nice if the Super Pac ads are truthful.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 3, 2012
at 7:10 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/post-poll-obama-leads-romney-as-campaigns-converge-on-virginia/2012/05/03/gIQAgH1hzT_story.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 3, 2012
at 7:01 PM
NOP – Thank You for that information. I will keep moving forward in getting President Obama re-elected. With Citizens United – it is going to be an ugly election with lots of money from Super Pacs. I am very hopeful that the names of donors must be known. That should be the way – put money where you want but you must use your name or the name of your company or organization.
Time to put some light on donors of Super Pacs.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 3, 2012
at 6:58 PM
I found this very interesting.
From the TELEGRAPH:
“Barack Obama has already held more re-election fundraising events than every elected president since Richard Nixon combined, according to figures to be published in a new book.
Obama is also the only president in the past 35 years to visit every electoral battleground state in his first year of office.
The figures, contained a in a new book called The Rise of the President’s Permanent Campaign by Brendan J. Doherty, due to be published by University Press of Kansas in July, give statistical backing to the notion that Obama is more preoccupied with being re-elected than any other commander-in-chief of modern times.”
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 3, 2012
at 6:42 PM
If you missed “Rock Center with Brian Williams” you can watch a repeat tonight on MNBC, check for your local time. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/03/barack-obama-rock-center-brian-williams-interview_n_1473390.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 3, 2012
at 1:48 PM
Thanks Pfesser. heard about that place never could find it..ill check it out.
A perfect example of what I have always said is a defining difference between Liberals and Conservatives. Last night around 1am I noticed a news story on Huff post about a new book about Husein Obama’s Girlfriends..presented itself like it was a scandal about to be uncovered. I said to myself as I passed the story by…why would I care about Obama’s past girlfriends or what they have to say? Nothing they could say would help solve any of our problems today…so I ignored it and moved on. Today listening to Glen and Rush…both said almost the exact same thing. Rush was like…why would I both with this? It has nothing to do with events of today and frankly it bores me.
It would have been easy for Rush or Glen to take the easy way out and make a big deal about an irrelevant issue..but they took the higher ground. Rush went on to say that even the story about Obama eating dog was useless news and he was not about to let the Liberal media dictate the topic of the day…not when we have so many more important topics to discuss.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 3, 2012
at 12:51 PM
Latest election map, remember folks, we have to keep people motivated and get them to the polls on election day, so get involved with the reelection campaign. http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 3, 2012
at 10:54 AM
anon – take a look at Rutherford’s blog. Smart folks, lots of good give and take there; he is getting 30-50 comments a day sometimes. It’s a lot more fun, not the same stale back-and forth stuff all the time.
http://rutherfordl.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 3, 2012
at 7:58 AM
Hi Whirled and Elsie,
Hope all is well. Good to see you posting.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/jon-stewart-george-w-bush-bin-laden.php
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 2, 2012
at 8:52 PM
Hey there, Whirled Peas! I love it when I wander by here and see your good sweet name.
Just for fun, I’ll “see” your “Mission Accomplished” and “raise you” this great piece:
Have a good one, Kemo Sabe!
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on May 2, 2012
at 8:04 PM
Again…
LINK
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on May 2, 2012
at 7:31 PM
W00t
.
.
.
.
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on May 2, 2012
at 7:28 PM
I hear you PFesser. Its the Christains that are making the most noise that you typically have to worry about. Everything we do outside of my organization is on the hush hush. Donations are made anonymously because true compashion is a selfless act. Those that promote themselves and what they do diminish that act and usually have secondary motivations.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 11:50 AM
Puppet…not that it is any of your business but I have more than I need in life. We have a great home..I have a great family and I love the work I do. Thanks for asking but do tend to your own needs and let me take care of mine.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 10:42 AM
Look Noah, I obviously went too far, but do reach out locally for help, I am sure it is there for the asking. Don’t worry about me, I am usually on a natural high, I exercise a lot.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 2, 2012
at 9:59 AM
anon – I really have NO problem with religion and in point of fact have a lot of respect for people who really do practice what they preach; it’s folks who try to cram it down my throat that give me heartburn.
Anyway, I have seen/heard the Paul Harvey speech and it is chillingly accurate.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 2, 2012
at 9:39 AM
good call lori..that video did blow your argument up quite nicely.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 9:39 AM
Amen JJ.. LOL LOL
Republicans have short memories don’t they?
LOVE my President!
LikeLike
By: lori on May 2, 2012
at 9:28 AM
And I am taking into account your stance on religion but it is still a hell of an incredible prediction by Mr. Paul Harvey
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 9:25 AM
This is the one to which I was referring too.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 8:32 AM
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/jon-stewart-slams-republicans-their-hypocr
Republican hypocrites!!! Ha Ha – I remember GW Bush on an aircraft carrier saying MISSION ACCOMPLISHED when the war had just begun.
Talk about politicizing 9/11. How many times did I hear 9/11 evoked? Lots.
Thank You President Obama for not giving up and taking out Bin Laden. Pres Obama sent men in and if the mission failed – his Presidency would have failed that day. He could have sent in a missile but chose to send in our men AND IT WORKED. Thank You again President Obama.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on May 2, 2012
at 8:24 AM
PFesser did you ever listen to that Paul Harvey 1965 sound clip I linked sometime back?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 7:40 AM
the “fail” video I mean.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 2, 2012
at 7:34 AM
anon – thanks for the video. Again – right on the money. Out to everyone on my mailing list it goes – that should be about a hundred.
There may be hope for us. Not much, but not quite yet zero. Not yet.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 2, 2012
at 7:33 AM
lori what party tries to keep people stupid? What party uses the police to make sure people don’t get information or talk about the issues? I wont be surprised if you chose not to respond.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 7:18 AM
anon – right on the money. I had the privilege of being in the Vietnam War protests as a college student. The Govt had brainwashed a lot of people into the “love it or leave it” motif. If you were worried about our problems as a nation, you were a bad person – or not loyal.
We students actually were extremely loyal, and because of that we hated to see our country go down the wrong path – like it is NOW, actually. Time has shown who were the real patriots, and I believe it will this time, too.
By the way, our response to “Love it or Leave It?” Change it or Lose It. Fine words for those times – and these.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 2, 2012
at 7:05 AM
Nice clip to go with your morning cup of coffie
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 6:57 AM
Will he continue with the old stale republican mantra of ” keep em dumb and keep em afraid?
This si you lori and the rest of your hens nest. You all have avoided every issue of substance by giving every excuse under the sun to not talk about it. Difference being is yours is by willful choice.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 2, 2012
at 6:50 AM
Many Americans—in particular those who are white and middle-aged or older—remember growing up in a far more homogeneous place than the present. The sense of mourning for — and the desire to restore — that world is powerful, as is the fear of what is to come in the new, far more diverse America. The question is whether politicians choose to exacerbate that fear through divisive rhetoric, or to assuage it with language that seeks to unify us as Americans and encourages us to transcend our differences. Mitt Romney must openly declare which kind of politician he is. Ian Reifowitz
I think this statement says it all. We will see what kind of campaign Mittens runs. Will he continue with the old stale republican mantra of ” keep em dumb and keep em afraid?
Or will he have visions of the best is yet to come?
Time will tell.
LikeLike
By: lori on May 2, 2012
at 6:32 AM
Easier –
re: nobody afraid of communism. I read Frederic Bastiat’s “The Law” last year (pub about 1850) and you would be surprised to find that most of it is a warning about “collectivism” – the then-current term for what would later become communism. Remember, Marx was born around 1820! He is not a current figure.
Not too long before he died, Milton Friedman commented that, paraphrasing: We have in this country spent the last century proving over and over that communism does not work; the world has listened and responded, changing their economies and becoming efficient, serious competitors. Now we look around and America is moving toward becoming that which they WERE.
Afraid? I sure am, because our very, very socialist government is surely and truly running out of other people’s money. That will bring a misery to me, you, and your children the likes of which can only be seen in communist countries. And the unfortunate thing is that, as the economy worsens, there will be inevitable calls for the government to do MORE. We only have to look to Europe to see where that road leads us. Think East Germany.
Afraid? You bet. I’m horrified.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 2, 2012
at 5:25 AM
It is always easier to put your head in the sand than to admit you are wrong. It is a trait shared by most Liberals. By all means do so Easier.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 9:06 PM
I am thoroughly amused. I have neither been commenting nor reading much. Some words caught my attention here and there and I thought to chime in. I know better than to enter into this endless cycle of a dog chasing its own tail and never catching it. I also understand the definition of insanity.
LikeLike
By: Easier on May 1, 2012
at 8:58 PM
Well yes Easier. We have never met a..do as I say not as I do politicaian …right? We have documented history contradicting everything you have said…ignore it at your leisure..but that doesn’t changed the facts. Communism still exists in the world..sorry but that also is a documented fact…and no matter how hard you wish it were not so…it is so. You can judge a man by the company he keeps. Obama keeps and has kept a lot of company with known and professed socialists and communists. Fact!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 8:41 PM
Life must have really handed you a lemon Puppet for you to concern yourself with my employment status. the well being of my wife and the well being of my child. Like Donna you must have a sad and sorry life and I will pray for you that life imrpoves for you soon. Until then Puppet keep your chin up. We are pulling for you here.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 8:35 PM
When I was a kid, my father had a vast collection of old Reader’s Digests that I tore into as soon as I could read. A lot of the stories covered had a lot to do with the cold war in its heydays. Communism was the boogyman and governments of a whole lot of countries around the world knew you only needed to claim you were anti-communist to be on the dole, the American way. Communism has been discredited, nobody believes in it anymore, not even Castro.
The people that still bring up communism just need to grow up a little and get their thinking out of the fifties. Nobody is scared of communism anymore people. The president is a millionnaire. A communist? Come on!
LikeLike
By: Easier on May 1, 2012
at 8:33 PM
“Thinking all conservatives reside in the D party” shoulda been R Party.
Crimenently
Gonna go have the first beer for 2012 and forget our alphabet soup for awhile.
Dear helen and Margaret-
Thank you for having us all in.
Sure would love to hear from you!
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 1, 2012
at 8:30 PM
😉 UAW!
Heck I can hardly make it through 2 beers a YEAR, can’t imagine what any other “dope” would be like.
lori- good description and overview @6:32 PM.
There’s a mistake to be made in viewing the Democratic Party as a monolith, equally so the Republican Party.
The Dem Centrists are a distinct group and most closely resemble the moderate Republicans like Eisenhower. They are nothing like the Blue Dog Dems.
Thinking all conservatives reside in the D party and all liberals reside in the D party is a mistake. Not paying attention to what the pragmatic centrists are is another and maybe the biggest current mistake folks make.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on May 1, 2012
at 8:25 PM
Annoy, I can only think you are unemployed, those of us who are here throughout the day are retired, and you tell us you are a young father, so…. We would like to see you gainful employed for your own good, but especially for your long suffering wife and child. Any job is better than nothing, it will give you a sense of pride, I’m a problem solver so I am giving you the same advice I would give anyone who has given up on their self.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 1, 2012
at 8:09 PM
A Swiss bank account Mitt, I’m shocked. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57424745-503544/obama-campaign-slams-romney-for-swiss-bank-account/
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 1, 2012
at 7:56 PM
No dope here UAW.. but if you have some to share????? LOL LOL j/k
ONE of the reasons we liburls say that UAW, is his welfare – to – work policies. While Clinton touts that program as one of his most liberal acheivments, to most of us, it was a very republican ideal in it’s purest form. His fiscal views leaned wayy right as well.There are a 100 more examples, but I would have to say those would be two of the biggest reasons you will hear liberals call him the best republican President ever.
I have to say though he did more than any other President on the issue of civil rights. Most of that work coming before he even step foot in the oval office. He also did a great deal for the middle class and working poor.
So I guess it’s tomato tomato..
Obama, while having a less cooperative majority AND minority party, has followed in Clinton’s footsteps. But as we discussed last night that is mostly because he is a centrist.. and that’s how they govern.
LikeLike
By: lori on May 1, 2012
at 6:32 PM
Puppet. I hope your life improves to the point you will no longer feel the need to insult me to make yourself feel better. Until then please feel free to insult me as much as your tortured soul needs.
As far as Husein Obama being a Republican I go to his 2007 record where he was chosen as the #1 most liberal senator in 2007 even ahead of Bernie Sanders!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 6:29 PM
WTF…I took the test and I’m left of center…….how the F$ck can I be left of Obama…..”me thinks” someone is full of shit…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on May 1, 2012
at 6:21 PM
Damn….Only on this site can someone actually make the claim that Obama and Clinton are actually Republicans…….GOOD DOPE APPARENTLY HELPS…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on May 1, 2012
at 6:02 PM
I am looking forward to hearing President Obama address the nation tonight 7:30 EST from Afghanistan.
Annoy, look into a GED, perhaps that would help you get a job.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 1, 2012
at 3:53 PM
WTG NOP! Fired up and ready to go!
farΔ…. Gov. Mark Dayton is a GREAT Democrat. I remember him from wayyyyy back when he worked on the Mondale campaign. Love love love him.. Sure hope we see him on the ticket some day.
and yesssss I’ll take 49 more just like him! LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on May 1, 2012
at 3:43 PM
I am overjoyed my commentary has inspired you to be politically active. That is 2/3 the batter getting people to participate. Now all we have to do is get you to hold yourself accountable for the things you believe in and we will be set for you to cast a competent vote.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 3:09 PM
Annoy serves a good purpose here, he reminds me how important it is to reelect President Obama and I will work just that much harder. Just got home from seeing Mrs Obama speak to us volunteers. Wow! Is she gorgeous in person and slimmer too.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on May 1, 2012
at 1:27 PM
That video PFesser literally made my head hurt.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 1:00 PM
On May 1 the United States celebrates Law Day, It is meant to reflect on the role of law in the foundation of the country and to recognize its importance for society. …..once upon a time that is…
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 12:15 PM
My best friend and I want to be a Margaret and Helen someday.
Having written a story set in the era of the most famous Democrat, I also salute your politics!
LikeLike
By: sshaver on May 1, 2012
at 12:12 PM
“Thanks PFesser, and kudos to you for your composure.”
You are quite welcome. But clearly you have not seen me blow a gasket. I am quite capable of outrageous utterance – and practice it with great skill – but am usually sorry afterwards. Some real nice folks live here and we agree on some things and some things not. That’s just real life, I guess, so I try to keep it under control as best I can. Not always successful, but I try.
Having said that, sometimes the Lord’s burden *is* more than a man can bear. In-your-face-Miss-South-Carolina-cheerleader-style ignorance will send me ’round the bend whereas venom, vituperative and personal attacks just roll right off. Odd, really.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 1, 2012
at 12:10 PM
Anon, you are thinking small and short term. I don’t need to motivate those that already know. I need to show those who live with their head in the sand or their hands at their ears singing la la la la the truth. While I think most do not have it within themselves to put into writing that they might have errored with Hussein Obama, I know I have them at least thinking. After reading the information posted, they can no longer go to their children with a clear conscious and say they didn’t know.
Thanks PFesser, and kudos to you for your composure.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 10:13 AM
Anonymous’s stamina is a generous gift to the Democratic party. All the time and energy he’s spending being AGAINST things here is keeping him from actually working FOR things that will help his party defeat us.
Obama 2012!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 9:18 AM
I could really go for a preview button.
Or maybe a HTML spell checker.
Repost…
Your Tax Dollars At War
Δ
LikeLike
By: alfonzy on May 1, 2012
at 8:35 AM
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=g272XxYnGcg"Your Tax Dollars At War
PEACE ~ Δ ~ I mean it. Really!
LikeLike
By: alfonzy on May 1, 2012
at 8:31 AM
anon
Kudos for your stamina.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on May 1, 2012
at 8:19 AM
Very interesting. I get bitched at for having one source. I provide more than a dozen sources. Not enough info, then too much into. Despite the hag squad I kept all personal comments out, and what do we get in return?
A ban request from the blogs self proclaimed leader for using a persons middle name.
“anyone care to join me in a really big yawn?”
“Do I smell dog gas?”
“Annoy, why don’t you sit on a tack,”
“It would be a yawner only if you read it.”
This then is the sum total of this blogs intellectual prowess. Met every criteria requested and more, and we get further proof to my theory that Libs can only attack the source and not the content. Even Delurk could not stand up for her own words that the message be examined not the person saying it.
Now I understand the customary defense of because its me, or because of the source I used isn’t credible by your standards, and that this lets you off the hook. It must be nice to be able to point at someone else and use them as an excuse for why you do or do not do something. I would call it sad. But personal responsibility is not a trait the Liberal party encourages or embraces.
No worries, Ive no intention of slowing down or stopping until long after the election. What you are showing anyone who reads this page is that the people here are only here to pat each other on the back, and cannot/will not, take on any issue of substance. At least not ones that would require them to admit the possibility that they might be wrong.Just remember, it is you ladies that make all the personal attacks. You are the cancer of this blog.
P.S. Told ya so pi.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on May 1, 2012
at 7:29 AM
Bernie Sanders – United Against the War On Women
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-bernie-sanders/united-against-the-war-on_b_1464730.html
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on May 1, 2012
at 5:33 AM
No, can’t say that I have.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on May 1, 2012
at 12:15 AM
farsight Δ-
😉
Sure wish I could tap on their “room”doors and have a chat
You ever read Erikson’s
Gandhi’s Truth: On the Origins of Militant Nonviolence?
Fascinating.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 11:05 PM
We need more governors like this!!!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/30/mark-dayton-minnesota-abortion-bill_n_1465756.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 30, 2012
at 10:14 PM
Alaskpi,
Well, looks like I am in good company. That was just about exactly where I was the last time I took it. Good company between Ghandi and the Dalai Lama. Kinda warms the heart…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 30, 2012
at 10:11 PM
It would be a yawner only if you read it. I don’t even bother anymore. That last one was me.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 30, 2012
at 9:13 PM
It would be a yawner only if you read it.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 8:55 PM
Barack Obama was rated as the #1 most liberal senator in 2007 (even ahead of Bernie Sanders!) – ” Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal’s 27th annual vote ratings.” Source: Brian Friel, Richard E. Cohen and Kirk Victor, National Journal
Commentary on Barack Obama’s Economic Policies – “Among other things, he is concerned about the “winner-take-all” economy where, he says, “the gains from economic growth skew heavily toward the wealthy.” Actually, the gains from economic growth can skew toward anyone willing to work hard and make personal and family decisions that improve their chances for success. This is boilerplate wealth redistribution, an economic philosophy at the center of the former Soviet Union. Obama and Democrats wish to embrace it now in order to make more people dependent on government, rather than encourage people to rely on themselves and the opportunity America offers to most citizens, even illegal aliens. Guaranteed equal outcome is socialism. America was built on and sustained by a “can do” spirit. Today, too many are taught a “can’t do” spirit. They are told that because of factors over which they have no control — race, class, poverty — it is impossible for them to do anything for themselves and so they must increasingly rely on government. Government doesn’t cure poverty.” Source: Cal Thomas via pressdemocrat
Now to sum this up better than I ever could myself. I turn to Ronald Reagan and what he thinks of Obama Care.
“One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project, most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.” – Ronald Reagan.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 8:32 PM
Do I smell dog gas?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 8:23 PM
11. Obama Endorsed Openly Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders – Video ” “Sanders is the first self-described socialist to be elected to the U.S. Senate.” Source: Wikipedia
12. Many Obama Supporters Idolize Che Guervara – Obama Campaign Worker Seen With Communist Cuba Flag Depicting Marxist Che Guevara on it. Source: David Benzion, Lone Star Times
“Guevara later served as Minister of Industries, in which post he helped formulate Cuban socialism…Guevara played a key role in bringing to Cuba the Soviet nuclear-armed ballistic missiles that precipitated the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. During an interview with the British newspaper Daily Worker some weeks later, he stated that, if the missiles had been under Cuban control, they would have fired them against major U.S. cities.” Source: Wikipedia
13. The Communist Party USA Endorsed Obama – “Our Party actively supported Obama during the primary election.” Source: CPUSA Website
14. Obama’s Church is Rooted in Liberation Theology which is Rooted in Marxism – ” The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology” Source: TUCC Website “Simply put, Liberation Theology is an attempt to interpret Scripture through the plight of the poor. It is largely a humanistic doctrine. It started in South America in the turbulent 1950’s when Marxism was making great gains among the poor because of its emphasis on the redistribution of wealth, allowing poor peasants to share in the wealth of the colonial elite and thus upgrade their economic status in life.” Source: gotquestions.org
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 8:21 PM
anyone care to join me in a really big yawn?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 8:14 PM
Obama’s Ties to Socialism, Marxism, and Communism
1. Obama’s Father Wrote About Socialism – His father wrote a paper called “Problems With Our Socialism” that advocates 100% taxation of the rich, communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land. Source: Greg Ransom, PrestoPundit
2. Obama’s Mother Was a “Communist Sympathizer” – ” Friends describe her as a “fellow traveler”, that is, a communist sympathizer, from her youth, according to a March 27, 2007, Chicago Tribune report” Source: Spengler, Asia Times “The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics – Barack Obama” Source: Tim Jones, Chicago Tribune
3. Obama’s Parents Met in a Russian Class (Back then it was the Communist USSR) – “His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (her father always wanted a son), was white and just 18 when they met in a Russian class” Source: Sharon Cohen, St Louis Times
4. Obama’s Teen Mentor was Frank Marshall Davis (a known CPUSA member) – “…through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his poetry and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just Frank.” Source: Cliff Kincaid, Accuracy in the Media “Kathryn Takara of the University of Hawaii, who wrote a dissertation on the life of Frank Marshall Davis, confirming Davis was a significant influence on Obama when the senator attended Punahou prep school in Hawaii from 1975 to 1979” Source: Jim Corsi, WorldNetDaily based on Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection (Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein)
5. Obama’s Brother Roy and Cousin Odinga are Marxists – “Barack Obama’s older brother, Abongo “Roy” Obama. He is a Luo activist. militant Muslim and a Marxist.” Source: Barbara Busby, 180people.com “The person who made me proudest of all,” Obama wrote, “was Roy Source: Bill Sammon, The Examiner “Odinga is a Marxist who reportedly has made a pact with a hard-line Islamic group in Kenya to establish Shariah courts throughout the country” Source: Invenstor’s Business Daily
6. Obama Attended Socialist Conferences at Cooper Union – “He went to socialist conferences at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn and started lecturing his relatives until they worried he’d become “one of those freaks you see on the streets around here.” Source: H Kennedy, NY Daily News
7. Obama Was Hand Picked by Alice Palmer to Succeed Her in the Illinois State Senate – “Nine years before Palmer picked Obama to be her successor, she was the only African-American journalist to travel to the Soviet Union to attend the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, according to an article Palmer wrote in the CPUSA newspaper, People’s Daily World, June 19, 1986.” Source: Jim Corsi, WorldNetDaily based on Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection (Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein)
8. Obama’s Run for the Illinois State Senate was Launched by a Fundraiser Organized at Bill Ayers’ and Bernardine Dorhn’s Chicago Home – Ayers and Dorhn are former terrorists from the Weather Underground who’s SDS organization received financial contributions from the CPUSA. “Obama’s run for the Illinois state Senate was launched by a fundraiser organized at Ayers’ and Dorhn’s Chicago home by Alice Palmer. Palmer had named Obama to succeed her in the state Senate in 1995, when she decided to run for a U.S. congressional seat.” Source: Jim Corsi, WorldNetDaily based on Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection (Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein)
9. Obama Had a Close Relationship with the “Anti-Capitalist” Group ACORN – “Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn)…Chicago Acorn appears to have played a major role in Obama’s political advance…Acorn’s radical agenda sometimes shifts toward “undisguised authoritarian socialism.” Source: Stanley Kurtz, National Review
10. Obama Attended Several Meetings with the Democratic Socialists in Chicago and Was even Endorsed by Them – “Obama’s socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the “champions” of “Chicago’s democratic left” and a long-time socialist activist. Obama’s stint as a “community organizer” in Chicago has gotten some attention, but his relationship with the DSA socialists, who groomed and backed him, has been generally ignored.” Source: Cliff Kincaid, Accuracy in the Media “In its broadest sense, democratic socialism could refer to any attempts to bring about socialism through democratic means as opposed to violent insurrection.” Source: Wikipedia
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 8:09 PM
From what I know of your politics Donna, I would agree.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 8:00 PM
LOL LOL That is funny…. same words!
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 7:58 PM
you guys crack me up. I think my politics would be pretty much in line with Clinton’s.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 7:57 PM
Oh funny! We were typing the same thoughts lori! Yes, I agree.
Hillary is somewhat more left leaning, yes. Not much but some.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 7:55 PM
Donna-
from my left/left basement window Mr Clinton was the best Republican President we’ve had since Eisenhower 🙂
Seriously, he’s a centrist . Very much so.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 7:51 PM
Bill Clinton was a moderate Republican! LOL LOL He reminded me a lot of Eisenhower. Didn’t he to you Pi?
Although, like Obama, he has moved socially left after retirement.
Hillary is much more left leaning than either of them.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 7:48 PM
Lori/Alaskapi/Delurker: How would you characterize Bill Clinton?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 7:40 PM
Well while this is all nice for chit chat, Donna’s meltdown aside, the facts just dont support Obama being a centrist. Who he hangs with past and present, policies, voting record, and ogranizations he has been a part of and supports, just doesnt add up to anything but a far far left individual.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 7:36 PM
I agree lori-
The very core of centrist pragmatism is to work with what is on the table and the table has been full of some pretty righty stuff. Also, the centrist notion is that one can accomodate social justice issues while accepting neoliberal economics. I disagree on that one but, oh well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Way_(centrism)
But it really is funny to me to hear this President called a socialist or communist or the like… 🙂
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 7:31 PM
Well it only makes sense that Obama would have been dragged even further right especially after the HOR flip in 2010.
Although, socially, he has moved more left since taking office.
I really think his ” pure core” is center, slightly tilting left however.
It’s tough to say what Mittens really is…and I don’t say that to be funny, it’s just he really has run under many different flags, given the year, week, day!
As I said before Santorum USE to be fairly moderate. When i knew him in Pennsylvania, when he was working for the Heinz campaign, he was sorta normal.. He didn’t go all whacka doodle until early 2000’s.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 7:22 PM
lori- you remember correctly. I’m waaaayyyyy left/left of Ghandi and the Dalai Lama 🙂
http://www.politicalcompass.org/crowdchart.php?showform&Rick+Santorum=7,8.5,-115&Newt+Gingrich=8,7.5&Mitt+Romney=7,6.5,7,10&Ron+Paul=9,-1,10,10&Barack+Obama=6,6,-118,10&Paul+McLaughlin=-5.25,-4.97&Ghandi=-5.97,-3.02&The+Dalai+Lama=-3.81,-6.62
In 2008 Mr Obama scored closer to center but based on his appointments , policies, et al he has behaved about where he shows now.
Delurkergurl-
Romney is more ” right” than he appears when you tote up his behavior in business and government and ignore Santorum’s crap about religion.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 7:11 PM
LOL LOL yes we can and have Donna!!! You know I always have an empty seat beside me, reserved just for you. ❤
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 7:07 PM
Lori and Delurker: You both are more liberal than I am, which I find kind of charming. But we can have some great discussions.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 6:58 PM
It’s always a fun discussion when you bring that link out isn’t it Pi? Many a LOLZ spent on here comparing eachothers “points”.
And yes you do know what left is.. as do I. You understand there are left and right libertairans that are two totally different animals.. 😉
and yes Obama is a centrist. He campaigned as a centrist and has been true to his word. Much to the dismay of some Progressives!
If I remember correctly you were somewhere left of the Dalai lama! weren’t u? LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 6:53 PM
Interesting site, AlaskaPi. I was suprised to see Santorum no farther right than Romney.
Obama hasn’t been nearly as left as the fear mongers screech about.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 30, 2012
at 6:51 PM
UAW-
viewed as per policies and all Mr Obama is truly “right”.
He makes Richard Nixon look like Che Guevara.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2012
Please remember this is a considerably more objective view of right/left than we usually use and if you poke around here you will find all the criteria for judgement used and so on so you can understand how they arrive at stuff.
Please note on that scale I am in the bottom left- as a left libertarian and almost fall off the chart. I think it is funny that a really lefty lefty is ignored as often as I am when I try to talk to folks about the Pres 🙂
I know what left is, really I do 🙂
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 6:35 PM
And the board leader steps forth to set down policy. Predictable and called out days in advance.Banned by calling him his real middle name? Really? Wow Donna, you HAVE gotten desperate.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 6:25 PM
Matthew: Is it really a good idea to allow someone who believes it’s appropriate to repeatedly refer to the President by his middle name (oooohhhh—bad foreign name) to continue to use your grandmother and her friend’s lovely blog to do so?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 30, 2012
at 4:18 PM
Everything in it is documented and backed up. Please feel free to dispute the claims at your leisure. However I suspect you will take the easier path and discredit the source without visiting the facts, and continue on with the blindfold gleefully and happily on.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 2:41 PM
“No one I debate without in the real world of my political bent believes it is evennecessary as we know we have the moral high ground and logic on our side.”
“This speaks to the mans integrity.”…speaking of integrity.
Do you have a creditably site other than – http://keywiki.org – to backup your accusations. This site seems to be dedicated to only finding fault of President Obama using few facts but mostly fiction?
Thank you.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 30, 2012
at 2:33 PM
Not to toss around the word Lie to lightly, but Hussein Obama flat out lied about his involvement with ACORN.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_-_ACORN_and_Project_Vote
This speaks to the mans integrity. He should have fessed up from the beginning rather than lie to us.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 11:55 AM
NOP probably the most insightful post you have to date. I am proud of you. You have come a long way.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 11:39 AM
Hey Alaska….WTF….
This president is right of center????????
Did you slip on some ice???????
If you stretch your arms apart,the center would be your nose. Not your left thumb…….
Helll…Bush was closer to the center than Obama…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 30, 2012
at 11:22 AM
Annoy, why don’t you sit on a tack, that would be a bigger reaction than you are going to get here.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 30, 2012
at 11:18 AM
To continue on the path of getting to know who Hussein Obama is, lets take a look at another aspect of the man who would be king.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_-_Ties_to_Islam
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_Committees_of_Correspondence
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 11:08 AM
Well that is true NOP.. good point. And we have an open Senate seat sooooo you’re right .. lottsa work to do here up an down the ticket!
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 11:04 AM
I found this particular page to be Very!!! interesting. One can judge a man by the company he keeps.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_-_Controversial_and_Radical_Associates
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 10:50 AM
Lori, don’t give up on Texas too fast, even Karl Rove thinks it only leans Romney at the moment, just saying feet on the ground make a big difference to every campaign. I think as Mitt veers left, and he already has, he will alienate many conservatives and they will stay home election day, so if there is a larger than normal turn out of key Democratic constituents Texas just might go blue. Michelle Obama is holding a grassroots event here tomorrow for the OFA/NV volunteers, I’ll be attending.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 30, 2012
at 10:43 AM
Here is a warm up pitch to see if lori and others can find a more Liberal/Socialist/Communist President than Hussein Obama.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_Democratic_Socialists_of_America
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_Communist_Party
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_New_Party/Progressive_Chicago
I understand this is a lot of information, but that is kind of the point. This man was born and bread to be a Socialist/Communist/Progressive.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 10:40 AM
statement out of the blue much lori? This a desperate attempt to change topic off a subject you know has factually already been decided?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 10:05 AM
I know some of you are familiar with this site… but for those not… you will love it..It’s fresh, energetic and current… especially the comments.
Of course you will have to understand a little bit of politics to be able to keep up and understand the conversation. You also will need the ability to hold two parallel thoughts at the same time ;-P… LOL LOL but it’s a fun place to be,,, much like this site was at one time…. http://www.democraticunderground.com/
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 9:49 AM
I can pull together a list that, if you have the integrity to be truthful, you are welcome to show me a President who has put forth more policies that are communist and or socialist in nature. I do not think you will find one that exceeds the policies of Mr Hussein Obama.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 9:34 AM
Pi, all we can do is keep trying! LOL LOL Keep pushing the pile left.
As far as the ignorance towards our President? I say… thatsssss fine by me…. I’ll ride that ignorance all the way to November and beyond. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 8:39 AM
lori- I’m busy watching the weirdities of Alaskan politics right now
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/how-sen-murkowski-was-booed-paul-supporters-alaska-gop-convention
while we have some old fashioned moderate Rs in the State Legislature and some moderately progressive Ds too, the state Ds and Rs themselves are pitiful.
I don’t see much chance to rid ourselves of our blue dog for someone more progressive next go around but we will be seeing state fireworks this fall as all districts except mine have been shifted enough in redistricting ( final plan still in court) to require a vote on every state leggy seat- House and Senate- except mine.
Insisting this terribly centrist President is far left is going to bite some in the rear this next go round. Even those who don’t pay much attention can see he is right of center.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 30, 2012
at 8:04 AM
Meghan McCain and Sandra Fluke met up and have each others backs. Conservatives are going crazy about it. A TRUE Republican can not support any Democrat or their belief(s). Heads are exploding among the crazies.
http://www.politicususa.com/the-girl-power-unity-of-fluke-and-mccain-spawns-a-right-wing-meltdown.html
Meghan added, “My fav meeting of the night, the very brave and badass Sandra Fluke! #MSNBCafterparty”.
To which Ms Sandra replied, “.@McCainBlogette thanx 4 support/advice re: public attacks! We girls have 2 have each others’ backs despite polit diffs. #MSNBCafterparty”
Meghan wrote back, “@SandraFluke There’s like ten women on the planet that know what being in the middle of a political media firestorm feels like. Any time”
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on April 30, 2012
at 7:27 AM
Let me get this straight. We have the most radically left President in our history, and you want government to move even more left? Are you advocating a move to a socialist or communist Americaa?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 30, 2012
at 6:55 AM
For those of us who wouldn’t mind seeing the Democratic party move to the left there are signs of good news coming out of PA last week.
As you know 2 blue dogs went down to 2 progressives (PA 12 – 17) . Now let’s see how they do in the general. We will need to work hard to make this happen. 12 is a pretty conservative district and 17 has been newly redistricted and we aren;t at all sure how that is going to work out.
Since I am in a red state this year I have been looking for a place where i could make a difference. I have decided PA 12-17 fits the bill. Anyone wanna join me?
Let’s keep an eye on New Mexico 01 this week too. That is where two of the three major candidates are outspoken progressive Eric Griego and conservative, anti-labor Marty Chavez. We need to make sure that Griego wins and Chavez loses. That will keep the anti-Blue Dog momentum going, and be an important step toward building a better Democratic Party.
It’s a new day. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 30, 2012
at 5:16 AM
Blah blah blah. Prime example of a liberal name calling er telling the truth…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 29, 2012
at 8:19 PM
Get it right UAW!!! It is a polite term for dickhead.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 29, 2012
at 8:17 PM
and as delurk pointed out..cant we talk about what was said and not the person? I know its all Liberals got but common, Delurk did ask nicely.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 29, 2012
at 8:08 PM
did we just witness an internet meltdown at 7:10? Guess I used the dirty trick combo of truths and facts. my bad.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 29, 2012
at 8:05 PM
what’s this Noah shit????????if it’s a polite term for C^nt can I start using it…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 29, 2012
at 7:36 PM
Noah, where did you paste that from, Noah? Noah, you didn’t cite your source, Noah. Noah, Noah, admit you pasted it, Noah, Noah, Noah, you didn’t write something original did you, Noah? And you don’t actually know if any of it is true, do you, Noah? Noah, you wouldn’t just drink that crap up without checking it, would you, Noah?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 29, 2012
at 7:10 PM
Currently, our nation owes over $15 trillion. That’s more than $115,000 per family. In 2000, this number was $68,000. By 2020, the debt per family is expected to be $194,000, meaning our share of debt will have nearly tripled in just 20 years. Clearly, this path is not sustainable. And furthermore, national debt figure do not include the massive unfunded liabilities of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs (another $115 trillion in total). These entitlement programs are some of the biggest drivers of our debt.
Rather than reform our current entitlement structure, ObamaCare actually expands the role of government in health care, to the cost of taxpayers and our foreign lenders. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) originally estimated that ObamaCare would cost about $1 trillion. But that estimate has already been revised upward several times, and even then, the CBO numbers are almost certainly an understatement. Former CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin released his own analysis, finding that the law will cost $1.072 trillion in subsidies during the first ten years and another $2.85 trillion in the decade after that. That’s a total of nearly $4 trillion in spending over the next 20 years.
Proponents of the law will argue that despite the costs, ObamaCare creates enough new revenues to pay for itself. It’s true that ObamaCare creates $500 billion in new taxes and cuts about $491 billion from Medicare to fund its new subsidies, but many policymakers doubt that such reductions will really take place. Furthermore, these new revenues will not be enough to fund ObamaCare in the long term. More than likely, policymakers have severely underestimated the burden that this will be on government deficits. In 1967, Medicare’s costs were predicted to be $12 billion in the year 1990. In reality, in 1990, Medicare cost $110 billion. ObamaCare will follow suit, and will bend the cost curve in the wrong direction by continuing to use other peoples’ money to pay for health expenses.
Now let us not forget about the unprecedented Individual Mandate. It’s unprecedented because never before in the name of enforcing a law has Congress claimed the power to forcibly compel private citizens into private contracts with private businesses.
It is unlimited because even the lawyers for President Obama’s Department of Justice — and even the lawyers who defended ObamaCare last week before the Supreme Court — have struggled and failed to offer a single limiting principle on the power represented by the creation of the individual mandate. The lack of any limiting principle to this power means, in effect, the end of our nation’s tradition of limited and enumerated government powers.
It is unnecessary because all along Congress has had the power to create a new health care regime — but it knew that the American people wouldn’t stand for an explicit government take-over of health care, so they opted instead to disguise this goal by creating a mandate for “private” insurance. Ironically, the individual mandate is also vastly unpopular, with a stunning 72% of Americans believing that it expressly violates the Constitution.
And finally, the individual mandate is dangerous because standing behind it to enforce it on an unwilling American populace is the full power of the government. That’s the power not only to impose fines and penalties, but to even imprison citizens for the “crime” of not purchasing health insurance.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 29, 2012
at 5:28 PM
Or perhaps we should discuss Obamacare, let see how many people have a problem with this http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2012/04/health-reform-in-action-15-million.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 29, 2012
at 4:27 PM
And then to make things fun, let insert some Presidenial politics http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2012/04/karl-rove-steps-all-over-mitt-romneys.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 29, 2012
at 4:05 PM
Laughing does the body good, http://juanitajean.com/2012/04/29/men-i-love/
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 29, 2012
at 3:35 PM
Kind of disturbing how many people answered yes to the question Should illegal immigrants be allowed to vote in this country. I guess not everyone believes we are a nation of laws. Common ground what?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/when-you-ask-protesters-if-illegals-should-be-allowed-to-vote-you-get-these-answers/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 29, 2012
at 2:21 PM
Jimmy Kimmel at the Whit House Correspondents Dinner last night. President Obama was amazing too.
http://www.dumpbachmann.com/2012/04/marcus-bachmann-roasted-at-white-house.html
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on April 29, 2012
at 9:36 AM
http://www.cagle.com/news/obama-eats-dog/page/3/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 28, 2012
at 5:46 PM
above was me…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 28, 2012
at 4:55 PM
how’s this…
http://www.cagle.com/news/obama-eats-dog/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 4:52 PM
I as going to ask why who Fluke is matters so much more than what she said?
How ironic is it that anyone from your group would make this statement. Funny that when the shoe is on the other foot
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 4:47 PM
I as going to ask why who Fluke is matters so much more than what she said? Even if she DID go there specifically to challenge the policy (which I don’t buy), it doesn’t make her wrong! So stupid to waste time on that fluff. Policy, not people, people!
If I had money to lend my kid, I wouldn’t. I wish I had more to put towards college. I’ve done my best, and they’ll borrow the rest. They will pay it back – that’s what I did. Here’s hoping they get the lower interest rate. The last thing I’d do is hand my kids money to start up a business in a climate that is totally stacked towards the rich! Cinderella stories are great but most of the time they are fantasies! Romney is a total tool. I take some comfort that if somehow he wins, he’s a far better alternative than Santorum – or Gingrich! Shudder.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 28, 2012
at 4:38 PM
Thank God for Gary Trudeau! If it wasn’t for comedy we’d have no outlet for prophets and truth these days.
Thanks for the link, WP. 😀
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 28, 2012
at 3:06 PM
and the campaign ads are writing themselves.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 3:04 PM
They way I see it is Romney wants so bad to be “the one”, that he will do whatever it takes to get there. He is trying to be everything to everyone. He is a very shallow man. Smart, attractive, rich… sure. But where’s the beef? Where are the cajones? Lacking.
The longer he stays in the spotlight, the more transparent he becomes.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 28, 2012
at 2:58 PM
Bill ‘Village Idiot’ O’Reilly reporting…
From the ‘It’s funny because it’s true’ file.
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on April 28, 2012
at 2:57 PM
Agree. And I see that one of Romney’s advisors said today that the auto bailout was Romney’s idea and that the President took it. Which is fascinating because Romney has spent so much time criticizing the bailout. It’s a dreadfully run campaign–at least to this point.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 2:53 PM
$20K is a drop in the bucket for Romney. The man is so out of touch with where real Americans are at. Most people that “borrow” money from their parents never pay it back. Business start-ups can run a lot more than $20K.
Do you let them fail and default at that point? Or pursue legal avenues of collection? Usually you bail them out.
I don’t think it wise to be your student’s banker, though many are just that. Teach them responsibility early. Put them in the workforce at least part time before they are adults and out of the house. Many college students are just perpetuating their childhoods, often parent-enabled. It’s an expensive daycare, exacting a toll far greater on society than just that one student.
Romney’s “solution” is a diversion tactic. Apprenticeships are a better solution, I think. Teaching personal responsibility early in life is key. It is very difficult to learn once you are “out on your own”.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 28, 2012
at 2:50 PM
I am quite happy to move on from Fluke. Any reaction to the Romney suggestion that students should borrow $20k from their parents and start up businesses?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 2:34 PM
I agree with you, poolman. It is so damnably frustrating – this blog has so many smart people with such divers opinons that it could be a veritable Garden of Eden of great arguments, but we cannot seem to pull ourselves out of the BS.
To my eye, Sandra Fluke is a dead issue.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 28, 2012
at 2:30 PM
Another day at the M&H blog. I wish we would hear a fresh word from Helen and/or Margaret.
Hint, hint, hint. 😀
Just to let us know things are still peachy.
But, alas. Not today.
As usual, some are here to argue and disrupt. Others are here to inform and learn. Some come to spread propaganda. Some just to visit. I like the music exploration we get into, though the videos make for a slow load. Too bad.
I can’t believe we are back to the Fluke debate. Arrghh.
Even settled history isn’t. Damn revisionists.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 28, 2012
at 1:47 PM
Well, NOP: I think we can agree that the concept of nuance is lost on Noah. There is an obvious difference between saying “by gosh–I’m going to go to this lawschool rather than any other one because it has this policy that I want to challenge” and saying “I’m going to this lawschool for reasons X, Y, and Z. I understand that it has a policy with which I disagree. I will work to challenge it.” Accepting the difference takes an understanding of human behavior. Denying the difference is simply accepting soundbites thrown at one as actual fact.
Of course, the same buffoon who is clamouring like a 2 year old who needs a nap about “Say it with me Donna. I was wrong…ouch did that hurt?” is studiously ignoring that he insisted on a canard: that Ms. Fluke was already a lawyer. Apparently he is untroubled by making false factual statements. Yet he at the same time claims that people who reach different conclusions about actual facts are wrong. That is a pretty limited and dismal mind and character.
In any event, Noah has made a fool of himself yet again. So what else is new? And he can resort to his constant exhortations about people having sad lives and needing to be on their medications and on and on and on…but at the end of the day, there’s only one person haunting this blog who has admitted he has nothing but empty time on his hands. And it’s clear why that is.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 10:26 AM
You did all anyone could do Donna, Noah is a idiot and if he takes that remark personally, it would the first time he got the message as it was intended.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 28, 2012
at 10:10 AM
jumping up and down..lmao. hey Donna its ok. Like I said Liberals have but one course of action, attack the person personally. Sorry your life is such Donna you feel the need to put forth this tremendous effort and expend all of this mental energy evaluating me. I hope life improves for you soon.
Say it with me Donna. I was wrong….ouch did that hurt?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 9:50 AM
Pfesser: I believe that I responded to the issue of Ms. Fluke’s intention in my posts to you and to UAW. The fact that the resident low information troll is now jumping up and down like Rumpelstilskin doesn’t change my response. It simply emphasizes his immaturity and inability to act like an adult. If anyone questions my position on this, it is set forth above and I’m quite comfortable with this: no matter how many times Noah repeats something, it doesn’t make him correct. So Noah–you can continue to make yourself look even more ridiculous than you typically do (which is really quite something) or you can accept that (a) I have provided my position on the “intention” issue, to the extent it is of any relevance at all; (b) I agree with Pfesser that it’s a remarkably stupid thing on which to focus; (c) I have corrected your false factual assertion about Ms. Fluke already being a lawyer. You don’t warrant any further time or attention.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 9:48 AM
Donna..Im sorry..you had what to say Donna about Flukes intention Donna? Donna..why do you keep avoiding Donna that you were wrong Donna? Donna, tell us Donna why she choose George Town Donna?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 9:32 AM
By the way, for those of you who have any shred of a doubt by this point that Noah is a complete charlatan, google “Washington Post” and “Sandra Fluke.” You’ll see articles there from April 2012 that make clear–as even the most right wing media that have made a habit of attacking Ms. Fluke acknowledge–that she is a law student.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 9:27 AM
As previously noted, I don’t intend to engage with a troll–much less one that is not very intelligent and deliberately repeats falsehoods. For the rest of you, to the extent you have any interest whatsoever in the issue, I believe you will find from the most basic review of the facts that Ms. Fluke currently is a third year law student at Georgetown. As for the whole “purpose” issue, I’ve already addressed it with Pfesser. I hope those of you with a brain have a good weekend. He who has none will continue to sit in front of his computer and hope for attention.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 9:24 AM
Donna lets not gloss over your other lie that was covered by “In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. Just making sure you didnt miss that Donna, Thanks Donna for your attentiveness Donna, The floor is yours Donna
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 9:11 AM
Donna, ell yes Donna we really should trust you over the Washington Post, Donna. Thanks for bringing that up Donna,
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 9:05 AM
Although I normally would not respond to Noah, I will merely correct his attempt to continue to spread false information. Ms. Fluke is a law student now. She has not graduated yet, she is not a lawyer, and Noah is–yet again–making statements that are provably untrue and criticizing others for making accurate statements. Pfesser: I think Exhibit A in your characterization of the mindless focus on irrelevancies would be Noah.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 8:56 AM
Republicans prepare contempt citation against Eric Holder over Fast and Furious
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57423017-503544/republicans-prepare-contempt-citation-against-eric-holder-over-fast-and-furious/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 8:54 AM
Donna, you missed the point and you might want to do some research. She already was a lawyer. She already had her law degree when she attended the college. She said herself in the interview she looked at their policy on contraceptives and chose them for that explicit reason.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 8:48 AM
My favorite news item of the week or perhaps least favorite, depends on how you look at it, Mitt Romney telling college students, to prevent student debt, they should consider asking their parents for a college loan. Could he be more out of touch?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 28, 2012
at 8:45 AM
White collar prison is too good for him anyway. As a woman, wife, and Elizabeth Edwards fan, I would love to see him completely and utterly ruined. A girl can dream, right?
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 28, 2012
at 8:40 AM
Pfesser: I agree with you. It’s just foolish. She never represented herself as a “co-ed.” She made clear IN the statements she made that provoked the controversy that she was a law stuident. So certain media reported she was a co-ed and then announced that she was exactly what she said–a law student–and then the deliberately misleading stories about her ‘evolving’ status started coming out and were perpetuated by the low information crowd.
Ditto the issue of why she decided to go to Georgetown. Ordinary logic refutes the idea that this bright and accomplished woman chose to get her law degree at a particular school for that particular purpose, as opposed to deciding to go there for a range of reasons and believing that the policy was one that should be opposed. Agree with her, disagree with her–but you are absolutely correct that setting up strawmen for which she had no responsibility is silly. As my late grandmother used to say, empty barrels make the most noise and it has been amply demonstrated here.
Lori: I have been watching it with great interest. Young has been completely discredited. If this is the best they have, they have problems–even if convicted, I question whether it would hold up on appeal.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 28, 2012
at 8:20 AM
PFesse my 10:36 PM post was a quote from a Washington Post news article, I should have stated that when I posted it. It was in answer for proof Fluke went to Georgetown for the expressed purpose of furthering this cause.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 7:39 AM
Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.
Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for “betting against America,” and accuses you of having a “less-than-reputable” record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.
Are you worried?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304723304577368280604524916.html
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 28, 2012
at 7:36 AM
Have any of yinzs been following the Edwards trial? Whatcha think?
My take so far .. if this is the best witness the prosecution has…. I think they are in big trouble.
So far, it just seems to me, this is another example of attempting to criminalize a horrible husband’s behavior.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 28, 2012
at 7:17 AM
Donna, anon –
I think anon is on very shaky ground, going after Sandra Fluke. Whether all your points are true or not, it seems to me that splitting hairs over whether she was 23 or 30 or whether she looked at their insurance policy before attending Georgetown, just makes one look churlish. I think you should just fold your tent on this one; the more you talk about all these fine points, the worse it makes you look. Come the fall election, the Democrats are going to make a lot of hay, pointing to the “persecution of Sandra Fluke” by all those big, mean Republican men. See if I’m not right.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 28, 2012
at 6:33 AM
Cynthia –
“I’m happy they at least put a time limit on their ‘last fling for ole time stake’ although for the life of me I can’t understand why one would want to have sex with a dead woman.”
Heck, I don’t know. Wouldn’t be that different from my first marriage, now that I think about it…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 28, 2012
at 6:23 AM
Is this the future of education in America? We will be better educated the rest of the world, eh?
“Do you know how difficult it is to get anybody to read about “privatization of education?” It’s hell. A pineapple, on the other hand, is something everybody likes. It’s a symbol of hospitality. Its juice is said to remove warts. And you really cannot beat the talking-fruit angle. “
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 28, 2012
at 5:21 AM
“For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.”
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 10:36 PM
I am with Donna, wouldn’t it be enough, if there were no law against…. I can’t believe there is that much difference between their culture and ours that any ‘normal’ person is attracted to corpses.
UAW, I am pro-hoice as you know, but I mourn a little bit for every abortion, all of them represent failure of one sort or another, they are not a substitute for birth control. But I am not in any position to make those decisions for any other woman, so I will always support her right to choose. And sometimes, most often in fact, the late term abortions are the ones where the mother’s life was at stake. The first one I ever heard about was when I was a rather small child, it was in the case of the grandmother of a friend of mine, I don’t think I fully understood at the time how such things happen.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 9:52 PM
UAW- I wrote a long response to you which disappeared into the ether (or the spam folder here 🙂 ) which I don’t have the patience to right now to try to do again, but I would like to know if you read the link I put up above?
It does not matter who the President is when it comes to these things. I had a lot of symapthy for the Viet Nam era service men who got canned because of how I felt about the war, but the rules stood then as they stand now. You seem to have sympathy for this guy because you don’t like this Pres- but the rules still stand ,,, and they are not new.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 27, 2012
at 9:50 PM
cynthia….
don’t speak to loud and give the Dems in N Carolina any ideas….
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-26-2012/tarred-heels
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 27, 2012
at 9:10 PM
UAW: I think people pick a school for lots of different reasons. It may be location or the quality of a particular program or having friends/family there or getting a merit or financial scholarship. My bet is that Ms. Fluke made the decision to go to Georgetown for a combination of reasons. If her only goal was to find a Jesuit school with an insurance program she could challenge, there would have been lots of choices. But I think it’s more likely that her background and political orientation are liberal and she decided that, in her view, there should be coverage. What I wince at is when obviously intelligent and well-meaning people repeat a sound bite that may present only a fraction of the truth (i.e., “She went there IN ORDER to challenge this policy.”). Not sure what that sort of thing accomplishes.
You and I agree on some things and we disagree on others. No biggie. But I think we are both well served to check out facts before either making up our minds or offering our opinions. Have a good weekend.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 27, 2012
at 8:59 PM
cynthia…..
sounds more like something ACORN would come up with…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 27, 2012
at 8:18 PM
Donna…
I will agree that Sandra Fluke did not break any Georgetown rules…..Obama did……..
I cannot find the U-tube of Fluke ” quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend”…..maybe your more computer savvy than me…..google the phrase and end up with numerous pages to look at……..is that proof….I will have to say NO………doesn’t mean she didn’t do it…I just can’t prove it………being a prior political activist before Georgetown and past president of Law Students for Womans Justice IMHO would lead credence to this…….still not proof…….
If you’ve paid any attention at all to what i’ve posted before you know that I don’t have a problem with most abortions (I have concerns with late term abortions)….my problem is who has to pay for them and who doesn’t……..and if the government is going to mandate that birth control is paid for (not something to control bleeding or migraines or some other health issues) then I want Viagra paid for also……..and you can have the joy of paying for my F%$king……..my own sister brought that up to me and was astounded to find out I wasn’t covered………and any coverage is by negotiation…….not government edict……..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 27, 2012
at 8:14 PM
I’m happy they at least put a time limit on their ‘last fling for ole time stake’ although for the life of me I can’t understand why one would want to have sex with a dead woman. Unless of course you are Dave and live in a cave.
But don’t speak about this too loudly and give those Repubs any ideas. Next thing you know ALEC will be writing up legislation on this subject for their kinky politicians in those red states!
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 27, 2012
at 8:11 PM
OK–I’m baffled. It’s weird enough that anyone would want to do that, but to pass a law?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 27, 2012
at 7:40 PM
I have to concede on your story PF, there is a least one wacko in the Egyptian Parliament, but it isn’t the law yet, so don’t go all crazy on us. http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/04/25/210198.html I am more concerned with our own nut jobs in office and running for office.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 7:20 PM
I think you mean the October surprise Anon..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 27, 2012
at 7:07 PM
Was just talking with my cousin who works on the border partrol on the Mexican border. Said there is a document where Obama signed off on and Eric Holder signed on those guns. I think I know what the November surprise is going to be.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 5:40 PM
Well consider the source PF, the “Daily Caller” repeating a story from a UK tabloid, who back in the day, backed Hitler. I might want to get a second and a third varification on that story, before I believe the worst.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 4:06 PM
NOP opined:
“Dang PF, you are the one who told us you made porn, how else would be even know about it. So now you say, it is inappropriate to mention it on this blog. I guess I just don’t get your point.”
I can explain it to you; I cannot comprehend it for you.
********************
Somewhat along those lines, has anyone seen this?
http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/27/thedc-morning-keeping-it-classy-in-cairo/
Jesus. The Islamic women get screwed even in death.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 27, 2012
at 3:12 PM
Dang PF, you are the one who told us you made porn, how else would be even know about it. So now you say, it is inappropriate to mention it on this blog. I guess I just don’t get your point.
And Delurker, I didn’t take any offense at PF directing a endearing term towards me, I just assumed he was sweet on me. Well there goes that fantasy, well damn.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 2:50 PM
I thought this was a great tweet! and true!!! LOL LOL
Donna Brazile@donnabrazile
Democrats must get the economy to move fast enough in order to outrun the House Republican efforts to drag it down.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 27, 2012
at 2:38 PM
delurker opined:
“fesser, I read a condescending tone into “opined” because I don’t recall ever seeing you use it when agreeing with or praising someone.”
You are mistaken.
“Typically you use it as an entry into tearing apart a comment or putting someone down.”
You are mistaken again. It is a short form of “expressed the opinion…” I use it on all blogs I visit for all occasions, pro and con. It is an appropriate use of the term. Don’t get a complex about it.
“Hitting back at people twice as hard and taking pride in the damage seems like a guy thing.”
It is. It is also effective at stopping inappropriate attacks and helps get the terminally distracted back on track. Better than Adderall.
“It’d be nice if you’d drop the sweetheart thing.”
Glad to. Drop the porn references. Believe me, there are other things I’d rather discuss rather than the embarrassing naivetes of middle-aged women. (There’s a great line in “9 to 5” where Jane Fonda conflates S&M with M&M’s. Reminds me of someone I know, actually…)
NOP opined:
“I don’t recall ever taking a position on porn PF, for all you know I might have a vast collection of it, not saying that I do, but you don’t know that I don’t. ”
Good for you. I hope you have a barrel-full, but it’s IMHO not an appropriate topic for this forum. Lori started with the PFesser – “Fesser” reference, which of course refers to the French word for spanking. It is quite telling – embarrassing, really – that someone in this day and age thinks that’s something to titter about like a twelve year-old schoolgirl. Some like it, I’m sure; some don’t. I couldn’t care less. As I said, it’s not IMHO an appropriate topic for here.
Wanna get back on topic now, or want more spanking? Your call. I’m feeling festive, I could go either way.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 27, 2012
at 2:28 PM
I’ve been watching Romney’s speech in Ohio today, someone forgot to tell the people behind him on stage, they are supposed to react enthusiastically to his speech. Pathetic, he is the worse candidate they have ever fielded, including Dole.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 1:51 PM
I don’t recall ever taking a position on porn PF, for all you know I might have a vast collection of it, not saying that I do, but you don’t know that I don’t. Liberals are far more likely to continue to protect your right to own it, watch it, make it, sell it, etc than the conservatives. Oh they watch it and own it alright…but….
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 27, 2012
at 11:11 AM
Another very bad law that never should have hit the books. Another freedom lost.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 11:07 AM
Obama is already campaigning on the tax payer dollar flying around in Airforce 1.
Delurk, get on those meds little miss. I never made any of those claims you were mindlessly rambling on about. Take a deep breath and relax. Be calm my child. For you to have gone off like that means I hit the nail on the head with your attack group. Thanks for the confermation.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 10:22 AM
Cynthia, same same same.. They are all slimy bloats … 😉
Delurker I agree that the movements were bright lights that burned out quickly. Time will tell if they are even mentioned in the political history books.
But speaking of political tactics… everyone who lives in swing states should start to see some carpet bombing real soon. If Obama’s staff is worth their salt, and they are, the time is right.
The period right after the primary but before the convention is the time for the incumbent to hit their opponent BIG time. They should be running relentless ads in all swing/ blue state markets. It’s time for Obama to define Romney and make Romney spend lottsa dollars, that he doesn’t have, un defining what Obama defined. 😉 Romney’s pot is running lower than he would have liked emerging from the primary while Obama’s pot runnith over!
here we go!
LikeLike
By: lori on April 27, 2012
at 9:05 AM
Pfesser, I read a condescending tone into “opined” because I don’t recall ever seeing you use it when agreeing with or praising someone. Typically you use it as an entry into tearing apart a comment or putting someone down. Hitting back at people twice as hard and taking pride in the damage seems like a guy thing. I feel like you use these tools to plump your own feathers is all. It’s not a big deal. Feathers have their purpose. 😛 It’d be nice if you’d drop the sweetheart thing.
Noah, I’m not here to engage with you. It’s not your blog, and you aren’t the only one here. I wasn’t talking to you. I’m not going to listen to you. I’m not going to explain my opinion or defend myself to you. You have no dominion over me. Get it? You’re wasting your time. I don’t have any doubt that you can saturate the blog. I hope you’ll respect the hosts enough not to bother but history doesn’t put the odds in my favor with that wish at all, does it?
Cynthia – good to see you. Rove is very effective, whether he actually gave those instructions to his flock or not. 🙂
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 27, 2012
at 8:36 AM
sorry for not spell checking that..doing 3 things at once.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 8:03 AM
PFesser
The blogs thug squad has you in their crosshairs. I am not sure why as I have seen you ben very cordial to even the nastiest responses. They are going to pick out every tiny detail of what you say and micro analzie it to try and wear you down. I know I have been attacked by then dozens of times in the same way. It (A) serves to distract from what you are actually talking about and allows them to avoid having to respond and (B) gives them cause to turn things personal.
It always goes the same. 1 gets nasty. you respond. then another responds in their defense. you respond. then everyone for a time but the person you were talking to chimes-in in their defense. In this case you and lori were at it, NOP chimes in a few times, as you were getting the better of her delurk comes in, now if it were me being attacked, next would be Donna to instruct everyone what to do from that point forward. They round robin attack to keep you from focusing on one target. They are a well oiled machine when it comes to their thug tactics.
Watch when they come after me again, the order may change but the tactic has been consistant through the years.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 8:03 AM
delurk said: n my opinion, both movements were poorly executed and epic failures.
Explain please. Both left and right news organizations have said, agree or disagree with what they did, as far as accomplishments, the Tea Party is one of the most, if not the most successful organized moment in the history of our country. I could list these accomplishments but I will assume you know what I know.
No one bu you and your group said Tea Party had no arrests. But what they were arrested for, and the amount of arrests is vastly different from OSW. I will take your challenge when I get more time today and I will match you. For every 1 arrest you find for the Tea Party, I will match you 5 arrests for OWS. Once I have done this, I will continue to summarize hundreds of more arrests and other calls for violence, including calls for rape and murder.
Comparing the Tea Party to OWS is like comparing a J-walker to a mass murderer. Ya they both broke the law, but…..
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 27, 2012
at 7:53 AM
“Pfesser, is it really necessary to use sexist derogatory terms with people you disagree with? And why can’t you quote people without using the derogatory “opined”? Do you feel it gives you an edge?”
I don’t need an edge.
Opined is short for “expressed an opinion.” If you find that derogatory, the problem is in your head; it is an appropriate use of the word.
Differing opinions are the spice of life, and why I come here. You will find that I rarely, rarely, rarely jump on someone personally, but that I NEVER tolerate someone jumping on me. You will recognize those that do by their shortened limbs. Live with it.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 27, 2012
at 6:40 AM
Pfesser, is it really necessary to use sexist derogatory terms with people you disagree with? And why can’t you quote people without using the derogatory “opined”? Do you feel it gives you an edge?
Back to the “not a single arrest” TEA party. It didn’t take much effort to find out this wasn’t the truth. You would think the Beck crowd would get very tired of being lied to and manipulated.
Spokesperson Michael Kobulnicky was arrested for kidnapping and rape. TEA partier Tim Profitt was arrested for stomping on a person’s head. As I learned from someone here, ONE rape is too many, right? Also learned here, anyone who doesn’t come out and decry the behavior of the man who was convicted of raping his own daughter must be FOR raping children, right? It was BS then and it’s BS now.
Every “movement” attracts nut jobs, and among nut jobs crime is more common. It doesn’t condemn the movement but the people who commit the crimes. It’s obvious to everyone but Beck followers!
I do agree with this guy that a major difference between OWS and TEA rallies is the treatment they received, as well as the media portrayal.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/daveserchuk/2011/10/20/the-tea-party-never-got-pepper-sprayed/
I also can see that the right-wing media is much better at search engine optimization!
In my opinion, both movements were poorly executed and epic failures. I’m not trying to say OWS was superior to the TEA party, but its time to stop the fantasy that the TEA party was the epitome of purity in action. BS then, BS now.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 27, 2012
at 6:33 AM
“PF… I really DGAF about discussions with you. We all have our talents and assets. Clearly politics and personality aren’t two of yours. kiss kiss”
OK – I’ll try to read between the lines there and assume that means you are going to stop bringing up porn as a topic. Good choice. Maybe advanced sex is not your game. I know; let’s have a spellin’ contest…(HT to Val Kilmer)
1:54
Onward.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 27, 2012
at 6:32 AM
So do we think Rubio is rolling out his alternative to the Dream act in order to catch the eye of Beth Meyer’s? Or perhaps he is interviewing for a possible cabinet position?
If so, Boehner sure did throw cold water on that plan. It becomes more and more clear just how much disarray the GOP is in. Now that Romneyis the presumptive leader of the Republican party, wouldn’t it be wise for Boehner to at least entertain the idea of legislation that would help Romney’s campaign? SMH.. all I can say is I am enjoying the show.
Peas… LOL LOL Love ya 😉
If it’s the end of April it’s gotta be draft time.. one of my favorite times of the year.. Go Stillers!
Have a great weekend all!
PF… I really DGAF about discussions with you. We all have our talents and assets. Clearly politics and personality aren’t two of yours. kiss kiss
LikeLike
By: lori on April 27, 2012
at 6:07 AM
“Pfesser, just when I begin to think you might be approaching normal, you cut loose with a zinger.”
NOP –
I didn’t start it, sweetheart. I’m willing to stop anytime you are, but as long as you and lori want to keep bringing up porn, so be it; I’ll match you tit for tat, so to speak. Let me know.
The ball is in your court.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 27, 2012
at 3:46 AM
What’s normal? Why do we take unique beings and try to form them into the mold some other person or persons decide fits THAT particular parameter.
Who benefits? It’s a herding tactic. Humans are SO out of control, and all. 🙄
As long as we aren’t hurting anything or anybody in anyway, we should be free to explore this planet and all its wonders with the ability to express ourselves however we prefer. It’s freewill. Liberty. Really lacking in this country from sea to shining sea.
♪♫ Step out of line the men come and take you away…
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 27, 2012
at 1:55 AM
Pfesser, just when I begin to think you might be approaching normal, you cut loose with a zinger. Guess we all know the subject of your next porno. I usually have to leave the house to be encountered by wierdos, but ever since the trolls showed up….
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 26, 2012
at 10:23 PM
Thanks, Delurker. Your friend the SEAL’s view is consistent with the opinions of the military people with whom I have spoken.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 26, 2012
at 7:13 PM
delurk, how purposefully deceitful that statement is about tea party people. This act this person did, was not at a tea party event. But you already knew it was unrelated. There are so few straws to grasp at you got desperate, thus proving how superior the Tea Party movement is over OWS. Just this month I can show you more bad things from OWS than in the entire existence of the Tea Party.
Donna. Fluke stated that she interview colleges and picked Georgetown because of their policy. Those were her own words in a TV interview. Check youtube.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 26, 2012
at 7:07 PM
I talked to a good friend of mine today. He’s a Navy SEAL on a very brief leave from he-can’t-tell-me-where. He confirmed that Gary Stein got off easy after willfully and repeatedly disrespecting the Commander in Chief, violating Pentagon policy during time of war. He said any military man knows this is simply not done, and if Obama were to intervene and let him off it would be a very sad day for our nation.
Also heard about TEA partier Charles Dyer, convicted of raping his own daughter. I guess the concept that OWS people are criminal in contrast to TEA people isn’t such a contrast after all.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 26, 2012
at 7:00 PM
“proposition.” My bad.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 26, 2012
at 6:03 PM
UAW: Can you provide your proof that the reason that Ms. Fluke went to Georgetown was to test their policy? And I”m not sure why you believe she was accepted under false pretenses–do you believe or have proof that Ms. Fluke stated that she agreed to that policy?
As for Mr. Stein, he did not voice his opinion on the change of the President. He specifically stated that he would not follow orders. Further, the military code to which he agreed (and was bound) provided that he would not criticize the President. And, of course, he was ordered to stop what he was posting and disobeyed that order.
I agree with you as a general propositin that neither oaths nor rules should be broken or, more specifically, that if one chooses to break a rule or oath, one is subject to prescribed consequences. Ms. Fluke broke no rule because Georgetown did not have a rule that provided she could not disagree with its policy. She was absolutely free under University policies to do what she did, i.e., speak publicly about a matter, including expressing her disagreement. Mr. Stein, in contrast, broke a number of rules.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 26, 2012
at 5:54 PM
hey NOP…..that last statement would classify you as a troll…..
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=troll
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 26, 2012
at 5:24 PM
PF….
60%cut…..40% tax increase……
I’ll vote for it………..
and lets take the 60% out of federal judges salaries…….
http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/Judge-Declares-State-Worker-Drug-Testing-Order-Unconstitutional-149070815.html
good enough for truck drivers….. good enough for state employees…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 26, 2012
at 5:12 PM
alaska and donna….
its been proven that Sandra Fluke went to Georgetown just to complain/test their no contraceptive policy…….both of you have just stated that she didn’t do anything wrong by voicing her opinion…..apparently she was accepted under false premises ……the soldier was there before the commander in chief was changed………and has now voiced his opinion on the change…..
do you truly believe that there is a difference between an “oath” and “knowing the rules”……..I believe that neither one should be broken……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 26, 2012
at 5:04 PM
NOP –
It’s only kinky the first time. LOL
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 26, 2012
at 1:48 PM
Pervert was the exact right word to describe trolls! Since I am shocked by nothing he says, I won’t be giving him a thrill LMAO.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 26, 2012
at 1:42 PM
Why are we giving $1.5 billion of our tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood? Why are we supporting Egypt with our tax dollars with their war on women? They just passed a law that makes it legal for husbands to have sex with their wife after she has died. They have lowered the age of marriage to 14 years old. Should not our tax dollars, if they are not going to be spend on us, at the very least reflect values we support?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 26, 2012
at 1:21 PM
Was listening to an ABC news report on AM radio today. 59 of the past 60 weekly reports on the unemployment numbers were adjusted upward a week after they were reported. Of course we only hear the inflated number an never about the adjusted (true) number.
Also. Obama campaigning on the tax payer dollar. With all the financial problems we face is it inappropriate in my opinion for the President to abuse and misuse tax payer dollars flying about the country on our dime doing fund raising.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 26, 2012
at 12:25 PM
“PF, you might want to catch up on the latest economic news from the UK, their austerity plan, the same one you conservatives… ”
Just a minor correction, NOP. I think I might have mentioned this before. I am not a conservative; I am a Libertarian. And, secondly, as I believe I may also have mentioned, I like SOME conservative ideas; in other areas I prefer the more liberal approach. Wanted to set the record straight there.
As I noted above, my reading suggests the best course out of this mess is balancing the books via about a 60% spending cut and 40% via tax increase. That sounds about right, since it pisses off libs and cons. If nobody is happy, it’s probably the right thing to do. LOL
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 26, 2012
at 9:18 AM
PF, you might want to catch up on the latest economic news from the UK, their austerity plan, the same one you conservatives advocate for the USA, has resulted in this http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/apr/26/britain-long-depression-100-years?intcmp=239
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 26, 2012
at 9:02 AM
good morning, UAW. It’s a very different issue. Ms. Fluke did nothing that was contrary to Georgetown’s rules or regulations. There is no policy there that would restrict the rights of students to offer their opinions, including on matters involving university policies. If Ms. Fluke had voluntarily gone to an institution, been aware of a rule prohibiting criticism, and then violated that rule, she could have been disciplined. However, there was no rule of the sort that you suggest and therefore it’s not equivalent.
You have raised the issue of Ms. Fluke several times. I hope that you have had the opportunity to check into just what she said (and did not say) that provoked the firestorm against her. She was not referring to her personal sex life or contraception for herself.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 26, 2012
at 7:33 AM
UAW- If Sandra fluke had to swear an oath like the Marine did, went through training which included the whys and wherefores of what was permissible to shoot her mouth off publically about insurance afforded to her and other students ( for which they paid) , and failed to respond appropriately to discipline ( one was sworn to follow as well) I see nothing wrong with her being expelled as a student…
but
really-
it is apples and oranges because the military has a whole different set of law and regulation surrounding it as far as free expression goes. this is NOT the same thing.
go read the link I put above
It cites a time and place and cases where you would have had no sympathy what the soldier’s politics were as they were considered lefties
It describes the singular situation the military occupies as relates free expression
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 26, 2012
at 7:32 AM
NOP….
mental healthcare for perverts??????????
your not biased in anyway are you……….
if your talking child molester’s, healthcare should be in different calibers…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 26, 2012
at 7:24 AM
Just wondering if the people here that are happy about a person, who knowingly joined an organization/institution and then complained (said something they didn’t like) ,and then was getting kicked out/discharged would feel if Georgetown University did the same thing to Sandra Fluke………..Someone who knowingly asked to be accepted to that institution and knew the rules there……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 26, 2012
at 7:16 AM
lori –
Nobody’s trying to put you down; I just want to know what you said. I’d love to participate in a conversation with you but I can’t figure out the sentence fragments and flights-of-ideas. Try doing what they told you in eighth-grade English class: a paragraph is a statement of ONE idea.
re: whip and chain haunts. You really are a sexual amateur, aren’t you? Nobody uses chains. Nobody. Too cold and un-sensual. Leather and/or hemp rope are preferred by most bondage aficionados. Buy that book: Fifty Shades of Grey. It’s poorly written, but you might learn something.
NOP – Yep, it looks pretty bad in the UK; unfortunately your debts always come home to roost. I’ve read a couple of pretty thorough analyses of the European situation; best advice has been about a 60% reduction in govt spending and a 40% tax increase to get out of it with the least damage to the economy. The conservatives are opposed to ANY tax increase, but that is the shortest way out of what I consider Bush’s Folly. I don’t agree with Obama’s methods of recovery, but I do NOT blame him.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 26, 2012
at 6:47 AM
Here I thought Donna was a lawyer. How is a source bad when there is video for people to make up their own minds? LMAO!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 26, 2012
at 6:45 AM
heh the hyprocricy of that post Donna was taken to a new level. Remember, you personally insulted me. I didn’t come after you. I asked you to stop the personal stuff. I offered you an email address to post insults to me to clean the blog up. You and your cackle of kitchen runners were the ones who chose not to stop, so dont pin this on me.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 26, 2012
at 6:43 AM
good morning, all. I believe we have established beyond question (not that there was anything) that Noah is here for one reason: to disrupt the blog. Offered a number of suggestions that would allow him exactly what he has claimed repeatedly he wants (discussion of ideas), he rejects them in favor of the same projection, accusing others of doing what he does. This, of course, extends to his worn out accusations that others have limited or sad lives when he is the person who admitted in a rare moment of honesty that he has nothing but “empty time” on his hands.
In light of the fact that it is now beyond clear that Noah is a classic troll with absolutely nothing of value, can we regular porch dwellers agree to strictly ignore him? There’s no reason to respond to discredited “sources” such as the Blaze or Drudge, and there’s nothing to be gained from giving him the attention he craves and obviously gets nowhere else. Even he is likely to get tired of being ignored and ultimately bless us by his absence.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 26, 2012
at 5:55 AM
All I can say is health insurance for all including mental health care for perverts.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 11:18 PM
Hey Puppet my offer extends to you as well. Please feel free to use me as your punching bag until such a time you feel the hate leave your withered, poisoned soul. I am here for you Puppet.
On the note of poisoned souls…just another look into the Liberal mindset and what OSW is all about. Hard to believe.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/chilling-charges-at-dc-occupy-speaker-if-im-arrested-i-want-you-to-start-killing-mfs/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 10:10 PM
I just don’t get the payoff. There is most certainly a sadness to it…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 25, 2012
at 10:08 PM
I will take note that yet again Liberal Donna decided to take the only path a Liberal can take and engage in personal attacks. I find it very telling that it is so widely accepted and only further backs up my assertions that this is all Liberals have.
Sorry your life is such Donna that you dedicate so much time imagining what my life is like. It does warm my heart that it appears Karma is doing its thing. I am here for you Donna. Use me is your kicking bag. Maybe one day the abuse I endure will heal all the bad that is so obviously going on in your life.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 9:59 PM
Funny, I think Donna sounds just like a lawyer, she deals in facts and thank goodness, her clients deserve nothing less. Noah if jobs are so hard to come by or if you are so ill prepared for gainful employment look into volunteer work and gain some experience. It is your life, make something of it! You are losing it man.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 9:54 PM
I find it interesting this is getting so little attention.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/after-brutal-string-of-black-on-white-violence-in-the-name-of-justice-for-trayvon-beck-asks-where-al-sharpton-is/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 9:54 PM
You will receive your daily list of talking points and topics that we want you to cover. Consistent, persistent repetition and inculcation will drive our talking points home and so will neuro-linguistic programming. Stick with it and our talking points will become truth.
If they debunk your talking point, ignore it, and move on as if you didn’t hear it.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 25, 2012
at 7:49 PM
Those of us old enough to remember Viet Nam remember notable cases from that time which addressed similar issues of free expression constraints on military personnel. Some of those cases went all the way to the Supreme Court and added to the large body of settled law and precedent which the Marine Corp relied on in this latest case. http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1980/may-jun/moran.html
This gent can choose to appeal but it isn’t likekly with his current arguments or established behavior that he would prevail in the end.
It’s sorta silly to act like this has never come up before – President after President has been mocked/derided by service members, regardless of party, and the outcome has been the same- they get shown the door, at the very least.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 25, 2012
at 7:36 PM
Any Liberal website or information source must be marginalized, trivialized and discounted. Discredit Liberal sources of information whenever possible.
Don’t allow a Liberal to present their dogma unchallenged EVER. Intimidate Taunt the Liberals. If you find yourself in a debate with a Liberal where you are losing a fact-based argument, and then call them a name to derail their diatribe.
Play upon any identifiable idiosyncrasies, character flaws, physical traits, names, to their disadvantage.
This is what a good conservative troll should do according to Karl Rove.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 25, 2012
at 7:18 PM
A few more suggestions:
1. “Hi, all. Hope you had a good weekend. I’ve been wondering what you think about X.”
2. “Interesting question about music. Here’s what I like: [ ]. Never heard of [ ] but will check it out. Meanwhile, what do people think about X?”
3. “I am bothered by X. It seems to me that Y. Am I missing something?”
See–it’s very simple. If, as you claim, you actually want people to discuss something, you show some basic respect and interest in them and their opinions. You don’t say something obnoxious and then whine about how “liberals” don’t want to debate. You don’t act like an ass and then claim that “liberals” just make personal attacks. You treat people with something approaching courtesy and you’ll get it back.
Or, of course, you can continue to show up, post something that attacks other people’s beliefs (frequently from a dubious source), preen over the superiority of your own beliefs, and then treat the understandably negative responses as somehow reflecting on those who make them–rather than your own asshat-edness. Of course, if what you really want is to be a jerk and get attention and feel like you are actually accomplishing something by disrupting the blog, you’ll continue to act as you have.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 25, 2012
at 7:08 PM
And because I am feeling magnanimous, here is how you actually start the sort of discussion you claim to want (but clearly do not); “Has anyone seen this? What do you think? Should the military have discharged Stein or not? I think they shouldn’t have because I think that people should have the right to do what he did. Your thoughts?” See how simple that is? And how easy to avoid being the jerk that you universally are?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 25, 2012
at 6:43 PM
Noah: It is possible that somewhere on the planet, there is someone whose opinion is of less interest than yours. But I can’t think of one. The view of an unemployed and apparently unemployable troll, who can’t come up with anything more or better to do with his time than to keep coming onto a blog under different names (after his dramatic promise never to return proved too much for him to honor) and spouting nonsense is, as previously mentioned, as momentous as dog gas. The fact is that you claimed that Stein had a “right to free speech” that encompassed his behavior. A first year college student (who obviously has significantly more education than you) would know that this has nothing to do with what actually is the right to free speech. And I do not suffer fools gladly. Call that whatever you want–I call it discernment.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 25, 2012
at 6:37 PM
I think the point is Donna is you go out of your way to be a bitcch. You cannot remain civil and that is a character flaw with you. Sorry to have to bottom line you like that..but there you go.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 6:27 PM
NOP: I trust you’ve seen that people in the military, of all ranks, overwhelmingly support the dishonorable discharge, particularly since Stein had been repeatedly warned before it. And Stein himself has now apologized and admitted he was wrong. This is just another talking point for the low information crowd.
Noah: it takes a particularly high level of immaturity to claim that people who point out the many ways in which you are wrong and uninformed aren’t “defending themselves.” If you ever post anything of actual merit, I think you’ll see a substantive response. You have yet to do so. I’m sorry if you aren’t able to understand the difference between (a) people viewing you, personally, as an ignoramus and (b) people disagreeing with your ideas. You have yet to graduate from the former.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 25, 2012
at 6:23 PM
Sorry for not reading your rant Donna, as you seem to recycle the same responses over and over again I am sure it was laced with personal attacks on me and my character. Old news. But thanks again for proving the Liberal 1 dimensional argument style.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 6:18 PM
You were due to chime in Donna, thats how this mob of Liberals work. This way no one actually has to defend themselves. Delurk is usually next.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 6:16 PM
My husband is retired military as are other members of my family, so believe me I know what I am talking about. Don’t be afraid of a little knowledge, it is a good thing.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 6:13 PM
Actually, Noah, you are demonstrating (once again) your ignorance and your unfortunate propensity to attack people who disagree with your uninformed opinions. When someone enlists, they agree to act in certain ways and not to act in others. One specific action that they agree not to take is to criticize the U.S. government or its appointed or elected officials. Another is not to publicly engage in political activities. If someone does not want to abide by these restrictions, then they are free not to join the military.
The person in question increasingly ratcheted up his rhetoric in violation of both the policy to which he agreed and direct orders to stop. When he wrote that “As an active duty Marine I say “screw Obama–I will not follow orders from him” he was disciplined. And that was for both saying he would not follow orders and encouraging others to do likewise.
It is obvious that you have no real understanding of what the First Amendment is and is not. For example, if you were ever able to find a job, your employer could discipline you, including terminating your employment, if you were to publicly criticize it. There are a number of cases in which courts (yes, conservative courts) have upheld the right of an employer to fire an employee who was complaining about the company for which he or she worked on Facebook.
I realize that, as you admitted to Matthew, you have “nothing but empty time” on your hands. I also realize that you, for reasons that only a qualified mental health professional could explain, insist on hanging around this blog and insulting people and then whining that you only respond when you are “attacked.” However, this is a perfect instance in which you have made a demonstrably stupid, uninformed statement and then gone after NOP when she correctly pointed out your error. I realize that you are unemployable and certainly not fit for any sort of military service. But perhaps you might read a bit before spouting your inanities.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 25, 2012
at 6:00 PM
Way to be petty Puppet. But then you always are. I can think of a dozen or so Communist countries that would welcome your belief system with open arms. One way non refundable ticket is on me.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 5:16 PM
Here is a bit of news for you, guess you never served your country, the military typically does not have free speech, and criticizing his Commander and Chief, you must be kidding me. Talk about acting like a fool, he deserves a dishonorable discharge, he was taught the ropes in boot camp. Honestly, you really must at least attempt to educate yourself! There are places Online where one can learn something or you could go to the library.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 4:56 PM
This is how we treat our men and women of the military. I wonder if Obama will step in and defend this man’s right to free speach? I am betting not!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/25/gary-stein-marine-obama-facebook_n_1453031.html?ncid=webmail1
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 3:52 PM
Amen. few have said it as well as George Carlin.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 3:48 PM
A wise prophet once said:
The table is tilted…the game is rigged!
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on April 25, 2012
at 3:38 PM
“I certainly know they have never worked on or for a national campaign nor know an ounce of politics. That is clearly evident by the way they always resort to their gammar and spell check refrain when the topic of conversation confuzzles them…. LOL LOL Silly bullies…”
not sure what meds your on lori but up the dose…your little rant here seems like mindless ramblings.
Again sorry to point out the obvious but as you can see, Liberals have only one tactic, go after the person, not the topic. It really is all they have. Thanks for once again Puppet and lori for helping me prove this out conclusively.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 3:30 PM
LOL I don’t know about that NOP, but I certainly know they have never worked on or for a national campaign nor know an ounce of politics. That is clearly evident by the way they always resort to their gammar and spell check refrain when the topic of conversation confuzzles them…. LOL LOL Silly bullies…
I think their talents are a tad bit misplaced? Perhaps would feel more adulation in their old whip and chain haunts? Maybe that is where their misogynistic views would be better appreciated and they really don’t have to participate in conversation… just put downs… I donno… jussss sayin
LikeLike
By: lori on April 25, 2012
at 2:30 PM
Don’t suppose either of you boys, in between your trolling and crank phone calls, have had time to keep up with the dire economic repercussions in the UK due to their austerity program?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 2:02 PM
I dont think it is so much the worst ideas rather that how do you convince a group of people who have drank the cool-aid that the American Dream is government programs, that we need to cut spending? There is no good way to do it as you will always be perceived as an uncaring villain.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 1:02 PM
anon –
I’m not much on saying, “A liberal does this or a conservative does that.” It just makes people angry – and, it’s also not true in my experience. I think anybody can have a good idea – or a bad one. I just try to focus on whether what they say makes sense or not. Although most of the time I agree with the conservatives, it seems to me that sometimes they have the WORST ideas. Just my .05.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 25, 2012
at 10:55 AM
Since lori seems unable to articulate her own point I will try. I had to read it a few times myself to get it…i think.
lori is of the opinion that Romney cannot win as he stands now. And that he cannot win without pandering(as a Liberal would do) to women and Hispanics.
She is also of the mind that the issue of health care is already a dead issue and that everyone’s mind is made up on that. What I think lori is failing to recognize is that as the cost of this bill continues to go up in multiple billion dollar increments above and beyond what Obama claimed it would cost, support for this bill is falling across the board. And as support falls, blame is getting assigned. That sways votes.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 25, 2012
at 9:04 AM
Nonsense. If you are going to post for others to see, you have to be able to express yourself on at least a second-grade level. It’s not a question of meeting some elevated standard, it’s a question of being understood at all.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 25, 2012
at 8:49 AM
Come, come PFesser, you don’t actually think Lori is going to bother detailing anything to your standard. Her time is more valuable than that.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 8:44 AM
In case anyone missed it http://gawker.com/5904926/watch-president-obama-and-jimmy-fallon-slow-jam-the-news
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 25, 2012
at 8:36 AM
“PF, I’m sorry, I need to be done with you for today. I’m sure there is someone willing to explain the very basic of campaign strategies to you, Obviously it’s not me.”
No, sweetheart – I’m just trying to figure out WHAT you said, not what it means. Reminds me of Myron Cohen and Sid Caesar – real comic genius. Let me see if I can find an old video of them …
No, nothing much, but here is a modern day version:
See what I mean? Now try again. Now what were you trying to say?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 25, 2012
at 7:19 AM
And “Also if he fashioned it off Romneycare, did he ever give him credit for it? I never saw it..” Only every chance he gets! Haven’t you heard, Romney is the godfather of The Affordable Care Act? You really miss a lot when you only look for things that support your preconceived positions.
I can hardly wait for the debates!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 24, 2012
at 5:37 PM
And perhaps someday you will be able to understand the difference between an economic discussion and a political one.
I didn’t agree or disagree with you on your assertions on the debit anon. I just said HCR will not move the poll numbers in a general election. Nor will gloom & fear about the debit, in a general election. UNLESS it is accompanied with some new ideas. Ideas that will reach Hispanics and women. because that is where Romney is sorely lacking in poll numbers.
he needs to offer more than he has so far and it can’t be HCR repeal.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 2:47 PM
lori, I hope at some point you take a course in economics or at the very least get some basic understanding. I hope, the rest of the nation is mroe educated and understands that it is not a matter if health care reform is good, needed, or if this particular legislation is good or needed, but rather the consequences of what will happen if we keep it.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 24, 2012
at 2:29 PM
PF, I’m sorry, I need to be done with you for today. I’m sure there is someone willing to explain the very basic of campaign strategies to you, Obviously it’s not me.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 2:13 PM
?????????? What?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 24, 2012
at 1:48 PM
Again PF, when talking about campaigns and what wiill win THIS elections.
When you are talking about what will sway the women’s vote in Romney’s favor. A componet he is losing by 29 points! And how he will make up the 40 percent latino deficiet.
It will NOT be repealing healthcare reform. Which is what anon suggests. Sorry it just won’t .
People have already made up there minds about that issue.
In fact those two demographics LOVE healthcare reform.
The fear factor you suggest will win white old Christian men. Romeny already has that. He needs something else.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 1:27 PM
No, anon’s right about the debt. When a household runs up debt beyond a certain point it becomes more and more of a burden, then at some point it becomes impossible to pay because of ever-faster accumulating interest.
Our govt is just kicking the can further down the road, and they can do that because they own the money-printing presses. But you cannot thwart basic laws of economics and we will have to default in some way if we do not contain our spending – whether it be a real default or a disguised default via hyperinflation. Think Weimar Germany.
We are in a little golden period right now. I am not sure how much leeway Obama had in dealing with this financial crisis that he in large part inherited, but we are definitely heading down the path to perdition. It’s a question of when and how bad, not if, IMHO.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 24, 2012
at 1:18 PM
yesterday’s news anon, move on, nothing to see there.
What will move the needle for Mittens is being FOR something. New ideas that will take this country forward to deal with the challenges that face our country in this new day.
These stale temeper tantrums over argued law, as in women’s rights and healthcare reform, only serve to highlight the bankrupted vault of GOP ideas.
Granted it does galvanize the wingnuts on your side, but they are already registering in the pools. Those issues do nothing to move the needle in your direction with the componets of the electorate you desperately need.
You really need to take your arguments to a rightwing nut site. They would appreciate and applaud your efforts.
But by all means sit down and enjoy some pie here while the rest of us chat about relevant issues that will be affecting the 2012 general.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 1:08 PM
I guess I am of the sort that feels a lie is bad all the time, not just until it becomes the past. That level of deceit and or incompetence will always be relevant. A single part of the bill was shown to be $15-$17 over what we were told it was going to be. That’s one part. Imagine what else we have in store for us. You might be able to gloss over it, many will not.
Again, I am almost eager to let Obama win. He will then be the sitting President when the full brunt of Obama care comes due, while at the same time our failing infrastructures start to give way. We will fondly look at these days when we were only $15 trillion in debt. I bet that number will be 40%-50% higher or more with another Obama run. $5 dollar gas will be a thing of the past as we enter into $6-$8 dollar a gallon gas and we will be importing more oil than we have ever in our history. 8%-10% unemployment will be considered the norm, and 60%-70% of the nation will be getting some form of government assistance. That is if we dont fall the way of Greece by then.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 24, 2012
at 12:52 PM
The electorate has already made their peace, or not, with the healthcare reform law. Those feelings are reflected in the polling already.
That was an issue for the Republican primary, it won’t be much of a factor in 2012 general.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 12:13 PM
The logic being he was tens of billions of dollars off on the cost. We were flat out lied to as to the cost. Either that or he was completely incompetent.
Also if he fashioned it off Romneycare, did he ever give him credit for it? I never saw it..
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 24, 2012
at 12:05 PM
so anon, it’s your thinking the electroate will turn away from Obama because of a healthcare reform law that he fashioned off of Romneycare?
I don’t follow that logic.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 11:24 AM
Obama is addressing college costs:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gSf0UkzItew9QH2V4QOtS__Qhepw?docId=da8c5b6b256a4230b6399cc1452af345
A very smart move on his part, and IMHO a good thing. Good for him.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 24, 2012
at 11:18 AM
I think once the hammer drops on Obama care, and we start to see the real numbers and discover we were lied to all along about the true cost, Obama’s numbers will plummet.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 24, 2012
at 11:16 AM
Some good info on the ever changing unaffiliated or independent electorate.
Steve Singister is one of the few that has always understood who those voters are.
Anyway, great news for the good team! I’ll take these odds.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/24/1085910/-Daily-Kos-SEIU-State-of-the-Nation-Poll-Obama-maintains-lead-amid-positive-signs-among-Independents
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 10:32 AM
I heard some say yesterday that the home state of a VP doesn’t matter much anymore. They were pointing to Biden and Cheney as an example. But what they were forgetting was Biden had huge swag in eastern PA. So although not from an important state he was associated with one. Cheney… wellll..lol Im not sure he counts since he was never a VICE President. LOL LOL
I’m sticking with the old school thought. Veeps need to deliver a state and do no harm.
NOP, I think Romney will look at Rand Paul, as he promised his Papa he would. But I think his party would have his head if he took a sitting Senator.
So that leaves Govs…. and non- sitting politicans. Which brings us back to Jebby.
Maybe he will give Christy another look? Not a likely pick though. I don’t think Mittens wants to associate himself with another “liberal” east coast gov.
I am popping my corn.. This is where it starts to get good. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 24, 2012
at 7:29 AM
NOP –
McDonnell is of course governor of MY state, Virginia.
You don’t want him. His MA/JD degree is from Regent “University” in Virginia Beach – otherwise known as the Christian Broadcast Network College, or the University of Pat Robertson. He signed the Ultrasound Probe Rape bill into law and is a major player in the ReBiblican’s Crusade to Put Women Back Where They Belong.
If he’s the Veep candidate, I’m voting for Hussein.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 24, 2012
at 6:10 AM
Newt has way to much baggage. Will never be considered.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 24, 2012
at 12:30 AM
I am at a total loss, I can’t think of anyone who could help him. Newt it is then, by default. lol
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 10:36 PM
NOP isn’t McDonnell wayyyy wayy right on immigration? I just can’t help but think Romney needs someone to carry a swing state (which he probs would), and someone who will lessen the 40 point percentage gap he has with hispanics. So I think it is going to have to be someone who is left of Romeny on immigration.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 9:47 PM
That’s very true about Jeb NOP.. I actually think if Rubio isn’t number two that will be the reason why. I think he has his sights set down the road and he doesn’t think Romeny will get him there. But.. he is a politician and they have egos and at the end of the day it’s hard for them to turn down the number 2 gig.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 9:33 PM
Jeb is the smart Bush, I don’t think he wants to run with Romney, but I think he will run for the top position some other time. He could have ran this time and he would have won the primary, so I think he is bidding his time. McDonald (spelling?) of Virginia would really like to run with Romney, he might be the only one who does want to run with him. He is really promoting himself.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 9:19 PM
Wow Cynthia, I donno about Jeb. The first rule of thumb of a Veep is do no harm and I think his name has potential to do harm. For that reason I don’t think he will be tapped.
I do agree though, he would carry Florida and I see absolutely no path for Mittens if he doesn’t carry Florida. It’s a must win.
Donna speaking of women and the Sarah Palin mistake… that Susana Martinez from New Mexico would have been a real possibility if it weren’t for the Sarah fiasco the last time around. I think Mittens is too cautious to go with a neophyte this time. He seems kinda like a steady Eddie kind of guy.
No way it will be Rice.. she has never ran for an office and wayyyyy to close to Bush and Bush policies,
Everyone knows there is a huge difference in just being in an appointed position and an elected official. To run your first race as a Veep is usually disastrous, especially in this age of slash and burn campaigns. Talk about not doing any harm.. geeze she has the potential to blow it up. I just can’t see Rice.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 9:04 PM
1st concert?
John Sebastion
It was fun but
I like him better now 🙂
favorite concerts ever
1- Leo Kottke
2-Sweet Honey in the Rock
3- Ray Charles
4- Carolina Chocolate Drops
always, always wanted to see Joe Cocker , Earl Scruggs, Neil Young and /or Townes Van Zandt
don’t get everything we want… sigh.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 23, 2012
at 9:02 PM
way to take the high road puppet, no one expects any less from you.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 8:39 PM
Donna –
LOL. Dog flatulence to describe irrelevance. My mom was a salty old gal; she used say that something didn’t matter any more than a big dog farting. I hadn’t thought of that in a long time.
re: Rubio. I know absolutely nada about him. Any info, good or bad?
Cynthia – I know some folks in Elkins, WV – right in the highest part of the Alleghenies. They were slated to get 16″ of snow – really bad since all the trees are leafed out. On Bill Monroe: Flatt and Scruggs worked for him but decided to leave because of the grueling schedule and poor pay. I never cared much for his music, especially after he got old. Too lonesome and sad for me. F/Scruggs really turned me on, though. I always thought Lester Flatt had the perfect bluegrass voice, not so high and whiny like Monroe.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 23, 2012
at 8:37 PM
Boring little man! Isn’t anyone hiring in your neck of the woods?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 7:48 PM
My money is on Jeb Bush for VP.
First concert was the Grand Ole Oprey (sp?) with Red Foley in Miami. The only other was a Blue Grass concert with Bill Monroe who was so drunk we were making bets on when he was going to fall off the stage. I lost! I would have liked to have gone to others but never had the chance.
Any one else get this snow?
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 23, 2012
at 6:54 PM
My bet for VP is Condoleezza Rice.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 5:44 PM
Per post 2 Donna, I see you have given this a great deal of thought. I just cant bring myself to read your predictably insulting posts. Get your mad on, be a bitch if that is what gets your through the day. You dont like me, I have no particular use for you. Lets agree to dislike each other and can the personal issues on the blog. Agreed? If you really feel the need to insult me personally, puppet, lori, delurk and anyone else, I would be happy to make a google email address and I can read each in turn. That way we can rid ourselves of the clutter here.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 5:41 PM
Donna, you always attempt to change the tone, right after you get down bashing someone. Fact!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 5:36 PM
I say you are absolutely right. It’s their attempt to pander to the Hispanic vote. Which will fare as well as picking Sarah Palin to appeal to women did.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 23, 2012
at 5:34 PM
Anyone want to talk about real politics?
The big buzz today seems to be Rubio or not. It was even trending on twitter this afternoon.
I have already shared my feelings up there ^ . I think it’s going to be a Romney Rubio ticket. Rubio says he will absolutely not run with Mittens. But they all say then until they don’t. 😉
What say you?
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 5:31 PM
oh, and let’s try to preempt the predictable response from Noah, who can’t manage to come up with anything new or original. No, you are not important to me. You are, again, canine flatulence and not even from a dog for which I have fondness. No, I do not engage in personal attacks because I am so stunned by your insights that I have nothing else to say. You have yet to offer any post of any merit or interest and, to the extent I have any reaction at all, it is that you are remarkably dim. No, there is nothing wrong in my life that requires you to address me as “kiddo” or “tiger” or offer one of your phony little “chin up” posts. I have a life that is so much beyond yours that I don’t need to hang around blogs and try to disrupt them for attention. Instead, I can occasionally drop in here because (a) I enjoy the hosts and hope they have a new post and (b) many of the people here (with the exception of yourself) are funny and interesting, regardless of whether or not I agree with their viewpoints. Sorry that you apparently were unable to drum up any interest in your blog, but it’s obvious why.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 23, 2012
at 4:44 PM
Actually, as PFesser can confirm, I am the one who regularly tries to change the subject to more pleasant things and, in fact, started this (and the previous) discussions of music. I note that you never participate and ignored this one; instead, you had to come up with something to insult the other people here. As predictable as is your projection of your own behavior onto others.
Oh, the dog passed gas. I thought you might have posted again.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 23, 2012
at 4:19 PM
Always count on Donna and Puppet to take the mood south.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 3:42 PM
And we were doing so well on the music thread, too…(sigh)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 23, 2012
at 3:12 PM
Well of course you don’t care about my topics..they highlight the hypocrisy and immorality of your political beliefs..were I forced to be Liberal I might take the same path to ease my own guilt.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 2:53 PM
Yes, I am! Thank you for noticing. I’m not arguing, why would I bother? I don’t care about any of the subjects you bring up and I really don’t care about your opinions. I can’t speak for anyone else here, but I’d be shocked if any of them gave a damn as well. Face it you just aren’t that interesting to us.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 12:57 PM
Thanks Puppet for showing everyone your 1 dimensional argument style. You are a credit to the Liberal cause.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 12:00 PM
Boo! Have you worked up the strength to leave the house today? Sooooooooooo scary!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 11:05 AM
Have you heard about the new Pew survey which found that Republicans are better informed, more intellectually consistent, more open-minded, more empathetic and more receptive to criticism than Democrats? Not that this is really breaking news!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 23, 2012
at 10:23 AM
The Who……..MSU ……????????69 I think………..after that…no in order…
Jethro Tull
J Guiles
ELP
crap…CRS kicking in……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 23, 2012
at 9:00 AM
Ik you are NOP. Thanks soo much for pulling the weight for us red staters! LOL LOL That is one of the only things I miss about living in a swing state. ;-( Oh well .. at least I can still work for down ticket candidates, GOTV, and fund raising! Always something to do, even if it isn’t canvassing.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 8:55 AM
Lori, here in Nevada, a swing state, we are in full campaign mode. Actually had canvasers out on Saturday.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 23, 2012
at 8:36 AM
OK one more link for tonight. I guess i must b likin me some KOS tonight! I LOL LOL over this one though. I have every single one of these FB friends! I may or may not be one or two of them myself! I bet you are too!
I hope ypou enjoy
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/22/1085276/-The-five-types-of-political-friends-on-Facebook
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 3:15 AM
Hello friends, I rarely play sir links a lot but I think my fellow election junkies will enjoy this one.
We all know this, but it’s good to be reminded before we go into the the season.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/22/1085260/-A-guide-to-reading-polls-and-preserving-your-sanity
Donna… can’t remember my first concert but I can certainly remember my favorite. Earth Wind and Fire circa 77-78 Pittsburgh civic arena, they called it the igloo. It had a retracable dome and EW&F came down through the open roof in these pod like things… Coolest thing I think I have ever seen! I was attending a near by university at the time. My college roomate and I walked to the concert from campus,,,, beautiful night 😉
Awwwww “Do You Remember The Twentyfirst Night of September”…..
….But right up there with that concert was seeing Diana Ross on broadway in the Wiz.. Excellent! That by far is my favorite broadway show..
I already think I know Delurkers… LOL LOL everone elses?
LikeLike
By: lori on April 23, 2012
at 1:11 AM
3 Dog Night was the first concert I ever went to.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 22, 2012
at 9:08 PM
Makes my point for me…
AND
LOL NOP
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 22, 2012
at 8:50 PM
Donna, fun question. My first concert was Jimmy Buffett. He’s a natural entertainer. I also enjoyed seeing Elton John & Billy Joel together in concert once.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 22, 2012
at 7:22 PM
I realize trolls hang around us, because they would like catch our optimism and we are all generous enough we would willing share it. It must be so frightening and limiting to be scared shit less of the future.
BOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 22, 2012
at 7:15 PM
not to make too fine a point of it, but take nore another liberal bothered to log in to talk just about me and make personal observations. Like I said..these guys have ONLY 1 way they do things. Very predictable.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 6:44 PM
“You matter to me about as much as the quiet passing of gas by one of the dogs.”
(((LOL)))
Donna, I think that if you are honest with yourself, you will realize the self deception in this.
The passing of gas by one of your dogs is exceedingly more important than the troll who shall not be named. Your dogs intestinal health can be indicated by his gas and could give you notice to be paying extra attention. The dogs health and welfare is important to you. The troll, probably not so much.
Not sure that it really matters whether he is Noah, but his MO as the not named troll, while reined in, reeks of the same stench.
There are a couple of reactions expected from the troll, neither of which make a difference. Remember, he comes in here and makes it all about him.
There are energy givers and energy takers. Would you care to guess which one I believe the troll to be.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on April 22, 2012
at 6:23 PM
Thanks for proving my point. You who put so much thought into who I am and how I live my life. The very fact you have given me so much consideration thought, and imaginings to what my life is tells everyone here the real truth, even if you cannot find the conviction to put it into print.
Nice thing about this free country that you are trying so hard to dismantle, is that I get to live the life that makes me happen, even if it doesn’t measure up to your standards. You will take note I have not made all the same conjectures you have about me, as I really do not care how you live your life. I only care what your flawed and infectious thinking, and your singular vote, could do to my country.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 3:18 PM
Sorry, Noah–I have a great job and wonderful family and friends. I have many interests. I occasionally post here but not often, because I have so much else going on. This is unlike you who, as you admitted to Matthew in a rare moment of self-awareness, have nothing but “empty time” on your hands.
Your attempts at being patronizing fall as flat as your posts. You simply have nothing of value to say. You matter to me about as much as the quiet passing of gas by one of the dogs. And you’ve never said one thing that exceeded the passing of gas in merit or interest or value.
To the extent you matter at all, it is as a sad example of how the most unsuccessful and unappealing and unaccomplished people can still manage to pretend that they have a voice if they have a keyboard and a monitor. So your resort to terms such as “kiddo” and “tiger” are nothing other than your typical self-inflation: and aren’t you just occasionally embarassed at how trite and lacking in originality you are? Or are you so limited that you don’t have any awareness of your own banality?
As for those of you who genuinely do matter, there is an amazing new post at Stonekettle. I think you’ll enjoy it.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 3:04 PM
Ohhh Pffer you are a stich! LOO LOL .. (gotta love ya)))
Hav e a great wekend all!
LikeLike
By: lori on April 22, 2012
at 2:59 PM
Thanks for always being you Donna. Nice to know I am so deep inside your head. I do hope your life gets better to the point I no longer matter so much to you. Keep your chin up kiddo.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 2:41 PM
Sorry, Pfesser: Your little pal isn’t interested in discussion. It’s either lecturing or self-aggrandizement, regardless of how either is received. With a sprinkling of projection (claiming that he doesn’t go after people personally while doing exactly that).
And Poolman, you are so right.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 2:32 PM
I found this on Yahoo. Had to share.
😆 I wonder what smoked hydra is like?
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 22, 2012
at 2:20 PM
Cynthia
I am very much against this type of discourse. It is exactly the tactic you ahd many others have used since I first starting reading this blog. No one I debate without in the real world of my political bent believes it is evennecessary as we know we have the moral high ground and logic on our side. I am dismaked if he really is advocating this.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 1:46 PM
Donna “of course, this “oh, let’s not get personal” meme ignores that he who spouts it is the one whose posts virtually all claim that those who aspire to a different philosophy are somehow deficient. Perhaps if he would stop posting insults, he might not get personal insults in return.
The difference being is I am generalizing, not calling anyone out unless they do so first to me then I just return what I get. But you already knew that didn’t you?
As to being deficient. It is not so much that as it is I think most here are deceptive and dishonest as to their true intentions for our country. Growing up with parents who were of Vietnam age and grand parents who were of the WWII era and in the war, I had grown up all my life with the notion all US citizens were patriotic and loved their country. Progressives such as we have on this blog woke up me to the reality that this is not the case.
I think some are ashamed of what we are. I think others want to hijack what we have and turn it into something other than what our founding fathers intended. Still others want to destroy us from within by turning us against each other at all levels. I consider you a destructive force and a real threat to our way of life. Fortunately for you I will never be in a position to deal with you all as I feel is necessary considering your intentions for our country.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 1:39 PM
Interesting observation today from http://juanitajean.com/
How Karl Rove is Attempting to Drive You Nuts
……..“TACTICS FOR EFFECTIVE CONSERVATIVE BLOGGING By Karl Rove
Engage Demand an elaborate, time-consuming comparison / analysis between your position and theirs. Entangle Insist that the Liberal put their posts in their own words. That will consume the most time and effort for the Liberal poster.
They will be unable to spread numerous points on numerous blogs if you have them occupied. Allowing a Liberal to post a web link is too quick and efficient for them. Tie them up. We are going for delay of game here. Demoralize Dismiss their narrative as rubbish immediately.
Do not even read it. Once the Liberal goes through the trouble to research, gather, collate, compose and write their narrative your job is to discredit it. Make it obvious you tossed their labor-intensive narrative aside like garbage. This will have the effect of demoralizing the Liberal poster.”……..
….“If you find yourself in a debate with a Liberal where you are losing a fact-based argument then call them a name to derail their diatribe. Remember your goal is to prevent a meaningful exchange of views and ideas which may portray Liberalism in a positive light.”…..
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 22, 2012
at 11:32 AM
McCoury is a seventy-something (!) year old, old-time country and bluegrass man. He’s a bit of a throwback to the “high, lonesome sound” of Bill Monroe, Flatt/Scruggs, et al.
Bonnaroo is a yearly music festival in Manchester, Tennessee. You can see anybody there: Dylan, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Dave Matthews, the Beach Boys, Big Freda. (I don’t know who that is; I just included her for fun.) My wife and her son went last year; she said the best was John Fogerty (of old Creedence) and Steve Martin (yes, the comedian – but his shtick was banjo) I have seen him play on YouTube; he is really, really good.
A couple years ago my wife went with her kids and a huge storm came through, collapsing her tent and drenching everybody. Great fun. (Yeah, right) LOL
My tastes are pretty eclectic; the only thing I can’t tolerate is Crap – er, I mean Rap. I am an amateur WWII historian and I keep forties big band on at my desk all day long, so there isn’t much I don’t like.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 10:27 AM
ok–let me admit ignorance. Who is Dell McCoury and what is Bonnaroo? thanks!
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 10:15 AM
Love Haggard’s music, largely because I know a little of his back story; he’s a very reaI kind of fellow. I saw him the other night on a Johnny Cash tribute. He was talking about Cash’s Folsom Prison concert and what a profoundly good effect it had on the inmates. Of course, HE had been an inmate, but not Cash. Haggard was in prison with a fellow who had been declared “incorrigible” but was quite famous for his writing? I think. They ended up executing the guy and Haggard said it had a real effect on him, since he had been referred to as incorrigible also and he realized they could execute ANYBODY. He decided to get his act together, and as a former inmate had great respect for Cash.
I loved Johnny Cash, although he couldn’t sing for beans. I really liked his real-life true story of how a good woman (June Carter) saved his life (drugs). Now THERE was an epic romance!
I saw Hartford in a high-school theatre in Morgantown, WV, many years ago. It was like watching the Pied Piper of Hamelin. Within a half-hour people were in all the aisles, dancing their arses off. We were all up and swinging, dancing in place, just having an absolute ball. I was so hoarse I couldn’t talk for a week. He had the audience in his palm the whole night. I’ll never forget it.
A large corporation has taken over my tiny hospital and made it clear that the doctors are to all be employees, underlings and resources – take it or leave it. I tried it for three months; I ain’t under nobody’s oppression, by God, so I Johnny Paycheck-ed their asses…(Take this job and shove it.) I hope to get my life back soon and start seeing some concerts, visiting old friends, drinking liquor, doing things with my sons and wife. I miss those days terribly. We’re going to start with DellFest shortly (Dell McCoury) and Bonnaroo after that. I can’t wait.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 10:06 AM
Best ever….Merle Haggard. No question about it.
LOVE John Hartford!! Huge talent.
And of course I remember Melanie. Never was a Carpenters fan but certainly can’t deny Karen’s talent.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 9:45 AM
Donna – our posts passed in the aether. I had already posted as soon as I saw your first.
And thanks for going onto something more pleasant.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 9:18 AM
Donna –
“Melanie.” Remember her?
Second was “The Carpenters.” They had the biggest sound system I have ever seen; after Karen hit the first note and filled a huge arena, I was in love with her for life.
Best ever? No question about it: John Hartford.
et tu?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 9:16 AM
Hey, Pfesser: you and I have had some great exchanges about music. First concert? I’m betting it was something cool.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 9:15 AM
“LOL LOL I don’t care enough about you to waste my time to dig through a year of arcives PF.”
Of course not. You just care enough to spread lies and then try to weasel out when someone challenges you for proof. That’s about what I figured: all hat; no cattle.
And BTW, It’s “archives.” (((LOL LOL LOL)))
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 9:12 AM
of course, this “oh, let’s not get personal” meme ignores that he who spouts it is the one whose posts virtually all claim that those who aspire to a different philosophy are somehow deficient. Perhaps if he would stop posting insults, he might not get personal insults in return. On the other hand, that appears to be what he wants so that he can continue insulting others. The day that this particular poster stops insulting others is the day I’ll assume he actually is interested in discussion.
Meanwhile, first concert you ever saw? Mine was Jimi Hendrix.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 22, 2012
at 9:09 AM
If you dont care enough to back up your own personal rants on someone, then dont care enough to have them in the first place. Its a reasonable request if you are going to make it personal, that you back up what you say.
As for being calm, I could not be more calm and less excited. This is all very predictable. Most of you have one clear method of discourse. You all dont give me anything to get worked up about.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 9:01 AM
As my Daddy always said a stuck pig squeals. LOL LOL I don’t care enough about you to waste my time to dig through a year of arcives PF. You would just deny them anyway.
And anon.. he use to call himself JIm, he would end his posts by signing his name.. I’m not outting anyone for heavens sake. For a while we had a Jim and a James. Geeeeze.
Calm down now. There is no need to go off the rails here. You are going to be the one needing high blood pressure meds if you let these little things get under your skin.. It’s just the internet PF.. relax. xo
and on we go..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 22, 2012
at 8:52 AM
I absolutely agree on that point PF. If the conversation could remain above the belt, and people did not need go after eachother personally, that would indeed be ideal. Unforunately that is not the case.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 8:06 AM
anon –
It is kind of nice to know whom you are corresponding with, but it is not critical, and it’s kind of fun to speculate as to whether someone is a re-tread of an old personality. I don’t think that speculations of you as Noah are correct, though; your writing styles are very different, to my eye.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 7:49 AM
In keeping with Liberal tradition, there has to be a victim and a villain. I think this is why these people are so obsessed with your identity “Jim”. You do not always think as they do and in order to vilify you they have to be able to accurately identify you. Libs are very one dimensional. If they cannot argue the facts, they attempt to discredit the person. Over and over again on here we see that is all they’ve got.
For no other reason that it aggravates them do I take little concern if I log in a name or not or which. I get a chuckle every time Donna or her kind think they are actually “outing” me, because I know I’ve gotten into their head.
Just do as I do. Every time someone makes comments about you of a personal nature, just say to yourself “I’ve won” because it is desperation talking from that point forward.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 22, 2012
at 6:41 AM
lori opined:
“LOL LOL Donna, you probs forgot Pf started as “Jim”.. then morphed ( a couple of times) into the spanker Pffer… No matter… we know enough “recent” history to form an opinion..”
“ohh and don’t forget about the georgio.. or gregieo (sp>?) stage..
What am I sayin.. Im sure yiu don’t..”
Again, you are misinformed.
1) My handle has always been PFesser; occasionally I sign more personal posts at the bottom as Jim, because that is my name. In interest of brevity, others have used PF – just like NOP, instead of noonespuppet – which is fine by me, and I occasionally use that. At the risk of being a little brusque, get your facts straight before you shoot off your mouth. The archives of this blog are readily available, but it takes a focused attention to search them.
2) So you are into spanking, huh? Actually, that’s good: these days *lots* of middle-aged women are experimenting with mild BDSM. “Fifty Shades of Grey” is #1 on the NYTimes bestseller list right now. Reviews refer to it as “mommy porn.” Perhaps it’s for you?
3) As to recent history, please enlighten us.
4) georgio, gregieo?…… WTF? Lori, if you need some ADD meds, I can hook you up with some good doctors who specialize in that…and for God’s sake, turn on the spell-checker and dig out your eighth grade grammar text to learn when “quotes” are appropriate. I’ll give you a leg up: they are “not” used for “emphasis.”
Now, about those cites? So far you haven’t done well with such challenges; perhaps today your luck will change. (((LOL LOL LOL)))
Cordially,
Jim
(That’s my name.)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 22, 2012
at 6:29 AM
Well, Lori: You may be right. But he’s certainly tried to be more constructive since then and does make interesting points. The contrast with Noah couldn’t be greater: never anything to offer, the constant b.s. and bids for attention. I’m good with Pfesser.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 21, 2012
at 6:02 PM
ohh and don’t forget about the georgio.. or gregieo (sp>?) stage..
What am I sayin.. Im sure yiu don’t.. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 21, 2012
at 4:14 PM
LOL LOL Donna, you probs forgot Pf started as “Jim”.. then morphed ( a couple of times) into the spanker Pffer… No matter… we know enough “recent” history to form an opinion..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 21, 2012
at 4:00 PM
Further proof we have no common ground with Democrats.
Pelosi: “we have a clear agenda to amend the first amendment in the Constitution”
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-amend-first-amendment
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 21, 2012
at 1:46 PM
Are you sure about this, “STRIKING Zimmerman was, however,” that SYG law seems to apply to just this kind of circumstance. How do you know, if Martin realized Zimmerman had or didn’t have a gun? And how would that make any difference? Anyway, the trial should be interesting and of course enlightening in so far as how the STG law is actually applied. But I do think a lot of factors contributed; such as the SYG law and perhaps poor lighting. The thing is though, the law won’t go to prison and neither will the street lighting, someone is dead and Mr. Zimmerman’s attorney has a tough job ahead of him defending his client. I hope in the meantime all the publicity and gossip die down so he can get a fair trial.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 21, 2012
at 10:36 AM
Good morning, all. Lori: Pfesser is correct about the history here. And about the fact that he and I have exchanged apologies. Disagree with him when you do (I sure will) but I believe you are referring to someone else. Have a good day, everyone. And Pfesser: Lori is someone who admits when she’s incorrect about someone. You’re both good peeps.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 21, 2012
at 10:21 AM
NOP –
Points well made. I, of course, live in VA now, and it is a bad, bad place to commit any crime with a gun, as you automatically get an additional ?6 yrs? on your sentence and there is no parole here. If you get ten years, you serve ten years.
Having said that, as we have all noted, we don’t know what happened, since one participant is dead – so lori’s declaration about the “stalker rushed him” is just so much supposition, as is the idea that Martin did, paraphrasing, “whatever he could do to save his life after being pursued by an armed Zimmerman.”
First of all, “armed” at that point is irrelevant to Martin’s reaction, since he did not know Zimmerman was armed.
By Z’s account, he did give chase after M started to run, but then lost M, who was a trained athlete – which Z was not – and started to walk back to his car only to be confronted by Martin, who apparently had doubled back around.
Zimmerman ‘way overstepped his bounds and should in no way ever have pursued Martin, no question about that, but what he did was NOT ILLEGAL. Nor was Martin’s confronting him. STRIKING Zimmerman was, however. Just trying to be fair here.
lori opined on another matter:
” I could have sworn when you stormed onto the screen calling poolman (and all others on this site) derogatory names and declaring your superior intellegence, you also announced you were a TPer.. Butttt, maybe I just assumed you were cause you acted like one.”
You are misinformed. The posts are still there. It is not my custom to name-call, although occasionally even I can get fed up. If you find a post where I “declare… .. superior intellegence,” or call anyone a derogatory name, please inform me and I wil apologise. (I have already apologized to Donna for my part in our unpleasantness, and she to me.) My guess is that you can not. I could be wrong. Have at it.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 21, 2012
at 9:55 AM
I feel sorry for them too NOP. But as we all try to teach our kids, we are where we are in life as a direct result from the choices we make. Had Zimmerman done what he was told to do, he would not be in shackles testifying at his own murder trial. And Trayvon’s parents would be taking pictures of him attending his senior prom this weekend, instead of visting his grave sight.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 21, 2012
at 9:42 AM
Lori is correct, the trajectory of gun shot, gun powder residue, bruising on the victim,etc will tell a compelling story. I am glad I’m not on that jury, I do feel sorry for both families, the Martins and the Zimmermans, put that enter the jury’s minds until afterwards. I know because, I was a juror on a murder trial, afterwards and only afterwards, we jurors discussed how simple it would have been for that tragedy to have been avoided. Same in this case, Zimmerman went way overboard when he pursued Martin through the neighborhood, and a horrible tragedy resulted.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 21, 2012
at 9:34 AM
The stand your ground law does not allow you to kill someone even if you didn’t throw the first blow.
I have to tell you, if someone was following my husband through our neighborhood he wouldn’t just wait to be attacked from behind. I know he would turn to his stalker and face him nose to nose. If at that time the stalker rushed my husband he wouldn’t just stand there and let him attack him, he would fight back pushing him to the ground. Possibly resulting in the back of stalkers head being hurt. If while on the ground the stalker pulled a gun and shot my husband, the result would be a shot at close range with an upward trajacetory.
Soooo nooooo, we still don’t know if it happened JUST as Zimmerman says.
Pf sorry to call you a Tea Person. And i mean that sincerely, I wouldn’t call my worst enemy that if it weren’t true. I could have sworn when you stormed onto the screen calling poolman (and all others on this site) derogatory names and declaring your superior intellegence, you also announced you were a TPer.. Butttt, maybe I just assumed you were cause you acted like one. 😉
It’s a beauuuutiful day in the great state of Texas.. I’m about to take advantage of it…
HAGD.. allll xo
LikeLike
By: lori on April 21, 2012
at 9:16 AM
PFesser, just for your information, we used to live in Virginia and my husband had a concealed weapon permit. Well to keep this simple, if you get out of the car with your weapon and an injury or death results in Virginia, you are automatically considered the aggressor and put on trial.
Now I don’t know what happened and won’t pretend to, but didn’t Mr. Martin have just as much right to “Stand His Ground” as Mr. Zimmerman? Consider that in the courtroom yesterday, it was established that Mr. Martin was 70 feet from his back door when he was shot, he got that close to safety, of course he would do whatever he could do to get inside to safety. If he, Mr. Martin, shoved Mr. Zimmerman, if he punched Mr. Zimmerman in the nose can you know a better reason for him shove, punch, claw him with his fingernails or… to try to save his, Martin’s, life after being pursued through the neighborhood by an armed Zimmerman? This PFesser is why we have trials. You aren’t doing Zimmerman any favors by putting out all kinds of different possibilities on Internet blogs. It is high time for you to consider your own bias. Try it, it is a growth experience, make a better person of you.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 21, 2012
at 9:15 AM
PFesser-
Before we do much of anything, I think we need to reconcile our own rather peculiar views with each other and as relates the country we want.
Since WWII we have given a lot of subsidies in the form of tax breaks to big business with some notion that would allow for development and jobs and all. Up until Congress and Pres Clinton “modernized” banking law we had some firewalls in place-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act
not enough , but some.
The so called “financial products” which the financial sector bought and traded in in the inflated housing boom , the starve-the-beast crap from the right , and the clueless aquiescence of the left for too long in some notion that we would all rise if the overall flow of money was good ( neoliberal economics with a social justice aspect) all figure into where we are now.
I don’t think amending the Constitution to get rid of the IRS and trading one entity for at least 51 more is a good start.
The revenue neutral thing is kind of a shell game as best as I can see but am still reading about it all.
None of it much matters though if we don’t get congress to spend the $$ more sensibly though… is just a shift in revenue stream generating function
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 21, 2012
at 9:09 AM
alaskapi –
Points well made. Like I said, I’m not married to any particular solution, but from what little I know about it, this is one of the better ones.
Of course, as you have pointed out, there are problems, but there will be problems with any system – as well as problems getting it up and running – but the bottom line for me is, will it be worth it? THIS system has problems too – and I believe far WORSE problems – including the fact that the wealthiest pay very little tax, relatively speaking.
As for the cost of the “prebate,” that has been figured in. Net-net the program is touted as being revenue-neutral. Who knows how it would really work, though…
It seems to me that it would be worth the change, and worth working out the problems. What we are doing now is SO wasteful.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 21, 2012
at 7:40 AM
PFesser- here’s a piece of my concern- note the eventual conclusion ( by proponents as well as detractors) that middle class Americans would pay more under the program.
http://www.factcheck.org/taxes/unspinning_the_fairtax.html
also- note
1-that many so-called products that are not taxable under most current schemes like rent and all would be taxable. As this tax proposes to do away with payroll taxes , this becomes an interesting problem with how programs like Social Security are funded and managed, amongst other problems.
2- note the Fed govt paying taxes on its own purchases… costs us all more.
3- NOT noted by most pie-in-the-sky economist types on either side ( or in between) is that this set of taxes would be collected at the “street” level and remitted to the federal govt under a scheme which would put sellers on the front line for tax collection.
This should concern Americans , as citizens and consumers. It’s all well and good and proper to despise the IRS but it is an entity dedicated to collection of taxes in our name, our collective name. Trading that for a vast network of collectors under a scheme designed to get rid of the IRS , with a rather amorphous set of entities overseeing the collectors (state income tax boards mostly) is a whole new world of rules and regs- no matter what the economists say.
Here in Alaska we don’t pay state income tax but in a home rule borough like mine we have more taxing authority than most places. We charge ourselves property tax and sales tax and it all stays in the community. The state legislature has authority to limit some things we can do but not much compared to Outside . We already pay sales tax on services, including labor, some government services, food and so on. There are some real problems associated with managing it and quite frankly some real problems with what it does to costs for young families ( we have a number of exemptions for seniors like 50% off property taxes and no sales tax) and what it costs local businesses to manage their collection and remmitance to the borough.
The prebate program the Fair Tax proposes comes with a hefty price tag no matter whose numbers you use and creates yet another area needing regs and oversight.
Anyway- those are some of the issues I have with the Fair Tax- which I just do not see as fair to everyday people or small business.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 21, 2012
at 7:30 AM
mageen –
Here is the photo.
Note this is ABC News, not Fox.
Anon-
You express your POV very well, and for the most part I agree. I do have a problem with the idea that the Republicans always want smaller govt and less influence on people’s lives; they certainly have not been behaving that way recently, IMHO. Their meddling in people’s personal lives is the reason I became a Libertarian about twenty years ago. (Not a Tea Party member, lori. ((LOL LOL)))
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 21, 2012
at 6:47 AM
Have questions about the photo of Zimmerman’s head with “blood”. Where was the blood when he arrived at the precinct? Re: blood loss – he was walking normally in the video. Also, does the Sanford police department have any forensic people who might have discovered blood on the sidewalk where all this allegedly happened.
This probably won’t do GZ much good inasmuch as he was told not to follow the kid, but he did and his own actions got him into this mess. He really should have stayed in his vehicle. Even a fish wouldn’t get caught if he kept his mouth shut.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 21, 2012
at 6:16 AM
I don’t know what happened to my post; it may float in later.
In any event, alaskapi:
Fair Tax. I don’t know much about it except that it was crafted by a group of businessmen and economists who thought it was the most efficient way to collect taxes, eliminating 200,000 IRS positions and literally billions of dollars of cost in tax collection. It also spreads the tax burden more fairly across the taxpayers, including the wealthy, and relieving the burden on the middle class, according to what I can glean.
NOP – did you see the ABC News photo of George Zimmerman’s head, streaming blood? It looks like things happened just like he said. Reports are also that Martin had gunpowder burns, indicating a very close shot, and a bullet-track that indicates he was shot from below – as would be expected if he were sitting astride Zimmerman. Remember the Duke Lacrosse case, where the players were tried and convicted in the press? It was all a fabrication, remember? I think we need to get a collar around this media before they cause someone to get lynched.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 21, 2012
at 5:22 AM
Romney is too close to the Koch Brothers for my liking.
Missing you Helen and Margaret. I hope all is well with you and yours.
LikeLike
By: shashm on April 20, 2012
at 8:10 PM
Ive been looking at the issues we face as we enter into the election season proper. The more I look at it the more I have concluded that things have really changed. Changed in such a way that we really have no more common ground.
Obama and the Progressive movement has taken the Democrat party way left of where it used to be. Progressives by definition are Communists. They may have changed the flavor and toned down their rhetoric but their end goals are the same. Progressives very much want government controlled capitalism, much in the way China has. Progressives want the government to take control most every aspect of our lives to achieve “fairness” in all things. Something they feel only government can do.
The Progressive party, should they continue on, will fundamentally change who we are as a nation. We have seen our government give itself the power to arrest its citizens at will without representation. We have seen our government give itself the ability to force commerce on its people. We have seen our government take control and ownership of companies. We have seen our government decide who stays in business and who goes under.
By contrast Republicans for the most part want limited government involvement in all things. They want deregulation and for government to get out of the way of business and let them do what they are good at,namely making money and thus revitalizing our economy and solving the unemployment issues.
These two points of view are mutually exclusive. One philosophy takes us north on the path our country has been on for generations. The other takes us in the opposite direction on a path I feel our founders never intended. To compromise, when one has a choice of north or south, left or right, there is no going half way. There is no common ground or compromise. Neither side can tolerate what the other side wants without defeating their own cause.
Neither side will give us campaign finance reform. Neither side will give us a simplified tax code. Neither side with give us meaningful education reform. So both sides have significant issues. Fundamentally it comes down to damage control. Who will do the least damage in the next 4 years? Who can we count on to hold true to the cherished traditions and beliefs that this nation was founded on?
For me that answer is the Republican party. Progressive thinking is founded on changing the statues-quo. I know the system isn’t perfect, but it is in my opinion the best out there in the world. We should never be so closed minded that we no longer entertain the idea of change, but that change should be measured and gradual. Progressives and their ilk are to radical and to impatient for gradual change. They are a complete departure from what we are as a nation.
As long as we have sects in our nation that believe we need to leave the founding principles that made us who we are, we should no longer expect the two parties to work together. I will not support a candidate who gives me even the slightest notion of compromise. For this reason I am actually considering voting for Obama.
Romney is too close to Obama for my liking. If we vote Obama out, the Progressives willl go on and on about how they were not given enough time to effect real change, and this in my opinion will give them good cause to return. However, if we hunker down and let them have another 4 years to let everyone see the folly of this path, we may put a final end to this. While it will make our recovery very much more difficult, I think we will never again have to travel down the road to Communism/Socialism ever again.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 20, 2012
at 2:30 PM
I was wrong about the length of the hearing, Zimmerman’s lawyer was able to elicit some of the prosecution’s evidence against Zimmerman, but probably not as much as he would have liked. Anyway the defense prevailed and bail was set.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 20, 2012
at 9:36 AM
I am listening to Zimmerman’s bail hearing this morning, it appears that the hearing will last most of the day.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 20, 2012
at 8:18 AM
someone else posted about sarcasm…or was it hyperbole……..
and Obama did talk about “belt tightening” and not wasting money in Vegas…
get over it Mageen
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 19, 2012
at 11:16 AM
Looks like I need to stand up for Vegas, I love living here. Good weather, bargains everywhere (including freebies), and it is the entertainment capitol of the world. For the life of me, I cannot understand how GSA employees blew through so much money, they didn’t gamble or drink; seems they overpaid for cheap souvenirs and so so food. Wonder if the planners of that particular shindig got a kickback on all this crap they blew so much money on? That might be the burning question that needs to be asked.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 19, 2012
at 10:08 AM
yes no Lib can be directly blamed. They cannot stand alone and be held accountable for their individual actions. If one is found, then distract with a look at the “big picture” that way this person can be the victim of his environment and thus cannot be held accountable.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 19, 2012
at 6:33 AM
Vegas is the absolute last place I would ever want to be! Frankly it is just sad that a state has to look upon gambling as an economic engine. As for Harry, his folks elected him to look out for the state. For that matter so does the local Chamber of Commerce, Board of Tourism, etc. etc. If you really want to spread it around, UAW, include them in your rant.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 19, 2012
at 5:12 AM
OH GREAT….
Harry Reid caught on camera encouraging trips to Vegas……Think GSA…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 18, 2012
at 8:01 PM
I agree….
R.I.P. Dick Clark
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 18, 2012
at 7:47 PM
Damn….
Romney puts one on his roof in a kennel and Obama eats one(that’s dog people…. )!!!!!!!…..and I thought I was doing good with tibbar(rabbit backwards), coon, muskrat,deer.and caribou…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 18, 2012
at 7:45 PM
R.I.P. Dick Clark
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 18, 2012
at 2:01 PM
Misconceptions and Realities About Who Pays Taxes
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3505
LikeLike
By: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on April 18, 2012
at 9:29 AM
lori-
Sorry- didn’t respond.Spring means real life speeds up and gets very intense as daylight lengthens here – so much to do in a short time 🙂
I think as long as the multiple challenges to publically funded elections along the order of Citizens United and buckley v Valeo stand, we will have to work on all the other fronts,
PFesser- the more I look at the stalled Fair Tax proposals the more I’m convinced it’s a shell game on multiple fronts and peculiarly non fair when it comes to how it would be managed .We love to hate the IRS and our tax law is a mess but think the FT is not the answer.
UAW-
something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately is that “bias” in the media (and elsewhere) is too easy an answer to too many questions we have amongst ourselves and across the country. The notion that bias is bad in and of itself ignores that we are all biased yet we accept our own worldviews as sufficient to the task of explaining what is going on around us to ourselves. There’s something basically self-cannibalizing about that…
Dear Helen and Margaret-
We are having great fun yakking away here but sure would like to hear what’s on your minds these days 🙂
Thanks for having us all in.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 18, 2012
at 8:10 AM
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 18, 2012
at 6:29 AM
when i say I walked into the room.. I mean the room I go to with my dogs so they don;t get into her way…
anyway.. true story a couple weeks later she brings me this evaluation she wants me to fill out so she can get a job with a local company.
When I got to the question of her honesty, I said wellllll I can honestly say she brings back the things she steals if you ask her too! LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 9:37 PM
well the proof was when I walked into the room my TV was playing when I walked out it wasn’t. When I went to turn it on my cord was gone! Lmaooo.. She and I were the only ones in the house..
I text her and told her to bring back my cord! LOL LOL she did… all is forgotten..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 9:31 PM
LMAO…..
got pictures/proof……..
serious accusations there Lori…….
YES,,,who does that???????
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 17, 2012
at 9:23 PM
LOL LOL yes she is legal UAW…she stole my cable cord though.. Who does that? LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 8:21 PM
and to find out that Lori is part of the 1%ers……
“Butttttttttt just because I’m in a good mood today and am stuck in the room with my dogs while the housekeep finishes up her work I will indulge you just this once with a bit ”
Is she legal?
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 17, 2012
at 5:17 PM
Another “Mission Accomplished” moment?
http://www.talkingproud.us/IraqWithdrawal/IraqWithdrawal.html
Why would the GOP oppose it? Seems it will be a privatization success story and they like those.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 17, 2012
at 3:36 PM
Anyone earning approximately $114K – $380K/year + paid 70% of the collected Federal Income Tax. HALF of America paid NO Federal Income taxes AT ALL.
So we already know this grouping feels that even this is till not fair. What do you then consider to be fair?
Of the half that paid nothing in, many still got money back, thus actually showing a profit. Profit being defined as putting nothing in and getting something from it. So half pay nothing, and we want to expand social services more. Half make no contribution to the system and of that half 95% take from it. Any part of this sound sustainable, let alone expanding it being possible? Could anyone show me with this mentality how we are not heading down the road of Italy, Greece, Ireland, and others?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 3:02 PM
Sorry that should read golf game
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 12:26 PM
lori, some of us believe in finishing a job. We went into those countries, right or wrong we have a responsibility to finish what we started. I saying this knowing how repulsed you are by the word responsibility.
Some of us remember our history, in regards to Iran. Some of us see the logic in not letting them acquire nuclear weapons.I am sorry you do not possess the foresight to understand this.
Just so we remain true to the facts. Bush bombed Iraq and Afghanistan during his presidency. Obama bombed Irag, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya during his term so far. He still has time to get 1 or 2 more in.
Obama has managed to take several strokes off his gold game though…so there is that.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 12:07 PM
Im sorry lori could you quote where you listed your response to Obama empowering the government to arrest its citizens for not buying their product? I looked up top and could not find 10 responses to this so I guess that makes you a liar.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 11:54 AM
Will there ever be another original post by Helen? What does everyone think?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 17, 2012
at 10:51 AM
Iraq war ended Dec 15 2011. Check
The United States is scheduled to pull out 33,000 troops from Kubal by the end of 2012. Check
Something the republicans are against BTW.. not only do the Republicans want to stay in Afghanistan they want to INCREASE forces ANDDDD enter iran and Syria..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 9:17 AM
anon.. all that stuff u said up ^^^^^^ has been addressed at least 10 times wayyy up ^^^^^^^.
Back to Obama’s accomplishments.
Lets talk about banking reform, since that has been mentioned today..
1) Signed a sweeping bank-reform bill (the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act)into law
2) Managed the $700 Billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) that Banks have repaid more than 100% of TARP funds ($251 of the $245 banks owed) as of March 2011 exceeding the original investment by $6 billion.
3) Cuts Salaries of 65 Bailout Executives
4) Closed offshore tax safe havens, tax credit loopholes on companies that use the tax laws to ship American Jobs oversees. HR 4213.
5) Signed into law the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act to fight fraud in the use of TARP and recovery funds, and to increase accountability for corporate and mortgage frauds.
6) Signed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act
Obama has done more to reform banking than ANY other President ever….
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 9:07 AM
Lori, I stand corrected. It was Hillary that voted for it. And since it was lies that were presented to the congress, I suppose she could not be held accountable then. But Ron Paul voted against it.
Let’s review his prophetic “lunacy”…
Obama said he was going to end those and bring troops home right away, a campaign promise made over and over again. What happened?
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 17, 2012
at 9:02 AM
Hard to imagine lori supporting our government forcing us to buy a product and jailing us if we do not comply. Hard to imagine lori trusting this administration when they have already shown how irresponsibly they are with our tax dollars. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/16/gsa-las-vegas-conference_n_1429899.html?ncid=webmail10 The do as I say not as I do party like Warren Buffett who is being sued by the federal government for more than $1 billion in unpaid taxes, interest and penalties. The same person who thinks the rich should pay more.
Thanks lori for showing us that, like Mr. Buffett, the standards you hold are for everyone else, but not yourself. You may submit your excuses now, or stick your head in the sand.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 8:57 AM
me thinks your vison from the “center” isn’t as clear from the center as you may think.. Check your glasses.. jussssssssssss sayin. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 8:51 AM
Poolman my love.. Obama was sworn in as a US Senator on Jan 2005. The joint resolution vote for the Iraq war was taken on Oct 11 2002.
Kinda tough to vote on soemthing 3 years before you are sworn in. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 8:44 AM
I noticed the person demanding answers from others does not set the same standard for herself.
You say it will pay for itself in a few years. In this part of the country a few is about 3 or so years. You have any documentation that can back this up?
Doesnt matter what party’s policies we are talking about, when interest payments on debt reach $1 trillion, a doom and gloom conversation is necessary.
So your defense of this bill is that since the Republicans supposedly didnt care about the budget way back when you do not need to care about it now? Really? Thats the best you got?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 8:29 AM
Well, yes. We ALL have opinions. But I don’t see the left as any better (or much different) than the right. When there WAS a window of solid democratic majority and good things COULD have been done, they weren’t.
Both parties are run by special interests and are corrupt.
Did it matter when the Republican White house thrust us into a senseless war that costs us to date 3.7 TRILLION dollars… and climbing?
Yes. And Obama voted FOR them. Ron Paul did not. Loon behavior, right?
Republicans HAVE wasted money on wars. And this administration has continued that trend and even kicked in overdrive.
Vision is much clearer from the center.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 17, 2012
at 8:27 AM
It amuses me this whole the.. country is dying… we are destroying our country… Mayan doomsday state of mind… only occurs when we talk about Democratic policies. Policies, I might add, that will pay for themselves in a few years and in the mean time help million and milllions of Americans.
Those aurgements might be more credible if there was even a wordddddd uttered about the money Republicans have/are wasting on wars and tax cuts for the rich.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 7:22 AM
Did it matter when the Republican White house thrust us into a senseless war that costs us to date 3.7 TRILLION dollars… and climbing?
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 6:50 AM
Does it matter that it gives our government the power to force us to buy a product and fine/jail us for non complaienace.?
Does it matter that Obama was billions and billions and billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars off on how much this is going to cost us? I know some feel it will save money at some distant point in the future and thats all good and well but we have to live through the costs now.
Does it matter that we will be pushed furthest into debt than we have ever been as a nation with no possibility of ever getting out of that debt as our interest payments will be over $1 trillion by 2018?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 17, 2012
at 6:27 AM
Our family has been touched by that beast too Mageen, 3xs.. as sooooo many others have. At least now, thanks to Obama and the democratic House and Senate, people battling the disease don’t have to worry about having the insurance company dropping them from coverage, or being denied coverage because of a pre exisiting.
Continued good thoughts going your way. xoxoxoxo
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 6:23 AM
Lori, good stuff and appreciated even more as we as a family go through the experience of cancer.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 17, 2012
at 6:08 AM
Ron Paul is a loon in my opinion…… insignificant, not relevant , a joke. You have a different opinion.. okie dokieee..lol There were a lot of people that thought Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman were the next great white hope on the horizon tooooo… every lock has a key. LOL LOL Have at it Poolman.
Back to Obama’s accomplishments…
Let’s start with health care reform.
Not sure how anyone can say it’s worse now than it was before? Maybe those who think that way should talk to the millions, and millions of people this bill has (or soon will ) allowed access to avoidable healthcare. Something they did not have before.
Here is some talking points for ya.. and BTW talking points aren’t necessarily a bad thing. Especially when I give them.. LOL LOL
Have a fun day all.
1) Coverage can’t be denied to children with pre-existing conditions.
2) Adults up to age 26 can stay on their parents’ health plans.
3) Free preventive care.
4) Rescinding coverage is now illegal.
5) Eliminating lifetime limits on insurance coverage.
6) Restricting annual limits on insurance coverage.
7) More options to appeal coverage decisions.
8) $5 billion in immediate federal support to affordable Coverage for the Uninsured with Pre-existing Conditions.
9) $10 billion investment in Community Health Centers.
10) Create immediate access to re-insurance for employer health plans providing coverage for early retirees.
11) Made an $80 billion deal with the pharmaceutical industry to contribute to cut prescription drug costs for the nation’s seniors reduce the size of the “donut hole” in the Medicare (Part D) Drug Benefit.
12) Provides a $250 rebate to 750,000 Medicare Beneficiaries who reach the Part D coverage gap in 2010. As of March 22, 2011, 3.8 million beneficiaries had received a $250 check to close the coverage gap, according to an HHS report.
13) Businesses with fewer than 50 employees will get tax credits covering up to
>35% of employee premiums effective 2011 and a 50% tax credit effective 2013. 14) Creates a state option to provide Medicaid coverage to childless adults with incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level. By 2014, States are required to provide this coverage.
15) Provides a 10% Medicare bonus payment for primary care services and also a 10% Medicare bonus payment to general surgeons practicing in health professional shortage areas.
16) Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) requires that insurance companies spend at least 80 to 85 percent of the proportion of the premium dollars on clinical services. As an example, WellPoint’s Anthem Blue Cross unit in California has reduced its proposed rate increase.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 17, 2012
at 5:51 AM
And he is Black. Is that not true?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 16, 2012
at 9:21 PM
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 16, 2012
at 7:46 PM
Gun sales have climbed for the past decade, faster after Obama was elected. He really has done nothing to suppress gun ownership or the second amendment, despite the rhetoric from the right.
I think it is primarily that the media has stoked the public’s fear.
As to violations of freedoms in a bill, I just don’t think Obama can do much, yet he gets blamed for all of it. But he has turned those tables on his political opponents a few times.
But it must be determined if he is just a.) a “normal” politician, b.) a serial liar, or c.) a figurehead with no real power. My best guess is a combination of a and c.
A second term would give him more freedom to push his agenda, as he eluded to Medvedev. If I was a gambling man, I’d say with today’s odds, he will get the chance to prove it.
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 16, 2012
at 7:37 PM
Can we back up a second? Why are perceived violations of freedoms in a bill with bipartisan approval that were in place for only as long as it took to undo them (while keeping our military and vets paid) a bigger ding against Obama than ALL the real freedoms we gave up under Bush that Bush (and now Obama) didn’t undo? Sorry, I know that was horrible grammar but I hope you smart people can see what I expressed so poorly.
While we’re at it, why is the NRA nastily campaigning against a President who hasn’t done a thing to expand gun control? In fact, several states (not a reflection of Obama, of course) have EXPANDED gun rights? They’ve had it really easy, much to my chagrin.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 16, 2012
at 7:15 PM
Okay, back into the fray…
Just because they are Ron Paul’s GOALS, why are they dismissed as merely talking points? How can you dismiss him as a loon? I think he is the ONLY candidate with a solid plan that he has enumerated and articulated. He has also been CONSISTENT in his message for decades. That means he’s not a flip-flopper. And his voting record is proof of his convictions. That means he’s not a liar. He is also an MD and a military veteran. I’d say his resume holds more weight than ALL the others.
We’ve had our share of lawyers and businessmen. Time for a physician. This country is SICK and dying on the vine. And you want more benefits?
RP proposes cutting the deficit by a TRILLION dollars the first year.
Unfortunately Obama’s answer is to let Bernanke print more fiat money, putting us further in the hole. Bailing out banks and huge corporations has not helped the common man. It has put him deeper in debt. Now we are using the Fed to bail out the euro, at our expense. Why are you fond of the Fed?
Obama’s “talking points” ended up be falsehoods.
Shut Guantanamo. NOT
Repeal the Patriot Act. NOT
Health care reform. NOT (it’s actually worse)
End these illegal foreign wars. NOT (we’ve started more)
I can go on. We are doing NATO’s dirty work and promoting genocide.
Can we admit any of this and really face reality? Or are we just going to keep spinning it?
Really, RP is the only one that COULD beat Obama IF he was the GOP nominee. At this point it seems he will not. And the reason is not because he is crazy (as you keep stating), but because the banksters are in control of the game and Romney is their current crony. And yes, we have plenty of time between now and November. Many things can change between now and then.
Even Obama is NOT the banksters choice, anymore, though he has done MUCH to improve their bottom line and further empower them. He sure did owe them plenty for putting him where they did. We’re suffering for it.
Goldman Sachs is calling the shots, or haven’t you been paying attention?
LikeLike
By: poolman on April 16, 2012
at 6:09 PM
At least you have Donna here to tell when its ok to talk or not. There is that.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 5:15 PM
Been in trial. Just finished last week. Hope you are well! Missed you too–xxo
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 16, 2012
at 5:03 PM
Waving to Donna! Didn’t see you there.. How u been? What have u been up too? I have missed you. xo
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 4:51 PM
WElllll anon… I guess I’ll have to deal with the fact that you think I am lacking in character. I’m not sure I’ll be able to go on in life.. But I’ll give it my best shot and carry on like a good lil girl.
But I still have to say I don’t understand how eliminating the EPA is going to solve the problem of Obama having to sign a massive bill even t hough he disagrees with a portion of it JUST SO our vets can get a paycheck. Or how the Tea Party movement made that better? OR How Ron Paul talking points will solve a damn thing? I THOUGHT that was where this discussion starts. 😉 silly me…
Nor do I see how the TEA Party movement made anything better when it stormed the house.. in fact it’s worse..
anyway Im done for the day,.. a new CNN poll has Obama up 52 – 43… It won’t stay there.. Obama typicaly has bad summers.. But for today I’ll take it… Life is good.
love yinzs all 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 4:37 PM
Lori, dear: Please don’t even attempt to respond to Noah in his latest incarnation.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 16, 2012
at 4:29 PM
sorry wireless keyboard not keeping up.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 4:15 PM
lori excuses are a time a dozen, you dont comment because you have no ground to stand on. Not an insult but the truth. Your character is the only thing preventing you from admitting it. Common sense is funny that way.
FYI, when your only defense is that it is a talking point, what you should just say is either (A) I really no nothing about the topic so I chose not to comment or (B) your logic is undeniable and I do not have it in my to admit I am wrong or cannot come up with an adequate defense.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 4:14 PM
and PF, as far as your Ron Paul talking points? those have all been discussed at nauseam on this blog. Just about everyone on this board chimed on on the 100000 of Ron Paul discussions. Pi took the time to go through every single on of your/Paul’s talking point and tell you what she like or didn’t like about each of them. We all did, you just didn’t like what we said.
I don’t like Paul, he is a hard core conservative POLITICIAN dressed up in a clown suit. IMHO.. Apparently 90 percent of his own party agrees with me.
You have a different opinion of RP.. so be it..
But I didn’t think this discussion was about Ron Paul or Tea Party talking points. I thought it was about how to get things done?
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 3:43 PM
PF, we live in the day and age of texting and twitter. I don’t really like spending time spelling every little thing out when a few words will do….. and I am not going to spend hours bloviating about my personal political resume within the democratic party just to appeal to your idea of intellectual discussions on a silly blog!
LOL LOL
Butttttttttt just because I’m in a good mood today and am stuck in the room with my dogs while the housekeep finishes up her work I will indulge you just this once with a bit
….Women’s rights.. When Stupka threatened to vote against the healthcare reform bill because of a trumped up abortion issue I worked within my party to primary him and immediately began work to find someone to replace him, even though he represented a very conservative part of Michigan. In the end he decided not to seek reelection so obviously there was no need to primary him.. but the work had begun.
Much the same for CFR. I have been working for years, through local and state wide party officials to make CFR a litmus test for all incoming candidates.
We are currently fighting to get marriage equality added to the platform.
There.. don’t say i never did anything for ya. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 2:56 PM
and anon, I’m sorry but I’m not going to spend much time addressing your foolishness.
But I will say this….You are a great advocate for your particular movement.
However your movement died on the vine after it got to the HIll. I will give you it clever way to disguise the right wingnuts. It fooled a lot of people. But it didn’t take long before the “people” that put them there turned on them.. again anon… 20 percent approval rating for congress and I think the TP movement polls lower than the two parties now. ( That is from memory.. it hasn’t been polled in a while, that I have seen)
Now it is fighting just a spot at the table at the convention! Hell even Paul, who polled somewhere around 10 percent will get the attention of a few.. They might even let him speak!
You had a chance.. and you blew it.. because at the end of the day a movement needs to be FOR something.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 2:35 PM
No platitudes, homilies, mom-and-apple pie that we are all in favor of. No credit for vague, incomplete, poorly thought-out, sophomoric answers. You wanted to play with the big dogs, now PLAY. Show us what you have, little girl.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:33 PM
“campaign finace reform, womens rights, gay rights to name a few..”
NO CREDIT FOR PARTIAL ANSWERS. BE SPECIFIC.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:30 PM
Anon – thanks for getting me started. We should have some fun. You write well.
The Fesser’s spanking new policies:
1) Pass the (28?th) amendment. Congress shall make no laws that apply to the people that do not equally apply to Congress/and vice-versa.
2) Term Limits. To address the “Not enough time” people, make it 8 years for Senators, 4 years for Congress, 6 years for President. No consecutive re-election, but can run again after sitting out one term.
3) Flat tax, Fair Fax, tax tables – your choice. Eliminates the IRS and 200,000 IRS jobs, while being revenue-neutral.
4) Close 600 of our ~750 military bases.
5) Go back to the Bretton Woods agreement in order to stabilize the dollar, which has lost 95% of its value since Nixon took us off in 1971. You may have to read about that, Lori, or get someone to explain it to you.
6) Eliminate Department of Education, which has provided NO progress in student education since its inception. Ditto Department of Energy. Ditto EPA.
7) Eliminate the FED. You will need to get someone to explain the ramifications of that one, too…although I think there is a cartoon online that might be at your level. Here you go…
That will do for the first day. We can do more the next…
Your turn. Don’t puss out on me; the ball is in your court.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:29 PM
campaign finace reform, womens rights, gay rights to name a few..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 2:17 PM
“I’ll keep working for my party rasing money and trying to influence change on policies and platform with grass root organizations.”
And what, pray tell, ARE those changes? Be specific. No credit given for partial answers.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:15 PM
lori I want to take a moment here and bask int he utter hypocrisy of your statement. I seem to remember or year or more back when I was asking you and yours to provide answers and you were mute. Dont ask of others what you are incapable of yourself.
lori how about common sense. Tell your welfare party to pay its F*cking bills, Understand that you cannot tax your way into prosperity. Understand that people, not the government, is our greatest asset. Understand that people having the means to provide for themselves is the American Dream, not government programs.
The Tea Party did not fail. It accomplished things that no other organization in the history of this country ever has. I would go so far as to say it was the most successful movement in our history in terms of actual goals accomplished. You might not like what it did, but they were done with amazing success.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 2:13 PM
And there you have it folks. The typical snarky, nasty, Tea Partier response when asked for an idea or solution. Precisely the reason their movement has failed. Exactly the reason the “new” congress is at a 20 percent approval rating. Exactly why we can’t even pass a bill that will pay our service people! Look no farther.
A whole lottta bitchin but no answers, solutions or willingness to roll up their sleeves and discuss matters in a polite and “gentlemanly” way.
That’s OK PF, keep bitchin, keep writing words words words words about our fore fathers, keep snarking away.
I will keep fighting for change from the bottom up, I will keep talking to people who not only want a difference but are willing to offer ideas as to how to make a difference. I’ll keep working for my party rasing money and trying to influence change on policies and platform with grass root organizations.
You just keep a bitchin..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 1:57 PM
Well spoken, anon. One of my favorite quotes is by Louis Brandeis:
The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.
I think you would have to say that the Congressmen and Senators who passed this bill were definitely both. The President who signed it – the celebrated, brilliant, Constitutional Professor – knows better.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 12:43 PM
Someone sounds depressed. And someone else is always angry, pity.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 16, 2012
at 12:31 PM
thats the problem with incomplete thoughts, no one but you knows really what you are talking about, but then again, maybe thats intentional.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 12:00 PM
whewwww thought I might on on the wrong track there.. but after reading above.. I know I’m OK.. 😉 Thanks anon..
and on we go….
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 11:51 AM
Could not agree more PFesser. To bad so many feel like lori and consider them lofty goals not worthy of the effort because it is difficult, thus not an option worth considering.
The problem with this security act and the provision to detain US Citizens is that it should never have been allowed to even appear on the books for any period of time. It is something that should never have been considered let alone to be the law of the land for even a second. Change happens imcrementally. Freedom is taken from us one tiny step at a time. Just having this in existance no matter for how long takes us 1 step further down that road.
As for Obama, short of high treason, and even then I am skeptical, there is no possible way that people like can be found here would ever consider not voting for him. In their mind, no deed he could do would make a non-democrat an option. Morals, ideals, none of this even matters at the end of the day if choosing someone else isnt even on the table for consideration.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 16, 2012
at 11:41 AM
Those are lofty goals PF..Translate it into reality and I’m with you.
All of us here can tell you whats wrong….. let’s hear some real solutions.. I’m listening.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 16, 2012
at 11:19 AM
re: “right in theory”
You do not compromise principle. If you believe in something, then you act on it; you do *not* say, “Well, I know what we are doing is wrong, but the ends justify the means.” Think where we would be if our forbears had said, “Well, you are right in principle, but fighting the British is SUCH a bother, and we *have to get bigger things done.*
It is precisely because we have compromised principle and said, well you are right in *theory* but we have to get things done, that has brought us to where we are today. A few freedoms here, a liberty or two there, a right given up, an evil tolerated – pretty soon you won’t have anything left of your country that is *worth* saving.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:49 AM
alaskapi –
“My Reps don’t see any problem with having passed this on to the Pres and the votes here appear to be veto proof. We need to be after ALL of em. All.”
I think you have hit on it exactly. People all say, “Throw the scoundrels out!” – but they love *their* scoundrels, so they vote their own reps back into office.
However, you CANNOT vote for *anyone* except your own scoundrel, so if you vote *him* back in, they *all* stay in office. What needs to happen is that you vote your own representatives out – then maybe something will change.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 16, 2012
at 2:37 AM
UAW, what’s your problem, you learned something you didn’t previously know, it happens, get over it!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 15, 2012
at 10:07 AM
Well again Pi I agree those are all things we need to look at and it certainly would be nice IF, and that’s a big IF we could make them better. HOPEFULLY one day we can.
however… LOL
I don’t have to tell you how much money is spent by the RNC and DNC every year to try and understand how to get people to the polls OR in the case of the RNC how to keep people OUT. Well at least everyone that isn’t white and old. 😉
And of course YES the voter should become more informed. Again, I don’t have to tell you how much money is spent on “informing” the voter.
Howeverrrrr, I think we just have to face the fact that today… now… the “voter” is as informed as it’s gonna get. The more optiosn avaliable to the voter for gaining knowledge is greater than it has been ever in the history of this country, but it seems we have less informed voters..
As we continue to understand this “new” world in which we live repeating the same old tired mantra of “people just need to vote” or people need to be more informed” just isn’t the answer..
Who was it that said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different result?
LikeLike
By: lori on April 15, 2012
at 9:09 AM
lori-
I think it has to be a multi pronged set of changes.
Publically funded elections top the list for national elections.
How far down the chain should that go? State too?
Figuring out why people do not vote matters a great deal as well
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html
Education level, gender, age all seem to matter . The concerns that folks lack transport to polls, time off work, etc have resulted in a lot of changes which allow early and/or by mail voting but these things do not account for enough of the absent in the voting booth.
Paying attention to what Congress is doing is very important, not what the talking heads or party pros say it is doing but reading the bills, following the (mostly boring) track of said bills through committee and on the floor and so on.
The latter is not nearly as fun as blaming stuff on the Pres (any Pres) or the Rs or Ds and so on but it does change one’s perspective about a number of things- mostly usefully so.
At the state level , folks need to pay more attention to their legislators and govs as well. We have 2 year sessions here. This go around 595 bills between both houses have been introduced, 71 have passed. A number of important bills have been held up in committee but a concerted constituent effort has moved some out of committee as well. There will be a flurry today since it is end of normal session. The House, Gov , and Senate have been battling over oil taxes for most of session- to the detriment of many important things .
If we are going to live up to the idea of a nation of laws, not men, it behooves us to know more and stay more engaged.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 15, 2012
at 8:47 AM
How nice to find comments from smart people to agree with this morning, instead of disagreeing with stupid one(s).
Pfesser, like Lori said, you’re right in theory but at the end of the day, Obama wasn’t going to just let people stop getting paid because the House and Senate are obviously willing to play chicken.
I’d like to extend your explanation of pregnancy dating to point out that the way due dates are estimated do not make a woman 2 weeks pregnant at conception.
Mageen, thanks for the detailed recap of the language of the bill. Sadly, it’s been explained before and only people willing to read more than bullet points will get it.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 15, 2012
at 8:25 AM
How do two parties come together when they are so completely opposite of eachother? When you have one party openly stating that government services are the American dream, while the other believes people create their own Americna dream through hard work, and can do it, better in fact, without the governments inolvement? There is no common ground here.
mageen, I hope this coming year allows your life to improve enough so you do not need to worry so much about mine. Keep your chin up tiger.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 15, 2012
at 8:15 AM
So I said all fo that to say. I agree with Delurker. Obama did what he had to do. Do I like it? no Is it a dangerous practice? yes, Do I wish it were different? yes.. But then again if my Mom had balls she would be my Dad. (See UAW I know nasty words to describe body parts to.. so na na a poo poo on you!)
LOL LOL peace …
LikeLike
By: lori on April 15, 2012
at 7:51 AM
I sure do agree things SHOULD be different on the Hill. I agree there WAS a time on the Hill where both parties, or at the very least people in the same party, worked together on what was best for the country. They passed “simple bills” that could be read and understood by all citizens and when arguments ensued they were not personal and everyone held their duty to their country above all.
Guess what.. Times have changed. So instead of wringing our hands and talking about years of yore or jumping on the band wagon “with kick the bums out mentality” how about we begin to unwind the ball of yard that has us tangled in this web of failure.
That starts with …. publicly funded elections. And here is why IMHO: MOST of this partisan ness can be traced back to who funds who’s election, and who the candidate is beholden to. Reps run every two years, which in reality, they are in a constant campaign mode. Even though they have a relatively small area in which to campaign the cost of perpetual campaign mode is exorbitant. Senators are not up for election as often but have massive state wide campaign and duties to perform. That all takes money. Back in the day of our fore fathers.. things were different.
Take away the need for quid pro quo and you begin to unwind the ball of yarn.
Next, we need to understand how the Hill works (TODAY), not the way the founding fathers saw it, but today. With all due respect to the Tea People, apparently they didn’t understand the Hill and that is a major reason their movement is/was dead on arrival.. or at the very least in grave condition. That whole “we want our country BACK regressive thinking just ain’t gonna hunt in today’s world. It will NEVER go back.
The “throw the bums out mentality” won’t make things better, in fact it just might make things worse. Disagree? look at the massive 111th congressional freshman class and ask yourself are things better or worse? is there MORE or less gridlock? is there more or less gigantic complex hot mess bills?
If we want change and realll change it begins with publicly funded elections. Support candidates who are in favor of campaign finace reform.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 15, 2012
at 7:36 AM
Respectfully PFesser- The 86 Senators (including mine)
and the 283 Representatives (including mine)
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll932.xml
who passed this have a lot of answering to all of us on this too.
My Reps don’t see any problem with having passed this on to the Pres and the votes here appear to be veto proof. We need to be after ALL of em. All.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 15, 2012
at 6:56 AM
delurker opined:
“No, it means it was part of a massive bill that HAD to get passed or else. Even when he signed it, he said he would not enforce that piece and waived it right away. It seems to be the only way to get things done any more.”
I have to respectfully disagree.
Yours is one way to look at it; another might be, that is the way our increasingly oppressive government gets a heinous, oppressive and very likely unconstitutional law passed: they bury it inside another, bigger bill that they say “HAD to get passed or else.” I’m sorry; NOTHING *HAS* to be passed. NOTHING.
It is very easy to get a law put on the books and very hard to get it off; the LAST thing I want to rely on is a president’s word that he “would never use that law.” That may be true for Obama – or it may not – but nevertheless, if it is available someone down the line WILL use it. You have to stand by your principles; the only proper course IMHO was for BO to say, “If that is in the bill I will veto it. Period.” But he didn’t do that, did he?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 15, 2012
at 6:48 AM
page 1562-
SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF
THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS
PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY
FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the
President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40;
50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces
of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection
(b)) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section
is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided
the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,
or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged
in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,
including any person who has committed a belligerent act or
has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy
forces.
Click to access PLAW-112publ81.pdf
It is somewhat disingenuous to assert that the President is the only one responsible for this section of Public Law 112-81 .
If you search the votes in the House and Senate, you will find it passed with a large majority, as it is a large defense reauthorization act, covering multiple defense issues.
It is seriously disingenuous to insist :
1-this law allows for frivilous detention of Americans for being merely disruptive- it is a narrow definition here of “covered persons”
2- that it is difficult to find the actual language of the law
If you want to get worried about what constitutes information which can be used to determine whether someone fits (2) I’ll join in the worry.
This piece of garbage inserted into a huge bill is exactly the kind of game we want politicos to stop. Playing games about who signed /voted what and how when so much other work is at stake in the larger bill misses the point that this is the exact kind of horsepunky we want stopped. Seperate these things out and debate and decide them specifically. Period.
PF- spring is here. warmer, wetter , birds returning…days gloriously long 🙂
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 15, 2012
at 6:48 AM
AnoNoah, I still say, get some exercise! And that’s not a trick question.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 15, 2012
at 6:36 AM
UAWT –
Pregnancy occurs about 14 days (+- 3-4 days) after the start of the LMP (last menstrual period). The pregnancy is dated, however, from that first day of the LMP even though conception won’t occur for another two weeks because is easy to pinpoint the LMP; the date of conception may not be known.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 15, 2012
at 6:35 AM
trick question?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 15, 2012
at 12:20 AM
so NOP….
your really hung-up on the left-right thingy…….if someone misses their period and a month later finds out that their pregnant, are they 6 weeks along or 8 weeks along like the Docters say…..
It’s not emaculate conception; it’s a math issue…..
are you that friggen stupid or are you just being a CUNT!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 14, 2012
at 11:57 PM
Thanks No One:s Puppet. How do you tell the people who are the most unhappy with their lives? Just look for the people who comment endlessly on the lives of others.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 10:58 PM
And Noah, you’re not! Get out there Monday morning and start filling out job applications and tell those lazy friends of your’s to do the same, good lord-a-living, your wives are all too good for you, what must your children think of you. Think about that.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 14, 2012
at 9:48 PM
Obama is the 1%. Wonder why Obama didnt follow the Buffett rule? Obama only paid 20% tax rate, far less than the average American. He could have paid in more if he wanted to keep his integrity, but he did not. I wonder if we looked at the money trail if we could find any more proof Obama is for his own club, the 1%’ers?
Citigroup $45 billion bail out & Donated $701,290 to Obama
Bank of America $45 billion baulout & Donated $230,552 to Obama.
JP Morgan Chase $25 billion bail out & Donated $695,132 to Obama.
MOrgan Stanly $10 billion bail out & Donated $514,881 to Obama.
Goldman Sachs $10 billion bailout & Donated $994,795 to Obama,
Obama, you are the 1%
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 6:32 PM
Let’s see, Noah. First you blame Obama for things he has not done. When proven wrong, you moved on to the right to hold Americans and said he’d done nothing to eliminate it. When proven wrong again, you dodged and weaved, spewing phrases intentionally taken out of context. You probably don’t even know what the context is, since you’re on the talking points diet. Now you act like you’re not aware that a person can’t be pregnant before conception. It’s true that the due date is calculated based on LMP, but that doesn’t mean the person was pregnant on the first day of their last period – OF COURSE. A smart guy like you knows that so I guess you’re just up to your stupid games again.
I’m sorry that life in Beckistan is so terrifying and confusing. You may wish to relocate to the real world.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 14, 2012
at 6:25 PM
Sound to me you are making up a extreme dream scenario to support an argument.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 6:06 PM
This should explain why I said, Arizona is considering a woman pregnant, when in fact she could still be a virgin. http://www.birth.com.au/How-conception-works/Timing-of-sex-for-conception
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 14, 2012
at 5:14 PM
Obama’s Labor Secretary: “Government Services” are the American Dream.
I could not have summed it up better, just not possible.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 5:07 PM
Actually he said he had a problem with the bill because of a particular part that limited his powers and gave it to someone else, if facts mean anything to you.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 3:12 PM
No, it means it was part of a massive bill that HAD to get passed or else. Even when he signed it, he said he would not enforce that piece and waived it right away. It seems to be the only way to get things done any more.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 14, 2012
at 2:55 PM
delurkergurl ..with considerable pressure. But did you miss the fact that after having promised to not sign it, he did indeed sign it. Doesnt this tell us he would rather have it be the law of the land if he had his way? This tells us his true desires for this country. If this was not an election year he would not have given up his favorite part of this act.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 2:25 PM
OK….
I googled it….
Your baby’s due date is calculated from the first day of your last menstrual period.
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/baby_due_date
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 14, 2012
at 1:30 PM
NOP…..
I like my responce better than emaculate conception…..
so tell me..when the DR.asks a pregnant wonan when she had her last period do they start counting from then or subtract 2 weeks??????
and cows take 9 months also…..and I didn’t have to google it…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 14, 2012
at 1:20 PM
More info if facts interest you.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/28/indefinite-military-deten_n_1308129.html
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 14, 2012
at 12:59 PM
Anon, this was covered in my post from on March 6, 2012
at 9:39 PM.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 14, 2012
at 12:58 PM
UAW, you need to learn a little biology. Google.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 14, 2012
at 12:45 PM
NOP….
still reading but from what I’ve seen the law restricts abortions after 20 weeks….still reading….OK….the law says that pregnacies start right after the LMP (last menstral period)…..isn’t that also how DRs. count weeks of pregnancy??????
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/04/arizonas-new-abortion-law-doesnt-do-what-everyone-thinks-it-does/51095/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 14, 2012
at 11:20 AM
delurkergurl
Everything I find on the web says that Obama signed into law a security act that allows him to detain US citizens for nothing more than for being considered disruptive, detain them indefinatley, deport them from the country to be held without representation. Do you have something that can contradict this?
Do you have anything that shows Obama has done anything to repeal any of these other things or is he content at leaving them as is? Has he even made mention in passing he is against any of it?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 10:49 AM
What does everyone think of the new abortion law in Arizona, that stipulates life begins approximately two weeks before conception? How about they put, “Arizona, home of virgin births,” on their license plates?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 14, 2012
at 10:48 AM
Lori….
I like your idea about gun training……something like the NRA’s Eddie Eagle program would be good in K-2nd……Marksmanship could be a part of Phys. Ed. …….the discussion of self-protection could be in Civics in HS…….gun care and cleaning could be in Home Eq.(I clean mine at the kitchen table)……reloading could be a part of Shop class……
send donations to
http://www.usashooting.org/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 14, 2012
at 10:01 AM
Anonymous, you failed to acknowledge that you said Obama had done those things when he had not. Facts don’t matter to you?
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 14, 2012
at 7:39 AM
mageen, was more a point to what we are evolving to as a country..for what we once reserved for the worst among us, is now done for our children and the public at large. You chose not to weigh in on the security law though…interesting.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 14, 2012
at 7:05 AM
I agree with you Cynthia. Zimmerman was clearly lacking the training that is absolutely necessary to deal with those type of situations. And the “Stand Your Ground” laws, need work.
My opinions on “gun control” and gun laws are slightly nuance. While I see nothing wrong with the ides of ADULTS owning guns for protection and sport .I feel there needs to be much more education involved before someone is issued a licence.
As it stands now the only education that I am aware of is state “hunting & gun safety”. Which doesn’t begin to address people owning and operating guns in a populated urban area. I think ALL states need to have a uniformed education program.
If a person is going to carry a concealed weapon, or wants to own guns (hand guns) for personal protection, I think they should have to go through the training much like a police officer goes through. There should also be a written and practical test. Much like states do for drivers licensees. Not just for the safety of innocent citizens, but for the gun owners own protection.
For me and my Libertarian bend, that would strike the right balance between “my personal choices” and the “safety of ordinary citizens”. .
Time and testimony will tell if Zimmerman had more sinister motives when he stepped out of his front door with a gun in his pocket that afternoon.. But for now, at the bare minimum, we can all agree he was in wayyyyyyy over his head. He should have left that situation up to trained police officers. After all it wasn’t like Zimmerman was faced with Trayvon busting in his front door! Zimmerman got in a car and went looking for trouble. Sadly he found it.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 14, 2012
at 6:12 AM
Whoa, anonymous! The metal detectors in schools are the result of the local school board’s decision. Metal detectors in prisons are the result of a state decision. Metal detectors at the airport are the result of the Department of Homeland Security founded during the Bush administration after 9/11 which is also involved in the security act you mentioned..
The weather is improving daily. Get some exercise!
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 14, 2012
at 4:57 AM
I was just sutting here thinking about all Obama has done to move us away from benig the “land of the free.” Thinking about the laws to control us like the security act to detain and deport US citizens without representation or a day in court. Look what we have evolved too. You go into prison, what happens? You go through a metal detector, then you are patted down. Go to any large school, metal detector and sometimes patted down. Go to travel, metal detector and get patted down. Eh, but then maybe its just my overactive imagination.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 13, 2012
at 11:56 PM
lori – I thought Pf was talking about Zimmerman being in the wrong place not Martin.
I think the bigger problem is this Stand Your Ground law. It allows anyone with a gun/weapon who feels threatened to kill at will. As long as they kill the other person and there are no witnesses the dead person will be the “aggressor” and they can claim self defense.
This law came about from ALEC for the NRA, Walmart and the gun makers and suppliers. It was not initiated “by the people” who felt there was a need for everyone to carry a gun for protection and shoot to kill if they felt the least bit threatened.
Now you have two people – one a dead teenager who did nothing wrong and another a young man who may end up in prison for awhile. IMO opinion Zimmerman is a little man with a BIG gun which made him feel POWERFUL and important. Hopefully he will have time to think about taking the life of another human being.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on April 13, 2012
at 6:47 PM
I am anxious to hear all the facts surrounding the Trayvon Martin case too NOP.
JSRI (or was it Auntie Jean?) wrote a great thing about prejudice and bias and how each of us perceive things based on our personal experiences. Maybe they could be persuaded to re-post it. I know they never read comments over here anymore but mayyybe they will jump in the fray just this once. 😉 Hint hint.. LOL LOL
That posting came to mind when I read PF’s post up there ^^^^. PF has related this case to a story he has heard about his g-father. His g-father was in a place, where he was warned not to go, and ultimately found himself in harms way, merely from being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Apparently PF feels Trayvon should not have been walking in his own Father’s and step Mother’s neighborhood the day of his murder? I wonder if PF has ever advised his own children to not walk in HIS neighborhood for fear of being murdered?
Just things I think about..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 13, 2012
at 6:30 AM
Would it be any less tragic if he was an armed teenager?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 12, 2012
at 8:54 PM
“What’s wrong with you people? An unarmed teenager is dead! This has nothing to do with the media or the President.”
Funny you should say that. That’s what I told the President, too, but did he listen to me? Noooooo…..
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 12, 2012
at 8:07 PM
What’s wrong with you people? An unarmed teenager is dead! This has nothing to do with the media or the President. What idiots!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 12, 2012
at 6:40 PM
“My favorite thing from all of this, Liberal media calling him a White Hispanic. Guess you cant have your race card if some part of him isn’t labeled white first….”
I was thinking about that myself. When the Prez said that, “If (he) had a son, he would look like Trayvon Martin,” I was thinking he was wrong. His son would look more like George Zimmerman, wouldn’t he, since both he AND BO (but not Martin) are half-white…I guess BO’s white when that is an advantage and black when THAT is an advantage. Kind of having your chocolate and angel-food cakes and eating them, too.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 12, 2012
at 6:15 PM
It is a mistake I think to 1. personalize this case or 2. politicize it. Like I said before, we haven’t heard any sworn testimony or seen any of the physical evidence.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 12, 2012
at 1:01 PM
My favorite thing from all of this, Liberal media calling him a White Hispanic. Guess you cant have your race card if some part of him isn’t labeled white first….
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 12, 2012
at 12:22 PM
NOP –
This case reminds me so much of what happened to my father in 1918. Long time ago, huh? HIS father had warned him to not go near the “forks of the creek” – where the local young people gathered on the church steps to socialize. There was a WWI soldier living across the creek; he had seen unspeakable things in France and was a pretty humorless fellow.
The younger kids used to tease him by setting up a fake gun emplacement and poking a stick through the rocks as a pretend howitzer, yelling, “One, two, three, shoot!”
One day the fellow got tired of it and came over, scattering the kids – but not my dad, who just sat there. He reasoned that he should have no trouble, since he wasn’t doing anything. He was wrong; the soldier decided to tear into my dad, a skinny eighteen year-old with no experience in fighting, certainly not like a soldier. He grabbed my father around the neck and began to beat him in the face. Of course my dad couldn’t get loose from this guy, but he DID have a knife in his back pocket that he could open with one hand.
He began to sink the knife in the soldier’s back, over and over and over, until he fell away.
That cost him two years in the worse penitentiary in the country, if not the world, Moundsville State Pen. Eighteen years old; never been out of the “holler.”
Yep, he had every right to be where he was. *His* father tried to warn *him* that having the right to be there wouldn’t mean anything if there was trouble. He should have listened to the old man. So should Zimmerman have listened to the dispatcher. And a thoughtless Trayvon Martin paid with his life. All so very sad.
My father has been dead 33 years today. Guess that was why I was thinking about him.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 12, 2012
at 11:47 AM
I find it interesting, that a day after Zimmerman’s arrest in Florida, people are still weighting in on the case, including so called experts. None of us have heard any sworn testimony or seen any of the physical evidence, so there is a lot of grandstanding going on. I make one prediction, if after his hearing, he is bound over for trial, I think the trial will be on Court TV and It will have a large audience. I know I will be glued to the set.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on April 12, 2012
at 9:12 AM
5 days later?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 11, 2012
at 1:20 PM
UAW, if you watched the news once in awhile you’d get the joke.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on April 11, 2012
at 1:13 PM
Just got back home…….
Happy Belated Easter….
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on April 9, 2012
at 10:00 AM
PFesser – much appreciation for asking! He is going into radiation treatment next week. This modality is considered the tops and is used straightaway whenever possible in places like Australia and the rest of the world. It is still considered with suspicion by the FDA here but really aggressive treatment centers dare to use it. We have great hopes for a really, really good outcome.
Weather enjoyment here is just about optimal. A little too breezy to stay very long outdoors doing much needed clean up and gardening. Entire state now has a fire warning due to the wind and the dry conditions. Must remember to lengthen one of my garden hoses.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 9, 2012
at 4:49 AM
I hope all my friends are enjoying their day doing what they love best. ❤
Peace.
LikeLike
By: lori on April 8, 2012
at 1:14 PM
Happy Easter, Margaret and Helen. May your days be filled with bacony goodness.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on April 8, 2012
at 7:05 AM
Ditto on Easter from Virginia.
Maggeen, how is your husband feeling? Hope he can enjoy the beautiful weather we’ve been having here.
Alaskapi, what’s going on up there? Things warmed up any or are you still in the clutches of Ol’ Man Winter? My wife wants us to move up there for a year or two. Good pay, lots of adventure. I don’t know; I’m getting a little past much adventure. Sure would be a good place to learn to be a Real Pilot, though…I’m afraid if I moved I’d never leave.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 8, 2012
at 7:05 AM
Happy Easter and Passover to all.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 7, 2012
at 6:56 AM
Margaret and Helen, hope you both have a very happy Easter!
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 7, 2012
at 5:25 AM
Defense Secretary Racks Up $860,000 In Commuting Costs
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/defense-secretary-commuting-leon-panetta_n_1407923.html?ref=business&ncid=webmail26
http://gov.aol.com/2012/04/06/video-boasting-lavish-las-vegas-outing-released?ncid=webmail7
Could someone give me that argument again how we are better off having the government run our health care or anything else for that matter? Anyone?
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 6, 2012
at 6:06 PM
WTF
Jesse Jackson Calls On Blacks To Wear Hoodies To Polling Places……..
does that mean that whites should wear hoods also???????
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 6, 2012
at 9:17 AM
and why would I return the Pepsi, Coke or mac and cheese???????
surly not because some stupid ass on Huffpo said to!!!!!
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 5, 2012
at 9:13 PM
UAW, have you made a second trip to Walmart to return the Pepsi, Coke, and Kraft Mac &Cheese yet?
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on April 5, 2012
at 7:16 PM
Worth a visit and sign. Vote and vote often.
http://action.freedomworks.org/5968/stop-obamas-unconstitutional-appointments/
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 5, 2012
at 3:22 PM
UAW, have determined how to commit suicide yet? Quick or little by little? You gave me my laugh of the day.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on April 5, 2012
at 11:34 AM
Denoah……
spit my coffee out laughing so hard…..
I think blast could use some pie(with a double shot in it)……seems a little tense…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 5, 2012
at 9:46 AM
On my way to Walmart’s to stock up on Coke,Pepsi, and Kraft macaroni and cheese…..sent the NRA a $25 yesterday plus a free 1yr membership to a serviceman($10)……..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 5, 2012
at 9:37 AM
People are probably not happy with their lives if they are busy discussing yours. Just sayin.
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 5, 2012
at 9:13 AM
DeNoah:
Your bitterness is like a cancer eating you alive. I couldn’t imagine living such a hate-filled life as you do and getting any enjoyment out of it. I couldn’t imagine you being married.
If you got to know a few of the people you constantly rail about, perhaps your Limbaugh-like virulence might change, though I doubt it. I think it’s pretty obvious that most people on this site ignore you simply because they don’t want to slip to the depths of your depravity. But if you see that as some sort of warped vision of success, so be it.
Okay. It’s you turn for the usual liberal blah, blah, blah.
LikeLike
By: Blast on April 5, 2012
at 9:08 AM
ALEC – A review of accomplishments
http://rackjite.com/archives/9579-Shoot-em-up-Charlie-discovers-ALEC,-the-NRA-your-Representatives!-Mark-Fiore.html
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on April 5, 2012
at 8:01 AM
The IRS sent me back my tax returns AGAIN!!!. I guess it was my response to the question: List all dependents: “12 million illegal immigrants, 3 million crack heads, 42 million unemployed people on food stamps, 2 million people in over 243 prisons, and and 535 fools in the U.S. House and Senate.” Apparently this was NOT an acceptable answer.
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 5, 2012
at 7:53 AM
mageen….
when you get the job of overseeing the GSA just remember that caning has been outlawed…….(and if a few on the backside doesn’t help then one upside the head)…….maybe we can get congress to allow it…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 5, 2012
at 7:02 AM
Mageen –
re: insurance companies. Hear! Hear!
My nephew is a mainframe programmer for a large insurer in Cleveland. He is aghast at how they conduct business. He told me that they had a huge auditorium-sized room full of cubicles and their only job was to deny claims.
I also have personal experience: My young son has a cochlear implant; the old model became obsolete and had to be replaced. My insurer (Anthem BC/BS) gave us WRITTEN notice that we were approved and they would pay $7000 of the $8000 cost, but we had to pay for the device and get reimbursed from them. When we applied for reimbursement they first said we were not approved, then failing that, when my wife called they began a run-around of always transferring my her to a different desk, where of course it went into voice mail. They never called back, so when she called THEM, they started the process all over. She estimated she had about thirty hours of phone calls. We eventually wrote the attorney general of Virginia and got $4000 from the bastards – and were glad to get it, which of course was their object all along – wear us down until we gave up.
Along those lines, several years ago California passed a bill that the insurers had to either reduce their rates or open their books to the public. They lowered their rates. Feh. Don’t tell me about insurers and “free enterprise.” I hope they all go bankrupt.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 5, 2012
at 6:16 AM
Everyone I know of on either side of the political aisle was totally blown away by the GSA big buck blowout in Vegas. For one thing, no one, including me, ever envisioned that agency as anything but a huge general store type warehouse full of supplies such as light bulbs. To discover, especially in this manner, that the outfit actually had a head shed was mind boggling. Would like to know who among them decided the agency should fall into the same trap as private firms for a meeting involving “team building”. There are actually organizations that sell this kind of activity to businesses with a cockamamie story that it will actually vitalize a business, etc. Somebody somewhere at a level higher than the head of GSA has to be on the ball and keeping an eye on this stuff. If there isn’t currently such a person, I am available!!!
As for handling our healthcare, DeNoah, I now have a very thick skin about the “handling” after so many decades of dealing with private healthcare insurance companies that can’t wait to violate their contract with me. If there is any way they can be brought into line, perhaps by a big legislative sortee, then I am all for it.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on April 5, 2012
at 4:34 AM
Martha Johnson, the head of the federal agency that oversees supplies, transportation and office space for the federal government, has resigned amid reports of lavish spending at a 2010 training conference outside Las Vegas.
What made it so lavish? To start, the General Services Administration’s (GSA) “training conference” cost the taxpayer around $835,000. Staged at a luxury hotel, it featured (among other things) a $3,200 mind reader, $6,300 worth of commemorative coin sets, and a $75,000 training exercise where the attendees tried to build a bicycle. Furthermore, the airfare and lodging for six the “planning trips” for the event cost around $147,000.
And you want to trust these same people with our healthcare, or anything else involving money for that matter?
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 4, 2012
at 12:11 PM
It looks like Santorum’s big mouth may have cost the ReBiblicans the fall presidential election.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0403/Gender-gap-daunting-for-GOP-Why-women-s-vote-is-key
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 4, 2012
at 11:58 AM
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 4, 2012
at 7:04 AM
Anyone know anything about this outfit, Fhtmus?
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on April 3, 2012
at 4:22 PM
The full Obama response.
“Ultimately, I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress. And I’d just remind conservative commentators that for years what we’ve heard is, the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint — that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example. And I’m pretty confident that this Court will recognize that and not take that step.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/04/03/when-the-president-predicts-victory-in-the-supreme-court/
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 3, 2012
at 3:21 PM
Noah –
I have to say, point well-made. I haven’t seen the news today; Obama really said that? Do you have a cite?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 3, 2012
at 2:48 PM
Sorry for the transposed n & e above.
Obama – a former Constitutional Law Professor — to SCOTUS: Obamacare is “constitutional” and it would be “unprecedented” for an “unelected group of people” to overturn it. Apparently he missed the part about checks and balances and 200 years of judicial review! Obama actually taught this stuff?
LikeLike
By: DeNoah on April 3, 2012
at 1:45 PM
I just watched “Special Report With Bret Baier” on Fox News, they just stated polls which showed Romney ahead by 4% among women in swing states four weeks ago, without so much as a mention of the latest polls. No wonder Fox News viewers are less well informed than people who don’t follow the news. How do they think playing ostrich helps the Republicans?
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on April 2, 2012
at 4:41 PM
Hey thanks for the yuks folks. Nice to know I’ve made a permanent impression on so many of you libs. Paranoia rocks. just an fyi my last post was mid-way down the Pink Razor thread. I’ve found 2 other sites full of lib to kick around as my mission here was accomplished better than I could have ever hoped. James, pfesser, uaw, tex..keep on keeping on.
LikeLike
By: dneoah818@comcast.net on April 2, 2012
at 8:54 AM
Donna –
You never cease to surprise me. A bluegrass fan?
I always thought Lester Flatt had THE perfect bluegrass voice. Here is my second favorite song of his/Scruggs.’
My favorite is “Saro Jane.” I can’t find it on YouTube. I may have to put it up myself.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on April 2, 2012
at 5:39 AM
Sarah Palin Co-Hosts TODAY on Tuesday.
April Fools?
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: a.b.gas@hotmail.com on April 1, 2012
at 4:01 PM
LOL LOL JJ
and in more news Hillary announces her secret love affair with Ken Starr. 😉
Gotta love the first of April..
LikeLike
By: lori on April 1, 2012
at 9:45 AM
GW Bush today endorses President Obama!!
http://www.the3halves.com/3-news/291-george-w-bush-breaks-from-partisan-politics-endorses-barack-obama-for-2012.html
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on April 1, 2012
at 9:33 AM
don’t be accusing Rush of having hyperbole…He ain’t never caught that disease…..Glenn might have (but would have been in his druggie years)…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 1, 2012
at 8:54 AM
Good morning my friends,
Hyperbole, a word a lot of people should learn the meaning of and recognize it when they hear/see it.. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on April 1, 2012
at 7:51 AM
You’re welcome, Donna!
You and UAW have reminded me why I am not sad I don’t have TV and my radio can’t pick up much except Alaska Public Radio, so thank you both too
🙂
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 1, 2012
at 7:29 AM
UAW: I don’t like either Schultz or Olberman. And I do like both Jon and Steven. But I bet we differ about Rachel–I like her alot.
Alaskapi: You have completely made my day.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 1, 2012
at 7:20 AM
yes , and I love this one with another favorite, Doc Watson
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 1, 2012
at 7:12 AM
Donna…
I tend to lump Bill Maher in with Ed Schultz and Keith Olberman….that’s where the double standard is that I speak of…..
still love Jon and Steven….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 1, 2012
at 7:11 AM
thank you, UAW and Alaskapi!!! Isn’t he something?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 1, 2012
at 7:08 AM
here you go Donna
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on April 1, 2012
at 7:03 AM
Hey Donna….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 1, 2012
at 7:01 AM
good morning, UAW–hope you are well. Here’s what I think is a major difference. Maher speaks of himself as an entertainer and comedian and presents his show as pure comedy (even though I don’t find him at all funny). Limbaugh justifies himself as “just an entertainer” but presents himself on his show as offering actual facts and many people then spread what he says as though it were truth. So one is clear on what he is, and the people who enjoy him are equally clear. It is the opposite with the other.
As for hypocricy, I view Maher as the equivalent of a Sam Kinison (without the screaming) or Howard Stern–don’t care for that sort of “humor.” And I find Limbaugh’s attempts at humor to be, at best, hamhanded and juvenile. But I view Limbaugh as more abhorrent because he presents and is accepted by many as other than that.
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 1, 2012
at 6:56 AM
new rules….
and I’m called repugnant……..(actually I thought the chip filled hat was funny)
Oh…that’s right….Bill Maher is an entertainer…….(and Rush isn’t)????? double standard again…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on April 1, 2012
at 6:44 AM
Agree, Poolman. Outed by the poor spelling, the misuse of words (“your roll” as though we were talking about hamburger buns as opposed to social functions), the demands (whether or not purportedly couched as requests) and the insults (either “cowardice” or the supposed inability to respond) when people understandably choose not to engage, and the false equivalencies. Sad, foolish person with nothing better to do than constantly appear under a new name and try the same stunts. Who was it who said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result?
Good morning, JuneauJoe: I guess I’ve never been a particular Maher fan. I may agree with his positions on certain issues, but just don’t find him funny. Of course, I find relatively few comedians to be entertaining.
On another topic, I mourn Earl Scruggs. Anyone up for posting a link?
LikeLike
By: Donna on April 1, 2012
at 6:44 AM
New Rules – very good. Gun Makers need to Thank President Obama.
http://rackjite.com/archives/9554-New-Rules-Bill-Maher,-STAND-UP-TO-THE-GUN-NUTS!-March-30-2012.html
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on April 1, 2012
at 12:22 AM
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#inbox/1366c2bdca7cc820
APRIL 1, 2012
Republicans Reveal that Entire Presidential Race was a Prank
April Fool’s Day Announcement Brings Practical Joke to an End
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report) – In an April Fool’s Day announcement that took the political world by storm, the Republican Party revealed today that its entire presidential race had been an elaborate prank.
“April Fool!” exclaimed former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum at a press conference in Washington, where they were joined by fellow merrymakers Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain.
Moments after revealing that the GOP primary had been one long practical joke, Mr. Santorum explained the rationale behind staging such a complicated and expensive prank.
“A lot of Americans are suffering right now and need a good laugh,” he said. “I think my colleagues and I can be justifiably proud of the entertainment we provided – even if it meant me wearing these ridiculous sweater vests.”
…Get a free subscription to the Borowitz Report
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 31, 2012
at 11:54 PM
Whether we’re shooting blanks or filling in blanks, it never ceases to amaze me how circular the jerk is. It most definitely is the hydra. I don’t think more than one pea can subsist in that pod… er, cob. Too early in the season for fresh, I’m thinking canned.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 31, 2012
at 10:51 PM
Donna, I can see your roll here is just to cause trouble and to get people fighting. You will be ignored from this point forward.
alaskapi. We are two different kids of people. I look for the good, while you look for the bad. Per your acknowledging the bad. I think it says something that someone insists the bad be mentioned before allowing the good. But then again this isnt the point, its picking knits to distract from your other agenda. I am imagining that you cannot reshape our country without first destroying what made it great, thus your obsession with highlighting every dark point at the expense of the good. I am sure you are one of those people who think we are the villain in most everything.
Were we to believe you, our troops are murders, rapists, some of the most vile creatures on the planet. A being to be loathed and feared. I am going to copy all of your conclusions to a couple of vet blogs and encourage some of my brothers log on to give you their opinion of what you think of the American Soldier. This way it wont be just one crazy old mans rantings. Who knows maybe some of them will agree with you, but I am betting not.
I thought initially my comparison to the Holocaust was a bit over the top. I think now my initial instincts were correct.
As my final word on this topic it is worth mentioning you passed on the chance to show why your way is better. The anonymity of the internet makes bold even the biggest cowards, but not all it seems.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 7:53 PM
done engaging, Donna 🙂
– was interested in depth and durability of argumentation there.
not so much and not so much, eh?
loving all that paternalistic forgiveness hoobobby, yes I am.
so much I’m gonna go take my dog on a long walk in the cold sun and laugh out loud a whole lot more where only the pupper and the ravens can hear to spare all of you
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 7:24 PM
oh my corn, thank you for your paternalistic, colonialistic, forgiveness 🙂
just made my day.
Professing how great we are without acknowledging our failures is still dangerous in my mind.
No,I wasn’t there for WWII. My parents and elder family were. Each of them has had a tale to tell to flesh out what happened then, many of them full of sacrifice and hard work. There were dark and unforgivable things too, corn.
And peculiarly probably good things . Folks forget Alaska was attacked and most have no idea what happened here.
One of the sorriest outfalls of troop buildup here and thankfully fairly uncommon was a type of soldier who thought little Alaska Native girls were fair game because they weren’t real Americans or people somehow.
I have a picture on my desk of my mother and 3 of her sisters, all of them 4 to 14 years old, at the end of a self defense “training session” some MPs put them through. Sometimes I laugh at the stainless steel bowls they have on their heads to be good lil soldiers of their own safety, sometimes I ponder the deeply fierce looks on their faces, such young faces, and sometimes I cry that such small girls had to be taught to sleep with pieces of pipe to defend themselves from a type of American soldier who more than once broke into their home to harm on a drunken lark.
their brothers were all in the war , their elder sisters all sent Outside as they were married to soldiers in Alaska, their father suddenly dead and not there to watch over his kids, and their mother trying to work to feed them in a time when there were no safety nets.
Those MPs who figured out what was up and helped and tried to watch over them still deserve praise, The time and place and behavior of others, not so much.
Ignoring that such things went on is more like holocaust denial than what you state but oh, well, keep your illusions. No skin off my nose.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 7:18 PM
My two cents: Corn either is Noah (my bet) or is simply another person who feigns beginning discussion in order to then insult people. The “maybe English isnt (sic) your first language” and the “I will be forgiving” and the self-aggrandizement are the same. Either way, not worth engaging.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 31, 2012
at 7:08 PM
Maybe English isnt your first language so I will be forgiving.
I said: but made no argument or attempt to defend why you think your way is better
you said: that’s pretty clearly an answer to what I would like to see us do, isn’t it?
If you do not understand the difference you probably would not be able to answer the question.
As for your claims about our country, I put them in the same category as those that claim the holocaust never happened. Professing it is so does not make it so. I was there. We accomplished a great many things. This nation you and yours would have us have pales in comparison to the United States of that era.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 6:44 PM
corn-
truly laughing out loud:-)
The last thing an Alaskan Native has is Europe envy 🙂 I don’t bring my riff about colonialism, genocide, and the like here because most who visit here are far from that fray but suffice it to say the Europeans can have their continent.
You can call me an apologist if it floats your boat but I see myself as a realist. I’ve spent almost 40 years fixing things, figuring out what the problem is and fixing it. I’ve lived with bosses pretending we can wait or defer maintainence or repairs endlessly and have had to spend inordinate amounts of time trying to convince bean counters we’ll pay more later or take the chance we’ll harm someone. For too many of them the facade of a well managed system is adequate and a notion of a tight-ship runs second best. When you’re the one with your finger in the leak the notions and facades don’t mean much. I think we are always better off counting our successes AND failures and working to right the mistakes and extend the successes.
and- really.
I said :
i’d like to see us dump ACA in favor of a single payer system and provide job training and re-entry services for all in the for-profit insurance industry myself. most of this economic hullaballoo about cost is a protectionist device for keeping us from dropping the middleman of the insurance companies-
that’s pretty clearly an answer to what I would like to see us do, isn’t it?
I have no love for the ACA and would like to see us pattern a national care approach similar to what native health has done here in Alaska and across the country.
we have clinics in the most remote places you can imagine and the frontline health care they provide at no to little cost saves a bazillion dollars in left-untended health issues. good place to start.
the only real agreement i can see with you is the stoopid addition to law of locking up Americans suspected of having ties with muslim extremists – and no national political group has clean hands on that one.
sincerely, hippie commie liberal weirdo apologist Pi
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 5:07 PM
alaskapi, we are a great nation and we did great things. You obviously were not there and you are an apologist. Your argument that we had to be saints and perfect for any of the good to count makes you look foolish in my eyes. Of course we did some things wrong, this negates none of the good. We were, and we are an exceptional nation. It is a disheartening that you are so ashamed of what so many millions died to defend. When one has no skin in the game I suppose that makes it easier to do.
As for firing blanks.
Remember a certain defense bill passed not to long ago? American citizens can be taken from the United States and sent to a camp at Guantánamo Bay and held indefinitely. It puts every single citizen American at risk with no other justification of imprisonment and suspension of civil rights than for being considered disruptive.
This mandated medical coverage. Our government can force us now to buy a service and has empowered itself to imprison us if we do not comply.
The only blanks I am firing are at your shortsightedness. This is all leading to a very bad place. You either cant see it, or desire it to come to pass.
As for who I am vowing to fight it is people like you who would denigrate and defame the sacrifices and accomplishments we have made. Those who, for lack of a better term, have Europe envy, despite the fact that are on the verge of immanent collapse from the very policies you support.
I have noticed you have attacked everything I believe in but made no argument or attempt to defend why you think your way is better. I believe because you have ulterior motives, and are smart enough to know not to get into a discussion that ultimately you cannot win or defend, and thereby exposing yourself and your real intentions.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 4:23 PM
corn- we can merely disgree.
the proposal that we came together in WWII to do something no other nation could have ever done is hooey. American exeptionalism in all its forms is dangerous. as soon as we start thinking we are special or anointed or looking back at events and declaring we have done something no other could have we risk failure at levels which will eat us up from inside.
also-be wary who you run that one by if you don’t know everyhting “we” did whilst coming together.
“we ” gathered up American men, women , and children , burned and ravaged their homes and sent them away to be forgotten “to protect them” from the Japanese
http://www.nps.gov/aleu/historyculture/unangan-internment.htm
as these were my people i think i have a pretty dang good idea what can go wrong when we are busy being exceptional without thinking .
it’s rather much to assume anyone wants the govt to raise your family or surrender any freedoms from anything i said.
you are filling a bunch of blanks that are not there with that stuff.
i would hope if you are vowing to fight with somebody or other at your side that you all get clear about what it is you think is at stake and don’t get off on the old POST WWII bogeyman of communism that cost this country untold $$s , lives, and problems during that stoopid cold war we got our buns stuck in for years.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 3:44 PM
We will just have to agree to disagree alaskapi. I will never think the government can raise my family better than I can. I will never think surrendering our freedoms is a necessary part of any government legislation. I dont know if you were old enough to have lived through WWII but to have that sense of coming together to do something like we did then that no other nation could have ever accomplished is something to behold. There are those of us who will not surrender it willingly or easily. We will fight, and dont you think for a minute we wont.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 2:08 PM
and you did get it poolman
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 12:45 PM
corn- I couldn’t disagree more.
unless you say what you think we were being true to as a nation which fell apart in the 90s , not much else to say. we can say we evolved and we can be proud of our forebears dragging themselves and ourselves into accepting and expanding
notions of civil and political rights to include far more of our populace in a more even playing field.
1. Rights
1.1 The Civil-Political Distinction
Until the middle of the 20th century, civil rights were usually distinguished from ‘political rights’. The former included the rights to own property, make and enforce contracts, receive due process of law, and worship one’s religion. Civil rights also covered freedom of speech and the press (Amar 1998: 216-17). But they did not include the right to hold public office, vote, or to testify in court. The latter were political rights, reserved to adult males.
The civil-political distinction was conceptually and morally unstable insofar as it was used to sort citizens into different categories. It was part of an ideology that classified women as citizens who were entitled to certain rights but not to the full panoply to which men were entitled. As that ideology broke down, the civil-political distinction began to unravel. The idea that a certain segment of the adult citizenry could legitimately possess one bundle of rights, while another segment would have to make do with an inferior bundle, became increasingly implausible. In the end, the civil-political distinction could not survive the cogency of the principle that all citizens of a liberal democracy were entitled, in Rawls’s words, to “a fully adequate scheme of equal basic liberties” (2001: 42).
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/civil-rights/
but actualization from paper and thought into fabric of real lives has been stained over and over with damage to real live people and we shouldn’t be preparing any beds of laurels to rest our fannies on and say we have arrived.
real wages starting falling in the 70s and only the bubbles since then have made the blips which keep being used to obscure the downward trend.
get real- the insurance companies which act as middlemen between us, our employers, and healthcare are not mom and pop operations. they are corporate collectivist hydras with their hands in multitudes of businesses. my boss and i abandoned the NFIB because of them fronting the argument for big business that all small businesses ( of which we are) would fail if we don’t keep feeding the corporate love fest.
i don’t care if some portion of what i say is seemingly communist or socialist- i think a nice tidy balance between speed and greed neoliberal capitalism is about right.
glass-stegall did us proud for a long time- the entitlment 90s are more about business wanting to be freer to do whatever it wanted,. you can blame it on everyday people but it’s the boys and girls at big busness who got the entitlments.
and please- you missed entirely what my second comment was about.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 12:43 PM
for a country that yabs on and on about being independent thinkers and do-ers and patting ourselves on the back for being inventive, ready to tackle frontiers and all, we sure are a bunch of stick-in-the-mud let’s-do-it-the-way-we-always-have-whether-it-works-anymore-or-not type folks.
Insanity, isn’t it? Yes we can, as long as it doesn’t inconvenience us. I’m with you on the middleman thing. We are a country of middlemen. Yes, it would add to the unemployment ranks tremendously to eliminate them, but sometimes the best cure does require surgery.
Media parrots aside, we’ve given up responsibility and authority along with it to those who don’t have our best interests in mind and it will require us to come out of our comfort zones to gain the upper hand. The movement is swelling.
The American Dream is/was more of an illusion. For many it has become a nightmare. Not only have we lost many freedoms, but our family and land connections have been severed.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 31, 2012
at 12:32 PM
alaskapi I couldnt disagree more. I would go so far as to say we have evolved but we have stayed true to who we were as a nation until the mid 1990’s. Since then entitlement, what we expect our government to do and to provide has gotten all out of wrack.
As for your notion that the American dream is dead and has been dead I will not subscribe to. It may be dead for you but the rest of us will not roll over and give up so easily. My grand children deserve that dream and I will not see them denied.
As for your problem with companies and getting profit. This to me is a communist way of thinking I have little regard for. They perform a service, they deserve a profit. The system is not perfect, but then no system is. Wrapping a tourniquet around someone’s neck may stop the bleeding but it defeats the purpose. Reform is necessary but not at the expense of our nation.
And remember, when you say drop the middle man, you are talking about small business people. Most small business people are middle men/women. You idea will cause tens of thousands of people and business to disappear instantly.
To your second posting, you are talking about changing policy for 300 million people. One does not hap hazardously go mucking about in the lives of people without careful consideration of the consequences. Especially when we are talking about a government mandate to purchase something with financial consequences and jail time attached to it.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 12:11 PM
Donna you are instigating. You are turning this into something that it is not. You tell me how I respectfully requests = HAD to be answered. Please stop trying to turn this into a conflict where there is none.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 11:55 AM
When it is yadda, yadda, yadda and everyone reaches for their snooze button, it must be Noah.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 31, 2012
at 11:31 AM
for a country that yabs on and on about being independent thinkers and do-ers and patting ourselves on the back for being inventive, ready to tackle frontiers and all, we sure are a bunch of stick-in-the-mud let’s-do-it-the-way-we-always-have-whether-it-works-anymore-or-not type folks.
sheesh.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 11:30 AM
corn- we have changed the kind of nation we are over and over in just the short 6 decades of my life.
some for the better, some not.
the extension and contraction of individual, state, and national liberties and responsibilities is a dynamic thing
much is made of the debt we have, and rightly so, but not enough is made of the shift in notions that contributed to it and a real vetting of ideas which haven’t panned out is not likely to happen because everyone has too much vested in their perfect-world-American Dream scenario to do so.
the American dream scenario where everyone has equal opportunity to pursue their personal goals has been DOA for 3 decades and yet we just keep going on about it.
i’m way more worried about for-profit insurance companies having way too much to do with health care access and decisions than i am about debt at this point.
i’d like to see us dump ACA in favor of a single payer system and provide job training and re-entry services for all in the for-profit insurance industry myself. most of this economic hullaballoo about cost is a protectionist device for keeping us from dropping the middleman of the insurance companies-
corporate welfare, anyone ?
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 31, 2012
at 11:24 AM
that certainly got garbled by my messed up keyboard. My point is that this is not anyone’s blog but the hosts and it’s certainly presumptuous for anyone to expect that his posts should warrant a response. If someone wants to engage, they certainly will. If they don’t, it says nothing about the merit of the post they choose to disregard.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 31, 2012
at 11:20 AM
See, this is why I believe(d) that Corn was yet another Noah iteration. The insistence that whatever points he raised HAD to be answered. As though this were his blog and people could decide that they wanted to post what they wanted and engaged as they wished. So Corn, whether or not this is yet another of the many heads of the hydra, in my experience people really don’t like having strangers demand that their observations be answered–particularly not when that then turns into accusations that someone can’t respond. I certainly hope that will not be your next volley. Can you accept that maybe people just aren’t here to debate you?
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 31, 2012
at 11:13 AM
I respectfully would like the question I posed responded to.
I have read my response to you 6 times and I cannot figure out what part you are referring to that sacrificing kids would make sense so I am not sure how to respond.
What I do know is that if this bill is allowed to continue, the American dream dies with it. We change the kind of nation we are, and what we could be, with this bill.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 9:30 AM
Corn, does your argument require the sacrifice of the very human lives of son and grandkids?
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 31, 2012
at 9:19 AM
Mageen. The government doesnt have unlimited funds. The fact we are over 15 trillion in debt proves this out. This part of the bill Obama failed to mention more than doubles our current debt, and that is just this new oversight, we still have the rest of the bill to pay for. And it is not alleged, they found it an announced it. Am I to assume that no matter how much this bill costs you are for it?
I am starting to get the impression you people believe there are no consequences for being in debt and that we can spend as much as we want with no ill effect. Are you really willing to put everything we have into having insurance (lets not forget what we have empowered the government to do and what freedoms we loose by doing this)? What will we do when we are in debt over our heads, and our nations infrastructures finally start to fail? Or another big disaster strikes. Or one of these new emerging nuclear powers decide to play their hand?
I would like for you to help me understand how you think we can afford this? I dont want to hear how you think we cannot afford to do this, that is another topic. The cost on this bill is staggering, many times more than any other bill passed in history. With massive debt and a very fragile economy and high unemployment, I would surely like to understand how taking on this additional spending in your mind makes sense.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 31, 2012
at 9:01 AM
Gee whiz, Corn. The health care program was been gradually ticking into implementation for about two years now. Even the ridiculously greedy health insurance our son has is getting in line with it and actually paying for what the contract states. And he is one of these people who has a pre-existing condition. It took all kinds of searching to find something almost affordable to begin with only to have to fight with them to pony up per contract. They finally did when the President signed the health care reform law. We have grandkids with pre-existing conditions as well. Prior to the law, we had to fight like mad to make sure the health insurance company that took them on (at a HIGH rate) honored their contract. Found out at that point that the insurance company, despite the name, was not located in-state but in California! That meant layer after layer to fight through. That has also straightened out since the new health care law. Corn, if we had unlimited funds in pocket we would gladly spend them on our own health care but we aren’t plutocrats. As for the alleged extra funding, I am sure that will be found. The lives of our son and grandkids, you know what I mean?
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 31, 2012
at 5:13 AM
Senate Republican staffers continue to look though the 2010 health care reform law to see what’s in it, and their latest discovery is a massive $17 trillion funding gap.
“The more we learn about the bill, the more we learn it is even more unaffordable than was suspected,” said Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the Republicans’ budget chief in the Senate.
“The bill has to be removed from the books because we don’t have the money,” he said.
The hidden shortfall between new spending and new taxes was revealed just after Supreme Court justices grilled the law’s supporters about its compliance with the Constitution’s limits on government activity. If the court doesn’t strike down the law, it will force taxpayers to find another $17 trillion to pay for the increased spending.
Knowing this…do you all think we need to keep this bill considering the consequences if we do?
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 30, 2012
at 9:57 PM
Bravo, alaskapi!
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 30, 2012
at 6:33 PM
(and I’m not just angling for some smoked venison sausage either…)
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 30, 2012
at 5:57 PM
let’s see- I’d like to seeing us enact living wage laws, a single payer insurance system, abolish capital punishment, build a strong fence between churches foodling in government, end socialism for corporations, and any number of things which put me left-left.
I like some of UAW’s comments and want to pinch his face off for any number of the rest of them , but bottom line, I like UAW, would rely on him in an emergency and am happy he hangs out here with all of us.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 30, 2012
at 5:55 PM
I think my progressive credentials are pretty darn good–and I happen to like UAW’s posts.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 30, 2012
at 5:38 PM
Crypto: I know what this blog is about. I have been enjoying for longer than you have appeared to post here.
You have proven my point: you insist on speaking for other people when you have no basis to do so. You don’t have a clue what the “overwhelming majority that reads this blog” thinks. You, at most, can say what you believe the actual posts indicate. But even that shows an incredible amount of hubris. Is there a reason you are unwilling to simply express your own opinions but insist on claiming to articulate what others believe? It certainly appears to reflect a lack of confidence in your own views and a need to try to bolster them by attributing them to others.
Again, UAW can be a crotchety SOB and is sometimes offensive. But he is a long term poster and if you don’t care for him, fine. My point was that you have zero business purporting to express anyone else’s opinion. Is there a reason you are so relentlessly unpleasant? Seriously?
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 30, 2012
at 2:30 PM
Hey Evelyn. Read what this blog is about. Some people don’t seem to get it. And the overwhelming majority that reads this blog concurs with M&H. Most don’t post now because of the incorrect and unverified junk trolls seem to love to post and dominate the comments with little reseaech skill
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 30, 2012
at 11:22 AM
Crypto: I typically don’t read what you post–you are just nasty. However, I take exception to you claiming to speak for other people. So, for you to claim “ignorance is bliss” while purporting to speak for anyone other than yourself is beyond ironic.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 30, 2012
at 11:13 AM
Somehow my post came through as “anonymous”. ??????
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 30, 2012
at 11:10 AM
Evelyn too bad. don’t read what I post. That poster can defend itself. Ignorance is bliss. And showing it on this great progressive blog proves it.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 30, 2012
at 11:03 AM
Crypto: Please do not make statements such as yours above. You do not speak for other people. I happen to very much enjoy UAW, even when I disagree with him.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 30, 2012
at 10:16 AM
If you are referring to the Gayle above from a few days ago, nope not me. Noah I couldnt find above, but I am not a Noah.
I am however someone who things you left wingers are weak and pathetic. This women, a lawyer, can afford her own contraceptives. These able bodied kids in college, they can work and get their own contraceptives. We have a lot bigger fish to fry than this pathetic issue of yet another entitlement.
We have failing roads and bridges, we have serious inner city school issues, we have disabled and elderly that need the help a whole lot more than these young kids who can fend for themselves. They are in the prime of their lives. If we teach them now that they cant live without government help, how will they ever learn to be productive adults?
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 30, 2012
at 9:31 AM
it appears that the “I’m out of here” was simply the signal that Noah/Gayle would return as Noah/Corn. sigh.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 30, 2012
at 6:09 AM
The Congressional Budget Office has revealed that the true cost of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare, will reach $1.76 trillion dollars over ten years, not the $940 billion promised by the Obama administration.This staggering 87% increase in cost is for a program that is certain to damage the American economy and, quite simply, hurt people.
According to a House Ways and Means report, the AARP stands to make an estimated $1 billion – perhaps much more – over ten years if the president’s healthcare plan remains in place. This is surely an incentive for the AARP to support the plan, even though it could hurt seniors and Baby Boomers. This has many older Americans, including AARP members, perplexed. How could an agency that claims to be the voice of American seniors actively support a program that will harm many of them?
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 29, 2012
at 9:16 PM
Rather interesting. Despite all the “imagined outrage” seems you people out here on the way outer fringes of the left got it wrong again, Rush was virtually unscathed. Guess the truth won out. Even the Washington Post agrees.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/rumors-of-rush-limbaughs-demise-have-been-greatly-exaggerated/
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 29, 2012
at 8:59 PM
Todd Palin is not important at all.
MsTripp has been playing games for quite awhile now and that is all it is- games, innuendo, and foolishness.
Arizona Senate voted down the bad bill but partly as a strategy to leave it open for reconsideration to bring it back up.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Arizona-Senate-OKs-new-vote-on-contraception-bill-3443264.php
THAT is important.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 29, 2012
at 7:30 PM
So how can anyone keep defending Obama when The House defeated ANOTHER President Obama’s budget 414-0? This guy is too left wing for anyone.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 29, 2012
at 6:06 PM
crypto. This doesnt tell me anything. It shows a lot of people used the info and forwarded it on their own. When it was produced doesnt matter as long as it falls within the timeline of the Obama Presidency, and it does. What was your point?
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 29, 2012
at 11:22 AM
went to that Shailly Tripp website……talk about a sick woman…..
and I thought JJ had a fixation on the Palin’s……
and loves to cook ??????? bread/ketchup ????? sandwich ?????? PB&J ?????
even Helen uses bacon……and pots,pans,roasters….and pie pans…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 29, 2012
at 11:16 AM
UAW you can be as ignorant and repulsive as you want. You weren’t being replied to. no one cares what is fine with you or not.
this is not a rebuttal. this is not a debate. if it was then try *thinking facts. urban legends are great for those that have no research skills.
http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/socialism.asp
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 29, 2012
at 11:08 AM
yes crypto…and what did you find….
I found no matches…….doesn’t mean true or false……..if corn wants to believe the story fine with me……don’t try to use Snopes as a rebuttal because they didn’t prove anything….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 29, 2012
at 10:47 AM
I think someone has a fixation on Todd Palin
Tell me again why he is so important………
He’s about as important as our hoodie wearing ex-mi-gov (Jennifer)……
how about Obama’s budget that was turned down 414-0
tomatoes and peppers are starting to sprout….onions are coming……..soon I can do the work that illegal aliens do……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 29, 2012
at 10:25 AM
Corn please check it out on SNOPES. oh and also acquire research skills, some critical analysis skills. that ignorant article is factually wrong and has been modified several times. Nor is it recent.
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 29, 2012
at 10:21 AM
http://www.whowillwinthe2012election.com/college-economics-professor-flunks-entire-class-for-sympathetic-socialistic-views/
First two paragraphs are opinion, ignore it. The rest is pure factual gold.
LikeLike
By: Corn on March 29, 2012
at 7:46 AM
Land sakes! Saw in the WaPo this AM that Rushie thinks the worst is over for him and that the really big name sponsors are still supporting him and that only two stations dropped his show and they were piddly little operations anyway. Do you think we will ever live long enough to enjoy the day when Rushie learns how to spell D E N I A L? His behavior is sooooooo like that of an addict. Seriously, who would want to advertise their precious product on a show starring an addict?
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 29, 2012
at 6:44 AM
UAW; A 45 year old with a pre-existing condition has been turned down for coverage quite often. The same can be said of the 3 year old with expensive a medical condition. So, if we go back to the old way – the 45 year old will be turned down again and Romney will deny him insurance because you do not have insurance. (Even though he tried but was denied or could not afford super high premiums.)
Todd probably was involved. You need to keep up with the information in AK, my friend. There is information which many want to ignore but it will come out in time.
http://shaileytripp.yolasite.com/blog/greg-west-todd-palin
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 28, 2012
at 9:05 PM
and say it like Romney said…..
“”Well, if they’re 45 years old, and they show up, and they say, I want insurance, because I’ve got a heart disease, it’s like, `Hey guys, we can’t play the game like that. You’ve got to get insurance when you’re well, and if you get ill, then you’re going to be covered,'” Romney replied. “
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 28, 2012
at 8:13 PM
Todd Palin info update….
Todd Palin, husband of Sarah Palin, is not involved in a prostitution ring with Shailey Tripp: cops
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-01-26/gossip/27737965_1_todd-palin-prostitution-ring-sarah-palin
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 28, 2012
at 8:03 PM
Mitt Romney on pre-existing conditions —- sorry, ‘we don’t play the game like that’ to the 45 year old with a heart condition who was denied insurance in the past. The next Republican Presidential candidate speaks.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/romney-preexisting-conditions-deny-coverage-
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 28, 2012
at 10:34 AM
Todd Palin info update:
http://shaileytripp.yolasite.com/blog/greg-west-todd-palin
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 28, 2012
at 10:23 AM
Cheny’s heart….
Pelosi’s Botox injections….
whats the diff….
http://derekclontz.wordpress.com/2009/03/23/23-million-for-facelifts-and-botox-on-capitol-hill-and-you-are-paying-the-bill/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 28, 2012
at 9:42 AM
Cheney got his heart paid for by us taxpayers, this family is now wondering who will help them pay for their daughter’s needed heart transplant. The reality of life for many. Health Care, or lack of, is about people but sadly, the focus is more about the poor insurance companies.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/27/1078131/-I-Just-Paid-for-Dick-Cheney-s-New-Heart-Now-Who-Will-Pay-for-My-Daughter-s-
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 28, 2012
at 7:57 AM
re: Cheney –
My oldest son asked how the got the Darth Vader mask off to give him anesthesia. LOL.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 28, 2012
at 6:10 AM
I get what you said Bev, and you should be ashamed of yourself, that does not speak to our President’s character, but it sure tells me more than I care to know about you!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 27, 2012
at 11:30 PM
Cheney was the one person who DID need a new heart. Good for him. Too bad for the many affected by his decisions that it happened so late in his life.
As they say, “better late than never.”
I hope it comes filled with compassion. 🙂
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 27, 2012
at 10:43 PM
Dick Cheney is a public figure, thus fair game. You just don’t get it do you?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 27, 2012
at 8:43 PM
Crypto: Interesting – You and I just paid a million dollars for Dick Cheney to get a new haart. He is a multi millionaire, maybe Billionaire, but who gets stuck with the tab of the heart? You and I. Poor Folk will be stuck on the road, if you have a name and connections – you will be covered and the middle class will be stuck with the bill.
There is a huge waiting list for heart transplants. My guess is that Dick Cheney was at the top of the list and the poor folks needing a heart got moved on down the transplant line.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 27, 2012
at 6:23 PM
satire?????????
outrageous statement????????
Like “slut” or “prostitute”…………
civility goes both ways………
and so does “BULLSHIT”
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 27, 2012
at 2:49 PM
JJ: how about US???? WE are paying for the uninsured. I say to those who do not want to get insurance: if you become ill or have a major accident, we will no longer pay for your hospital bills and related expenses. we’ll just leave you on the road.
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 27, 2012
at 2:32 PM
Amazing really: The Supreme Court Justices were not as curious with Citizens United or Gore V Bush but suddenly the Right Wing Judges want to know if passing this decision will lead to people being forced to eat broccoli. Right Wing Activist Judges at work for the good of Corporations, Insurance companies and the 1 %.
Again: The people with pre-existing conditions and costly medical procedures will be dropped by insurance companies if the Supreme Court Justices drop the ACA.
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 27, 2012
at 1:49 PM
HEALTH INSURANCE and the Affordable Care Act: It affects people, like this baby with large medical bills. The Insurance Company would drop her fast without the APA!
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/27/health/health-care-insurance-lifetime-caps/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 27, 2012
at 12:23 PM
UAW, when you hear a statement that outrageous, it is called satire.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 27, 2012
at 11:07 AM
LOL LOL UAW… that was a copy and paste of Helen’s tweet.. that wasn’t me talking, that was your hostess.
Silly
LikeLike
By: lori on March 27, 2012
at 10:07 AM
JJ the Crooks and Liars’ article, just makes me think, the most important vote we cast this November will be our choice of who to send to the House of Representatives. Naturally, because they are the front-line on the budget, but also because “shit happens,” and your Congressperson is the-go-to person to bring it to the attention of the proper agencies. This certainly is not a job for someone, who doesn’t even believe in the power of government.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 27, 2012
at 9:49 AM
THIS IS A MUST SEE!
What cutting the budget to balance the budget would look like. Quite the eye opener.
http://crooksandliars.com/kenneth-quinnell/afge-activist-destroys-republican
LikeLike
By: JuneauJoe on March 27, 2012
at 9:17 AM
Please grace us with a post soon Helen, we would all benefit from a good belly laugh.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 27, 2012
at 8:58 AM
The Paul Ryan and Republican budget proposal or more TAX BREAKS FOR MILLIONAIRES paid for by the poor and middle class cuts to needed programs. The Ryan budget also adds TWO TRILLION TO OUR DEFICIT!
http://kikoshouse.blogspot.ca/
LikeLike
By: Juneau Joe on March 27, 2012
at 8:58 AM
no Lori….you don’t…your a good example……….
or are you now for death panels???????
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 27, 2012
at 7:03 AM
Do I see another post in our near future Helen? Sure hope so.
Helen Philpot@HelenPhilpotReply
Retweeted
Don’t you have to have a heart to get a heart transplant?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 27, 2012
at 4:56 AM
Big Oil has made a trillion in profits in 10 years. It is past time to take away their 4 Billion dollar subsidies. That money could be used in so many useful ways.
http://current.com/shows/the-young-turks/videos/top-5-oil-companies-made-1-trillion-in-profits-in-last-10-years-so-why-do-they-get-taxpayer-subsidies
LikeLike
By: Juneau Joe on March 27, 2012
at 4:33 AM
And we are expected to donate money to read uaw’s ramblings? You’re kidding right?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 26, 2012
at 7:48 PM
ROTFLMAO….
Rush is in good form today…..
Media Matters is like “jock itch”
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 26, 2012
at 12:44 PM
can you imagine the outrage if the KKK offered a bounty on a black man…..
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/03/26/149399082/new-black-panther-party-offers-10k-bounty-for-george-zimmerman
so where are Jesse and Al…..
http://www.kctv5.com/story/17048649/teens-set-13-year-old-student-on-fire
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 26, 2012
at 12:22 PM
PFesser….
if your talking about the National Defense Resources Preparedness exectutive order it’s been around since around 1950……..it gets updated every now and then……it was amended twice by Bush…….not saying it wouldn’t be easy to slip something in…..
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/ndrp.asp
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 26, 2012
at 10:33 AM
alaskapi…..
I’ll pass on the seaweed soup………stone soup sounds tastier……..
make a loop in the end of the piano wire and snare the fish (I doubt if its legal)……
smoked 400# of venison sausage 3 weeks ago……..I know….a little late for XMAS……
waiting for wind to switch so we can smoke the 270# of old milk cow/broken leg sausage……
won’t be any singing going on but might be a beer or two imbibed…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 26, 2012
at 10:22 AM
farsight….
just saying that after reading some of the posts here(not singling you out) that every now and then someone has to say BULLSHIT……aren’t people called trolls for trying to incite a response from others on this blog…..how about the phrase…..GOOGLE SANTORIUM….or……OL’FROTHY…..makes you proud to be a liberal doesn’t it……civility works both ways……..and so does uncivility(not sure if that’s a word)……….
back to trolling….GO NEWT/2012
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 26, 2012
at 10:12 AM
Well, it would appear that our Boy Bo has authorized himself to declare martial law. This on top of the PATRIOT Act, the suspension of habeas corpus and negation of posse comitatus pretty much puts the cap on it, doesn’t it?
It’s always done the same way throughout history: put the country in a state of perpetual war and take away the People’s freedoms under the guise of “protecting” them and “national security.” All it takes is an ignorant, asleep population and boy do we have that…
Welcome to Amerika, comrade.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 26, 2012
at 4:52 AM
UAW-
We sang “Granny’s in the cellar. Lordy, can’t ya smell her?” too.
Pond scum soup is seaweed soup and while there are supposedly some good recipes out there we were learning wild edibles and it was just seaweed and water cooked in our lil backpack mess kits… salty, boring , but filling.
Wish I’d known about piano wire. Fish would have been good 🙂
All of it was pretty fun.
Even the singing Kumbaya part.
Even with all the latest political BS, life has been pretty good.
Sure wish I felt like it will be for my lil grands. Sometimes I want to wear a bag over my head and tell them I have no idea who has been making such a mess of things.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 25, 2012
at 8:15 PM
UAW, no need to get frustrated just because we don’t communicate well, you and I. I’m still not exactly sure what you were getting at above, but if your response is the bird, I’ll consider the source and smile on. I thought your post was cryptic and if you can’t explain it I’m OK with that.
Hmmm… I was complaining about troll behavior on this blog. I don’t see any democratic trolls here. What’s your point?
There is blame on the fringe of both sides. But if you say they rise to the same degree, I believe I would have to call that a false equivalency. Also, Jim will call out the fools on the left but he has way more to work with on the right. Also, back to the topic at hand, I don’t think that Helen was right because their will be way more than six more weeks of stupidity regardless of what the ground pig saw.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 25, 2012
at 6:11 PM
“Now you’re quoting my quote farsight Δ.” Just checking to see if it was one and the same.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 25, 2012
at 5:37 PM
alaskapi…
I can honestly say that I’ve never sung Kumbaya…..
do you have the recipe for pond scum soup……
piano wire works better than string……
LMAO…have to say that bad lipreading Newt was the best…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 25, 2012
at 2:58 PM
DUH?????Farsight…….
Maybe your rants need to get challenged once in a while…….
I might not be very good at the “rebuttals”…..I sometimes fall back on 40+ years of being an industrial rodent(shop-rat)………sometimes a middle digit conveys more info than a paragraph…….
and sometimes I still can’t understand why “you” complain about Republicans that are doing the same exact thing as Democrats………
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 25, 2012
at 2:32 PM
Now you’re quoting my quote farsight Δ. I left Jim a reminder that Tex followed me over there soon after we discovered his blog last year. He said he’d remember me at Christmas for that, and I hoped he’d forgiven me. Apparently he had, and made a whole post dedicated to him.
Similarly, the hydra was made a post here by our host Helen.
Have we deviated much from the main topic? 😀
Here’s a very trollish return to it…
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 25, 2012
at 1:54 PM
“farsight……if you got rid of the trolls you wouldn’t have anything to talk about” >>You know I was kinda starting to think the same thing<< "…….but then you could all sing Kum-BY-Ya…….." Even when the troll(s) have/has been absent, I haven't seen anything resembling Kum-By-Ya singing here really.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 25, 2012
at 10:48 AM
These bad lip reading sound bites make a whole lot more sense than their usual worthless dreck . And yes UAW, you can find one for President Obama as well:
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 25, 2012
at 10:39 AM
“and Farsight….that’s why some people get called trolls…..” UAW, exactly what are you trying to say here? I don’t see the “why” in your quote/example. Please spell it out for me so that I don’t misinterpret your meaning.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 25, 2012
at 10:28 AM
I haven’t sung Kumbaya since I was 12 years old in camp. It was sensiblle then as we had survived making pond-scum soup , trying to fish with string, and slept on beds of pokey, scratchy tree boughs.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 25, 2012
at 8:01 AM
I think I like that Jim Wright….
a quote from above article….
“Because far too many of us allow this kind of nonsense to go unchallenged. Far too many allow the Rush Limbaughs and the Glenn Becks and the Oprahs and the Yahoo commenters to go unchallenged. We allow the Louis Farrakhans and the Reverend Wrights and the Billy Grahams and the Bill Donohues to go on without rebuttal. ”
and Farsight….that’s why some people get called trolls…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 25, 2012
at 7:08 AM
farsight……if you got rid of the trolls you wouldn’t have anything to talk about…….but then you could all sing Kum-BY-Ya……..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 25, 2012
at 6:49 AM
sounds like the only winners from Arizona House Bill 2625 would be the lawyers…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 25, 2012
at 6:44 AM
Arizona House Bill 2625 like so many of its ilk is headed to the courts as soon as it is turned loose on the public. Frankly, I think that is why this type of legislation is written. There are two sides to getting such stuff shot down in the courts: the backers can gin up their martyrdom meter to yet another stratospheric level and use it politically and the other side, the resistance, can chalk up another win. I think I get a whiff of gamesmanship here.
As for being a woman in a company in charge of determining the “purity” of the women working for the company, that becomes another litigous situation right off the bat. And the courts have overcrowded dockets already which means that all such cases presented leave everything up in the air and the enforcement of such rabid regs goes into suspension, if the enforcers have any sense of self-defense at all. Now, remember, “any sense.” Just sayin’…
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 25, 2012
at 5:47 AM
“I do so hate to assume, but have to go there every now and then.” Familiar?
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 24, 2012
at 10:21 PM
Farsiight
Jim Wright has already dispatched one of the loons to the trash bin. I think it was the odious Tex, more than a year ago.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 24, 2012
at 2:39 PM
Pfesser, if you take the time to check out Stonekettle Station, read the commenting rules. http://www.stonekettle.com/p/commenting-rules.html There is a link to the long version, which is very interesting and the link within the long version to the “troll issue”. I would love to see our Hydra go try to pull some crap on Jim’s blog. He would find out how truly vulnerable he is and maybe even realize, in the process, that posting to blogs has nothing to do with free speech. Actually, I don’t believe he would do it because he is basically gutless. The reason he stayed around here was due to the good graces of Helen and Matthew’s hands off approach. To the Hydra, that is low hanging fruit.
In my opinion, the Hydra is one of the loons that Jim is writing about. I would place no one else, NO ONE ELSE, on this blog in that category.
Dead horse in the middle of the road, dead horse in the middle of the road, there’s a dead horse in the middle of the road and he’s stinkin’ to high heaven. Been beating on this one overly long. Nuff said…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 24, 2012
at 10:40 AM
Pfesser, you were asking about this earlier and I thought I would take a chance to post a portion of a Stonekettle Station post, “Why I Talk to Loons”, by Jim Wright. I also provide a link to the full article below. This guy is great. He was a Chief Warrant officer and kicks some serious but on issues of the day!!! Hope this all posts.
“Arizona House Bill 2625, passed by the state House two weeks ago and endorsed by the state Senate Judiciary Committee last Monday and advanced to the full Senate today would require that any woman who wants the cost of her birth control pills covered by insurance (any insurance, not just that provided by religious organizations, and not to mention insurance that she herself must pay for) must submit a claim to her employer providing evidence that it’s not for contraception. Now, if that wasn’t bad enough, the law would allow an employer to fire a woman for taking birth control pills to prevent pregnancy. This in order to, and stick with me here, protect the religious freedom of the employer. The woman’s religious freedom shall be protected only so long as it agrees with the religious doctrine of the crazy religious loons in the Arizona state government. This bill is different from other similar legislation at both the state and federal levels in two ways, 1) it specifically differentiates between birth control used for contraception and that used for medical reasons, and 2) it requires a woman to disclose that reason to her employer – not doctor, not insurer, her employer. I want you to take a minute here and think about that, think about a woman being required to discuss in detail her reproductive medical decisions with her boss – including her intentions to have, or not have children. Remember, her boss can then use that conversation to fire her. No. Stop reading for a minute and think about that in detail, think about all the vindictive small-minded pointy-haired religious freaks you’ve ever worked for. Think about a woman having to discuss her period with a boss like, oh, let’s just say Rush Limbaugh, or her sex life with Bill Clinton, or the results of her last OBG/YN exam with Newt Gingrich. Think about it.
No, really think about it.
Now, flip the coin and think about being that boss. Of having to screen the women under your authority, even if you don’t want to, because otherwise you could be fired for not enforcing company policy with regards to her reproductive system. Bad enough if you’re a man, but what if you’re a woman? If you’re the boss, and a woman, wouldn’t you always be under suspicion for any medical procedure you approved for other women? Would your company ever really trust you to make unbiased decisions when it comes to enforcing their reproductive health policies?
But, of course, nothing like that would happen where you work, right? No chance of, say, your company being bought out by a Christian investor? How about an Arab?”
http://www.stonekettle.com/2012/03/why-i-talk-to-loons.html
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 24, 2012
at 9:25 AM
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 23, 2012
at 10:15 PM
Once again, the hydra retreats to its lair. The “mission accomplished” denotes it was indeed commissioned to be here. As to the purpose of that mission, we can only surmise that it was to disrupt and promote discord among the porch community. Now it bids us all farewell. Again. For now. Peace.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 23, 2012
at 6:37 PM
OT –
Ladies and gentlemen: We are well and truly intercoursed.
http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/water_cooler/viral-video-man-posts-embarrassing-video-of-wife-struggling-with-math-question
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 23, 2012
at 3:25 PM
Well tried twice today to respond and it seems I can only post a line or two. Not worth the effort all things considered so moving on. Enjoy your sandbox ladies, mission accomplished.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 23, 2012
at 3:00 PM
There is nothing I can say that could surpass some of the divine comments above so I’ll restrict myself two short notes. 1: I’m now really glad I live in Canada. 2: Even if it really is only six more weeks that’s still too long.
LikeLike
By: MIkeB on March 23, 2012
at 2:10 PM
“Why do you always battle around for full participation of others the majority don’t like and you disagree with and who ultimately, as with Noah, blame you for all the bad things which they bring down on themselves?
I dunno. Just stoopid, I guess.”
Actually, there is a better name for it. It’s called maturity.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 23, 2012
at 1:46 PM
My last comment was in regards to Pfesser.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 1:24 PM
The standard for such things is almost always subjective, regardless of what someone may say. Additionally, what I say here carries little weight, but I will still express my opinion or concern.
Most reasonable people would consider the “bitchy” quote trollish behavior (IMO) and especially in light of the post that Cynthia had just previously made. We have seen this and much worse behavior repeatedly in the past. Gayle is new and due to the way he/she has started I’m not feeling charitable. My perogative!
I would expect an occasional rant or pissed off reply. However, in the end, it won’t be my decision to make any kind of axing. I am sure that Matthew’s tools put him in a position to know if Gayle is the Hydra. He will decide when any limits have been reached.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 1:18 PM
🙂 whole lotta agreeing going on here…
Gotta say that it’s just fine to merely disagree, without any agreement to do so, farsight Δ
As re:”Gayle”- I don’t really care at a lot of levels whether it is Noah- because if it is there will be a signature meltdown and truth will out.
Lack of response to being accused of being Noah is merely lack of response – nothing else, except maybe some cricket chirping stuff…
Nothing in Gayle’s comments ,at this point, rises to the level Matthew ,as blog administrator, established as criteria for possible banning:
“I should also let you know that I don’t monitor the comments very often, but when I notice that someone is commenting over and over in a manner that seems to be solely to disrupt the conversation or someone is just being mean, I have been known to give them a few warnings and then ban them outright.”
However I would think all of us getting a warning for disrupting the conversation and looking mean might be a possibility 😉
Dear Pi-
Why do you always battle around for full participation of others the majority don’t like and you disagree with and who ultimately, as with Noah, blame you for all the bad things which they bring down on themselves?
I dunno. Just stoopid, I guess.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 23, 2012
at 1:14 PM
Well, I don’t change hearts, only the Holy Spirit can do that. Yanno, harden the heart of pharaoh, soften the heart of Nebuchadnezzar… I just try to enlighten. Shining a light…
I know full well the old adage, “You can lead a horse to water…” 😉
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 23, 2012
at 1:07 PM
Yeah I know Poolman, Aries always think their words are that great! LOL LOL It dosen’t surprise me you think you can change a heart.
We must agree to disagree.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 23, 2012
at 12:58 PM
Lori,
Yes, our economy is picking up. The area I live in has plenty of wealthy folks from all over the world that live here part-time. That has brought these investors buying up the low-priced real estate and does trickle nicely down to pool builders, even if sometimes delayed.
I have some very nice projects lined up and am really in a good position having weathered this financial storm. Thank God! In all estimations I may be too busy to visit these blogs in a couple months.
I am torn, but there is a season for everything. This has been a very enlightening endeavor and I have made many friends. I have also streamlined my lifestyle, which desperately needed to happen. A reassessment of priorities is always good when approached earnestly. I move forward with added perspective.
As to your “change of heart” comment, I must disagree. True, many will stick to their guns, no matter how wrong-headed. But I still hold out hope for the few that DO actually have an interest in growing and learning and renewing themselves. That is my prayer for many I have encountered. It is also a daily prayer for myself. The worse thing we can do is stagnate.
I hope everyone has a blessed day!
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 23, 2012
at 12:52 PM
Indulge me a moment as I play Devil’s advocate:
So is the understanding that, just because Gayle is SUSPECTED to be somebody we already know, he/she will not – just because of that – be allowed the same occasional rant or pissed-off response as everybody else, and then forgiven? It seems like pretty high bar – and a bit of a double-standard, doesn’t it?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 23, 2012
at 12:45 PM
Lori,
You be hittin’ da nail on da head. I don’t believe the foundation of the person (In this case the Hydra) will change. Trust would probably never be on the table.
Question: If I am correct in my suspicions, will all pretense of civility be removed due to frustration, or will an occasional zinger or momentary lapse of control be enough to satisfy his twisted needs?
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 12:35 PM
Alaskapi,
Gayle was accused of being Noah etc. several times but never rebutted it, and I thought there was a post she made that confirmed the link indirectly. I could not find that post by looking back through the comments section.
I admit that I have been very suspicious from the time she first showed up. I just think Gayle is very tightly controlled and only here on Matthew’s sober approval. When looking back at previous Gayle posts, I see a tight control that wanes at time. That could just be my suspicious mind at work.
I guess we’ll see how Gayle plays this. It will probably make a difference in the degree to which we disagree. For the time being, I don’t think I can get much past agreeing to disagree. 🙂
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 12:18 PM
true dat FarΔ .. with one exception … do people really change their spots? If they appeared here early on with malice and distain, can we really trust them, ever? I donno… I am of the belief, hearts seldom change no matter the screen name. But at any rate…. that is just my opinion…on we go…
On a more up-beat note did anyone read the new polling on Obama vs Mittens in the purple states? Good news is risin. 😉
And Poolman, the economical dawn is breaking. Maybe not for you, in your neck of the woods, but where I relocated to- it is booming. Jobs galore..
We are where we are by the choices we make in life.
Who said: Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex… It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction? AE?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 23, 2012
at 11:45 AM
Part 2
When I first started coming back to this forum a few months ago, Noah/Anonymous/etc. seemed to be in his heyday and there was very little actual posting of true opposite opinions as civil discourse. I encouraged people to just ignore the troll but that was not to be. Once Matthew reigned that trollish behavior in, the discourse has been much more civil. The sound to noise ratio has improved dramatically!!!
If Gayle continues in the same vein as his/her “Gayle” persona started, all will be fine, but if a couple of the more recent posts,>>> and I quote, “I am not sure why you are going so far out of your way to be bitchy Cynthia but lets set aside your short comings.”<<<, are any indication where he/she is headed, then banning for good is in order (IMO).
It is my belief that pointing out possible recidivism early on may keep the behavior from again spiraling out of control. Hope springs eternal…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 11:28 AM
Wish I could actually have a short period to go back and edit a post. The second comment immediately above was not included with my first comment. It somehow got stripped. Then my statement saying where to insert the verbiage of the second comment got stripped. Maybe Matthew can clean it up.
I will try again with the whole thing.
Part 1
Alaskapi,
You do realize that Noah/Gayle/Hydra/(old)Anonymous are the same person, right? And, with about a 99.85999% chance that this is true, I stand by my comments. I believe it is very possible that he just cleaned it up a bit as Gayle and may now be starting to show his old self.
I actually even think James presented (except for very early on) his side of issues in an acceptable manner, although I rarely, if ever, agreed with him. UAW brings plenty to the party, most of which I disagree with, but he usually presents in a palatable manner except for when he goes off on one of his really rude, crass sprees (I firmly believe from statements that he has made that these usually happen in conjunction with an elevated intake of alcohol <<just had to get that in there<<).
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 11:27 AM
farsight Δ –
I’m saying, at this point, I disagree that “Gayle” is Noah/ Anon/ad infinitum.
There’s more of a “Tex” tone to Gayle but even there there is a multitude of differences.
It doesn’t seem sensible to just assume this is Noah/et al showing up again and starting to fall off the wagon at this point.
I miss James- even his pigheadness.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 23, 2012
at 11:23 AM
).
When I first started coming back to this forum a few months ago, Noah/Anonymous/etc. seemed to be in his heyday and there was very little actual posting of true opposite opinions as civil discourse. I encouraged people to just ignore the troll but that was not to be. Once Matthew reigned that trollish behavior in, the discourse has been much more civil. The sound to noise ratio has improved dramatically!!!
If Gayle continues in the same vein as his/her “Gayle” persona started, all will be fine, but if a couple of the more recent posts,>>>
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 11:18 AM
Alaskapi,
You do realize that Noah/Gayle/Hydra/(old)Anonymous are the same person, right? And, with about a 99.85999% chance that this is true, I stand by my comments. I believe it is very possible that he just cleaned it up a bit as Gayle and may now be starting to show his old self.
I actually even think James presented (except for very early on) his side of issues in an acceptable manner, although I rarely, if ever, agreed with him. UAW brings plenty to the party, most of which I disagree with, but he usually presents in a palatable manner except for when he goes off on one of his really rude, crass sprees (I firmly believe from statements that he has made that these usually happen in conjunction with an elevated intake of alcohol <<just had to get that in there<>> and I quote, “I am not sure why you are going so far out of your way to be bitchy Cynthia but lets set aside your short comings.”<<<, are any indication where he/she is headed, then banning for good is in order (IMO).
It is my belief that pointing out possible recidivism early on may keep the behavior from again spiraling out of control. Hope springs eternal…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 11:12 AM
Many of the same arguments about government getting out of our way are valid turned toward big business.
Very true, alaskapi. Business is amoral. I’ve often heard the excuse, “Nothing personal, it’s just business.” Well, that is generally an excuse to justify an immoral or unjust decision. A way of shirking conscience or scapegoating responsibility.
Business as usual is what put us in the jumbo crapper we’re all in.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 23, 2012
at 9:57 AM
And Gayle-
please.
Explain how the free market self correcting as in housing boom/bust implosion is superior to anything.
A measured balance between competing concerns, as free a market as possible to offer opportunity with constraints to rein in big gamers, did a pretty decent job for us all before the repeal of portions of the Glass Stegall Act allowed all that market freedom to blow up in our faces.
The market is not us, it is a system. Human systems get out of control of the humans who devise them without constant attention. Many of the same arguments about government getting out of our way are valid turned toward big business.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 23, 2012
at 9:46 AM
Well- I disagree with you farsight Δ.
As we are surrounded by people-neighbors, family, and friends- who share some or all of the views the so-called hydra espouses and we have to live and vote and all that alongside folks who disagree with us I think busting the BS is as important as calling it out as BS. Because all BS is not the same.
There is a distinct difference between the Noah personality and the Gayle and so on so I’m not sure rounding em all up and calling em all part of the same is sensible.
UAW- I read Ms Fluke’s testimony and I talked round some here to women about contraceptive costs since I’m rather past that .
It is important to me to note that costs vary widely, depending on the specific woman and her health issues and specific prescriptions so I don’t think the cost thing is all that important. Just as some folks do fine on generic drugs to treat other health issues and some do not, I don’t think it is wise to get bean counters in as the final arbiters of what should be prescribed to anyone.
Ms Fluke was quite clear about being there as an activist to testify about issues with extending religious exemptions to businesses attached to churches as regards contraceptive services which is what the Blunt amendment was all about.
Whether Ms Fluke’s examples of students who are required to pay for insurance as part of their tuition yet are denied contraceptive services floats your boat or not, it is an argument which has merit across a much broader spectrum of insurance provided by employers/school administrations/ etc. as regards benefits denied for religious liberties of the employer/administration.
Mr Limbaugh muddied the waters enormously with his nasty outburst.
In the weeks since this, Arizona has been moving an amendment to its insurance law exempting ANY employer from providing contraceptive coverageto employees based on moral exceptions in the employer’s mind per religious liberties.
For all who love to go on about men being the culprits of all this throwback legislation, please note the AZ proposed law was written by and pushed by a woman.
We need to remember women can be as stoopid as men.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 23, 2012
at 9:39 AM
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 9:29 AM
I figured everyone could use a little apropos scripture to start their Friday morning. Thus, the above…
Even as an agnostic, I believe there is value to be found in The Bible.
AND!!!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 9:10 AM
Sorry for the disgusting visual. However, unless you have a super hyper-overactive imagination, I don’t think you can visualize anything from my remarks that becomes as disgusting as the hydra once he is activated.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 8:57 AM
In our fool’s case, the fool’s folly is far less appetizing than dog vomit once tripped into a higher gear!!!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 8:52 AM
so a fool repeats his folly.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 8:48 AM
As a dog returneth to his vomit…
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 23, 2012
at 8:46 AM
Noah/Gayle’s period of courtesy was short-lived and has concluded.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 22, 2012
at 2:00 PM
I am not sure why you are going so far out of your way to be bitchy Cynthia but lets set aside your short comings.
You said:
“I don’t think insurance companies should be making my medical decisions,”
So the government plan lets you make all your own decisions? Or is it like the insurance where they get to decide?
You said:
“banks deciding how much they can charge you to use your own money”
Banks are a business. They are not a public service. Why do you feel they need to be government regulated and mandated what they are allowed to charge? You sound to me like you are a proponent of how China runs their show. Where the government dictates to the market how they run.
At least you recognize that government will take advantage of people.
To your article I will just grab the top line:
“Here’s yet another form of hidden bailout the federal government doles out to our big banks, without the public having much of a clue.”
Sounds like a big government problem to me.
So again I ask, why do you feel the government is MORE qualified where they have no incentive to do it right while private sector has competitors that help(not perfectly but better than government) keep the market honest.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 22, 2012
at 11:46 AM
The orchestra has started, I hear the same old refrain!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 22, 2012
at 10:56 AM
I’m sorry Gayle; I thought the article I posted made my point/answer. Did you read it?
I don’t think insurance companies should be making my medical decisions, oil companies deciding what messes they’ll clean up, banks deciding how much they can charge you to use your own money etc, etc, etc. The private sector is about making more and more money for them. The government does not have to show a profit…..it would be nice if they did.
Both the government and the private sector will take advantage of the people. It’s just that I chose who I get scr*wed by. It’s a “chick” thingy, you know?
We each can have our own opinions.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 22, 2012
at 9:44 AM
Where we messed up was becoming dependent on the government for our day to day needs. Were we messed up is when we stopped teaching and believing in personal responsibility.
To answer your previous question Cynthia, as you chose, rather than to respond, to answer a question with a question, yes the private sector can do it better. The private sector is set up as such that if a business fails to operate properly, they go out of business. Government has the advantage that they can keep getting it wrong, even on purpose, and still have more tax dollars to spend anyway they see fit. There are no performance objectives they have to meet. To prove this last point, no matter how bad a job Obama does, no matter how many laws to take away our personal freedoms, you will still vote for him. As would Republicans vote for their candidate. These guys can mess up all they want, and they will still be in power. So no I do not think the government should be in charge of my health care or much else for that matter. Why do you think they should? What have they done better than the private sector that justifies your belief?
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 22, 2012
at 8:44 AM
Pfesser – That’s what I thought! They have sold their souls for a buck!
Now an Arizona lawmaker is saying “women should be required to watch an abortion before they receive the procedure.” IMO, it won’t be long before this will be put this into anti-abortion laws.
Teaching “abstinence only” sex education and limiting access to birth control will only increase the number of unplanned pregnancies. Taking away the “safetynets” and making women jump through hoops to have an abortion will only force more of them to the “back street” abortions again.
IMO we were born into the beginning of a great time in America. We help bring about some fantastic improvements and created a very civilized society. But unfortunately we will be leaving at the end of that time. Where did we f**k up while we were here?
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 22, 2012
at 6:54 AM
“But why are the docs not yelling and screaming about this. Standing up to stop it before it can be put into a bill?”
Cynthia – If you will indulge me a bit of profanity, I will tell you.
Because they are pussies. They are pencil-necked, back-stabbing pussies who have become used to high incomes and those are being threatened right now and that is all they are thinking about. They don’t give a good god-damn about principle, and I mean that sincerely. (Tell ’em how you *really* feel, Jim!)
The best time of my life was when I quit medicine, thoroughly disgusted, and spent eight years playing with my children, building an airplane, visiting my family and old friends and pursuing a degree in engineering. It was at that time I discovered how much I hated dealing with physicians as a group and made myself the promise that if I ever went back it would be out of necessity and that I would never again ever go into business with another one. Engineers may be boring, but they are straight shooters and are MEN. (Even the women, LOL)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 21, 2012
at 8:38 PM
Pfesser – Good point, I will assume you are correct. But why are the docs not yelling and screaming about this. Standing up to stop it before it can be put into a bill? I haven’t read anything about that. All you need are those Santorum-wantabes who know they can not be sued.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 21, 2012
at 3:07 PM
I don’t watch much TV and missed this until this morning. I thought it was worth sharing, no matter whose “side” you’re on. He does mention what supposedly happens during a “brokered” convention.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 21, 2012
at 1:57 PM
You are asking the questions PFesser, but we don’t have the answers for you. A new political Party? “hell, the people running that place are proof of evolution – and that evolution doesn’t always run in a forward direction.” lol
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 21, 2012
at 1:52 PM
Cynthia –
I wouldn’t worry too much about that; the State Board of Medicine would take his license. Failing that, he would be completely ostracised by his colleagues and within two weeks everyone in the community would know and his business would go to zero. He would be selling pencils.
What the hell is going on in this country anyway? Kansas. Feh. That’s where they are still arguing about evolution; hell, the people running that place are proof of evolution – and that evolution doesn’t always run in a forward direction.
The ReBiblicans have GOT to divorce themselves from the RR and the Fetus People.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 21, 2012
at 1:27 PM
For those of us that were talking about a contested convention the other day. Here is something for us to chew on.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 21, 2012
at 1:22 PM
“But now politicians in Kansas are giving pregnant women and their partners something new to worry about. Buried in a sweeping anti-abortion bill is a provision that would immunize a doctor who discovers that a baby will be born with a devastating condition and deliberately withholds that information from his patient.”
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/03/15/kansas-to-pregnant-women-little-lie-from-your-doctor-wont-hurt-you
Try google there is more information there. I remember reading one that the mother’s health could be withheld from her also, if the bill passes.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 21, 2012
at 12:51 PM
NOP – I actually did follow the link and it just seemed to me to be a bunch of rambling. What the hell are they talking about? Why would your MD lie to you about your tests? Just some kind of disjointed straw man argument about some figment of somebody’s imagination was all I saw. Nothing to it at all. If your doc doesn’t want to do abortions, he’ll just send you to someone else. If he doesn’t want to do birth control, he’ll just send you out. I don’t get it.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 21, 2012
at 12:28 PM
“Do you trust your government to act in your best interest on your behalf?”
Do you trust the private sector to act in your best interest?
“The biggest names on Wall Street are lining up to become landlords to cash-strapped Americans by bidding on pools of foreclosed properties being sold by Fannie Mae…
While the current approach of selling homes one-by-one has its own high costs and is sometimes inefficient, selling properties in bulk to large investors could require Fannie Mae to sell at a big discount, leading to larger initial costs.”
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/another-hidden-bailout-helping-wall-street-collect-your-rent-20120319
Other interesting articles at RollingStone.
80 degrees in upstate NY in March!
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 21, 2012
at 12:25 PM
PFesser, I think if you go to his link, his statement will make more sense to you.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 21, 2012
at 12:21 PM
Brisco –
I must be exceedingly dense; I work in the medical field and I cannot for the life of me figure out what you are saying. Would you distill it down to specific accusations? Thanks.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 21, 2012
at 12:03 PM
Gayle, thanks for the Paul Harvey. Now we all have the rest of the story.
Maybe Helen will bless us with another witty post soon.
Hint. Hint. Hint.
I hope everyone has a great day!
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 21, 2012
at 10:51 AM
.. my advice to you is faith not fear.. educate yourself, look forward, join the 2012’s , and be brave.. all is gonna be ok.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 21, 2012
at 10:49 AM
Richard L Brisco
Interesting perspective. I have some questions for you
1) Does the government do it better than the private sector?
2) Do you trust your government to act in your best interest on your behalf?
3) Do you think that the government knows what you need better than you do, thus qualifying them to make the choice for you?
4) What freedoms do you think we as Americans should decide to give up so the government can better run our lives?
I ask this because I look at our government and how it has mismanaged trillions of our tax dollars. I look at a history of approval ratings often times in the under 30% level. I look at all the infighting and ask myself, is this really working. I look at big government and career politicians. Allowing themselves to do things that would land us, the average person, in prison for a great many years( example insider trading.) Do we really want to have ourselves indebted and dependent to this group of, for a lack of a better phrase, corrupt, self serving politicians? IT scares me to death to think of what we have already lost and what we are being forced to be dependent upon just in the past few years, I would really like to understand how you feel safe turning over your fate to a group such as this.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 21, 2012
at 10:02 AM
And the right-wing opposes this as a “government takeover of health care.” But when they want to endow your doctor with the ability to dictate their values in the form of dishonesty – health care (specifically women’s) needs to be taken over by government. Stat!
As a culture, would we tolerate this if it were any other medical condition besides pregnancy? What if your doctor was being paid by the soft drink industry to tell you your obesity isn’t from your 5-liter a day habit? What if your doctor didn’t approve of vaccinations and you actually get Meningitis? What if your doctor thought it wasn’t right to tell you about your cancer screening results while in its operable window? And what if some yahoo state lawmakers decided – against all ethics and medical research – to agree with your quack doctor?
If those things seem outrageous then lying to pregnant women has to be too. If we want to live in a society where women have the same rights as men, being of child-bearing ability can’t be a caveat to equality.
http://crooksandliars.com/tina-dupuy/purpose-driven-lies-and-gender-equality
LikeLike
By: Richard L Brisco on March 21, 2012
at 9:52 AM
Listen to the prophetic words of Paul Harvey from 1965. Remembering back in 1965 none of this was hardly a twinkle in anyone’s eye. Amazing, This gave me chills listening to it.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 21, 2012
at 9:52 AM
last part is the best
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 21, 2012
at 9:32 AM
Unbelievable, so this is how dysfunctional the Republican Party has become, http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/st-charles-county-republicans-embarrassed-by-caucus-shutdown/article_d295a24e-a949-5c94-82e3-63951ca223b1.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 20, 2012
at 7:16 PM
Interesting look at Obama and the Latino vote. But the more interesting, between the numbers story, IMHO, is the future of the GOP if they continue to under preform with this demographic. They will HAVE to move towards the center on issues that are important to the Latino community if they want tonot only win elections but survive as a party.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/20/1076099/-Romney-s-Latino-problem-in-charts-and-maps?showAll=yes
LikeLike
By: lori on March 20, 2012
at 6:21 PM
Pfesser
Haven’t thought of Escher in many years. Thanks for keeping him in mind.
Like you, I grabbed off a few ratings simply for the experience and ended up holding C-ASMEL-I plus AGI. But this was all long before glass cockpits and GPS. It’s been more than 35 years since I took the controls of anything and without a BFR, physical or current hours I wouldn’t know where to start anymore. But the interest never goes away.
However, the way things are tending security-wise I’d suspect that it’s only a matter of time before recreational flying is a thing of the past or will be restricted to smaller and smaller boxes. I’m not sure what that will mean for the industry some years down the road because I don’t know where the pilots will come from. Of course, drones might well be the future.
LikeLike
By: jsri on March 20, 2012
at 10:44 AM
PFesser, once again I find myself agreeing with you. In the past many people with opposing opinions have contributed here without incident, but the many faces of Noah was ugly business and I don’t think any of us want a repeat. And I have already told “Gayle,” I like this version of him better than any of the previous personas. It is kind of like the “Three Faces of Eve,” one is bound to prefer one personality over the others. But keep in mind, that is only my first impression, “she” if she reverts to Noah….
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 20, 2012
at 9:51 AM
NOP –
Something occurred to me. Does it really matter if Gayle is someone we already know? (I have no opinion on whether that is true or not, but if not it seems un porch-like to not be cordial to a new poster.)
What if someone decided that the old way of doing business wasn’t working and decided to have a clean start, complete with a new persona; would that be OK?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 20, 2012
at 7:52 AM
jsri –
“New Avatar I see. Why not a skull and crossbones?
BTW, how’s the Commercial ticket coming along and what do you think you’ll do with it?”
Good to see you again. I hadn’t thought of the Jolly Roger as an avatar; that’s a pretty good idea! That picture is M.C. Escher’s father; I’m sure it’s copyrighted or something…I’m an Escher fan.
Commercial rating is stalled (heh-heh) right now; I am getting pounded at work – no time to fly, doing 7-day weeks for long stretches; I keep M&H open on my desk for an occasional break. Pretty sad, huh?
I’m doing the Commercial rating just to improve proficiency, nothing else. I DID fly into DC a couple of weeks ago. Wow. Sure raises your pucker factor. Those ol’ boys ain’t fooling around. They will give you ONE warning – flashing red and green lasers controlled by radar. If you see them, it means YOU, and you better turn 180 degrees right now. They will still send someone to talk to you wherever you land. The idea of course, is to discourage all those pesky “little planes” from flying in the People’s Airspace. Kind of ironic, isn’t it?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 20, 2012
at 7:47 AM
The Democrats didn’t decide whether or not to change history when picking the President. We picked from the two most qualified people on the planet, and most of us felt that one was a bit better than the other, and history was made.
LikeLike
By: Taube on March 19, 2012
at 8:17 PM
Thanks Lori, I’ll check Helen out on twitter.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 19, 2012
at 9:51 AM
Love Helen’s tweets!
Helen Philpot@HelenPhilpot
It’s amazing to me how often the religious right gets it wrong
Keep it up Helen… I’m proud of you!
Come on M&H supporters.. RT her! LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on March 19, 2012
at 9:22 AM
Pfesser
New Avatar I see. Why not a skull and crossbones?
BTW, how’s the Commercial ticket coming along and what do you think you’ll do with it?
LikeLike
By: jsri on March 19, 2012
at 9:15 AM
testing
These new log-in rules are a puzzlement.
LikeLike
By: jsri on March 19, 2012
at 9:14 AM
In case you missed it…
…last week’s Doonesbury.
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 19, 2012
at 7:57 AM
NOP,
In the lead-up to Nov. 2008, I had over several years (about 7) become increasingly more involved with politics. I went from being left centrist to very left. Not revolutionary or batshit crazy left just very left. I had by about 2005 become obsessed to the point of almost almost all free time spent on the internet reading about politics, Bills, court decisions and of course some blogs with M&H being my favorite. After things turned out the way they did in 2008, I relaxed some. I quit reading political stories, read Helen infrequently and quit reading the comment section entirely. It was mental health therapy that was long overdue. I continued to listen to progressive talk radio but with a considerably less investment of time. Recently, I have started reading and paying closer attention to politics once again.
I would have preferred a less centrist Obama, but until Elizabeth Warren becomes president in 2016 or 2020 I will be happy with him for the next 4 years, and I do believe he is an exceptional man/president. I believe that had a concerted attempt at a public option been attempted, it would have been obtained! That is my biggest beef with him.
It is really nice seeing some of the ole regulars here, and now that the hydra seems to be somewhat tamed, I am enjoying the comments section. The hydra’s almost total one dimensional (as you would put it) domination of the comments section was appalling and boring at the same time. It is most certainly a joy that the comments are so much more civil and sane now!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 19, 2012
at 12:33 AM
It is on another blog farsight. Sure good to see back here, I hope a lot of the gang show up for election 2012.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 18, 2012
at 11:10 PM
NOP, what is “The BIn” you write of? Also, Mathew must have really played hardball with the hydra as he seems to be reluctant to do what comes naturally. Less one dimensional and maybe even civil.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 18, 2012
at 10:26 PM
Well Gayle, I wouldn’t invite you to a slumber party with the rest of the chicks here, but I find your new persona less one dimensional than your previous ones.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 18, 2012
at 7:59 PM
No One:s Puppet
I really have no interest in this thing you do on this website with people you do not like. Find someone else to taunt. Thanks.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 18, 2012
at 7:08 PM
one mo’ time
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 18, 2012
at 6:58 PM
again
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 18, 2012
at 6:37 PM
test avatar
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 18, 2012
at 6:36 PM
Hi Gayle, Poolman stopped by The Bin today, you’ll have ask him about it sometime.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 18, 2012
at 5:40 PM
delurkergurl lets try again.
First sweet cakes was not a derogatory term directed at anyone. Note By: sweet cakes on March 17, 2012 at 6:39 AM. As you can see this is a persons chat handle to who I was responding too.
You said:
“Gayle, how about criticizing policy instead of criticizing the people here?”
As with other manipulations of my words, this is just not the case. I was making general points directed at no one individual.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 18, 2012
at 5:05 PM
hmm seems my last post didnt post.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 18, 2012
at 4:45 PM
Remember those grocery store tabloids by the checkouts with their astonishing headlines, like Woman Gives Birth to Alien Baby, Alligator Removed From Man’s Rectum; folks the very same type of sensationalism is available today online. And isn’t always the same acquaintances and family members that email you these things? Geez Louise folks, surely you are sophisticated enough to dismiss these tales.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 18, 2012
at 12:49 PM
and another post……(what this order is NOT)
http://minx.cc/?post=327606
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 18, 2012
at 11:55 AM
lori….
I didn’t know that whitehouse .gov was MSM……
I just said that MSM (FOX,ABC,NBC,MSNBC,CNN,CBS,ETC) haven’t said anything………
I’m finding that might be because it’s not newsworthy……
“National Defense Resources Preparedness” executive order: Power grab or mere update?
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/18/national-defense-resources-preparedness-executive-order-power-grab-or-update/
what got my attention originally was a statement (looking for it again) that the gov would be able to confiscate food and farm machinery and control their movement……..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 18, 2012
at 11:52 AM
uaw here is a site that gives you all of the executive orders issued (I highlighted 2012) you can decide for yourself if the MSM is/not reporting something correctly. No one has to rely on MSM ..It’s allllll right here. 😉
http://search.whitehouse.gov/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=%2Bexcutive+orders+2012&locale=en&m=false&embedded=&affiliate=wh&filter=moderate&commit=Search
LikeLike
By: lori on March 18, 2012
at 10:35 AM
oops…above was me….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 18, 2012
at 9:14 AM
wondering why MSM hasn’t mentioned anything………not even FOX…..
Obama Executive Order: Peacetime Martial Law!
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45319
President Obama signs Executive Order allowing for control over all US resources
Continue reading on Examiner.com President Obama signs Executive Order allowing for control over all US resources – National Finance Examiner | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/finance-examiner-in-national/president-obama-signs-executive-order-allowing-for-control-over-all-us-resources#ixzz1pTjD1RoA
http://digg.com/newsbar/Worldnews/executive_order_national_defense_resources_preparedness_1
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 18, 2012
at 8:26 AM
Interesting discussion! Someone mentioned Europe and proportional representation. How about the way they campaign? It is terrificly short and sweet, about six weeks and its all over and they can relax and breathe again. Can’t wait for the current carnival season to end in this country. I long ago reached my gag level. Of course, in its own way the primary campaigns are a distraction from many things but that is indeed a mixed blessing.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 18, 2012
at 6:41 AM
Gayle, I called you by your name. I’m not sure how that’s worse than calling someone sweet cakes but I’m sure you’re very right.
Lori – go white!
Cynthia, one way to get money out of politics would be to acknowledge that corporations aren’t people. If they were, Rick Perry could execute them!
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 17, 2012
at 7:51 PM
:
:
😉
:
“On the Sixth Day, God created the penis…
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 17, 2012
at 7:50 PM
I agree Cynthia, unless we have campaign reform, nothing would change, in fact it would be worse.
We have had several attempts in recent history to form a 3rd party, they have failed, mainly because of money, or lack there of.
Happy St Paddy’s day to you to!
My brackets are still intact! I even picked Norfolk State! Now I need WI to lose.LOL LOL Big money here I come… and Go Green!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 17, 2012
at 6:13 PM
lori – I found the article. I have nothing against having more than two parties in the house and senate. It is just who and how the president gets elected. Also IMO the candidate must pass IQ and a$$h*le test.
I also think if we got the money out of it process, the lobbyists, the back room deals, the lack of discussion, held politicians responsible for making deals with corporations etc. and allowing them to later go for work with those they made deals with etc., an honest responsible press/media, get the “Grover Norquists” etc out of the game we might be able to level the playing field between two parties….well in my perfect world.
BTW – Happy St. Patrick’s Day to those with Irish roots and those who are Irish for the day!!!
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 17, 2012
at 5:53 PM
Yes Cynthia, under our current system of winner take all, that would be possible. Most of Europe uses employs the proportional representation method. That would be where everyone receives the portion of the vote they receive. So if a candidate receives 5 percent of the vote, he/she has 5 percent representation in Parliment.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 17, 2012
at 3:52 PM
Seems rather obvious to me, but I will elaborate. Right now we have the “good ol boys club” 3 party system makes it possible for both of them to lose.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 3:45 PM
cynthia, huffpo ran an article about the two party system about a year ago.. Did you see it? If not I’ll try and look it up for u.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 17, 2012
at 3:36 PM
“The only thing that will cause anything resembling bipartisanship is a three party system.”
but then would it be possible that just 34% of the people would elect a president. No???
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 17, 2012
at 3:26 PM
How do you figure that No One’s Puppet?
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 3:25 PM
How about that, Gayle is a rich “chick.”
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 17, 2012
at 3:02 PM
Sad place we find ourselves in today.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 2:33 PM
The problem hasn’t been high corporate taxes, as those have been greatly reduced in the past few decades. The problem has been off-shoring is still cheaper and business can still compete in our marketplace, with greater margins of profit and with less liability. That is how GE, among others, was able to pay zero US taxes and yet profit billions.
The problem with politics is who is actually controlling the votes. The teams are a diversionary tactic, backed by the same sponsors. These elected officials are generally acting for some lobby as opposed to acting on our behalf. The last decade SHOULD wake everyone up to that fact. The marketplace has invaded the womb. It shapes us to its purpose and discards what isn’t profitable.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 17, 2012
at 1:48 PM
delurkergurl
Unlike yourself, I did not mention anyone specifically. I was talking in general. Nothing for you to be disappointed in other than the obvious truth I presented.
As for bipartisanship, that is a mythical thing that rarely sees the light of day. The only thing that will cause anything resembling bipartisanship is a three party system.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 1:30 PM
I found this interesting…
“On April 1, Japan will cut its corporate tax rate to 36.8 percent from 39.5 percent. This means the United States will officially have the highest corporate tax rate in the world, with average combined federal and state profit levies of 39.2 percent.
As Japanese politicians found themselves staring down an increasingly burdensome deficit and an aging population, they came up with an idea: Cut the corporate profits tax to boost economic activity and generate higher revenues.
Japan‘s neighbors in Asia convinced Tokyo to act by luring investment from what used to be the world’s second-largest economy and is now the third, after the U.S. and China. Korea has cut its top corporate rate to 22 percent, Taiwan to 17 percent and Thailand is moving to 20 percent over the next two years. Hong Kong and Singapore have led the way with longstanding rates of 16.5 percent and 17 percent, respectively.” As reported by –The Wall Street Journal
Wonder what they have figured out that we havnt?
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 1:26 PM
Gayle, how about criticizing policy instead of criticizing the people here? You don’t seem to be conversing in the friendly manner you say we’re lacking. Sweetcakes? Sheep? Really? I’m disappointed.
As to your question about “party loyalty” – one factor is that there seems to be no such thing as bipartisanship (any more?). This means getting things done requires at least a majority, and now a super majority seems to be the new standard. People who support something when their own party is in power suddenly become opposed to the very same thing when the other party is in power. “Before it before you were against it.” Until the parties are willing to work together for the benefit of the country, voting for people in the party that systematically opposes you isn’t going to work.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 17, 2012
at 1:21 PM
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 17, 2012
at 12:13 PM
LOL LOL Realllllly? Pi? I didn’t know that about you! Well I’llllll b… learn somepin new everyday around here. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 17, 2012
at 10:51 AM
Poolman,
My point being that NOP had posted the same link previously vice you. Paradoctor, you nailed it!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 17, 2012
at 10:03 AM
If Hillary Clinton had been elected President, then the Republicans would have done misogyny first, and saved racism for later.
LikeLike
By: paradoctor on March 17, 2012
at 9:39 AM
LOL, Gayle.
You are welcome to think whatever you want about whether those loyal to a party vote straight ticket or act like sheep. You are even welcome to define “sheep” as you want to.
Doesn’t mean that’s what anyone does.
I regularly vote every which way except in primaries as the Rs demanded a “closed” primary system. Closed is in quotes because anyone except a D is allowed to vote an R ballot..
Often I leave a spot blank when everyone running stinks.
The Ds of the last 30+ years have gotten lost here in ANSCA and oil politics but continue to try, sometimes without even knowing why anymore :-), to fight institutionalized racism, big business running the state, and things which matter most to me. I am quite happy to hang out on the fringe and keep working to get some things changed which independant Ns and Us
( we are very careful here about when and how we call ourselves “independants” because of the AIP dealie) cannot do from their unaffiliated status.
I understand it is very different away from here but here in Alaska the bulk of voters are registered as N (non-partisan) and U (undeclared) and both categories outnumber Ds and Rs. We have a tidy number of AIP members
( secede-from-the-union group) and registered Libertarians as well.
Our State Senate has long had a bi-partisan working group majority though the State House tends to split along R majority and D minority lines.
The shift towards centrism in the D party , starting before but including both Clintons through to our current centrist President, ticks me off as I think centrism is hooey. It is however better than neoliberal neo-con gobbeldygook as far as how it shakes out for everyday people.
Both parties pandered to the shrinking middle class for too long , with little to no thought about that shrinking-ness and the outfall of policies which ignored causes.
I’m not loyal to that horsepunky and do talk about it in mixed company, lori 🙂
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 17, 2012
at 9:31 AM
Good to know, NOP, whatever that means. Yes farsight Δ, I have watched the video. I like the POTUS and he is my second choice in the election, as I have said several times (and places). If he is up against Romney or Santorum, he will likely have my vote.
But I am not too keen on imperialism or big government or propaganda. I don’t think it is our place to police this world. Now with the fake KONY propaganda campaign, MANipulating™ our kids in pushing us to police the continent of Africa, of course, under the guise of spreading freedom and democracy. They don’t want us there, and a showing of the KONY 2012 propaganda film caused massive anger and outrage in Uganda.
When we quit being shaped from birth and allowed to learn sans propaganda, we are much healthier and better equipped to deal with real life. Everywhere we turn we are being marketed to. Time to get back to real and unbiased education, if it isn’t too late. Only one candidate so far has addressed that issue.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 17, 2012
at 8:56 AM
sweet cakes
I think you have been watching to much of the msm. This isnt a war on women or health care. It is a battle if private insurance should pay for contraceptives. Fluke didnt do herself any favors misrepresenting herself and the facts. We already have massive channels where women have access ,for free, all the contraceptives they could ever need. I was rather wild child in my teen years, 1 parent household and a mother who worked 60 hours a week. Between PP, the clinic, and Every Womens Place I was wanting for nothing in the area of contraceptives.
Considering her connections to the Obama admin, I think this was a political ploy to distract us from other issues. Funny how in election year these things “suddenly” come up. Just smoke and mirrors.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 8:42 AM
I am curious why anyone would feel any loyalty to a political party. I can understand having issues you agree with more from one side or another but loyalty to a party? I take it most of the people loyal to a “party” are straight ticket voters who I like to think of as sheep. I myself vote for who I think will do the best job. Reagan for 2 years(most accomplished President of my lifetime) Bush senior was a waste of 4 years and didn’t get my vote. Voted for Clinton(Great policies, not so good a person)GW Bush, voted for him first term, not second term. Voted Obama first term, will not be voting him in second term. Everything else aside, we just cannot afford him.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 17, 2012
at 8:32 AM
Poolman, your secret is safe with me.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 17, 2012
at 8:08 AM
Proposal to counter the Republican attack against women’s health care – get the word out to your state congresswomen and senators – push for a bill that requires all males over the age of 12 to have their DNA in a database – after all they are half the genetic material needed to create a baby – and since the men do not want women to have birth control, and everyone is suppose to be 100% re…responsible for their own actions and offspring (no government support or handouts at all according to republicans) – it only makes sense that every single male should be in a database so they can be tracked down and their wages garnished to support their offspring – and if they can’t – then it’s off to a workhouse of some sort to work for below minimum wage (the rest of their compensation is in the form of room and board) and what little salary they get will go to any children they fathered. The wealthy will love this idea – it provides cheap labor (they can also be used in work groups (with chains of course so they don’t escape) to work in the fields – thus doing the work that no one else wants to do (and eliminating the jobs that are now filled by illegal immigrants). Inmates (with tracking anklets of course) who have good behavior could even become house help for the uber rich. Sounds like something the Republicans should really go for … right ??? After all personal liberty is meaningless when compared to the rights of a sperm and an egg which are much more important – so what’s a little DNA in a database if it means that every single sperm will now be protected and have a “loving” father ?
LikeLike
By: sweet cakes on March 17, 2012
at 6:39 AM
I don’t think you have convience NOP. She has been working her tail off for weeks now for Obama -Holding house parties, collecting signatures, opening her neighborhood headquarters! She is Alllll in. 😉 Fired up and ready to go!
But you are right FarΔ , we liberals are like herding cats. We get mad at our party and stomp our feet, yell at the TV, and bitch to our spouses. But as long as we come home and stay together we will be awight’! Loyality to your friends and your party is a good thing.. LOL I know personally, like PI, there are many things I disagree with my party about. You just will never hear me say them in mixed company.. LOL LOL
Enjoy your weekend all.
namaste
LikeLike
By: lori on March 17, 2012
at 6:27 AM
Pardon please… That should have been NOP not Poolman. I knew it didn’t feel right when I typed it in.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 17, 2012
at 12:42 AM
Yes Poolman, and again:
It’s 17 minutes you need to spare. The opposition has been effective at focusing on all the negatives; take time to listen to the positives. Also, remember that progressives are like herding cats and many progressives hold their own to standards that are hard to achieve and especially hard, if not impossible, in the current political climate!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 17, 2012
at 12:40 AM
Very true, alaskapi. I do plenty of label reading anymore. Take nothing for granted. Some days I’d like nothing more than to take industry to task, shut down the machine, and get back to nature. It’s been taking quite a beat down from our capitalistic me first tendencies.
Beck’s been for Beck for as long as I can tell. He still has his following and brings in a decent income I’m sure. He does tend to simplify and has contributed to the dumbing down of the public, a very successful campaign it is too, I might add.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 8:35 PM
Doesn’t much matter whether Gayle is a sincere face, poolman.
What matters is the tendency of Beck and many others to oversimplify and run with the oneliner.
My Representative to Congress made news last fall that he was one step closer to banning frankenfish- genetically modified salmon.
Horsepunky.
He sponsored legislation which prevented the FDA from using any funds to complete the certification process.
Nothing was done to address valid concerns that the FDA , by lodging certification as regards genetic modification of animals in veterinary medicine, was ignoring equal and competing concerns elsewhere in Fish and Wildlife and so on.
My Rep did nothing to actually ban frankenfish . He just blocked the certification process.
When we buy the oversimplification we are setting ourselves up for some rude awakenings – at the least.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 16, 2012
at 7:41 PM
Is Gayle the sincere face of this hydra? Time will tell. Anyway it is a new day and life is an ongoing series of choices. Truth be told, I have difficulty taking Glenn Beck seriously on any issue, although he has presented truth on occasion. Unfortunately he wears the clown suit too well and I’m not into drama so much.
Industry runs this place (US of A) and everyone has to give up a little moral ground to participate. It is very tough to motivate the masses to stand up against any oppression if it means their “lifeblood” is threatened. It seems to be easier for those outside the system to criticize and judge our character.
Funny, Cheney decided against the Canada visit. It must be uncomfortable to live life constantly worried about what’s behind you. I prefer to travel light.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 7:16 PM
Here’s a better description of the child labor rules too.
http://custercountychief.com/content/revisions-coming-child-labor-act-changes-could-impact-farm-operations
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 16, 2012
at 6:42 PM
Gayle-
I don’t much care whether people identify themselves as within or without a political party or any of the rest of it. I’m quite happily a registered Democrat who is pretty much in opposition to most of my party’s ideas.
The notion that this constitutional professor is set on dismantling the constitution is quite silly but you are welcome to think whatever you want.
Mr Beck has a habit of oversimplifying and hyerbole.
This is a considerably more thoughtful look at one of the sets of rules he’s got his britches in a bunch over.
http://madvilletimes.com/2011/08/thune-noem-johnson-raise-bogus-alarm-over-federal-farm-cdl-rule/
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 16, 2012
at 6:38 PM
alaskapi
I dont necessarily agree or disagree but I will say a constitutional profession who has intentions of dismantling said constitution to me makes a far more dangerous foe.
Now I post this link with the understanding that Glen is the anti-Christ to most everyone here. That said I understand those will not being themselves to listen to it but rather call into questions certain things about me. Those people aside, I think this is a rather shocking look into a law this administration has passed on our farming communities. Having lived in such a community all my life this resonates with me.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/our-values-are-being-destroyed-beck-blasts-new-fed-farm-rule-plan/
And since it was more than hinted at, unqualified, I am not a republican or democrat, conservative or liberal. I am a raging anti-government independent. Business isnt for us, they are for themselves. Government isnt for us, they are for their continuation of power and self interest.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 16, 2012
at 4:59 PM
PFesser- given we are a nation of laws, not men, a Constitutional law professer is rather more valuable than many business types in my book.
Maybe when big business accepts that it/they have been afforded protections and exemptions beyond all good sense I’ll reconsider .
The idea that productivity in dollars is the best measure of the value of a person to themselves and society has numerous shaky underpinnings not the least of which is that it is totally humanocentric and we live in a wider world than that.
The notion that competition strengthens all things runs deep in our society . We made it up though. We shouldn’t forget that. We made that notion up.
And we’ve run wild with it to the point we sneer at folks who work colloboratively and call people who are content with a basic decent job and all losers and lazy and all that crap.
I submit that we need all of us- the competitive and the colloborative, the adrenaline junkie high flyer and the pedestrian slogger through.
Over valuing a couple of attributes and the outcome of the lucky players doesn’t really get us anything but the mess we’re in right now. We need to be different . There’s too much to do
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 16, 2012
at 2:59 PM
And I think, anyone who puts down any type of employment is an elitist. I did not say Romney is an elitist, I said, you were, and you have just proved my point.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 1:27 PM
“How very ELITIST of you pfesser! Only millionaires have held real jobs? Especially one who bankrupted companies and sent the jobs overseas.
Not at all. Ross Perot built a multibillion-dollar company, but started out as a paperboy. Does that make him an elitist, or is he just successful? Romney started out with money but made a hell of a lot more. Does that make him elitist, or someone who understands how business really works?
Obama’s been a “community organizer.” What the hell is that? Also a “constitutional law professor” – basically bathing 24/7 in highly refined academia. I’ve done both – real work and University work. Believe me, the elitists are at the University, not the real world of high-powered productivity. The universities are sheltered workshops for the unproductive, where they take in socialism with their mothers’ milk.
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 16, 2012
at 1:20 PM
I think another big difference between RP and Obama, is RP doesn’t take his marching orders from the UN or NATO. He honors and upholds the constitution. I remember during the last campaign, our president said his first priority was to shut down GITMO, reverse the Patriot Act, and get us home from these wars. Wellllllll. I think things went a whole ‘nother direction.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 1:18 PM
I was looking for a pie chart. We all like pie here, so I thought it would be apropos, but alas, the data is compiled, but I can’t find 4th quarter in pie form. So here it is in bar graphs. It isn’t even close.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/ron-paul-military
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 1:08 PM
How very ELITIST of you pfesser! Only millionaires have held real jobs? Especially one who bankrupted companies and sent the jobs overseas.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 12:40 PM
@ NOP… not yet at least! LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:38 PM
might be a thin dime for you Pf .. not for me and my daughters.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:37 PM
You’re right NOP… of course he won’t.. it is silly…
but I am ready to declare.. it’s Mittens/ Rubio… LOL LOL
or not.. 😉 lmao
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:35 PM
“One of the dime’s worth of difference between Obama and Mitten is the Obama isn’t waging a war on women.”
That’s one way of looking at it. Another difference might be that one has actually held a real job and knows how money is made; the other has not, and thinks money comes from taking it from people who earned it.
So, it’s a pretty thin dime, but a dime nonetheless…
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 16, 2012
at 12:30 PM
Lori @12:23 PM. And Obama doesn’t tie his dog to the roof of the car!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 12:28 PM
Any discussion about a Ron Paul Presidency is ridiculous, he won’t be the Republican nominee. At this point, I am not making any predictions about who will be, but it won’t be Paul, that is for sure.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 12:25 PM
One of the dime’s worth of difference between Obama and Mitten is the Obama isn’t waging a war on women.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:23 PM
oh and btw poolman.. housewifes do count as an occupation.. check it out. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:16 PM
This should make for a lively discussion: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-dunn/sarah-palin-2012_b_1351763.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 12:14 PM
now Poolman I WILL give you percentage wise??? Probably yes.. but that is only because RP has no backers and the margins are so small.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:11 PM
exactly NOP…
lets help Poolman out here…
FIRST… the GOP by a margin of 2-1 has the MORE individual military contributions. Hands down, every election, the Reps bring it home .. No surprise there… although Obama had a pretty good showing last time around with $500,000? or so…
(this is from a fuzzy memory… but I think I’m pretty close)
Poolman … your guy doesn’t have a lock on the military… google Mc cain contributions.. google Mitten’s… helll google Newt’s… I’m just gonna take a wild guess and say 1/3 of their individual contributions comes from military/gov workers. Gov PAC’S and bundles.
Sorry bud… wrong again.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 12:08 PM
NOP – don’t get me wrong; I voted for BO and will likely do it again, but only as a distant second choice. I think the two parties are taking us down the poop-chute as fast as we can go, whether it is personal freedoms or financially, and I don’t see a dime’s worth of difference between BO and Romney. Ol’ Frothy is another story, of course.
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 16, 2012
at 12:02 PM
Lori, you can peruse the open secrets site and compile your information from industry, individual, etc. I think the relevant expression is “six ways to Sunday”. LOL. Ron Paul is the overwhelming choice for those serving in harm’s way. And he has been all along.
As for housewife’s donations, I would think the industry that provides the household income is what is counted. Just my guess. Go to the link and put in your own parameters, if you wish. I don’t think it is a partisan site.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 11:58 AM
How does grouping a bunch of small contributors make them top contributors? Do you know what the phrase “comparing apples to oranges” means?
Pfesser, if you watch the video, you can actually do your own review.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 11:56 AM
Interesting review of Obama’s campaign “documentary.”
The theme is to remind you of how bad things WERE so you don’t think about how bad things ARE.
Good plan.
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 16, 2012
at 11:39 AM
Mayb to make a fiar comparison you should include Mitten’s and the President’s INDIVIDUAL: contributors too? Who knows mayb one or two might actually work for the US ARMY? I donno… but its just my guess
seems fair to me?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 11:21 AM
Ohhhhhhhhh I c… so sorry poolman I was confuzzled…
But wait… you’re not tryin to trick me are ya???? LOL cause hmmmmmm under Obama.. I don’t see any INDIVIDUAL doners listed… ????
Cause there seems to be some INDIVIDUAL catagories missing.. MODEL?HOUSEWIFE being one of them ..I wanna know how much theyyyyyyy donate, cause I’m thinking they are a pretty boss doner tooooo 😉 jusssss sayin
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 11:19 AM
Lori, those are the contributions from individuals that work for those organizations, NOT the institutions or organizations themselves. Military salaries are not that huge, and these are folk’s donating their own bucks. Impressive, eh?
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 11:15 AM
Poolman could you help me understand something please?
U report the US Army to the tune of $81,423 is Paul’s top contributor. Am I right so far? Could you please explain to me what you believe that means? Does it mean out of the US Amy’s budget, that I fund with my tax payers dollars, the US ARMY contributes to Pauls campaign? Cause dat right der, makes me a mad girl.. 😉
II’m so confuzzzled would you please explain that to me?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 11:08 AM
I agree farΔ!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 11:01 AM
Cynthia, you absolutely nailed it at 5:05 PM!!!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 16, 2012
at 10:29 AM
lori, MY party? LOL. I voted Obama in 2008 and Kerry in 2004. At this point Obama is my second choice. I actually like him quite a bit. However, I don’t claim allegiance to either party. Independent, remember. I won’t vote a straight party ticket, to me that’s a sellout. I know you think this is a competition. Winners and losers. I think we’re rather all on the same team.
Here’s a listing of the top contributors as compiled to January 31st. I’d say the military is squarely in RP’s court. All the banksters are backing Mitt right now.
Ron Paul’s top contributors:
US Army $81,423
US Air Force $60,739
US Navy $58,267
Google Inc $34,191
Microsoft Corp $24,698
US Dept of Defense $22,821
IBM Corp $21,898
Boeing Co $20,986
Liberty PAC (Ron Paul) $20,000
Corriente Advisors $20,000
Northrop Grumman $17,804
US Marine Corps $16,490
Barack Obama’s top contributors:
Microsoft Corp $194,393
DLA Piper $164,087
Google Inc $144,430
Harvard University $139,566
University of California $136,253
Morgan & Morgan $128,145
Comcast Corp $114,950
Skadden, Arps et al $107,324
Sidley Austin LLP $102,015
Time Warner $100,457
US Dept of State $94,165
Debevoise & Plimpton $91,576
Mitt Romney’s top contributors:
Goldman Sachs $521,180
JPMorgan Chase & Co $356,400
Morgan Stanley $297,550
Credit Suisse Group $296,160
Citigroup Inc $280,050
Bank of America $245,900
Kirkland & Ellis $225,202
Barclays $217,150
HIG Capital $188,500
PricewaterhouseCoopers $185,550
Blackstone Group $178,050
Bain Capital $151,500
Wells Fargo $148,950
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?id=N00000286
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 16, 2012
at 10:01 AM
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 9:46 AM
I thought the backbone of conservatism was that you mind your own business and stay out of people’s personal lives. Apparently santorum (Ol’ Frothy) doesn’t ascribe to that philosophy.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/rick-santorum-social-issues-contraception-abortion-church-state/story?id=15931995#.T2NUI2JSTWs
Great! Let’s stick our nib-noses into every facet of the people’s personal lives…
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 16, 2012
at 9:44 AM
My mistake, I meant to post the new video “The Road We Traveled” from youtube. I will try again.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 9:42 AM
Do you remember? https://my.barackobama.com/roadtraveledfullvid
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 16, 2012
at 9:40 AM
Well Poolman, I don’t think Rand Paul will be Mitten’s choice for VP
either. I think he will keep Ron Paul on the hook though, if he is smart, which he is.
Another commentor and I had a conversation about this very thing a few days ago. I think Mitten will call on Rubio, the other commentor disagrees with me however. LOL LOL
I do think Paul will hang in there for platform influence. Not sure any of your Party’s “powers to be” will listen to him. But Paul owes his contributor’s something, although his donor’s have pretty much bailed on him in the last week or so. His strongggggg showing of 5-7 percent doesn’t cut the mustard. He will feel obligated to deliver a little more. His best shot is to go out as a “policy influencer”. Which is fine. Your party needs to move a little left imho! Imagine That!
Yayyyyy for MIOV’s son.. It has been a long season. Happy for you.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 8:31 AM
Saw where unemployment stats are down a hair. I think my son contributed to that. He now has a job. Its starting off part-time and took forever to get through the paperwork which apparently is a result of 9/11. Thankful? You bet!!!
LikeLike
By: Mageen in Old Virginny on March 16, 2012
at 8:17 AM
I’m so happy racism is a thing of the past. (snark)
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/15/1074757/-Our-post-racial-America
LikeLike
By: lori on March 16, 2012
at 5:17 AM
lori opined:
“Sniff sniff…..Need a tissue sweetheart?”
Grow up, little girl.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 16, 2012
at 4:13 AM
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 9:50 PM
There is some truth on Fox. Of course, now with Judge Napolitano gone, it’s harder to find. The MSM flirts with truth while bombarding us with propaganda and major marketing. It’s the independent journalists that still have integrity, and even then, you deal with a bias. The key is understanding the bias, then you can gather perspective, especially if you cross check numerous such sources.
The comedians do offer plenty of truth. As jesters, they can reveal more without fear of being censored, most of the time anyway. Jon Stewart gets away with plenty of freedom of speech that otherwise “journalists” cannot.
I think there are 6 people that control all the main media outlets. Rev Moon and Rupert Murdoch being two. Both with extreme interest in controlling the message.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 9:27 PM
I forgot….go to Jon Stewart for the truth……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 9:03 PM
wow Poolman…complaining about CNN…..what’s next…..MSNBC………damn….do you have to go to FOX to get the truth???????/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 9:01 PM
UAW, Newt works for Newt. That’s his first priority. Most politicians are that way, I suppose. Newt doesn’t conceal it very well.
We’ve had our share of lawyers, lobbyists, and businessmen… It’s time for a physician. This country’s pretty sick right now.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 8:51 PM
cynthia….
as I’ve said before….I f#$ked up and voted for Carter and after that I got kicked and stepped on by the union…….tired of sacrificing so some useless piece of shit could keep his job……. just why do you think I complain about people wanting something for nothing………back in the old days before safety harnesses and things you better trust your partner to grab your belt in case you slipped working on something 100+ft in the air……didn’t matter his/her skin color…….you had to trust them………..sure as F%$CK don’t trust Pelosi, or Reid….Obama just kind of hangs out with them…….I agree with about 60% of what Rush says………guess that makes me a conservative…….Newt did work with Clinton ………isn’t that the compromise were both looking for now…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 8:45 PM
Oh and if you want to chat about the doc on twitter its #roadtraveled. See you there 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 8:44 PM
Looks like CNN has latched onto that lie, too. I tell you. The MSM has been continually misinforming the public on his positions and campaign. He has suspected the GOP of election fraud, but has no proof. They run a pretty good ole boy primary network, as I’m sure you are aware. 😉
…in the Time.com article, there is ONE line from a “Paul adviser” who said, “If you’re talking about putting Rand on the ticket, of course that would be worth delivering our people to Romney.” I don’t know about you, but I don’t want ANY Paul “adviser” making claims about MY support going to Romney A: without MY consent, or B: while the race is still not over!
Anyone watching this would have come away thinking it was a done deal and would assume Ron Paul is dropping out of the race. Some of the dedicated Ron Paul supporters may even be convinced to vote Romney in their upcoming primary if they think this is going down. The MSM is already back to ignoring Paul completely. The last thing we need is for them to convince ANY Paul supporter that he has dropped out or is trading our support for trifles.
Contact CNN and let them know that our support cannot be bought or traded! And, let your friends who haven’t voted yet (or may be waffling on this idea) that Ron Paul has NOT made such a deal, and until the campaign officially says so, he will not make such a deal. Our support is for the cause of Liberty & the Constitution. I highly doubt Ron Paul is willing to give that up for empty promises from Massachusetts Ken!
http://www.dailypaul.com/220767/msm-reporting-ron-paul-cutting-a-deal-with-romney
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 8:35 PM
Poolman google TIME: “If you’re talking about putting Rand on the ticket, of course that would be worth delivering our people to Romney.”
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 8:10 PM
I am sure most of you have already seen this. But JIC, here it is..
A few of the reasons I will be voting for Barack Obama 2012. Love my President! 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 7:55 PM
My take is different about the perceived hostility here. Most of the opposing points of view over the past 3 years have come from the same 3-5 people coming in with various names. They often give themselves away with their first comment. They pride themselves on slinging crap and perfecting their straw man arguments. They accuse others of personal attacks when they always pick fights just so they can play the victim. It’s really old.
I can’t remember the last time a sane conservative appeared here and talked with some sense even if their views were different. My guess is that the rational ones have better things to do or better places to hang out.
Some actual back and forth would be really cool. It’s boring without that. Instead we keep getting the same Rush or Beck or Hannity listeners who aren’t even fazed when they find they are repeating lies.
So Gayle, it’s nice to meet you. I truly hope you’re here to say something different than taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for sluts to have sex because that wasn’t the issue.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 15, 2012
at 7:16 PM
I think No One:s Puppet that we have clearly determined we are different kinds of people. You and lori have attaked me from the onset and twisted everything I have said, and what I didnt say you made up. Neither of you have any desire to make this a nicer place to have a conversatation so unless you feel some primal need to continue to pick me apart, let us put this issue to bed.
For a second time, could you show me where I claimed I was a conservative? Since no one asked I am a raging independant voter from a family of generational southern democrats.
Cynthia, I do not see why a communist could not come onto this webpage and not be treated with some respect, Am I really expected to believe how we will treat another is by their political standing?
I have to say I never expected such a simple request to meet with so much resistance. Its astonishing.
Please understand that you can’t trust me. I have posted under several names including Jose, Roger and others. I am the Hydra and I refuse to leave. 😀
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 5:26 PM
“Another chick walks on in and the others get all territorial.”
I would agree if this were an actual social setting were the ladies were vying for the attention of the men in the room or a beauty pageant.
This is a political blog and IMO no one is looking for to be “territorial” towards or “feels threaten” by another women or man joining the site. Pfessor explained this is a liberal leaning blog and a “conservative” needs to realize it can be “territorial” in that sense. Just as a “liberal” would have a problem going to a conservative blog and expecting their opinion be welcomed.
Join in on the conversation at your own risk as we all do here!
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 15, 2012
at 5:05 PM
Not many women call themselves and other women “chicks,” Gayle. Anyone every heard a woman or girl use the word “chicks” in reference to themselves or another female?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 15, 2012
at 3:31 PM
I don’t know where you’re getting your info lori, but it doesn’t jive with what I’m reading. And it certainly is NOT b&w. That rumor has been around for some time, but both candidates deny it.
http://thehill.com/video/campaign/216289-romney-no-qsecret-dealq-with-ron-paul-over-delegates
I still think if the GOP would get their heads out of their heinies and bend toward real conservatism they would put Ron Paul against Obama. I still think he is the only one who can beat him on a straight republican democrat ballot. But it seems many conservatives are not really. If it ends up being Obama vs Romney or Santorum, I think Obama would win. But then a lot could happen between now and November and a number of events real or imagined could change the electorate.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 2:46 PM
Well it’s no surprise to anyone who knows the first thing about politics butttt we have our answer in b&w as to why RP was/is carrying water for Mittens.
Ron Paul adviser: ‘”Of course’ we’d trade our delegates to Mitt Romney for putting Rand on the ticket”
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 2:20 PM
Maybe this is just female psychology. Put enough of us into a room together and inevitably we get catty with each other. Now that I think about it, it makes a lot of sense. Another chick walks on in and the others get all territorial. Sorry if I pissed in your sandbox lori, No One:s Puppet I’m sure you will get over it.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 2:13 PM
Out of curiosity how was I defined as a conservative? Do conservatives have a monopoly on being civil to one another?
Appreciate the words pfesser53. I will feel welcome despite lori and No One:s Puppet
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 2:04 PM
LOL LOL PF…
Let me say this, Gayle, the conservatives here do NOT have a lock on rudeness, as you can see. I got the same kind of welcome from the same poster when I came three years ago. Ignore that kind of stuff – and welcome!
Sniff sniff…..Need a tissue sweetheart?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 1:41 PM
😉 NOP exactly.. and on we go..
Obama Biden 2012….
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 1:31 PM
NOP –
Maybe I’m a little naive, but I don’t think that Gayle writes like Noah.
Who knows…it’s like a giant circle-jerk anyway. It takes about two railroad cars’ worth of effort to shut down the bickering and snot long enough to get a toy wagon’s worth of decent discussion. Why anyone wastes his time on a blog is beyond me. Guess in my case I’m just bored with looking at hundreds of cases of nothing but black-and- white pictures for ten hours at a stretch. Maybe I need a life…
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 12:53 PM
UAW – I would like to offer my apology for my comment; it was out of line.
I have spent the last couple of days biting my tongue, talking to the screen and deleting my comments but last night hit my tolerance level button.
I know there were unions that gave up a lot only to still get the short end of the bargain at the end of the day. This IMO is what the Republicans will do to all of us 99%ers if they had control. There are too many things going on that no longer make sense or are logical to my mind BUT what does make sense scares the daylights out of me.
I have no desire to fight with you and will attempt to practice my own advice including using a clean finger.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 15, 2012
at 12:31 PM
Sorry about the +, I meant =, as in Gayle=Noah. It is so obvious, since it is so seldom a new reader is a conservative and isn’t it amazing they always go for how mean we are. I think if they were actually new, they would be more interested in discussing/debating actual content. Social issues are their thing. Right?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 15, 2012
at 12:21 PM
Gayle+Noah! Enough said.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 15, 2012
at 12:15 PM
lori opined:
“Well Gayle, I have a hard time understanding why you, after realizing the blog is soooooo awful and intolerant of other’s opinion’s, would remain?
Let me say this, Gayle, the conservatives here do NOT have a lock on rudeness, as you can see. I got the same kind of welcome from the same poster when I came three years ago. Ignore that kind of stuff – and welcome!
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 12:07 PM
Well lori I guess you proved my point. Most of us in the adult world gave up name calling after our middle school days. Why you and others insist on making things personal is beyond me. We all come from diverse places, backgrounds and ways of thinking. Would be nice if we could all present that without it degenerating into something nasty. Where I come from, it is possible to vehemently disagree with someone and still like them or at the very least treat them with respect. I will give you the final say, be as mean as you need to be.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 11:59 AM
I love me some Newt! I may just write him in myself. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 11:07 AM
UAW… you can always write Newt in! …. I will happily send you the MI rules of wrtie ins if ya need em?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 11:04 AM
slut….you say that like its a bad thing!!!!!!!
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 11:02 AM
let me explain that better…..2008 I voted for Romney in the MI primary because Newt wasn’t running……it looks like I probably won’t be voting for Newt this Nov. either…….crap
GO NEWT/2012
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 11:01 AM
Newt? 😯 You’re serious? Talk about a slut…
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 10:53 AM
poolman……
GO NEWT/2012
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 10:52 AM
Welll Gayle, M&H have and do call out individuals.. Noah being one of them. I’m sure you are familar with that name if you are a current “reader”.
Two… I really don’t care if you like me, like my politics, want to be my bff, or even read my posts…… scrollll right on by if you don’t like me….. no skin off my ass.
However if you do care about people not liking what you have to say, or calling you a little name, perhaps, politics isn’t your things. ORRRR you might want to go to a more friendly place? Cause I have got to tell you buttercup, politics aint for the faint of heart.
If you like the discourse here, by alllll means stay, if not… Oh wellllllllllll it is what it is…. Maytyrdom isn’t appealing …
suck it up buttercup…
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 10:43 AM
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 10:33 AM
lori
You are exactly what I am talking about. I love reading what Margaret and Helen write. With but one exception I have not seen them call out any one person on here as you did me.
My motivations are my own and should not concern you in the least. Please read what I said. I said I like the political discussions and spirited disagreement. What I said I do not like is going after the person saying it as you did me. I asked for people to be nice, and you tell me I should leave. What is it in my request that has made you so hostile to me and would make you say this in the first place?
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 10:25 AM
Don’t say that too loud, the righties will have a conniption fit. Remember private enterprise owns insurance companies. Like other brokers, they don’t provide the services or the products they sell, but they profit from both. We are a nation of middlemen, one where everyone gets a cut. Then we wonder why everything costs so much and gets squeezed at both ends.
UAW, too bad about the pension. I know plenty in the same predicament, many wondering now if they will outlive their savings.
Who is your candidate of choice right now? I know you voted for McCain last time around. Are you just waiting to see who the GOP nominates to decide for yourself?
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 15, 2012
at 10:10 AM
pfesser53……
found something on those jobs….
Graduating Class of 2010 Career Placement Stats [16]
Median Starting Salaries
Private Sector $160,000
Public Interest $40,000
Government $62,467
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Center
notice the private sector
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 9:25 AM
and Fluke could have gotten birth control…..
“Only Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, and Columbia Law School have graduated more Supreme Court Justices than Michigan Law, and Michigan Law has placed more Supreme Court law clerks than any other public law school, with over 50 to date.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Michigan_Law_School
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 9:19 AM
Waving to HRH!!!! How u b????
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 8:52 AM
❤ send your husband our best wishes and good thoughts MIOV..We are rooting for ya.. xo
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 8:50 AM
delurkergurl, my apologies for the tardy response to your kind comment re: husband and cancer treatment. I am now halfway between a pillar and post so I have a moment to thank you for your concern. Its not the first time you have offered a kindness. And we both appreciate it. He is to start radiation as soon as an appointment can be arranged. We all have our fingers crossed.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 15, 2012
at 8:46 AM
Well Gayle, I have a hard time understanding why you, after realizing the blog is soooooo awful and intolerant of other’s opinion’s, would remain?
If you don’t LIKE the political dialogue of this blog.. here’s a thought….. click the big X at the top right hand side of the page?
It is not like there aren’t a 100000000 other sites out there that might fit your likes better?
Perhaps you should do the same?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 15, 2012
at 8:46 AM
To be clear pfesser53 I do not mind spirited disagreement, just the opposite, I expect it and even enjoy it to an extent. What I find distracting and stressful is when I see comments made for no other reason than to be hurtful to a person. It distracts from the topic and takes the fun out of the place.
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 7:38 AM
For those who care…. yesterday was National Pi day. Sorry if you missed it.
http://gothamist.com/2012/03/14/happy_pi_day.php
LikeLike
By: HRH sofia EQ on March 15, 2012
at 7:27 AM
poolman…all insurance is socialistic…..
my UAW insurance is maintained by the UAW……..through negotiation us retirees “forgave” $37 billion in accumulated debt to the car companys…..most people forget that……..think everything is just handed to us….
as far as my pension; if your adviser took your account from say $6000,000,000 down to maybe nothing do you think you’d be happy…….the same cancer that ran the pension fund ran the auto companies…….
most people on here seem to forget that I’m also one of the 99%ers…..one of the overtaxed middle-class that made it possible to bail out the companies and banks………and I’m being taxed enough already….don’t need any more…….
Cynthia and Farsighed….good thing were not into personal attacks anymore…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 7:17 AM
“I find most folks here pretty tolerant”….WTF!!!!!…..
just my .05
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 15, 2012
at 6:46 AM
Gayle –
Your point is well-taken, and if you will indulge me a moment, I have about three years’ experience on this blog.
I think when one comes in, one has to realize that this is, first and foremost a liberal blog, and in the same way one does not start atheist diatribes in someone else’s home where there are pictures of Jesus all over the wall, a little discretion is a good thing. If you express a conservative viewpoint you will be challenged; this IS A LIBERAL BLOG. Happens to me all the time; I am VERY libertarian, so I piss off the libs and conservatives both.
I find most folks here pretty tolerant, but if you come in calling people names and insinuating that folks are not very smart, what do you expect? Go poke a hornet’s nest and see where that gets you. Express your disagreement agreeably and my experience is that you will still be challenged, but the personal stuff is much less.
Just my .05
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 6:32 AM
Ah, Donna – good morning!
It is a pretty eye-opening thing. I had toyed with going to law school at some point, but my life looks pretty cush after watching my daughter for a while. She’s out of law school about two years now, doing the public defender thing to build experience. I can’t begin to tell you how proud I am of her! Her work hours are just unreal and, now that she has moved up to felonies, the weight of, “If I screw up, somebody could go to jail for the rest of their life” has really sunk in. Couple that with clients who are often their own worst enemies – as well as guilty most of the time – and the stress is beyond what I could endure, that’s for sure.
Quick note: she had a client go before the court charged with fleeing, wearing a tee shirt that said, “I run from cops.” You just couldn’t make that stuff up. Or the serial rapist who wanted her to plead him innocent on the basis of “sexomnia” – that’s right – he raped people while he was sleepwalking and was thus innocent. God.
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 6:24 AM
Topic aside for the moment. Why is there so much hostility towards people who do not fall into line with the majority mind of this website? I do not understand why everyone is so mean. What is gained by making personal observations about people I am assuming none of you know outside of this page? It would be so much nicer to read people disagreeing about their thoughts and to leave the personal insults aside. I have had a real hard time lately opening this page because of the drama. Can cooler and more civilized heads prevail?
LikeLike
By: Gayle on March 15, 2012
at 6:19 AM
Pfesser: Thumper obviously confuses the starting salary at a very few Wall Street law firms with the “average.” Even putting aside how limited those jobs are, I’m not so sure that billing 3000 hours a year is the sort of luxurious lifestyle that Thump suggests. Those poor drones typically live in shoebox apartments (because of the costs in New York) and do nothing but work–seven days a week. No lives beyond the hope that someday they’ll make partner, which only a tiny fraction ever will.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 15, 2012
at 5:59 AM
“PS – Grammar: The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you’re shit.
May I join you? I love English.
Punctuation: The difference between, “Eats shoots and leaves” and “Eats, shoots and leaves.” LOL
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 5:56 AM
Thumper –
Can you send me some information on those $160K lawyer jobs? My daughter is just out of law school, making a little over $60K, with $110K in student loans.
Thanks in advance.
LikeLike
By: pfesser53 on March 15, 2012
at 5:53 AM
You all should lay off UAW and his obtuse ways. It is obvious that now that his insurance no longer covers Viagra he is having to pay full price (that is more than the Ins. companies bargain for), he can’t afford to buy as much and as a consequence his brain isn’t getting enough oxygen. I don’t think he buys Viagra to have more sex, I think he buys it for the increased blood supply to his brain.
He never has been able to concede when he is proven wrong except maybe a couple of very inconsequential matters.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 15, 2012
at 12:48 AM
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 14, 2012
at 10:57 PM
UAW, don’t you have a union established pension and an insurance plan through your previous career from which you retired? I think that is what you had related. I could be wrong, but if not, don’t you think that is kind of socialistic? I mean, the government did “save” the autoworkers and all and that must have meant the pension funds, too. Not saying that is a bad thing, just sayin…
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 14, 2012
at 8:48 PM
uaw – I don’t expect you to agree with me so I suggest you use that little round thingy on your mouse when I comment. Just put your finger and turn it. You know the finger you use to stick up your nose but be sure to wipe your finger off first otherwise you will gum it up and the wheel won’t work.
IMO Somalia would be more in line with your idea of a civilized society.
PS – Grammar: The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you’re shit.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 14, 2012
at 8:10 PM
No one with a brain give a damn what Allen West thinks!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 14, 2012
at 7:30 PM
someone else’s opinion of Debbie….
http://feministing.com/2011/07/20/rep-allen-west-attacks-rep-debbie-wasserman-schultz-for-being-vile-and-not-a-lady/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 6:44 PM
Poolman: If Thumper can’t spell “president,” Thumper is hardly going to be concerned about checking facts. Nor will Thumper understand that, as a matter of law, the “predisent” can’t get a super pac to do anything.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 14, 2012
at 6:41 PM
poolman…
so what was thumper talking about……Fluke’s political career ……..shit is see going to take Wasserman’s place now…..next comment deleted….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 6:40 PM
Those 28 thumpers must have been to the head. Sorry, as it seems to have affected your comprehension. Is it even worth pointing out we’ve already been all over this and Ms Fluke was NOT talking about her birth control?
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 14, 2012
at 6:19 PM
i love how you bleeding heart liberals jump on the band wagon when a conservative calls an idiot who wants to have tax payers (you) to pay for her birth control because she can’t afford it even though she is going to a 60k a year college! Oh and by the way when she graduates she will start her job (on average) at 160K a year which makes her one of those dreaded 1% you love to hate. It seems you are having an enormous amount of cute elite quips about Rush and his terrible use of a four letter word, which i don’t condone, but you have no problem with one of your own calling a candidate for our national office a c**t ! or other liberal pundits stating another conservative candidate should have been aborted! As usual your mindset seems to be that the only dirty words belong to conservatives. Your unwavering use of the double standard to fit your liberal agenda makes me (as rick santorum states so well) want to vomit. our predisent says we need to have more civilness inour dialogue when talking about ms. fluke but mentions nothing about the remarks by bill mahr nor does he have the super pac give back his 1 million donation. just more of the same and we should consider the sourse.
LikeLike
By: thumper28 on March 14, 2012
at 5:58 PM
oops….
http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/03/romneys-get-rid-of-planned-parenthood-remark-becomes-117503.html
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 5:55 PM
OH SHIT CYNTHIA….
your listening to Debbie Wasserman Schultz…..
“The test is pretty simple. Is the program so critical, it’s worth borrowing money from China to pay for it? And on that basis of course you get rid of Obamacare, that’s the easy one. Planned Parenthood, we’re going to get rid of that. The subsidy for Amtrak, I’d eliminate that. The National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities,” Romney said.
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 5:53 PM
I posted this regarding Rush over at Rutherford’s. It goes beyond the recent hoopla and describes his probable intended purpose, of which he has been monumentally successful. But maybe the information age has left him in its virtual dust this time around…
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/03/2012310112911500270.html
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 14, 2012
at 3:14 PM
Here’s Mitt Romney’s proposal for reducing the deficit, according to an interview he gave yesterday:
“Planned Parenthood, we’re going to get rid of that.”
That’s right, he said he’d get rid of Planned Parenthood — the more than 90-year-old organization that one in five American women has depended on for health care, and that for many women is their only option for cancer screenings, clinical breast exams, and critical preventive care. Apparently, we can’t afford it.
Here’s what he says we can afford: Protecting and expanding tax cuts for the wealthy, and “that includes the top 1 percent.”
Mitt Romney’s actually willing to cut off women’s access to health care to help fund tax benefits for millionaires and billionaires.
If you had any doubts that these attacks are real, or think they’re just a side effect from a nasty GOP primary season, consider this a reality check.
There’s one thing you can do right now — whether you’re a man or woman — to fight back against Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and every Republican in Congress who repeatedly thinks a woman’s health is their chip to barter:
Stand with the Democrats as we stand for women:
http://my.democrats.org/Stand-with-Democrats-for-Women
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Chair – Democratic National Committee
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 14, 2012
at 3:01 PM
Cynthia –
Apologise for length. Here is what they sent to us:
While MSV does not take a pro-choice or pro-life position, this year’s session has included abortion-related bills that have required our consideration. On the surface these bills may appear to be only about social policy, however they also have implications that are relevant to us as physicians in terms of protecting the sanctity of the physician-patient relationship, preventing additional liability risk and ensuring that our legislature is not codifying a standard of care.
This being said, the physician leaders and lobbying team for MSV evaluated these bills and decided to take a targeted approach to addressing these bills primarily on the basis of liability risk and, when appropriate, standard of care. Due to this strategy, we have been able to effectively defeat, carry over, or improve several of these bills which are updated below.
HB 1, the “personhood bill” has been carried over until next year. When the bill was heard in committee MSV expressed opposition as the bill would have created a new cause of action by a fetus against a physician.
SB 674 would have allowed two causes of action to be brought against a physician upon the death of a fetus; one by the mother and one by her representative or the father of a fetus. MSV worked with the House Courts of Justice committee to achieve favorable changes that preserve the current law which allows only one cause of action. The bill awaits action by the full House and, upon House approval, must be reconsidered by the full Senate in light of the amended language.
SB 277 would have prohibited a forced or coerced abortion and would have created a private right of action against the person who threatened or coerced a woman to have an abortion for the woman herself and for the wrongful death of the unborn child. This could have created a new cause of action for just discussing risks, benefits and alternatives to address physicians’ liability exposure, MSV worked in committee to delete the language that created a cause of action against a physician. The bill was carried over, ending its consideration for the year.
HB 462, often referred to as the “ultrasound” bill would require a physician to perform a transabdominal ultrasound on a woman prior to performing an abortion, thereby codifying a standard of care. MSV worked with key legislators to oppose this bill on that basis. We made a very strong effort with these legislators and were disappointed that the bill ultimately passed in the Senate by a narrow margin. The bill was amended on the Senate floor to create an exception for the ultrasound requirement for women who are the victims of rape or incest. The bill passed the Senate yesterday and returns to the House for a vote on the amended language.
HB 1285 and SB 637, the pain-capable unborn child protection act, would have prohibited an abortion after 20 weeks gestation and would have created a new civil cause of action against a physician who performs an abortion in violation of the bill. MSV worked to amend these bills to avoid a new cause of action. Both bills died in committee.
As a membership organization that has a strong commitment to advocating for its members, there is a dynamic tension when it comes to communicating about issues such as these. Factors we consider include a respect for the individual social positions of each member, an acute awareness of the political strategies we must consider to stay focused and achieve the most we can for our members, and last but certainly not least, providing our members with timely information.
This session, we weighed these options carefully. Our commitment to you is that we will make every effort to share as much as we can in real-time without unnecessarily compromising efforts that ultimately benefit physicians and patients in Virginia. In addition, we will explore ways to better connect you with information about issues and legislation that may impact our profession and our patients. Keeping you updated and informed keeps you equipped to advocate personally and that is certainly something that is critical to leading health care in Virginia.
re: everybody has a dog in this fight. No argument there. I’m in.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 3:00 PM
Pf – you may have a point. But by placing no blame on the physician it keeps them from complaining too loudly….. or is that the part of the “changes to this lunatic law” they pushed?
Yes the young girls don’t know what it was like before legal abortion AND also the pill. The social attitude and fear of pregnancy kept many young ladies from having fun. But the men of today should join in this fight for birth control. Back then they really had to do some smooth talking to bed a young lady but most had to get married for sex. The men today don’t realize just how important access to birth control is to them as well.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 14, 2012
at 2:46 PM
Cynthia –
Actually, the VA Med Society has (they tell us) been right there in the middle of the fight and has made some changes to this lunatic law, but they really don’t care what we have to say. We are but few. Women, on the other hand, make up half the population, control 80% of the money and all the p**sy, as my old high school buddy used to say. Talk about real power!
Most of those legislators are men and they have wives at home. I can’t believe the majority of them back this kind of nonsense. My wife says most young women have never lived during the days when abortion was unavailable and just aren’t paying attention to politics. It never occurs to them that they could LOSE this.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 2:17 PM
Pf – all those women are working and after their paying job they come home to cook, clean, wash, pay bills, homework with their kids etc. In their spare time they try to catch a few hours of sleep.
By the way…where are the physicians complaining about being told how to do their job? That it is okay to lie or mis-state the condition of a women’s pregnancy or the fetus or abortion can cause breast cancer. Oh that’s right…..they can not be held responsible or be sued if the woman dies or the child is born with disabilities. What’s next??
PS – juanitajean.com has the third day of Doonesbury.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 14, 2012
at 2:09 PM
Sex is evil, don’t you know PFesser? And it is the woman’s fault, they entice men and men cannot be held to any standards, because they are the victims of women’s sexuality. The Christian fundamentalist elements of our society have the same attitude as Islamic fundamentalists, they long for America to be a honor society, next they will advocate honor killings.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 14, 2012
at 11:24 AM
NOP –
I see that santorum (Ol’ Frothy) is ahead in Pa. If he is on the ticket anywhere, including dog-catcher, count me IN.
I have three adult daughters. I am ready to take a stick of firewood to some of these bastards’ heads. My wife is researching right now to see how our state senators a representative in VA voted. As a physician – and more importantly a father – I couldn’t be angrier. What the hell is wrong with these people, anyway?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 11:01 AM
PFesser, women (55% of the electorate) and supportive men will deal with the problem on election day.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 14, 2012
at 10:53 AM
Thanks, UAW – this brings up several additional issues I hadn’t considered. The procedure doesn’t change anybody’s mind about getting an abortion and simply adds additional work for everybody.
Interestingly, I read ultrasounds all day long. I wouldn’t have the foggiest idea how to do one, particularly a TV exam. The requirement that a physician rather than a trained technician perform the U/S just makes sure the woman gets a poor examination and increases her risk of complication during the abortion itself.
This is why legislators need to stick to their area of expertise (whatever that is) and let others do the same.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 10:45 AM
PFesser ””
“talking points”
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/02/transvaginal_ultrasounds_why_pro_choice_advocates_shouldn_t_call_them_rape_.html
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 10:16 AM
I have a serious question for the women on this board. Why are the women in America not burning down the statehouses over these legalized rape laws just passed in Virginia and Texas? I think Garry Trudeau had it right in his Doonesbury cartoon strip when he refers to the transvaginal ultrasound probe as a “ten-inch shaming wand.”
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 9:40 AM
JJ….
catching up on your last posts….
I believe you flunked mind reading in school…..you sure read mine wrong…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 9:30 AM
now that one hurt….OLD……
JJ…..you keep getting me mixed up with someone who is anti abortion/ anti birth control…..WTF….next you’ll be calling me a Catholic….girl raped by 4 guys 1 being father is about as smart as the argument about the woman who wanted an abortion after her water broke…..I just responded to Mageen’s bullshit with more bullshit…….as I’m responding to yours…..
my argument is “government mandated”……IE not through negotiations……..(and yes I’m pissed about the government taking away negotiated teacher benefits)…….if you want a different health care policy then buy it…… your ins might cover Viagra but mine doesn’t……should the government demand that all ins policies cover it……
people are trying to make this a religious issue when its a big gov/little gov issue…….and IMHO people should learn to take a little bit better care of themselves and not expect other to do it for them……
Hope the 15 yr old got an abortion and the men got hung until dead…..Utah used to have public whippings….maybe we should bring that back……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 9:25 AM
UAW; You would not have allowed the abortion because she was well along in her pregnancy before she started talking about it.
UAW: SHOULD THIS RAPED LITTLE GIRL HAVE EVEN BEEN ABLE TO HAVE AN ABORTION? Should tax dollars pay for it? (I think so myself)
This little girl had been a hard working cheerful, smiling girl who was doing well in school the previous year. The year of the coat, she did little, never smiled, looked worried and never took that coat off. She shut off all of her friends and just did enough work to pass a class.
Just wondering what your thoughts are about real world situations.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 9:13 AM
UAW: Should the 15 year old girl who was raped repeatedly during the summer need to have all 4 men sign BEFORE SHE GOT HER ABORTION?
I did not see your answer. The story is true. She was the prize for winning a poker game.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 8:59 AM
and now Bill even pissed off Roseanne Barr….
Maher Insults Alabama and Mississippi Voters: ‘Toothless Tuesday Too Tight to Tally’
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/03/13/maher-insults-alabama-and-mississippi-voters-toothless-tuesday-tight#ixzz1p6Pn4bCX
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 8:55 AM
UAW, you are one bitter old man!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 14, 2012
at 8:48 AM
First Doonesbury strip is out!
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 8:42 AM
UAW; I knew a girl who was 15. Her father ran a bar and the fam lived behind. One summer, she would get visitors after midnight. She was raped.
In the fall, she wore a coat and would not take it off, even in 95 degree weather. She finally talked to a counselor when a bump was super obvious. 4 men went to prison, including her father.
So, SHOULD THIS GIRL BE REQUIRED TO GET ALL 4 MEN TO SIGN OFF before she got her abortion?
UAW: Should we bomb IRAN? That is only a couple trillion. Should we continue the tax break to millionaires and billionaires which has cost a Trillion so far?
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 8:42 AM
JJ…
apparently your pissed that your health care isn’t as good as Rushes……(actually Rush pays for his health care himself without insurance)(wrote check to hospital in Hawaii….remember)….
didn’t your dad ever tell you that life isn’t fair…….
you forgot Bill Maher…….all he got was to donate $1 million to an Obama PAC
not sure about Imus but the penalties on the others were for language on TV….different rules…….kind of like speed limits….25 here – 70 here…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 8:37 AM
yes Mageen….lets worry about laws getting “ginned up”…..
like no abortion without the signature of the father.(after his “probing”) ….
like “WE THE PEOPLE” does not mean “WE THE PEOPLE”
still haven’t seen where the Affordable Care Act is bringing down costs…..I’d rather see something set up to cover catastrophic illness (so people don’t loose homes) than free birth control…..the CBO just said that Obamacare will cost twice what expected ($1.76 TRILLION)……we need to get more people working so this can be paid for…….
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/cbo-obamacare-cost-176-trillion-over-10-yrs/425831
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 8:26 AM
UAW; We, the taxpayers, are paying for RUSH’S Viagra. He and the CEO’s have Cadillac health plans with no Co-Pay. The company then writes off the health care on their taxes. So, we, the taxpayers end up paying for Rush’s Viagra. Rush then spends 3 days saying SLUT, PROSTITUTE, SHOW ME SEX VIDEOS if you get Contraception. What a crock.
Here is Jon Stewart telling Rush and FOX to shut the F*** up about being the victim. (Remember: Ed Schultz lost his job for a week with no pay. Imus got fired for less than what Rush said. Olbermann got booted off MSNBC for comments he made. RUSH IS CANONIZED BY FOX)
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/14/jon-stewart-fox-shut-the-fck-up-about-how-victimized-you-are/
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 8:06 AM
yes Mageen….all those laws…….anal probing for Viagra…….to treat cold feet, MS, stroke, diabetes, or underweight babies TERRIBLE……..
Should be FREE!!!!!!!!
http://www.alternet.org/health/61605?page=1
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070727182359.htm
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 14, 2012
at 7:44 AM
Wisconsin: This is the losing argument regarding Abstinence. Facts and accurate information means little to these legislators.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 7:32 AM
Wisconsin is voting for Abstinence only. This is the winning argument in Wisconsin. I can imagine Todd Palin being this guy. I will also add that the Palin;s children end up pregnant.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 14, 2012
at 7:28 AM
Delurker –
I don’t get it; maybe you can explain this to me. Where are all the women in this debate? Why are these legislators not sleeping on the couch? What the hell, are all the girls in America having a Low-T crisis?
*******************
Well, well, well…I see santorum (Ol’ Frothy) won Miss and Ala.
Keep it up, boys. You are just assuring that our next president is Barack Obama. And I assure you, I’m going to help – and so are a lot of Independents just like me. (dup @ Rutherford’s) We are g-d fed up with you right-wing religious nuts, and I mean *beyond* fed up.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 14, 2012
at 6:09 AM
(a) Fluke said insurance plans should cover birth control pills, which are prescription medications that serve a lot of medical uses. She said employers and universities shouldn’t be allowed to interfere with that coverage.
(b) It is the affordable care act that says insurance plans must provide coverage for birth control pills with 0 copay. That’s smart because of the costs (and abortions!) it prevents.
You can’t combine (a) and (b) to come up with “whore demands free pills”, even if Rush sputters that all over his microphone. Don’t feel bad about Rush being wrong – it’s getting him all the attention he demands and he likes it that way.
(c) Churches don’t have to pay for coverage for stuff they morally object to except in states where it’s mandatory. That has not changed.
(d) Hospitals and universities and any other businesses are not churches, even when they are owned by churches. This disappoints the churches, who want to have it both ways.
You can’t combine (c) and (d) to come up with “churches are being forced to cover stuff they morally object to – it’s a war on religion!”
If all this were about a medical therapy for men, men would be outraged when a bunch of female politicians got together to debate it and refused to let any men participate.The contortions that are required to make this topic not look like an old fat white politician double standard are unbelievable.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 14, 2012
at 5:14 AM
Ugh! All those invasion of the most private parts laws popping up in different state legislatures is enough to make a parrot puke! If any of those proposals reach the outside world they are headed straight to court which makes me think that is exactly why they are written. But, honestly, there must be something in the water in certain states. Which means that I am not taking my paltry pensioner’s pence anywhere near them! They can get rich off someone else! As for Virginia, the guv had a kinda sorta change of heart on the transvaginal thing and eliminated that part from the bill he signed. That means the old fashioned ultrasound which is usually done only after a certain time in the pregnancy. By which time anyone seeking an abortion will already have had one some place else.
There isn’t a woman alive of any political party who should think she is safe from the kind of thinking that would gin up “laws” concerning any part of her health. And remember, men! Whatever can be done against women by the guvmint at any level is just a dress rehearsal for what can be done against men! In sum, look quick cuz there goes the vasectomy procedures. And rubbers! Unless saltpeter really works like a charm there will be men forced to sire children they can’t afford and even carry forward conditions such as Huntington’s chorea. Got that?
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 14, 2012
at 5:06 AM
Comments from JuanitaJean’s site:
Here’s a law that might help. Any man who has sex with a woman he is not married to will be required to set up a trust fund for any children resulting from this sinful act. If he fails to do so then a notch will be carved in his penis to warn future potential sexual partners. This serves to make the father responsible for the child the same way the mother is (minus the stretch marks) and to inflict on him a painful, unnecessary medical procedure against his will.
judith says:
March 13, 2012 at 1:03 pm
I strongly suspect these are the same guys who had to be told in a court of law, AND IN MY LIFETIME, that a married woman had the right to say no.
They didn’t believe it then and they don’t believe it now. Wait for it – that’ll be the next law they go after.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 10:33 PM
Virginia Repub Senator McDougall got some interesting FACEBOOK comments on his site: (McDougall is one of the Republican Camera up the vagina group.)
*”Hey, since you’re so interested in my health, I just wanted to let you know that I’ve been really horny lately because I’m ovulating. But don’t worry; I won’t engage in dangerous heterosexual sex that could result in a pregnancy. This is because I’m a really fat and hairy Lesbian and I plan on having sex with women for the rest of my life, the really butchy dykey kind. The current object of my affections, and central character in the majority of the sexual fantasies at the moment, is Alison Bechdel (pictured below). Thanks for showing me the light in regards to my own sexual health, in affirming that having sex with men in more trouble than it’s worth. The fact that women are sexier anyway, it just a happy coincidence.”
*”Hello Senator. My daughter is still young, but will one day be a woman, and before I know it she’ll be having her ‘curse,’ if ya know what I mean… it’s not easy for kids, especially females, to have to deal with this fact of life. I don’t raise my kids to be Christian, even though some of my best friends are, and they have family in Thailand, so essentially they’re half Buddhist. My question to you is, is religion aside, what should she expect from a government here in the U.S. that wants to probe her vagina? How do I explain to her the whole ‘good touch, bad touch’ thing when politicians think it’s acceptable to explore vaginas with plastic instruments? Also, is this part of a plan to create jobs somehow?”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/13/1074013/-Hilarious-VA-Right-Wingnut-Sen-Ryan-McDougle-Gets-a-Taste-of-His-Own-Transvaginal-Medicine-
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 9:58 PM
FROTHY IS THE BIG WINNER TONIGHT!!!!! Two states!!!! FROTHY WINS IN ALAMABA AND MISSISSIPPI!!!! No more contraception because Frothy is agin it.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 9:31 PM
this is a good one……..especially the last part…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 9:00 PM
well JJ…I’ll agree with you…….being fired for using birth control is stupid……
delurker……talk about someone using bullshit talking points your one of them……still waiting for the answer to how is NOT FREE=DENIED…….IMHO I don’t think Fluke was talking about birth control and acne…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 8:53 PM
Great Read delurkergurl actually.
Pennsylvania just brought up a stick Republican Camera up women’s vagina bill.
Sponsored by GOP Rep. Kathy Rapp, House Bill 1077 would force women to undergo an ultrasound, hear the fetal heartbeat, and present images of the fetus to her abortion provider before she can get an abortion. But, the kind of ultrasound required would have to be a transvaginal ultrasound.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/03/12/pennsylvania-anti-abortion-bill-would-mandate-transvaginal-ultrasound/
ARIZONA IS JUST GOING NUTS!!! They just sent a bill through that would allow an employer to ask why a woman is on birth control. (If it is not for a good reason – she can be fired.) This is crazy!!
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/03/13/fired-for-using-birth-control-it-could-be-possible-in-arizona/
THE WAR ON WOMEN IS REAL!! I am a guy with 3 daughters and I think it sucks.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 7:38 PM
Sorry, that was probably awful to read. I’m weary and feel like everywhere I turn there are turds that just won’t flush. 😦
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 13, 2012
at 7:29 PM
Wow, Joe. Very interesting comment!
Pfesser, I understand your desire to move on. The discussion seems to be going nowhere. Certainly UAW has no interest in the truth, but keeps right on being wrong, and parroting people he knows are manipulating him with bullshit talking points. I know it’s a horrible flaw but it’s hard to just let him be wrong!
As human who feels really strongly that health care should be between patients and doctors, and that employers shouldn’t be in that space, it’s hard to let it go. I’m also a woman who knows that prescription medications for contraception are also used for other medical conditions A LOT. Contraception, excessive bleeding, PMDD, acne, cysts – no matter the purpose, go back to the first part where the employer doesn’t have a role in the doctor/patient relationship – very hard to let it go. Perhaps if we didn’t link healthcare to things like who you work for or who you marry, it would be easier to avoid these pitfalls.
Also hard to let it go when it’s obvious that covering prescription medications for contraception for everyone who chooses to use it will also decrease costs for insurance providers (therefore premiums) for everyone. The “get out of my personal decisions” people are insisting that people should override personal decisions and it’s driving me crazy.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 13, 2012
at 7:28 PM
Funding things we find immoral?
OK Tim, I’m with you, defund all programs that anyone deems immoral! I want to start by an 80% decrease in Military funding, close all bases not on American soil, and remove all combatants from current war-zones, Murder is immoral! End American’s committing murder today!
And by the way, nothing in the first amendment talks about how your taxes can, or can not be spent.
Maybe you should read the full Constitution. And aiding the poor in this country was always intended, and will always continue to be a “moral” use of tax money, even when it comes to the funding of healthcare for women.
I found this comment when following links in JuanitaJeans blog. There is some good stuff in there.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 7:09 PM
PFesser: I am with you. Pull our troops out of Afghanistan now. Wars make people crazy, even our guys. We are losing more soldiers to suicide than from the battle too. Each soldier costs a minimum of $800.000.00 per year to fight these days. Afghanistan has been at war for a few hundred years. We cannot and should not even think we are going to make it a Democracy.
Remember when GW Bush insisted the West Bank have elections. Who got elected? Why Yassir Arafat and the PLO (we called them terrorists back then.)
The only chance we had in Afghanistan was when we first went in. Too bad GW took our troops and invaded Iraq. We lost Afghanistan when that decision was made by GW Bush and his boss Cheney and Rumsfeld.
BTW: I think women need to keep talking about the WAR ON WOMEN because it is real and has long term consequences. It is also very stupid.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 6:53 PM
HoneyJo: JuanitaJean speaks to your very issue today. Some County Commissioners (60+ year old males) just turned down family planning funds – the old farts know better. Read the comments too.
They are all male and from the looks of them, none of them are capable of getting a nakkid woman within, oh dunno, a mile and half of them.
http://juanitajean.com/2012/03/13/dear-new-hanover-county-board-of-commissioners-stick-it-in-your-ear-love-juanita/
This cartoon speaks to the issue of men (politicians – Repubicans) controlling the lives of women.
http://juanitajean.com/2012/03/13/heads-up-texas-lege-we-are-pointing-and-laughing/
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 6:33 PM
So we’ve reached that stage of the political “discourse.” I would actually love to “move on” PFesser, but this is the point. For me and for millions of women like me, this is not just a political debate. We’re talking about our lives, our health. Some women in some states, and some women who work for certain church affiliated organizations are having their health taken out of their own hands and the hands of their doctors. And that hasn’t stopped just because people get tired of talking about it.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 13, 2012
at 5:42 PM
PFesser….I’m sick to my stomach that an American could do that……No more sickened than seeing Nicholas Berg get his head cut off though……or American soldiers killed by Afghan soldiers……….or American soldiers killed by an American soldier(Fort Hood)…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 3:54 PM
watch out…….”incumbent Democratic Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur, who ousted Rep. Dennis Kucinich in the March 6 Democratic primary”…..
Joe the Plumber is after you……
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/joe-plumber-politician-speaks/425141
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 3:44 PM
God Bless Democratic Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner. She is is the third female lawmaker to introduce a bill that would limit men’s access to Viagra and other erectile dysfunction drugs to make a statement about the dozens of anti-abortion bills that have passed statehouses around the country over the last year.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/third-female-lawmaker-introduces-bill-limit-men-viagra-204340160.html
She is a woman after my own heart, just as you two dear ladies are.
God Bless you Margaret and Helen.
LikeLike
By: Ray O. Chatterton US Coast Guard, Retired MK1 on March 13, 2012
at 3:31 PM
Highway bill is worth billions to companies owned by Soros, Pickens, Douglas
Of course it benefits the big companies. It’s all about the money. There is hope it trickles down to the people in jobs and local economy, but profits come first in today’s business ventures. You won’t see any of the named individuals signing any paychecks. Haven’t you noticed, trickle down NEVER works, unless we are talking about babies’ diapers.
These folks are investors. They lobby for profit and have for decades. Sometimes the things they want will benefit the rest. Sometimes it only benefits a few. As with any business done today, middlemen abound and subcontracting shields liabilities and overhead. Today’s market is all about investors’ exploitation of commodities and too big to fail corporate job slots.
It doesn’t matter what consonant is after their name, these politicos are working for business and that”s who rewards them. It’s cost us big time to rebuild the infrastructure we destroyed in Iraq. Now our government again wants to force us into buying their products and services? The government is against us and is not operating in our best interest anymore.
And we’re arguing over condoms and pricks. 🙄
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 13, 2012
at 3:09 PM
The lone sargeant story is false. It is already been debunked and has been proven as the latest administration’s spin.
But yeah, get us out of there. We should have never gone to begin with.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 13, 2012
at 1:16 PM
I’ll even go first.
GET US OUT OF THERE. TONIGHT.
My wife and I have six young adult kids between us; four are unemployed or underemployed. The money pi**ed away over there could go a long way toward helping out OUR people – who actually want it.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 13, 2012
at 1:07 PM
OK – I’ll gladly take you up on that.
What are the thoughts on the sergeant that did in all the Afghan citizens?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 13, 2012
at 1:04 PM
got another subject that Helen might comment on….or JJ or Poolman…..
Highway bill is worth billions to companies owned by Soros, Pickens, Douglas
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50163
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 12:40 PM
move on to what PFesser……..
I think we’ve been staying on Helen’s subject (rant) pretty well…..did you even read it……….Helen doesn’t pull any punches and why should we……..you want to get a new subject going “talk” to Helen…….How about high gas prices increases the amount of people on public assistance…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 12:04 PM
God guys, no offense, but can we please move on?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 13, 2012
at 11:29 AM
honeyjo……..
Target’s was a generic (I get generics through Medco)……..Sprintec and Tri-Sprintec were mentioned….those names mean about as much to me as Bayer or Excedrin……..My doctor wants me to take an aspirin (low dose) a day because I’m over 50 as a preventative…..where’s my free aspirin!!!!!!…..
Now were getting to the real problem….health care costs…….I don’t see where mine are going down and there’s a lot of people(Sandra Fluke being one) with their hands out……..We need to improve this country’s economy and make everyone a productive member……
Add it all up, and women can get birth control at Walmart for the cost of two lattes at Starbucks.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/03/05/attention-media-walmart-and-target-have-been-offering-9-birth-control#ixzz1p0xxxzpa
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 10:22 AM
hey JJ…….LMAO…….
make sure you don’t forget to listen to Keith and Rachel and Ed for their special spin on things…..make sure to check MSNBC,Media Matters,Huffpo,and Crooks and Liars(named that site right)….don’t forget Bill Maher…….and for fair and balanced make sure you go back to Junita jeans………….
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/28/georgetown-co-ed-please-pay-for-us-to-have-sex-were-going-broke-buying-birth-control/
“Under ObamaCare, though, if you have health insurance, contraceptives have to be not just inexpensive, but free. That’s right, as President Obama himself explained it on February 10: “As part of the health care reform law that I signed last year, all insurance plans are required to cover preventive care at no cost”…
“There are a lot of questions here that go right to the heart of ObamaCare. Why is the president getting involved in setting prices for prescription drugs in the first place? Where in the Constitution does he get that power? Why should people past reproductive age who are paying copayments for their heart or arthritis medication be paying taxes to subsidize free prescription contraceptives for law students?
No wonder a lot of people would prefer, instead, to discuss Rush Limbaugh’s word choices.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 9:55 AM
uaw – What KIND of birth control does Target have for $9? Is that a co-pay, with your insurance, or what? Is it the same kind that Ms. Fluke’s doctor, or Ms. Fluke’s friend’s doctor, prescribed? A woman can’t simply take just any old birth control off the shelf. It has to work with her hormonal balance, her blood pressure, lifestyle, etc. You want to separate the women who want to just have sex and the women like me who would need to take it to stop excessive bleeding, ovarian cysts, etc. The problem is, you really can’t separate the two. Any kind of hormonal treatment is an extremely individual thing. That’s why the woman’s doctor, who knows your history and your body, needs to be involved, and why you can’t always just grab something off the shelf at Target for 9 bucks. And if that 9 bucks IS a co-pay, then your insurance would have to cover the rest of it, which Ms. Fluke’s wouldn’t.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 13, 2012
at 9:53 AM
More of the “men only” myth — lies. lies. lies. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/291392/where-are-women-kathryn-jean-lopez
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 13, 2012
at 9:17 AM
JJ- Religion plays a large part in those big families in the bush. Religion and lack of access to healthcare education. My extended family is Russian Orthodox- which is even more restrictive on issues surrounding birth control.
UAW- I will read the testimony – gotta go to work now. You keep kicking tires. I have my own issues with what you say and your reliance on Fox type stuff but I’d rather deal with it all out in the open than build more walls we don’t need in this damn country- between everyday people.
When we do that , we let the twits and snots of the country do what they want while we battle each other.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 13, 2012
at 8:56 AM
The Palin legacy to politics – HATE and stupidity!! This quote is the Republican platform and we can thank Sarah Palin.
Since Palin, though, ignorance has become more than bliss. It’s now an attribute, an entire platform: Vote for me, I know nothing and hate the same things you do.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sarah-palin-and-other-ignorant-candidates/2012/03/12/gIQAoOPG8R_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 8:52 AM
UAW: Rush is supposed to be back on today. You need to listen to him, He will tell you what to think.
AlaskaPi- You sure got that right about remaking Religious Rights.
The Catholic Church has churches. THEY ALSO HAVE MANY BUSINESSES, many of which are hospitals, that are money making enterprises. I think the colleges also end up being money making enterprises. They should abide by the laws of business and government rules which apply to those businesses in my opinion. Also, once a church starts getting into politics – Why should the tax payer (me) have to pay for their POLITICS WITH A TAX BREAK THAT I, and others like me, END UP PAYING FOR? That road that got widened by the mega church was paid by me. That tax break for religious housing of preachers was paid for by me – why?
UAW: A woman on a minimum wage job can barely pay the rent, buy food and clothes for her kids. If the choice is contraception or food – good bye contraception. The child often gets paid for by the taxpayer. I saw this first hand in the AK villages – food or contraception. Families of 5- 10 kids were common. Contraception would have saved a lot in the long run.
College Students: The cost of college has never been cheap and it has skyrocketed the last 12 years. I ate mac and cheese and beans when I was in school. Then I had to pay for books and I could not afford that. The cost of contraception is significant to those with little or no money.
UAW: Listen to Rush and what is that fellows name? Beck? They will tell you what to think. UAW: DO NOT TURN OFF FOX TODAY – they too will give you all the info you need to look stupid on this site.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 8:26 AM
UAW- I’ll go read Ms Fluke’s testimony when I have time. At this point, I’m more worried that some very important things are getting lost in arguing about her testimony as relates to what this amendment actually proposed to do.
see (i) and (ii) above from the quote I put there.It is about religious-liberty ,not containing health care costs or making someone else pay , except as a moral attitude might see paying for life-style “choices”.
This life-style choice thing is going to bite us in the butt if we don’t get off that bandwagon.
When is some doof going to decide they are morally opposed to providing cholesterol and high blood pressure meds because people eat too much fatty beef? Or some such crap?
Also,Donna what do you see for (E)- Private Rights of action? I see nightmare court cases on the horizon.
Of note- the presumed special case is not so special- the various health issues which hormonal therapy can address are far more common than people want to talk about.
Also, costs vary widely depending on what people actually have. Law school typically lasts 3 years so we’re talking about $1K/yr. Here it would be more if you are away from Anchorage and here the minimum wage is $7.75 so it is well out of reach of poor women without some kind of assistance. Our cost of living runs many times that of the cities down there and the minimum wage and low wage earners don’t stand a chance THERE, let alone here.
But then we can never get any of these Congressional yahoos to write a budget of what a minimum wage might cover for the real live people who have to live on it anyway.
All that being said- I really worry about the failed amendment as yet another way to get religion into places it does not belong -more than anything else.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 13, 2012
at 8:23 AM
alaskapi…..
I’m going through Sandra Fluke’s testimony and she did say “Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school.”…..Sandra also said “After months paying over $100 out-of-pocket, she just couldn’t afford her medication anymore, and she had to stop taking it.”……..sounds like $hundreds/month but I’m still trying to figure out how liberals talk….I thinking contraception being that and not some special case with excessive bleeding/pain……
according to Google the Target store 3 blocks from Georgetown has birth control at $9/month……….someone is lying….I don’t care how you spin it…….LYING…….$108/year does not equal $3000/3 years…..I still say she wants something for nothing………upon further reading I see $24-$30/ month mentioned………that’s closer to what I remember……..
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-fluke-s-3000-contraception-testimony-factual-despite-9-month-birth-control-pills
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 13, 2012
at 7:53 AM
Amen Mageen!
and sending best wishes to your husband and you!
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 13, 2012
at 7:52 AM
JJ- it is ALSO a major attempt to redefine “religious freedom”.
There is a widespread and often effective strategy-wise movement in this country to discriminate against others to protect religious freedom. We are watching it here in AK in the form of the Alaksan Family Council and the national Alliance Defense Fund’s legal fights against civil rights for the LGBT communities as well as women’s health issues with this dumb Blunt amendment.
It is a very potent part of the whole thing and should stay right up straight and center in peoples’ minds as the VEHICLE which is being used.
from the same link above-
note how it would have protected the purchaser of insurance from having to have the opportunity for coverage for care they don’t want- can we all say PFFFFTTT! together?
“(b) RESPECT FOR RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1302(b) of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Public Law 111–148; 42 U.S.C. 18022(b)) is
amended by adding at the end the following
new paragraph:
‘‘(6) RESPECTING RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE WITH
REGARD TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OR SERVICES.—
‘‘(A) FOR HEALTH PLANS.—A health plan
shall not be considered to have failed to provide
the essential health benefits package
described in subsection (a) (or preventive
health services described in section 2713 of
the Public Health Service Act), to fail to be
a qualified health plan, or to fail to fulfill
any other requirement under this title on
the basis that it declines to provide coverage
of specific items or services because—
‘‘(i) providing coverage (or, in the case of a
sponsor of a group health plan, paying for
coverage) of such specific items or services is
contrary to the religious beliefs or moral
convictions of the sponsor, issuer, or other
entity offering the plan; or
‘‘(ii) such coverage (in the case of individual
coverage) is contrary to the religious
beliefs or moral convictions of the purchaser
or beneficiary of the coverage.
‘‘(B) FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS.—Nothing
in this title (or any amendment made by
this title) shall be construed to require an
individual or institutional health care provider,
or authorize a health plan to require a
provider, to provide, participate in, or refer
for a specific item or service contrary to the
provider’s religious beliefs or moral convictions.
Notwithstanding any other provisionof this title, a health plan shall not be considered
to have failed to provide timely or
other access to items or services under this
title (or any amendment made by this title)
or to fulfill any other requirement under this
title because it has respected the rights of
conscience of such a provider pursuant to this paragraph”
….
‘‘(E) PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION.—The various
protections of conscience in this paragraph
constitute the protection of individual
rights and create a private cause of action
for those persons or entities protected. Any
person or entity may assert a violation of
this paragraph as a claim or defense in a judicial
proceeding.’
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 13, 2012
at 7:51 AM
Sandra Fluke speaks:
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/13/opinion/fluke-contraception/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn
These attempts to silence women and the men who support them have clearly failed. I know this because I have received so many messages of support from across the country — women and men speaking out because they agree that contraception needs to be treated as a basic health care service.
Who are these supporters?
They are women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, who need contraception to prevent cysts from growing on their ovaries, which if unaddressed can lead to infertility and deadly ovarian cancer. They are sexual assault victims, who need contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancy.
They are Catholic women, who see no conflict between their social justice -based faith and family planning. They are new moms, whose doctors fear that another pregnancy too soon could jeopardize the mother’s health and the potential child’s health too. They are mothers and grandmothers who remember all too well what it was like to be called names decades ago, when they were fighting for a job, for health care benefits, for equality.
They are husbands, partners, boyfriends and male friends who know that without access to contraception, the women they care about can face unfair obstacles to participating in public life. And yes, they are young women of all income levels, races, classes and ethnicities who need access to contraception to control their reproduction, pursue their education and career goals and prevent unintended pregnancy. And they will not be silenced.
These women know how expensive birth control pills can be, with or without insurance coverage. For a single mother with kids, a woman making minimum wage, or a student living on loans, a high monthly co-pay could be the difference between buying contraception or one week of groceries.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 7:27 AM
IT IS A WAR ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS!!!! Plain and simple.
The Republicans want to strip women of contraception and abortion rights.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 13, 2012
at 7:18 AM
The highway reauthorization bill was even rejected by the Secretary of Transporation, Ray LaHood, as the worst bill he had ever seen. That should tell you everything you want to know when an executive department head blasts money that would be coming his way. And, no, that stupid stuff about “conscience” is not germane to the bill. There is a rule on the Hill about keeping things germane in fashioning a bill. But what the heck. Since they make the rules, they obviously feel free to break them!!!!
I’m also supportive of providing universal health care to cover folks regardless of the “life style” others may judge negatively. My husband is fighting liver cancer as hard as he can (radiation is next) and I know there is an entire army of people in this country who would jump to conclusions about this and decide that he should not get such coverage, even through Medicare. All I can say is may they be happy in their rabbit hole as they haven’t the snort to look me in the eye.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 13, 2012
at 5:20 AM
My life is richer for your postings. Thanks so much.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 13, 2012
at 12:01 AM
I think this entire health care birth control controversy is taking our eyes off the big picture. It is important, but very volatile, especially given the religious and sexist connotations. A marvelous diversion.
We are the globalist’s hammer, apparently. As Major General Smedley Butler famously said in 1935 regarding his 33 year distinguished military career, “I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.”
Not much has changed since except now it isn’t kept under wraps.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 12, 2012
at 10:32 PM
This all came about because Mr Blunt and the co-sponsors listed below wanted to tack this amendment onto the large and mostly basic transportation reauthorization bill .
(So- what the hell was the idea there? How does this belong in a transportation bill? Aren’t we sicka dn tired of amendments and holding legislation hostage to get votes and derailing from the chore at hand from Congress?)
Then the twits did not want someone female to speak to them on the floor.
And then the Dems let Ms Fluke speak.
And then the stuff hit the fan and it has been forgotten the whole idea of this amendment was to grant a kind of exemption for religious institutions which treads a very fine line between religious liberty and and secular activiites they may engage in.
I would urge you UAW to go read the record and forget the rest.
My female Senator voted yes on this to make a message about religious liberty and she also called out Mr Limbaugh.
She’s taking a lot of well deserved heat here over that vote but I’m glad she spoke up about the treatment of Ms Fluke.
Look at some of these co-sponsor names :
“SA 1520. Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr.
MCCONNELL, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. WICKER,
Mr. HATCH, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. RUBIO, Mr.
NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr.
MCCAIN, Mr. KYL, Mr. COATS, Mr. BARRASSO,
Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.
CORNYN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr.
HOEVEN, and Mr. GRAHAM) submitted
an amendment intended to be proposed
by him to the bill S. 1813, to reauthorize
Federal-aid highway and highway
safety construction programs, and for
other purposes; which was ordered to
lie on the table; as follows:
At the appropriate place, insert the following:
SEC. ll. RESPECT FOR RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE.
(a) FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.—”
starting page 35 of Congressional Record
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-2012-02-09/pdf/CREC-2012-02-09-pt1-PgS504-3.pdf#page=36
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 12, 2012
at 10:30 PM
delurker – wonderful points, and points out the absurdity of what’s going on. There are people who do in fact want to deny insurance coverage, in essence medicat care, to people who they feel didn’t live their lives correctly. Wow, it’s amazing. And horrifying.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 9:34 PM
Anonymous, if you’d read the post and the comments to it, you’d know what the issue is. Why are you asking a question when you clearly don’t give a damn about really trying to understand the answer?
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 9:27 PM
uaw – you are seriously comparing your limp dick to my bleeding non-stop for over two weeks straight? What will happen to you if you never get it up again? And compare that to what will happen to me if I don’t stop bleeding. I am seriously beginning to question your mental health. You just don’t seem to have the ability to mentally grasp what’s really going on. It’s been explained and clarified a few times here that Snadra Fluke didn’t say $3,000 A YEAR. She said $3,000 over the time one could be in her program there, about three years. But you refuse to hear it. You still insist she said $3,000 a year, when she didn’t. So it’s clear you’re not interested in really getting answers to your questions, you’re not intrested in understanding. Very bizarre.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 9:24 PM
Again – not covered = reduced access. It’s not fair to make people go off to “abortion clinics” (a.k.a. much maligned and decreasingly defunded Planned Parenthood) to get these LEGAL PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS when they already have insurance coverage that should provide it.
And again – it isn’t about free. Affordable care act says it should be free (whole separate debate) but what’s being argued over is whether or not employers should be able to second guess medical decisions between doctors and patients. Once you start down that slope, where does it stop? Should they also be able to decide people over 65 shouldn’t be able to get chemo? Or people over 200 pounds shouldn’t get insulin?
And AGAIN – birth control pills have other purposes in addition to preventing pregnancy. Remove access for pregnancy prevention, and you remove access for other purposes – potentially causing expensive or life-threatening conditions for some.
You aren’t here to listen anyway, or you’d have heard all this a bunch of times. Quit asking if you don’t want to hear it.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 12, 2012
at 8:39 PM
Quit being purposely ignorant UAW! Read! And while you are at it spare us the vulgarity, we are talking about Women’s health. Your ability to have an erection isn’t sparing you from hours of doubled up pain and surgery. Grow up and be a man!
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 12, 2012
at 8:38 PM
UAW, I did not put you in any category. If you find yourself in one, you must fit the parameters. From reading your rants regarding Ms Fluke and the issue at hand, it appears you have gotten wrong information and you sound just like the other mostly “righties” that are misinformed and spinning this as some nanny state free sex event. It doesn’t seem to matter how reasonable the people trying to clearly explain the facts to you are, you keep defaulting back to the same bunk.
Nobody said birth control was to be free. What is free anyway? Nothing is free. Maybe air, since no one has figured out how to mete that out – yet. If I pay for my insurance, I want coverage for my health needs. I don’t need birth control pills or viagra, but if I did, I would want my provider to include it, even if I was required to pay a copay.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 12, 2012
at 6:57 PM
delurker….same question as poolman….
how does NOT FREE =DENIED…….didn’t Sandra Fluke say she was denied birth control……..apparently she had it by paying for it…….and I don’t have a problem with that……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 6:29 PM
delurker…..
Viagra was covered until I retired……i am covered under a different policy after that……has nothing to do with my doctor……mine will write the scripts….he doesn’t really give a shit how much it costs or who pays for it…..that’s something a lot of people on here don’t understand…….they seem to think that the pills just appear and they don’t have to be paid for…….just for shits and giggles I called Meijers and their pharmacy quoted me $138.90 for 6 100mg pills(no insurance coverage)………I can see where I could spend $3000 /year
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 6:25 PM
PFesser…..
you’ve got it backwards…….Sandra Fluke was pissed because Georgetown didn’t provide birth control……she could have gone to another university but she wanted to bitch and change things………..my insurance doesn’t pay for Viagra…….my co pay and my buddy’s are different……why….. different policies……….if your insurance pays for a sex change operation does that mean that mine has to……..the stuff is negotiated for……….the pendulum swings both ways…..look at the shitstorm about teacher pensions…..(wish I was getting a teachers pension)…..it has nothing to do with religion…….they don’t pay for it and don’t want to start……my bitch is with the mandate……..the gov should stay out of it…….I thought you’d understand that…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 6:15 PM
UAW, most providers will not accept patients without insurance, other than emergency rooms.
The issue isn’t “free” vs “not free” but “covered” vs ” not covered.” The already approved Affordable Care Act is decided law that it should be no-copay but that doesn’t mean the cost isn’t figured into rates. But mathematically, insurance consumers will pay less if contraception is covered than they would if they were covering more pregnancies. And hey – there could be fewer abortions as a result.
If there’s a moral objective to contraception then don’t use it. People are absolutely free to become Duggars if they wish. Better you than me.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 12, 2012
at 6:14 PM
Goodness, what will it take to get people to actually hear/read what Ms. Fluke SAID? Geez, all these phony arguments over what she didn’t say are SUCH a WASTE OF TIME!
UAW, if your doctor and you decide you need Viagra it should be covered. Period. If it isn’t covered today it’s because someone other than you & your doctor is influencing your coverage.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 12, 2012
at 5:58 PM
honeyjo….
I’m a conservative because I think you should pay for your birth control…..just like I have to pay for Viagra…….do you want some sob story about my limp dick or do you want the story how Viagra turns me into a 16 yr old again……(2 minutes and stiff again)(multiple orgasms)…… you don’t like my language try being an industrial rodent for 40+ years……..and doing jobs that liberals won’t…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 5:50 PM
poolman….
but you haven’t said anything about me being discriminated against because I have to pay for Viagra…..WTF…..you already know that I don’t have a problem with birth control…..why do you and others keep putting me in with Bible-thumpers……..my problem is that before I retired (and I’m still paying taxes) I was one of the people that worked so liberal didn’t have to…….tell me poolman…..how does not free=denied…..answer that assshole…..nobody’s done that yet……everyones danced around that question but no one’s answered it……..give me a friggin answer…….or can’t you…….come on….answer the question…….how does NOT FREE=DENIED…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 5:39 PM
Touché…
Before getting a prescription for Viagra or other erectile dysfunction drugs, men would have to see a sex therapist, receive a cardiac stress test and get a notarized affidavit signed by a sexual partner affirming impotency, if state Sen. Nina Turner has her way.
http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/bill-introduced-to-regulate-mens-reproductive-health-1341547.html
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 12, 2012
at 3:50 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-w-smith/where-the-boys-arent_b_1338074.html
“Men are involved in 100 percent of all pregnancies.”
‘But our voices are mostly missing from the debate.”
“It’s time we spoke out, boyos. The pill is our contraception, too. Biology and the pharmaceutical industry may have conspired to produce the pill for women but their use of it has made our sex lives a lot simpler, and let’s admit it, a hell of a lot more enjoyable. We’ve got it pretty easy when it comes to consequences, too.”……
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 12, 2012
at 2:36 PM
uaw – I’m actually glad you’re here because you are our own mini Rush Limbaugh. You are the whole problem in miniature. I’m not lying. I don’t have to lie to make MY point. I’m not hung up on the word “free.” Like I said, I have no problem with a small co-pay as long as it’s affordable.
“I don’t care if you take birth control pills or not………Hell, the less liberal voters the better…….”
More proof that you are not understanding the real issue, here. 1) I’m a virgin, I don’t have sex, so if I do get pregnant, I’d better put a candle in the window ’cause the last time that happened, three wise men came, and 2) I’m almost 47 years old and missing one ovary, so I think my baby making days are over. I may need to go on the pill TO CONTROL MY CYCLE AND STOP THE BLEEDING that has been going on for about two weeks straight now. I have a Dr. appointment in a couple of days. I’ll know then what I’m in store for. If the doctor prescribes it for me, it will be for a valid and very real medical reason other than to prevent pregnancy, just as for millions of women who take some kind of hormonal control. Believe me, if I could still have children, I would love to have one, if only to piss you off. By the way, you’ve also just proven yourself to be quite the little hypocrit, as you plainly just implied in the above quote that you don’t really value life, only republican life. So I take it abortion is fine with you, just as long as YOU get to decide whose babies get aborted?
I say “you guys” because you’re obviously a conservative and have bought into the lies Rush Limbaugh has told you. You obviously do care if someone takes birth control pills since you have sided with the people who want to stop women from having access to them, and you’re here throwing a little hissy-fit all ovef the place. After being presented with the cold hard facts of the issue, it will be fun to see just how ignorant, hateful and stubborn you continue to be.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 12:28 PM
UAW, It has probably been said before way up there ^^^^^^. Sorry if this is a reap, I don’t read every post…. But JIC you don’t know.
This mess did NOT start when Obama’s mandate that churches supply birth control and the Catholic church complained……
The Catholic (or any other denomination) Church never did nor does now HAVE to cover birth control to their employees.
You do know that right?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 12, 2012
at 11:42 AM
UAW –
See if this makes any sense. It seems to me that if religious organizations stick with religious things – you know, proselytizing and saving souls – then they sort of have a free hand.
When they get into things that have nothing to do with religion – like healthcare – then they have to abide by the same rules as anybody else. If my office provides health coverage for my employees, I can’t say to my insurance company, “I don’t like the idea of chiropractors; you cannot provide chiropractic services to my employees.” I have to abide by the same rules as anybody else. It seems to me the churches should, if they are in the business of providing insurance coverage – have to provide the same coverage as I or anybody else does.
Thoughts?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 12, 2012
at 11:06 AM
what else does Sandra Fluke want others to pay for…..would you believe sex change operations…..WTF……..
http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 9:58 AM
honeyJo….stop lying….
yes you are hung up on the word FREE…..where does not free mean denied……….and why do you keep saying “you guys”….I don’t care if you take birth control pills or not………Hell, the less liberal voters the better…….
PFesser……
this shitstorm started with Obama’s mandate that churches supply birth control and the Catholic church complained……….Sandra Fluke testified that birth control either cost her (someone) $3000 either a year or 3 years…….that’s still a $1000 a year…………Sandra Fluke wanted a Jesuit university (Georgetown) to pay for it………..I still don’t think she was denied birth control like she said………..she was denied “free” birth control from the university….apparently the doctors there won’t write a prescription for birth control…….what’s so hard about going somewhere else…………that’s why I asked about Title X………then HoneyJo complains about”you guys” and I’m just wondering if she’s really pissed at the guy that signed the bill(Nixon)……still waiting for someone to tell me how not free =denied …….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 9:24 AM
One of the arguments I laugh about is the idea that needing contraception means you have a lot of sex. You still have to take exactly the same number of pills whether you have sex once a month, none, five times a month or thrice a day.
I read about two hours every morning before work – usually financial or investment articles. The debt America has piled up is at the point we won’t be able soon to even pay the interest – and that means default – the national equivalent of bankruptcy. This nation is heading down the road to where Greece and Spain are today; we have the makings of street riots and unbelievable chaos in the near future and we are arguing about how much sex someone has and who pays for the contraception? You have to be kidding me…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 12, 2012
at 7:54 AM
HoneyJo –
Appreciate your sharing your experiences. The Web is a pretty rough-and-tumble place with some real crass individuals, so I know it takes a lot to really hang it out there like you did.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 12, 2012
at 7:48 AM
PFesser – so sorry to hear of the passing of your friend. I guess it just doesn’t happen for some people. Speaking only for myself, I’m not about putting myself up on some kind of moral high horse. I actually agree with the majority of the world that would say there’s something sad and even pathetic about a 47 year old virgin. It’s just how things shook out. I’m just not the kind of person who could have sex without a deep and abiding love, true trust, emotional intimacy, and a true friendship besides. Not on any moral grounds, I just wasn’t wired that way. And I just never found that kind of love. I regret never having found that kind of connection with someone, but I have never regretted not having sex just for the heck of it with some guy who meant nothing to me, and to whom I meant nothing. I have never had intercourse but I have had sexual contact with two men, one I loved very much and who I thought loved me, but I was wrong, and one I played a little slap and tickle with in a misguided attempt to get over the first guy. I broke into tears in the middle of it, because it just wasn’t what I wanted, how I wanted, who I wanted, etc. and it was a hollow, empty, and very lonely feeling that I never wanted to feel again. There has been a guy or two since then who have wanted to “get down my pants” but who didn’t seem very interested in getting to know me or having a relationship with me, so I passed. So people can call me “Honeyhumpsalot” all they want to. It’s ridiculous and only takes the air out of their own argument.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 7:20 AM
p.s. because I don’t need toothpaste to stop the excessive, nonstop bleeding I’ve been experiencing on and off since I had my ovary removed last year. I may, however, need birth control pills. I’m not hung up on the word “free” like you are. I’m not opposed to a small co-pay, and I’m sure no one else is, either. I’m not even sure if no co-pay is what is meant when the word “free” used. Now, I don’t work for a church affiliated organiation, and even if I did, I live in one of the states that already requires church affiliated organizations to give complete coverage to its employees, sthis is not for myself. I am speaking out for the women who are in my situation but without my access. I can empathize with how much that would suck.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 7:00 AM
HoneyJo –
I knew a 50 year-old virgin in the physiology department where I worked in the ‘seventies. She was a veterinarian, super nice, pretty, friendly and funny. She and I became fast friends (I was in my ‘twenties). She said her GYN exams were tough sometimes, but otherwise seemed pretty sanguine about the whole thing. Her whole life was her work and that was that. I just got word the other day she had died from cancer. I always wondered what life looked like from her perspective…
UAW –
Apologies – I haven’t followed the “paying for contraception” argument at all. I guess I don’t get what the big deal is. Insurers pay for all types of medication all the time; why is contraception any different? Is it that “You can do without sex; it’s voluntary?” If that’s the argument, I think somebody is living in fantasy land. Never seen it happen yet. You’d might as well try to stop the tide.
Help me out there, what is everybody arguing about?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 12, 2012
at 6:53 AM
I’m glad you know about medical insurance, uaw. It’s unfortunate you have chosen to behave as though you don’t. Here’s the problem with Title X, and Planned Parenthood – you guys want both of those completely defunded and eliminated, REMEMBER THAT?? Another problem with that is, why should someone who has medical insurance, who can see a primary care physician for all other health related needs, have to go to a separate clinic and a separate doctor, as no dotor with his/her salt will give out birth control without an examination first, to get a medication that is medically necessary to stop excessive bleeeding or to stop ovarian cysts from growing?
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 6:50 AM
“Honeyhumpsalot
Fluke was proven to have lied about many facts in a few posts above. I suggest you read them.”
LOL Sorry, but you’re too ridiculous to take seriously. Your attemept to slut-shame me into silence has backfired. You have no idea how ludicrous it is to call me “Honeyhumpsalot.” It just so happens I’m a virgin. You have destroyed any and all credibility with me, and of course I’m not going to take anything you say seriously now. Since you have to lie about me and my sexual history, or lack thereof, I’m sure you’re lying about whatever else you ahve tos ay as well.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 12, 2012
at 6:40 AM
PFesser…..
I was reading (yes I can do that)about TITLE X family planning…..wasn’t Fluke covered under that????????
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 6:26 AM
HoneyJo
You are right on the money re: insurance. Because the govt mandates under pain of jail that hospitals see (basically) everybody — (EMATLA – http://www.emtala.com/), and Medicaid pays about 10% of the real cost of seeing the uninsured, there has to be some way to pay for it, since the nurses and people who sweep the floor are not able to do without a paycheck and the hospital, unlike the govt, cannot print money.
How is that done? Simple – the insurers overcharge YOU so YOU can pay for medical care for those who have no insurance – also the multimillion-dollar salaries of its executives, and the million-dollar homes of the malpractice attorneys. All of them get the benefits; you and I pay for it all. Nice work if you can get it.
Warren Buffett said that if you are in a poker game for half an hour and you still don’t know who the patsy is, you’re the patsy.
That would be US.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 12, 2012
at 6:14 AM
farsight….obtuse?????
the point being some insurance plans are different than others…….my problem is with gov mandates not benefits through negotiations……..IE your insurance plan pays for birth control and Georgetown University’s does not…..
people here like to bring up Viagra but I haven’t seen where
Obama is mandating FREE Viagra……so what is it??????people being denied or people pissed because they have to pay for it…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 6:03 AM
guess I stirred up some shit but I still haven’t seen where Fluke or the students were denied contraceptives…………they were denied FREE contraceptives……if you remember I don’t have a problem with birth control……
JJ….
“UAW: The girl denied contraception had to have an operation taking out an ovary which cost $20,000 plus”…so what is it …if she paid for her own then she was not denied contraceptives……..
and I don’t know how else to say it but…..”MY INSURANCE WILL NOT PAY FOR VIAGRA”…..so if I pay for it myself am I being denied????????WTF……tell me JJ…how am I being denied????????
and HoneyJo….talk about a line of crap………of course I know how medical insurance works……ever hear of co-pays…….you keep dancing around the subject but it boils down to having someone else pay for it………why aren’t you complaining about FREE toothpaste or mouthwash…….
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 12, 2012
at 5:39 AM
New Topic: Melissa Harris-Perry explains the Republican Right Wing convicting College Student Obama for hugging a black man. The more I learn about Dr. Bell, the more impressed I am with him. I saw the Brietbart video and there was no smoking gun, just a mountain made out of a mole hill.
HARRIS-PERRY: This week, a manufactured controversy erupted around an extraordinary legal scholar, who used self-sacrifice as an agenda change of his own. This week, this twenty two year old video surfaced of then student Barack Obama at a protest rally, introducing Harvard Law School professor Derrick Bell. Now Prof. Bell spent his career questioning and critiquing the institutional racism that infects America’s legal structures.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/melissa-harris-perry-president-obama-tried
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 12, 2012
at 12:50 AM
Joe, to argue one has to be a man to have an opinion is idiotic. I am not a complete moron and I can have an opinion on you.
Honeyhumpsalot
Fluke was proven to have lied about many facts in a few posts above. I suggest you read them.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 11, 2012
at 11:50 PM
Well, I left my tab open on M&H for a long time and waited to post without refreshing. Looks like I didn’t need to post my last comment as it was much better addressed in the previous ones.
UAW vacillates between being highly rude and offensive and maliciously obtuse. He still can’t compete with Noah though except for his ability to peg the crude/crass/rude meter!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 11, 2012
at 10:59 PM
Don’t be obtuse UAW. The point being that if someone is enrolled in insurance, or Medicare for that matter, not all things that are covered will ever have a chance of being collected on by you. You purposely put on blinders and make things very black and white on a frequent schedule. Try growing up for a change.
Also, remember that Fluke was not talking about herself in her testimony and that some of the Birth Control “Hormone” treatments are extremely expensive and are what is required for those with ovarian cysts/endomitriosis issues.
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 11, 2012
at 10:49 PM
NOP: You are probably right.
Here is the Santorum medical plan according to Andy Borowitz
NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – Today, former Senator Rick Santorum issued the following letter to the American people.
Dear American People:
When I think about government-mandated healthcare, I have the same response that any mature adult would have: it makes me want to throw up.
That’s why, on my first day as President, I will repeal ObamaCare. Well, actually, on my very first day I’m going to repeal the Renaissance. And also the theory of evolution. But I will definitely get rid of ObamaCare by Day Three, Four at the latest.
You see, ObamaCare runs counter to my well-documented position on personal freedom: I believe in the rights of the unborn child, until it’s born and wants a checkup.
What will take the place of ObamaCare? As your President, I will institute SantorumCare™, a healthcare plan that will cover absolutely no medical procedures whatsoever except one: exorcism.
For many years, possession by the devil has been America’s number one health problem, far more serious than those posed by cigarette manufacturers who have funneled millions to my PACs.
,,,NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report) – Today, former Senator Rick Santorum issued the following letter to the American people.
Dear American People:
When I think about government-mandated healthcare, I have the same response that any mature adult would have: it makes me want to throw up.
That’s why, on my first day as President, I will repeal ObamaCare. Well, actually, on my very first day I’m going to repeal the Renaissance. And also the theory of evolution. But I will definitely get rid of ObamaCare by Day Three, Four at the latest.
You see, ObamaCare runs counter to my well-documented position on personal freedom: I believe in the rights of the unborn child, until it’s born and wants a checkup.
What will take the place of ObamaCare? As your President, I will institute SantorumCare™, a healthcare plan that will cover absolutely no medical procedures whatsoever except one: exorcism.
For many years, possession by the devil has been America’s number one health problem, far more serious than those posed by cigarette manufacturers who have funneled millions to my PACs. You don’t have to take Rick Santorum’s word for it that America is in the grips of a devil-possession epidemic: just watch any episode of “Jersey Shore.”
You’re probably saying to yourself, “Government-mandated exorcisms are a great idea, Rick. But how will we find the devil babies to exorcise?” Good question, and I have a good answer: on my first day as President, I will order mandatory transvaginal ultrasounds for every woman in America.
These ultrasounds will be a prerequisite to getting a driver’s license at the DMV, where there’s plenty of downtime for such a procedure. Additionally, they can be easily and safely performed by TSA employees on the airport security line. If an ultrasound turns up any telltale signs of a devil baby (e.g. horns or tail) we’ll schedule the woman for her government-mandated exorcism there and then.
From the Borowitz Report
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 10:30 PM
Why bother, UAW is just another troll. He should use his time to write Rush fan letters.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 11, 2012
at 10:20 PM
UAW: The female students also have to go to an outside DR to get a Pap Smear and Pelvic Exam because the College will not allow the College DR to prescribe Contraception, even though they probably did the same exams.
LET WOMEN BE INVOLVED IN MEDICAL DECISIONS AFFECTING THEIR BODIES, including contraception and abortion.
Having MEN (OLD MEN) deciding female parts medical decisions IS STUPID!
Take your viagra substitute UAW!!!! Don’t let women take contraception though – you are a swell fellow!!!
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 10:10 PM
p.s. uaw, Sandra Fluke never said anything about $3,000 a year for birth control. If you actually read her testimony, you will find that she said it can cost up to $3,000 OVER THE TIME OF STUDIES, or about three years. How much it costs can depend on what type and what dosage of birth control, whether it’s offered in generic form or not, some medications are not.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 11, 2012
at 9:50 PM
Guess what, UAW, I didn’t say I pay your insurance. I do help pay for the MEDICAL COSTS of everyone who is insured under my insurance plan through the premiums I pay every year. If I pay a couple thousand dollars in premiums over a year but never get sick that year, my insurance company doesn’t give me that money back. They use it to pay the claims of other people on my same health care plan who did get sick. And if a lot of people on my plan get sick, then everyone’s premiums go up the next year, including mine, even though I didn’t get sick. That’s how it works. And yes, someone pays your medical costs, too. If you get your insurance through your employer, then everyone else who pays into that same plan helps pay your costs. If you are self employed, again, still everyone on the plan you pay into pays for your costs, and you pay for theirs. If you get your medical care through the military, then the tax payers pay your medical costs. If you are not insured and get your medical treatment through urgent care or emergency room treatment, then we all help pay your medical costs through higher insurance premiums, since uninsured emergency care patients tend not to pay their entire bill, which can run into the thousands right there on the spot, medical care costs go up to make up for the bills that take time to get paid or don’t get paid at all by uninsured emergency care patients. It’s scary how little people like you understand about how medical insurance works and how medical costs get paid, or don’t get paid, and what will make health care costs go up or down.
JJ, $20,000 is a bargain. My operation I had last year cost $40,000, $3,000 of which came out of my own pocket.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 11, 2012
at 9:45 PM
UAW: Please tell me again why this is a 60+ year old mans issue when it involved young women and women?
My daughters know a hell of a lot more about their bodies and medical needs than I do, or want to know. Any of my 3 daughters would have loved to have spoken to the senate hearing about the reality and needs of contraception. There are many medical conditions which THE PILL works on. Sadly, I know more about THE PILL then I ever wanted because of the stupid Republicans.
Let women be involved in all discussions involving their medical care!!! THE PILL IS A SIGNIFICANT PART OF A WOMAN’S MEDICAL CARE by the way.
Take your viagra type stuff and ignore the medical needs of women – cute trick UAW.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 9:31 PM
UAW: The girl denied contraception had to have an operation taking out an ovary which cost $20,000 plus. It was a medical issue which she needed the contraception. Also: Having a baby costs much more for the birth and the cost of feeding, clothing and feeding.
Contraception is cheap when you consider the losses. UAW: You get a viagra like substance with your insurance and so do I: WHY? Do you have a medical need? I don’t.
You just want to control women, along with lots of other Republicans. Did you like the send a Republican Camera up the vagina which almost passed in Virginia. Why was that necessary? Abortions are legal and safe until crazies restrict them and push poor women into back alleys with coat hangers.
Rush was totally wrong with his 3 days of constant and stupid comments about a college student. You seem to support him – I feel sorry for you.
That young lady has a point and it had nothing to do with prostitution, sex or being a slut. By the way: Any woman who uses contraception and having sex for pleasure (which happened a lot in my marriage) is a slut under the Rush (and your) definition.
UAW; You are sounding like an idiot and a fool by continuing to push this topic. The father of 3 sluts, according to UAW and Rush.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 9:17 PM
guess what HoneyJo……..
you don’t pay for my insurance
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 11, 2012
at 8:23 PM
saw that JJ….
still wondering what she’s doing with $3000/yr for birth control……..if someone else pays for it do they charge more????????????maybe the company suppling Fluke can go bankrupt like Solyndra……..?????FREE CONDOMS……..I had to pay for mine……..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 11, 2012
at 8:19 PM
What the heck, I’ll say something nice about Anthony Weiner. It was largely because of him that the Zadroga Bill was passed, that gives $4 billion to 9/11 first responders for health care they sorely need.
I just wanted to make two points – to those who think we’re hypocrits for not getting mad at Bill Maher for calling Sarah Palin names..because this is not about us getting our widdle feewings hurt because some big bad man called a woman a slut. This is about the fact that this gross big bad man LIED. He lied about what Sandra Fluke testified about, he lied and convinced millions of people she wants “all the sex in the world all the time, they’re lined up around the block, we’re talking sex addict frequency here” and convinced millions of people that any woman who is on birth control is a selfish slut, to stifle her real testimony about her friend who had to have an ovary removed because she couldn’t afford the hormonal treatment to keep the ovarian cysts at bay. Millions of women take birth control to avoid ovarian cysts, to help regulate painful or excessively heavy periods, to control premenstual dysphoric disorder, and other reproductive health issues. That issue is being drowned out by this ass hat, and THAT’S why women and the men who truly love them are so pissed, not because of a couple of dirty words. Neither Bill Maher or Jon Stewart, or any other democratic pundit has gone that far, and that’s why we’re not as pissed at them.
And for those who wonder why “should I pay for her birth control?” Well, why should I pay for your insulin? or heart medication or colesterol reducing medication, or for you to be in a program to help you stop smoking, which you wouldn’t have to do if you’d been smart enough never to have started in the first place? Because that’s what we do. My insurance premiums pay for your health care, and yours pays for mine, wahtever it is. That’s how it works. And birth control not only cuts insurance costs by avoiding unintended pregnancies, but Sandra Fluke testified that her friend had an ovary removed because of cysts that grew due to her not taking hormone treatment. I had my ovary out last year and the operation cost around $40,000. So which do you think will make your insurance premiums go up more, a $3,000 prescription over three years or a $40,000 operation?
It’s time to be heard ladies. If they want to make our reproductive systems a point of debate, then let’s debate it. I encourage all women to talk openly, frankly and freely about their female health care issues, like I did earlier in this thread, until we drown out the people like Limbaugh, who want us silenced.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 11, 2012
at 8:09 PM
Jon Stewart and his take on the Rush – Ms Fluke controversy. Stewart does such a great job!
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-5-2012/extremely-loud—incredibly-gross
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 4:03 PM
BTW, make sure you follow thru the links on the above page. Very interesting indeed!
Also, too, I got was sent there from
Andrew Sullivan’s The Dish,
the website that led me here to
M&H back on 10/29/2008 – ‘Why Blogging Rocks’
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 11, 2012
at 12:22 PM
Thank God for all the smart people that came before:
Inspirations
What exciting thinkers will express themselves next?
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 11, 2012
at 12:01 PM
and a slam to the 1%ers
Democratic National Committee Taps Crony Corporations
http://nlpc.org/stories/2012/01/11/dnc-desperation-help-sought-crony-corporations
I know….I’m not supposed to get mad when Democrats do things that Republicans do…..
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 11, 2012
at 11:27 AM
Lori…..”in their attempt to use sock puppets for their hidden agenda,”…………
what’s more hidden (or stupid) than “We have to vote for this to find out what’s in it.”……..
“They consistently have a losing and unpopular agenda, year after year.”….Is that why Republicans took back the House….. look at pictures of Tea Party events….what do you see…..WORKERS….. thats who the DNC lost……
Come on….say something nice about John Edwards or Anthony Weiner…….how about Gary Hart or David Guiles……
http://www.conservative21.com/Media/The_List.txt
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 11, 2012
at 11:18 AM
JJ, when you consider the failure of the “great white (or not so white”) hopes the the GOP has trotted out… (Sarah, Fred Thompson, Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Michael Steele, Donald Trump…) in their attempt to use sock puppets for their hidden agenda, it does give me hope that the system still does work. Everyone of those people didn’t make it an entire election cycle.
They consistantly have a losing and unpopular agenda, year after year. The only thing they CAN do is TRY and use smoke and mirrors to push their policies.
That isn’t the only front they have though.. if all else fails, their tried and true motto: ” keep em stupid (FOX NEWS, home school. anti college) and keep em afraid works too.
Or not. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 11, 2012
at 9:27 AM
Discussion of GAME CHANGE is happening on the Immoral Minority blog, which is out of Alaska. There are over 400 comments so far. Join in the conversation if you wish.
http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2012/03/game-change-open-thread.html#comment-form
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 9:14 AM
Game Change shows how messed up the present system is. It also shows what can be done with unlimited money thrown in, with little oversight. People are elected on sound bites now – pretty sad.
Here is a Bill Moyers show on Crony Capitalism with David Stockman, Reagan’s financial whiz discussing the current mess and how to get back to reason. Glass – Steagall comes up along with the current reform effort which is a joke in which the large corporations set the rules.
http://billmoyers.com/episode/encore-broadcast-crony-capitalism/
It is an interesting show.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 11, 2012
at 9:04 AM
I’ve read the book, haven’t seen the movie yet. My take away from the book was, poliitcs is a dirty hard job and she just wasn’t/isn’t ready for prime time.
Someone should have saved her from herself. That someone should have been her party.
Santorum isn’t ready either, and it shows…
and on we go!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 11, 2012
at 8:14 AM
Defend Rush Limbaugh
defendrush.org
Defend Rush Limbaugh is a fan site for supporters of Rush’s opinions about Sandra Fluke and other matters…
Interesting site!
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 11, 2012
at 8:01 AM
Good morning, all. I was hoping there’d be discussion of Game Change here today! We watched it last night, and I thought it was terrific. To me, the big take-away is how empty our current political system (regardless of party) is and how unbelievably easy it would be to have someone like Palin elected.
I think it was a sympathetic portrait of Palin and my best guess is that it’s pretty close to the truth. I’m glad that there was no attempt to delve into the family dynamic because that would have distracted from the real point of the movie, which was the politics. I think Palin’s psychological makeup was only important insofar as it related to that.
If you haven’t read the book, it’s a great read. Nobody is spared–not President Obama, not the Clintons. And John Edwards is flat out sliced and diced. But, again, I think it’s all about the message that we have a very messed up and dangerous system. Not sure what, if any, alternative there possibly could be.
I thought that the most poignant moment in the movie was when McCain hugged Palin on election night and quietly told her not to get in with “Limbaugh and that crowd” because of what it would do for her. Of course, that’s exactly what she did.
Pfesser: your last paragraph could have been written by my spouse, a number of my relatives, and several friends.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 11, 2012
at 6:34 AM
NOP –
My wife and I have made a bit of a case study of SP; as a physician I was just agog at the tale of “Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride,” where she allegedly flew from urban TX to the AK bush to be delivered of Trig. That whole story is utter fantasy.
We thought “Game Change” was right on the money, hard-hitting but sympathetic to Palin. Here was an ambitious woman who was just in over her head. (She’d be over her head in a car puddle.) As someone with limited intellect – and more importantly – lacking in that basic curiosity about the world which defines successful people – she not only lacked basic information, she lacked the integrity to say to Senator McCain, “Look, I am extremely flattered, but this is beyond my pay grade. I’ll be glad to help you look for somebody else.” She was convinced that this was God’s plan for her and she flattered herself that she was up to the job.
Thank God the system works. I have voted Republican very consistently for a long time, but when I arrived at the polling station, I thought about the prospect of Sarah Palin’s being one 73 year-old heartbeat from the Presidency and I just couldn’t do it. I have a lot of criticism for President Obama, but faced with the same decision again I’d make the same choice.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 11, 2012
at 5:14 AM
Poo. Anon abv is me. PF
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 11, 2012
at 4:58 AM
alaskapi –
“In Search of Reagan’s Brain” was a long series of Doonesbury strips where the reporter is actually walking through Reagan’s skull, looking for a brain. As you say, it just left me cold.
I LOVE Bloom County. You and I have a very similar sense of humour it seems. I used to hang glide in my former life (when I HAD a life). “Berk Brethed” – the cartoonist himself, fractured a vertebra learning to hang glide, subsequently doing a cartoon where Opus The Penguin crashes a glider.
“LO! I am one with the air! O rapture!”
CRASH!!!!
“Are you one with the ground, o’ rapturous one?”
“LO! I am ruptured!”
Great stuff.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 11, 2012
at 4:57 AM
I just finished watching “Game Change,” it was frightening on one hand, because I remembered so much of the event portrayed and read about the rest, actual leaks from the McCain campaign. On the other hand, I think this HBO movie went a long way towards rehabilitating John McCain’s reputation. That’s good I think. I still often find my opinions at odds with his, but it would be good if I felt I could once again respect him as a small r representative of the old Republican Party.
Today a lady, in her sixties, while I was registering voters, asked where she need to go to change her party affiliation. I told her, she could do so right there with me. She told me she had been a Republican her entire life, but she and her husband could no longer “countenance” what they see and hear from the Republican Party. I am a staunch Democrat which is no surprise to all of you regulars, but that saddens me, really saddens me. The movie had the same effect on me, I hope all of you will be able to view the movie, it was very moving and I think it will win a lot of awards. We have lived through a momentous period of history I think. I really do.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 10, 2012
at 11:04 PM
I love you Margaret & Helen. I hope you are able to watch the HBO hit movie “Game Change” and write about it!
LikeLike
By: Colleen on March 10, 2012
at 10:22 PM
Glad to see that NOP but folks will have to keep an eye out for those who come back after this latest fiasco of his dies down. Short memories are part of what has gotten us in this mess and allowed Mr Limbaugh to continue to have such a highly paid bully pulpit. I’d like to see him lose stations and maybe end up broadcasting from his garage.
PFesser- I have gotten a bang out of a lot of Doonesbury strips over the years but some have left me cold too. I never saw that run about Mr Reagan. I have to say I don’t think Mr Reagan did have much of a brain though.
i always loved Bloom County and still miss it.Bill the Cat storylines got too far out there for me at times but oh, well.:-)
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 10, 2012
at 8:33 PM
The federal government will stop funding a Texas health program that serves 130,000 low-income women because of a state law that bars abortion-affiliated clinics from getting public money, a top U.S. health official said Friday.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/09/obama-administration-ends-funding-for-texas-health-program-over-states-abortion/?test=latestnews#ixzz1oiz9ieHG
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 10, 2012
at 8:23 PM
Of course we all know Rush was just defending religion. Right? http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/10/nearly-100-advertisers-stampeding-away-from-right-wing-radio-altogether/
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 10, 2012
at 7:54 PM
alaskapi –
I LOVED Doonesbury during the ‘seventies, but when Trudeau did the “In Search of Reagan’s Brain” that was too much. Not that I thought it wasn’t ok to make fun of Reagan, but it wasn’t funny. When political satire isn’t funny it makes you realize that the author is just taking a cheap shot. That’s fine but it just leaves a bad taste and lowers one’s respect for the satirist.
I have a potful of Doonesbury cartoons saved; probably my fave is the one where Zonker makes a return visit to Walden Puddle and sits in the middle of it. He says, “I used to do this – for fun?” And BD says, “Yes, but that was before you were saying no.”
I remember well the days before a LOT of us were saying no. Somehow it seems like I had a lot more fun then.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 10, 2012
at 5:51 PM
JJ- I too think Doonesbury should be in all newspapers.
I just don’t think it belongs anywhere except on the editorial page. Some editorial pages make a practice of only running things which fit the paper’s POV but most of those I’ve read include views from across the spectrum whether it be columnists or political cartoonists like Doonesbury.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 10, 2012
at 11:35 AM
Alaskapi: Given the political crap on the news and the hateful, distasteful and distorted advertising by Politicians and SuperPacs, I feel Doonesbury should be in all newspapers. Sadly, our world today is a distasteful place where even Congressional hearings and the state capital hearings where the WAR ON WOMEN is being fought are for kids to see and it is sad but a fact of life today.
Here is a link where a lead Plaintiff against President Obama’a Obamacare because she was forced to buy health insurance IS GOING TO BANKRUPTCY BECAUSE OF HEALTH CARE EXPENSES. The case goes to the Supreme Court in a month or two – irony.
http://juanitajean.com/2012/03/10/somebody-hand-me-a-chainsaw-i-cant-cut-through-this-irony-with-just-a-knife/
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 10, 2012
at 11:19 AM
I agree about talking with our kids when they have questions, Cynthia .
I just think we have to be very, very careful how we use the word censorship. A problem like running Doonesbury on the funny pages doesn’t seem to me to be a censorship issue when papers then act like idiots about not thinking content is suitable for children.It’s poor judgement in placement coming home to roost.
Censorship is a whole nother critter.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 10, 2012
at 11:16 AM
Alaskapi – I don’t disagree with you. I don’t get the paper; there is one in this area worth reading – the only thing I miss about NJ is the Star Ledger. That said, if kids read Doomsday and are old enough to understand it to ask questions then it is time to have a talk with your child, IMO.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 10, 2012
at 10:55 AM
Wow! Rush really opened a real can of worms, there is a real possibility the last bastion of right-wing crazies will be on conservative blogs. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/10/rush-limbaugh-scandal-proves-contagious-for-talk-radio-advertisers.html
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 10, 2012
at 10:38 AM
Greetings to all the pie lovers on the front porch. Husband felt well enough between cancer treatment to check out alll the info on Rush’s latest foul-up. His conclusion: Rush thinks pornographically.
LikeLike
By: mageen in old virginny on March 10, 2012
at 10:24 AM
[…] Rush saw his shawdow today. Six more weeks of stupidity… (margaretandhelen.com) Share this:TwitterFacebookPrintMoreStumbleUponDiggRedditLinkedInEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]
LikeLike
By: Rush saw his shadow today. Six more weeks of stupidity… (Via Margaret and Helen, my new favorite blog) « uncommontary on March 10, 2012
at 10:16 AM
We are to believe, Ms Fluke controlled Rush’s filthy mouth?
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 10, 2012
at 10:11 AM
Cynthia-
Running those strips on comics page to begin with is stoopid. Doonesbury belongs on the editorial page- always.
Not alongside Garfield- ever.
The first bad decision is/was to run em on a so-called kids’ page.
The second is using that poor judgment as a reason to not run them.
Crimenently. Papers in this country make their own dang problems when they do stuff like this.
UAW is a redneck in a lot of ways. What’s new?
Disagree with you UAW, on lots of stuff, but there’s nothing wrong with being a redneck in and of itself.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 10, 2012
at 10:09 AM
Oh my gosh, Fluke is a liberal posing as a graduate law student! Color me shocked!
I’d really like to know what ACTUAL words she said that are so offensive. Not the ones she didn’t say. The ones she did say. No hurry, I’ll wait…
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 10, 2012
at 10:00 AM
UAW sounds like a redneck.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 10, 2012
at 9:44 AM
http://jimromenesko.com/2012/03/09/report-some-papers-wont-be-running-next-weeks-doonesbury-strips/
Report: Some papers won’t be running next week’s ‘Doonesbury’ strips.
Is Censorship coming to a newspaper near you?
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 10, 2012
at 9:44 AM
NEW RULES with Bill Maher, Santorum and Rush
http://rackjite.com/archives/9397-New-Rules-with-Bill-Maher,-Santorum-Knowledge-is-for-Idiots,-March-9-2012.html
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 10, 2012
at 9:41 AM
Can someone can help me out with this, because I cannot seem to wrap my mind around the topic. 1) most Americans can well afford their own contraception (it’s less than the cost of a weekly trip to Starbucks); 2) inexpensive contraceptives are widely available at every supermarket and pharmacy; 3) Medicaid recipients already receive them free; 4) the feds also spend another $300 million annually to provide free contraceptives to those who are low-income, uninsured, or otherwise do not qualify for Medicaid; and 5) Planned Parenthood and state and local public health clinics distribute contraceptives free around the nation.
So why do we need to have our government mandate this? Contraceptives are not a matter of life and death. But even if they were, as for example, cancer drugs are, is that an argument for forcing insurance companies to provide them free of charge? Why not force free distribution of all medicines? The mandate makes no economic, social, or moral sense. I just dont get it.
LikeLike
By: Mrs Sam on March 10, 2012
at 8:40 AM
HAHAHA Delurker……“Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?” …….. .LMAO….
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/sandra-fluke-cartoon-reignites-debate-law-student-testimony-article-1.1034603
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/is-this-why-sandra-fluke-testified/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 10, 2012
at 8:15 AM
Too funny…you two Ladies always make my day just a bit more brighter…thank you!
Matthew, you are a wonderful grandson…love the donate button…couldn’t think of a better cause…the more Margaret & Helen the better life will be! Count me in!
LikeLike
By: Lindsay K. on March 10, 2012
at 7:58 AM
10 Reasons we should not rush to war with Iran. There is too much discussion of war with Iran and we need to step back and think it through. Remember: WARS COST LOTS OF MONEY TOO. If deficits reduction is an issue, no war. WAR SHOULD BE THE LAST OPTION.
http://www.alternet.org/story/154479/10_myths_about_iran_driving_the_insane_push_for_war_–_and_why_they%27re_dead_wrong?akid=8388.294211.mGytgI&rd=1&t=2
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 10, 2012
at 7:52 AM
Well, isn’t that special Ed?
By: poolman on March 10, 2012
at 12:20 AM
Margaret & Helen I love you!!!
I will gladly donate! Your blog is the best!
LikeLike
By: SpaceGirl on March 9, 2012
at 10:44 PM
The order might not be as short as one might think eh?
LikeLike
By: Edwina on March 9, 2012
at 10:33 PM
Sorry. one more – Rush’s greatest hits:
http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2012/03/s-rush-limbaugh-says.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PleaseCutTheCrap+%28Please+Cut+the+Crap%21%29&utm_content=Netvibes
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 9, 2012
at 8:30 PM
Ha ha ha ha ha… the GOP translator:
http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2012/03/gop-translator.html
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 9, 2012
at 8:27 PM
[…] famous octogenarian marauding gang of thugs bloggers have anything to say about R… Oh, I guess they do: Rush saw his shadow today. Six more weeks of […]
LikeLike
By: Cheers and Jeers: Rum and Coke FRIDAY! | Hotspyer – Breaking News from around the web on March 9, 2012
at 6:57 PM
So glad to see you two are still at it. I read your stuff back in 2008 and loved you guys. Then forgot about you blog. Saw you mentioned on Daily Kos today and though “WOW! How could I forget about THEM?”
So came back to see what you’re up to. You are an inspiration to us youngsters…and believe me I don’t feel so young anymore but looking at how strong you guys are going makes me feel I better stop complaining.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 9, 2012
at 6:53 PM
Hi, everyone. Evelyn: that accomplishes nothing. Matthew already has said that he’ll ban Noah if he repeats his prior behavior of constant commenting and rudeness. Noah is doing it again, just using different names (both Ed and Edward at the moment, it seems). It’s obvious when it’s Noah, regardless of the name, and Matthew certainly doesn’t need anyone to inform him of the obvious.
Matthew will deal with it. I’d imagine in very short order.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 9, 2012
at 6:47 PM
Where do Republicans get their crazy pills? THIS REPUBLICAN COMPARES WOMEN TO COWS AND PIGS!!! Unreal but true!! This is simply crazy!!!
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/georgia-lawmaker-compares-women-cows-and-pig
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 9, 2012
at 6:47 PM
Well, Porch Dwellers: I have a proposal. I have sinned by acknowledging Noah/Ron/Ed/Herb/Tony because it truly accomplishes nothing–my mistake. However, how about the following guidelines:
1. Ignore any posting of an article or video obtained from Drudge, the Blaze, or other discredited sources. We know they are unreliable, so what’s the point?
2. Ignore any posting that contains the “like all Liberals” language or accusations. It’s Noah/Ron/Ed/Herb/Tony.
3. Ignore any false equivalencies such as the attempt to equate Limbaugh’s lengthy attacks on a private citizen with the far milder disagreements with Sarah Palin and her false image. It’s Noah/Ron/Ed/Herb/Tony.
We can then do what we really like, which is to chat with each other. And when someone with an opposing view comes along who is not just here to make himself feel noticed, we can have a true discussion.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 9, 2012
at 6:00 PM
NOP, no bore… just special.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 9, 2012
at 5:58 PM
Ed,
Get a f**king life! This is not a chat room and you can’t save the world one comment at a time. The more you comment, the more you’re proving what all of these folks are commenting about.
LikeLike
By: Sifleut on March 9, 2012
at 5:10 PM
What a bore!
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 9, 2012
at 4:46 PM
lori, in true liberal fashion, has to play the race card.She and her kind have to divide us as a nation to pit us against each other. Her kind knows divided we fall, and dont fool yourself, they want us to fall.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 3:45 PM
One last funny that I saw on another site…. and then I’m out…
I thought it sounded like something M&H would say.
The topic was the tsunami of OWF (old white farts) that have flooded the primary polls this election season. 90% of the people voting are white and 70% and change, are over 50.
Under the article someone commented:
I have always said the Republicans have two colors…White and Antique White.
I spit out my FGIF happy hour cocktail over that one…
namaste’ alllllll xoxo
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 3:27 PM
Actually Republicans are obsessed with morality that extends to include unborn children and this so called obsession is a Liberal fabrication, ie talking point, to attempt to discredit an argument that they cannot take on intellectually.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 2:49 PM
because the Tea party/people is a movement within the republican party and republicans are obsessed with people’s bedroom activities!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 2:45 PM
Evelyn
Do I need to talk slower to get through to your towering intellect? YOU.. c-o-m-m-e-n-t-e-d on my personal life. You took of your time not once but twice to make personal observations about a stranger. You are incapable of commenting on the content so in true Liberal tradition you go after the person. It is all you have, it is all you have ever had. You could have gone back and commented on any of the content, but instead you doubled down to try to insult a stranger on the internet. Sad and pathetic. Tells us a ton about you though.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 2:38 PM
As to the TSA nude-body scanners, I was subject to one last year, to this day I wonder if I was the Christmas party entertainment. I am definitely against using them, but I cannot help wonder why those same people, T P, aren’t riled up about the invasion of privacy into our bedrooms.
LikeLike
By: No One:s Puppet on March 9, 2012
at 2:35 PM
@NOP and Pi… I agree. I despise false authority that preys on fears.
on another note, just because I promised my daughter I would…
Kony2012 … April 20.. pass it on. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 2:25 PM
Nobody is asking about your personal life Noah/Ron/Tony/Herb/Ed. You’ve made it obvious that you don’t have one, both by your constant attempts to hijack this blog and your admisison to Matthew that you have nothing but empty time on your hands. Truer words were never spoken.
My suggestion was that you GET a personal life. The fantasy one can’t be very fulfilling and it’s unlikely that you’ve persuaded anyone that it exists. So you are reduced to coming here, constantly trying to get attention, staging grand exits and immediately returning under a new name to try to get attention, and adopting at least 3 additional identities. I occasionally come here, post, and leave. I have a job and family and friends and interests and a life. Every one of the regular posters here seem to have a rich full life. Only you appear to be so completely alone in the world and without any resources that you are reduced to a phony life on the internet.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 9, 2012
at 2:12 PM
NOP-
all citizens here , includingTP affiliated ones, live near enough or have occasion for medical, vacation, or work flights through the 3 Alaskan airports which have or will have those stupid scanners. We only have a road/rail system in a small portion of the state- often there are no other choices but to fly.
You and I and all of us also pay for TSA staff in airports which most of you would laugh at.Those airports are our lifeblood transportation wise and all interconnect with FBX, ANC, and JNU where services and supplies are- and stupid scanners.
Doesn’t add to TP numbers much here but ,across the board, we are pretty tired of phony security crap which infringes on privacy.
Waaay left libertarians like me are royally tired of it and concerned the govt is spending oodles of bucks playing games with peoples’ fears and infringing on privacy for no real and useful reason.Not enough to send me to TP camp but enough to make me furious with stoopid stuff the govt does and won’t fix . And madder yet that the “rules” have more than adequate potential to be abused- used against ordinary citizens who must travel.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 9, 2012
at 2:08 PM
Very, very interesting. Solid facts.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 2:02 PM
That republican Jesus is mighty white, Peas. 🙂
Folks do offer up quite a variety of interpretations. We all know how tough it is to be “me”. Ask the hydra. 😉 Enjoy the day.
“When life comes at you like a raging bull you must do more than shout, “Ole” 😉
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 9, 2012
at 1:30 PM
NOP –
I just meant the TP’s general attitude that the govt needed to be put on a much shorter string, which it does, IMHO. It’s not just this govt – they all will begin to gather more and more power and become more and more abusive of their citizens unless those citizens stay absolutely vigilant. It may already be too late here.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 9, 2012
at 1:27 PM
Then should of course be when.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 9, 2012
at 1:18 PM
PFesser, I never picture T P members living near enough to a major airport that they fly very often. Then they came here, most of them stayed in their campers.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 9, 2012
at 1:17 PM
Republican Jesus Rallies for Rush
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 9, 2012
at 1:03 PM
I saw this video last week. Unfortunately unless Obama loses the election, thereby allowing Liberals the chance to blame a Republican for it, they will not get past any changes that might make Obama look bad, even when our safety is at risk.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 12:50 PM
OMG – I just picked up this video from the FlightAware website. TSA nude-body scanners not only a huge, unconstitutional invasion of privacy, they are worthless.
http://tsaoutofourpants.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/1b-of-nude-body-scanners-made-worthless-by-blog-how-anyone-can-get-anything-past-the-tsas-nude-body-scanners/
Stuff like this is why the Tea Party has so many members.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 9, 2012
at 12:38 PM
Evelyn
All of that intellectual prowess and all you could come up with is to inquire about my personal life. That tells us a great deal more about you then it does me. How sad, that all this time on here, and all you are is the personal attacks you make on strangers. You are pathetic.
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 12:10 PM
Quick, someone ask him what grits are. Has Mitt measured the trees yet? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/mitt-romney-i-like-grits-learning-to-say-yall_n_1334935.html
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 9, 2012
at 12:06 PM
OK–Noah/Herb/Tony/Ron is now “Ed.” One can tell by the reliance on such “authorities” as the Blaze and by the constant whining about supposed hypocricy. Imagine how sad an existence it is to spend one’s days scouring biased sources so as to go to another blog and try to provoke a response.
Noah/Herb/Tony/Ron/Ed: Have you thought about a job? Or perhaps actually helping people? Obviously, your claims about a business, non-profit, wife, child/children all were false. But this really is beyond pathetic. Your posts, regardless of your Nom de Blog, are all instantly recognizable as you. And all you do is make yourself look like even more of a fool–if that’s possible.
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 9, 2012
at 11:44 AM
This is 1 of my all tm favs.. I hope you all enjoy…..
have a good weekend all..
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 11:12 AM
a-m-a-z-i-n-g. a liberal making a person attack on someone they disagree with but lack the ability to respond in a meaningful way. THAT never happens on here 😉
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 10:56 AM
ED
Your ID says it all. Have you heard about Viagra?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 9, 2012
at 10:50 AM
@Elsie, ❤ it! LOL LOL
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 10:46 AM
Well Well Well…who would have guessed this connection? Well everyone actually.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/connecting-the-dots-oreilly-traces-sandra-fluke-to-former-white-house-adviser/
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 10:45 AM
This is what integrity looks like. This is how one stands behind their own values, no matter what.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/limbaugh-drops-company-that-suspended-ads-from-show-over-fluke-remarks/
LikeLike
By: Ed on March 9, 2012
at 10:32 AM
Perhaps you need some levity this morning, so here’s a little something for all the sluts, snobs, and elitists out there:
http://juanitajean.com/2012/03/09/its-sing-along-friday/
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on March 9, 2012
at 9:57 AM
alasakpi –
Did you get a break from the weather yet? I looked at Anchorage this morning and it didn’t look too bad. Did you get any decent aurora from the solar storm? About ten years ago we had a freak storm and saw the Northern Lights in southern WV!
I don’t know how far north you are but I gather you are not too far from the Arctic Circle. Brutal wx on the North Slope. My hat is off to the flyers and residents up there; I don’t see how they do it. All you folks must be hard as balls.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 9, 2012
at 8:50 AM
Your apology accepted Pf. We all have bad days.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 8:17 AM
“no need to get catty”
Nonsense. I just find chaos – and chaotic thought patterns – to be frustrating – like trying to nail jello to the wall. If that frustration sometimes shows, my apologies.
BTW, I’m still waiting for you to point out my logical errors. You’re right – it will be a long day.
**************
On another front, a homeschooler friend sent me this:
The banjo player is *nine years old.* These kids are all homeschooled. I’m not much on some of the crazy homeschooling religious nonsense, but you have to give credit where due; it is amazing what children can accomplish when you pull them out of the public school system and away from their X-Boxes, isn’t it? Bluegrass is a little out of my line, but Flatt and Scruggs’ “Flint Hill Special” is an icon. (Flint Hill, VA is not too far from here)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 9, 2012
at 8:15 AM
Now, nowwww Pf, no need to get catty it doesn’t become you. Just chill out a little bit you have a long day ahead of you. LOL LOL kiss kiss
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 7:38 AM
lori opined:
“Ooopiessssss … gotta correct something here..
“the “change” in the democratic party didn’t come with “Nixon’s southern strategy”..”
No correction need there. Didn’t say it did. The Southern Democrats fought civil rights tooth-and-nail right up to the last minute. Kennedy – a Northerner – had different ideas. It is instructive to look at the voting records on the Civil Rights act. It doesn’t do the Democrats proud. But, we all make mistakes, don’t we?
“Nixon’s southern strategy came as a RESULT of the democratic party’s to rebuff the Jim Crow laws/Wallace ect”
I’m sorry; I can’t unravel that. Can you clarify? Try splitting it into sentences, each expressing its own separate idea.
“It was LBJ who finished what JFK began … who pushed congress to pass the civil rights act ….”
Yep. We agree there. Where’s the conflict? (He also lobbied both sides, but somewhat differently. When he lobbied the Northerners, he referred to it as the “negro” bill; when lobbying the Southerners he called it the “ni**er” bill. Quite a hypocrite, don’t you think?)
“lets not go off the rails here Pf… all puns intended”
OK – I have no idea where you are going there. Is that some kind of mixed metaphor; if so, where is the other part?
Please, lori, if you want to discuss things with me, I’m glad to do so, but try to collect your thoughts and express them coherently. Remember what they told you in grade school: “A sentence is a set of words that is COMPLETE IN ITSELF, typically containing a subject and predicate, conveying a statement, question, exclamation, etc…”
Give it another go and I’ll take another shot at a coherent response. Whaddya say?
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 9, 2012
at 5:00 AM
I guess evacuate isn’t the right word….they went door to door making sure all was ok with residents. According to my SIL there was some confusion about where/who the gunman was and for a period of time thought he had escaped and wanted to make sure he hadn’t run into the surrounding residencial area.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 2:36 AM
Delurker, yep, thanks for asking. She is on spring break and was far away from the action.
I am sure the Pitt University police/Pittsbugh police were thankful that didn’t happen while classes were in session because they did evacuate the blocks of houses that surround the hospital. I can’t imagine how they would have been able to do that during a regular class day.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 9, 2012
at 2:21 AM
Well Ms. I. M. Noah, I’ll say something nice about Gov. Palin, I like her hair.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 9:34 PM
Sorry – one more. Lori, is your niece OK?
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 8, 2012
at 9:26 PM
Good job, Alaskapi.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 8, 2012
at 9:14 PM
Obama has already waived it for his term, but Dems are working to REPEAL the indefinite detention clause. Guess it’s time for the Republicans to put up for shut up. Which party is interested in American liberties? We’ll see.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 8, 2012
at 9:13 PM
FOX and HIGH OIL PRICES and sudden price increases – during the Bush years. Such a change of perspective with a black President.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 8, 2012
at 8:09 PM
oh crud Donna- I was winding up to go at her crap about hiding polar bear research which didn’t fir her notion of what she wanted to present to the feds in the suit about that… and her lies about how empty the 1002 Area in ANWR is , so why don’t the feds open it to drilling. I mean who cares about the porcupine herd and the international treaty with canada over the herd and it’s calving grounds iIN the 1002 Area?
And then there’s the appointments to commish, boards, and all which gave us a stacked deck on the NPFMC against a hardcap on salmon bycatch in the bering Sea- you betcha, pollock will feed the world, halibut and salmon be damned!
And good ol Rossi the corrupt game manager
and DNR and it’s phony minerals plan from the previous governor’s days which likely paved the way for Pebble Mine to happen- still a suit on that BBAP which her AG fought to get dismissed. Since it didn’t maybe we’ll finally get it into court…
Poor ol Wasilla. When the whispers-from-Wasilla started right after her successful gov run, most of us didn’t pay enough attention. Wehn more popped out during the VP run, McCain spinmeisters aside, we were pretty shocked but as Troopergate was unfolding then too we got our own rudeat awakening.
She stunk as a gov. Stunk.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 8:01 PM
wild applause, alaskapi! And I trust you can also give Ms. I Know What You Think Better Than You Do a snootful about her “success” as a mayor.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 8, 2012
at 7:38 PM
And :
“Sorry dear but I just cannot swallow this load of crap you and your nest of sluts put out on here at your supposed outrage about Rush.’
——————————————-
I am happy to be in a nest-of-sluts with my conservative federal Senator Murkowski and the rest of the great company I find myself in over Mr Limbaugh’s disgusting behavior including many women and men here.
You messed up though hon- it is NOT supposed outrage, it is very real outrage.
I don’t give a hoot if you swallow anything.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 7:32 PM
donnashrycnt-
I am NOT one of the people who have lost their minds over her from either side and yes, there’s a contigent who calls themselves liberal who is sP obcessed and go on about her her hair and clothes and kids ad nauseum. She feeds it purposely, also too.
Do not tell me I’m lying to myself.
I know she is the governor who purposefully played games with filling my district’s State Senate seat for almost a whole session, depriving thousands of us representation in that body. She only filled it when a suit was going to be filed against her for breaking the law.
I know she failed miserably to deal with the food and fuel crisis in Western Alaska and that she was more interested in how she looked in the media over it than the thousands of alaskans in trouble there. I know she failed to declare an economic disaster there the next year when it was possible under law to do so because wshe was too busy making her quitty-speech to progress the state.
I know she struck a deal with Trans-Canada for a gasline for our natural gas to make it to Outside markets which stunk and still stinks and has cost us almost a half billion dollars we will never get anything out of .
I know she couldn’t even remember Exxon-Valdez when asked about supreme court cases- when a settlement after 20+ years for the spill had just happened.
I know what a crappy governor she was on many more fronyts and I don’t talk about her family nor her clothes nor her marraige or any of it.
She stunk as a gov -with the exception of ACES- which our Dems wrote anyway, not her- though she takes credit for it.
Do not tell me I’m lying to myself. Go find someone who bitches about her hair and bitch at them.
And don’t tell me it’s because she’s conservative- this whole frickin state is conservative and we have some damn fine women legislators at the state level and borough level and the like who are real conservatives and good at their jobs.
PFFFTTT
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 7:24 PM
Dear Helen and Margaret, please forgive me- how in the hell did we get SP back here again?
whatzername is the one who deflected attention from her governing decisions and actions by making flaps about her kids and family endlessly, not the other way round. She was a crappy, self-absorbed governor , who in the end failed us here greatly on multiple fronts . Anyone who falls for her whining about how unfair , blah, blah, my family, blah, poor me… blah is falling for her game of deflection , period.
Donna- good description of the differences in public and private persons though.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 7:01 PM
Anthony Donna.
LikeLike
By: Easier on March 8, 2012
at 6:47 PM
Hope I did that right. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 5:51 PM
I should have said “Ron/Herb/Noah…” any that I have missed, porch denizens?
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 8, 2012
at 5:48 PM
Ron – it must be difficult to be the only member of the Sarah Palin fan club. Why should any one here answer to you, are you the Hypocrisy Police?
I am sure you would be much happier on a conservative blog where they are always polite and would not consider saying nasty comments about anyone…even Liberals.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 8, 2012
at 5:45 PM
Ron/Noah: I see that you continue to offer your false equivalencies. Doesn’t it get tiresome?
Let me see if I can help you. If you are Sarah Palin and you sell yourself based on a narrative (loving wife, “good Christian,” wonderful mother, successful mayor/governor, political expert), you can expect to be confronted about the inconsistencies between what you want people to believe and what you are. This is particularly the case when that narrative is the sole reason for anyone to view you as worth listening to.
Having your own qualifications questioned is not being treated as less than a human being. Your question therefore rests on a false assumption.
Second, you ask whether Ms. Fluke became a public figure. If you have any knowledge about defamation law (which is what the concept is relevant to), you already know that the answer to that is “no.” Ms. Fluke’s brief testimony (only noticed because Issa refused to let her offer it at the appropriate time) is insufficient. Further, any previous actions as an “activist” were not well known–until people set out to discredit her. One cannot make someone a public figure by commenting publicly on them.
In terms of your view of what is “cut and dried,” my view is that someone who has so much “empty time” on his hands and can’t fill it other than by haunting a blog under a myriad of identities, doesn’t really offer any perspective that is of interest. Your opinion of what is or is not “courage” might be worth pondering if, at some point, you ever do anything that approaches being constructive or productive.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 8, 2012
at 5:39 PM
Seems to me to be a very cut and dry double standard. I just wanted to see if anyone had the courage to fess up.
LikeLike
By: Ron on March 8, 2012
at 5:05 PM
The difference to me is that folks here are nobodies posting comments on a blog. Rush is an enormous celebrity taking millions of bucks in advertising to intentionally poison public dialog. He know exactly how to bring out the nasty in his audience. Miss Fluke made a case for insurance coverage for birth control. She didn’t do anything at a to inspire hate from anyone but Rush fabricated some and then doubled down. He called her vile things and lied over and over about what she actually said.
Trashing even stupid, crazy VP wannabes is wrong to but it is hardly the same thing.
LikeLike
By: Josie B. on March 8, 2012
at 5:03 PM
If you become a public figure, in my opinion, no one should say anything about that isn’t true, as in President Obama was born in Kenya. That would be a lie, or say, Bristol Palin is a bitch, she isn’t, so that would be a lie. But Sarah Palin is a bitch, so of course people will call her a bitch. It is very easy to understand. When the only thing you know about someone is they are a college student and an activist, there really is not anything else you can say about them, without lying.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 4:54 PM
So if you are a public figure you lose your right to be treated as a human being?
Also did she not make herself a public figure when she (A) testified before congress and (B) decided to become an activist?
LikeLike
By: Ron on March 8, 2012
at 4:38 PM
It comes with the territory for public figures, they put themselves out there knowing everything they say or do will be perceived in the worst light by some. We held our tongues about Bristol Palin until she decided, she was a “star.” After she cashed in, she was fair game as far as I am concerned. Fame and wealth is the difference between a public figure and a private person, so if you want fame and wealth, you better toughen up cupcake.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 4:28 PM
Ron, Ron: No, it is not hypocricy. First, Palin is a public figure. The woman that Limbaugh was smearing was not. Second, Palin is largely criticized for her incompetence and the disconnect between her claimed persona and the actual facts. The woman that Limbaugh was attacking was targeted by three days of lying about her and her testimony. Next question?
LikeLike
By: Evelyn on March 8, 2012
at 4:22 PM
Love you Margaret and Helen! You are saving so many folks’ sanity!
LikeLike
By: KD on March 8, 2012
at 4:14 PM
So after reading some of the things that were said on this blog about Sara Palin in the section about her, How can the people who said some truly terrible things about her have any outrage about Rush? The people who are the loudest in this section were the same ones saying much worse. Is that hypocrisy?
LikeLike
By: Ron on March 8, 2012
at 4:07 PM
exactly NOP.. The civil rights plank came with the 1948 democratic convention… everyone knows Nixon’s southern strategy came in the 60’s.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 2:56 PM
Let us not forget Strom Thurmond and other southerners walked out of the Democratic convention and Thurmond became the presidential nominee of the States’ Rights Party otherwise known as the Dixiecrats. Like any other historical event it is possible to argue when a change began, otherwise PFesser’s comments are essentially correct as far as I am concerned.
One could conjecture that they voted for him for some reason other than conservatism. Certainly, I believe it is because most blacks are liberal. PFesser, I know a lot of blacks, many of them are religiously conservative, but I only know one politically conservative black, that she happens to be my step-daughter doesn’t help me understand her, but even so, I love her.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 2:14 PM
yikes major shooting at a Pittsburgh hospital!!! My niece is a resident there.. gotta go find out if all is ok… bbl
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 1:58 PM
Ooopiessssss … gotta correct something here..
the “change” in the democratic party didn’t come with “Nixon’s southern strategy”..
Nixon’s southern strategy came as a RESULT of the democratic party’s to rebuff the Jim Crow laws/Wallace ect
It was LBJ who finished what JFK began … who pushed congress to pass the civil rights act …..
lets not go off the rails here Pf… all puns intended
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 1:53 PM
NOP your point about older black folks and Obama is well-taken, but I think that is a separate issue, isn’t it? One could conjecture that they voted for him for some reason other than conservatism.
For the record, Patty, the Republican party of today is not the same party it was just a short time ago. Remember, a Republican president freed the slaves. The South was at one time called the Solid South – solid Democrat, and they viciously opposed civil rights legislation proposed by the Republicans. Lester Maddox, who handed out axe-handles to beat up black folks with – was a Democrat. Probably the greatest racist of the times, George Wallace – Democrat. Lyndon Johnson always referred to black folks as n***ers until after Kennedy was killed and then he *backed* civil rights laws.
The change came when Nixon instituted his “Southern Strategy” to pick up the votes of disaffected southern Democrats, and things changed from that point on. But that is only a short time ago.
Younger folks, especially those who have never recovered from the damage of a public education by educating themselves – have on their backs the twin monkeys of both not having lived through those times and possessing a poor education that never taught them about those days, either.
And also for the record, there are a great many of us out there – former Rebublicans – now Independents – who are thoroughly ashamed of what our former party has become. It deserves every word of criticism it gets, but remember, it was not always so. For the longest time the Republican party was the bulwark of defense against the bigotry and racism of the Democrats. I often see on these pages allusions to “wanting to go back to the ‘fifties, and oppressing women, etc.” Nonsense. Nobody decent wants to do that, but the Republican – and Democratic – parties were both far different creatures at one time, and it only takes a little maturity to see that NOBODY has a monopoly on the truth.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 8, 2012
at 1:43 PM
you don’t have much of a sense of humor do ya Pf??? LOL LOL If you are a LOLz counter I just can’t imagine you having much time for fun?
… I would have thought with a name that means spank me.. you would’of ??? my bad again…
It’s just politics Pf.. just politics… relax and enjoy the ride, my love.. I’m sure you’re use to that when it comes to interacting on the internet.. at the end of the day there will be a winner and a loser… and on we will go. lol lol kiss kiss
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 1:39 PM
lori –
“Now now Pf, don’t get your ire up.. It’s all good its just the internet bytes, and all that remember? LOL LOL”
Firstly, nobody’s ire’s up; I’d just like to see where my errors in logic are – to which you alluded – so I can correct them. You CAN point them out, right?
Secondly, you might want to get some of that gingko-viagra; your memory is just not what it used to be. The quote is, “It’s not real; it’s just electrons.”
I’m also kinda curious; can you help me with a couple of things? To wit:
I keep hearing the children in my town saying, “It’s all good” – like you did. What, exactly, does that mean? Does it have a meaning, and if so, how can you tell if you are using it appropriately, or is it just a sort of filler, like “ya know” ?
And are two LOLs better than one? Does that mean you LOL, then stop, and then LOL again? How much time between LOLs is required so that they would be considered two LOLs instead of one long LOL? Enquiring minds want to know…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 8, 2012
at 1:23 PM
JOBS! JOBS! JOBS!
http://www.barackobama.com/jobsrecord/
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 8, 2012
at 12:49 PM
MIOV, so do you think it is a continuation of the 60’s thing? or a whole other trend having to do with the “new” Catholic church problems?
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 12:39 PM
Lori, I saw the trend among Hispanics away from the RCC towards evengelism in my college days during the ’60s. The people I knew who did so came from a culture extremely rich in color, song and dance and expression in general. They felt “buried” in the RCC and started their own thing.
LikeLike
By: Mageen in Old Virginny on March 8, 2012
at 12:32 PM
Just heard, Rush, as of now, has lost 43 sponsors, WOW!
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 10:26 AM
Pi , I too have become more “Liberal” as the years marched on. The birth of my two daughters, the aging of my parents, the declining health and pre exsisting conditions”, of my loved ones,global warming, have alllll forced me much more left..
You’re right Patty, study after study has been done concering the conservative brain vs the liberal brain. One of the interesting findings is that indeed “conservative’s” are much more resistant to changing surroundings than liberal thinkers. The demographics/world trends are a changin… and the white conservative doesn’t like it one bit…
The out of date paradigm that the older one gets the more conservative one gets started reversing about 5-7 years ago, according to bipartisan think- tanks around the country. The wind of change is a blowin, not just in America but across the planet. One only needs to look at the Arab Spring to see the seeds taking hold in the Middle East …the pendulum is returning. We have a few more years to go, right now it’s close to 50 50.. but the motion is set…. ;=)
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 10:07 AM
Hopefully, when the republican men catch up (or die off) with the Democratic men and realize that the 50’s are long gone, and women are not ever again going to be the little woman waiting at home to cater to their every whim, America will be able to move on. It obviously makes them very mad and feeling impotent to come to that realization, and that’s why they have to paint women with the ‘slut’ brush. They grew up in the age when if a girl got pregnant, she had to drop out of school (bad influence on the rest of us, you know), and sometimes even having to move away. But the boy just kept on living his life like nothing happened. They just can’t stand that it’s not that way anymore, and women no longer have to pay society for having sex. They are just as free as men now. I’m 61 and luckily married a man (when I was 18) that already had the sense to see me as his equal. We’re still married 43 years later. I think republican women are just jealous of us Democratic women and the men we love. Patty
LikeLike
By: Patty in RED Kansas on March 8, 2012
at 9:46 AM
THE NERVE: Jon Stewart talked to a WOMAN about Women’s Contraception and Family Planning issues! STEWART EVEN SAYS women’s Contraception should NOT BE a penis issue! WTF? He must not be a Republican. OMG
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-7-2012/exclusive—cecile-richards-extended-interview—pt–1?xrs=share_fb
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 8, 2012
at 9:33 AM
I agree with much of what you said about the Republican Party PFesser, and I didn’t cherry pick this, “and among my personal friends, the older black folks are almost universally conservative,” to dispute how well you know your black friends,” but my experience is quite different. Most of my older black friends, 50-80 year old, are actively working for the reelection of President Obama.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 8, 2012
at 9:19 AM
awww OK gotcha Cynthia… I was just wondering if indeed Catholic’s were decreasing. I was thinking in terms of projected hispanic demographics, who are mostly but obviously not exclusively, Catholic voters.
There has been a lot of studies done saying that the hispanic vote is trending pentecostal/evangelical, I just wondered of you had read/seen anything to that effect. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 9:16 AM
Interesting: Georgetown U single students have to pay $1800.++ per year for health insurance and the women do not get contraception. It is also interesting that the female employees of Georgetown U do have contraception as part of their health care package.
The Premier Plan offered by Georgetown University is underwritten by the United HealthCare Insurance Company (United). Because you are responsible for understanding your health benefits, carefully read the enrollment and benefit details, including the Exclusions and Limitations, in the Premier Plan Description of Benefits, Policy #2011-32-1, before making an enrollment decision.
Eligible students are mandated coverage only once per academic year. The Premium Rate including administrative fees, Terms of Coverage dates, and corresponding Open Enrollment Dates are below.
Fall 2011-2012 Plan Year:
Term of Coverage: 8/15/2011 – 8/14/2012
Open Enrollment: 2nd week in July – September 15, 2011
$1,895 per student
$5,516 per student and spouse
$5,516 per student and child(ren)
$8,680 per student and family
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 8, 2012
at 9:14 AM
PFesser-
Well, I guess I have no brain. I’m even more liberal with each year past 40 and it’s speeding up as I edge up on 60.
Neoliberal economic policies got us here – this financial mess- and yet we don’t even talk about that. We argue lib/con . The financial mess is neither and , personally, I don’t see either addressing what is going on.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 8:51 AM
Now now Pf, don’t get your ire up.. It’s all good its just the internet bytes, and all that remember? LOL LOL
again.. if your opinion on the future of the GOP is based on the conservative black people you know.. and this article’s info is based on exit polls and demographics past and present! great! it’s allllll good….
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 8:46 AM
Your memory fails you, lori. I am not a Mensa member.
But I do take that new combination drug, gingko-viagra. Helps me remember what the f**k I’m doing.
Indulge the poor mental cripple and show me where the logic fails.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 8, 2012
at 8:37 AM
Pf if that is your take away from that article.. so be it..
I must say though, your conclusion surprises me. Seeing how you are a super duper Mensa manic.. I would have thought your understanding of math and all things logical would be better.. Butttttt so be it.. ;-0
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 8:32 AM
lori – I’m sorry, I have no stats for IMO! I live in a very Catholic area (and once married to a Catholic). There are three churches here but only one priest to cover the three. They wanted to sell one of the churches but local people protested and some came up with the money for the up keep of the church but it only holds service occasionally at this point. (It maybe the oldest (1860’s) of the three also the nicest and on the lake so would sell for a higher price.) The “talk” was it was happening in other places because of fewer men entering the priesthood and fewer people attending church and less money in the collection plate. No stats just an opinion from what I have heard.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 8, 2012
at 8:27 AM
“Voters aged 50 or older have comprised a majority of the voters in every Republican contest for which exit polls have been conducted.
So far, according to exit polls posted on CNN.com, whites have cast at least 90 percent of the votes in every Republican primary except Florida (83 percent) and Arizona (89 percent).
Those are two pretty astounding stats. The GOP has a lot of work to do. ”
Au contraire. They are neither astounding nor indicate work to be done; although the latter is certainly true, it is for other reasons.
The work they need to do is to eject the loonies and get back to the Goldwater Republican Party: the party of small government and low taxes that stays out of people’s personal lives, not the current Party that wants to *control* people’s lives.
As we all know, older people are comprising a larger and larger cohort as time goes on; for a political party that’s a *good* thing, since having more people who consistently vote give you, well, more VOTERS. And among my personal friends, the older black folks are almost universally conservative.
Astounding? Hardly. The fact that older people are predominately Republicans just illustrates the old saw: If you’re not a liberal when you are twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a conservative by forty, you have no brain. (again, that is a FISCAL conservative – you know, like Libertarians, who of course are SOCIALLY liberal. LOL)
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 8, 2012
at 8:24 AM
We need to be done with the madonna and the whore notions of woman.
We need to be done with the idea that women unfettered by “consequences” of sex will run out and tear the world to bits and ruin life-as-we-know-it.
Woman is not the keeper of the flame of humanity, the solid home and hearth to which men return after jousting with dreams and dragons on the horizon to be renewed.
Dumbo ideas like this harm all of us, men and women and our girl and boy children.
The vile Mr Limbaugh feeds all of this crap.
The movement in some evangelical circles and a portion of the Catholic church to assert “religious freedoms” well beyond the confines of actual church activities , well into secular businesses they own is a form of “freedom” which is mostly a negative freedom run amok.
I come from a Russian Orthodox and Catholic background. I walked away a long time ago.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 8, 2012
at 8:24 AM
JJ… the way it is stacking up. Obama will be able to LOSE 62 percent of the white vote in November and STILL win the Presidency… Those are some pretty good numbers going into the spring/summer.
We all know… the only sure things is policitcs is, there is no sure thing. ;=0
Fired up and ready to go…
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 8:20 AM
The winner of Super Tuesday revealed: PRESIDENT OBAMA
The polling on Romney over the past week has been dreadful for the Republican frontrunner.In the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, Obama leads Romney by six points (50-44) among all voters, seven points among independents (46-39) and eighteen points among women (55-37). Last year Romney led Obama among working-class white voters by 14 points (52-38); now that lead is down to five. Notes Ron Brownstein: “By comparison, in 2008 non-college white voters backed John McCain over Obama by a resounding 58 percent to 40 percent;
http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/super-tuesday-ohio-winner-barack-obama
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 8, 2012
at 8:10 AM
http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/2012/03/the-bucket-list-why-older-whit.php
If you are a political wonk like me … that article ^^^^^^ will interest you.
The take away?
The primary voter, by an overwhelming majority, has been: White and Gray
Voters aged 50 or older have comprised a majority of the voters in every Republican contest for which exit polls have been conducted.
So far, according to exit polls posted on CNN.com, whites have cast at least 90 percent of the votes in every Republican primary except Florida (83 percent) and Arizona (89 percent).
Those are two pretty astounding stats. The GOP has a lot of work to do. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 8:07 AM
Republish your article and omit everything undocumented or just outright untrue. Oh wait maybe there is a 10 word minimum.
LikeLike
By: Robert on March 8, 2012
at 7:40 AM
Is that Catholic Church stat just for American Catholics Cynthia? or world wide.. just curious. 😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 8, 2012
at 7:39 AM
Georgetown requires that all students be covered by health insurance. Georgetown has coverage for birth control in the insurance policy for their employees BUT does not include that in the policy covering students. This was part of Sandra Fluke’s complaint/concern.
IMO the Catholic Church is about Control, Power and MONEY. How can you be the richest, most powerful religion if you have few followers? They are closing churches for the lack of priests and worshipers. The days of large Catholic families have past.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 8, 2012
at 7:35 AM
HoneyJo –
Appreciate your being willing to reveal such personal data; I hope some turdblossom doesn’t get irritated at you later and use it against you; there is no honor on the ‘net sometimes. That’s the consequence of near-complete anonymity, I guess…
No offense meant, but as a lifelong atheist I just shake my head at some of the issues religious folks get hung up on – like the boyfriend who was adamant about birth control – but it was OK if the priest explained to him about using the pill for medical reasons. Just baffling to me…I don’t see how these people get through the day.
To my eye the Catholic church seems to be the worst. Some days I’d like to tie all the priests and officials across the bed and let all the little boys they have abused do the same to them. IMHO they are a thoroughly disgusting bunch of psycho-sexual defectives who have ruined the lives of millions – no tens of millions, if not hundreds.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 8, 2012
at 7:00 AM
UAW, Viagra is a prescription drug. Your insurance plan should cover it if you and your doctor agree it’s right for you. Your boner is your business. My uterus is my business. See how that works?
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 8, 2012
at 5:35 AM
We all know the biggest issue facing America is its increasingly slutty women.
LikeLike
By: edrevets on March 8, 2012
at 2:12 AM
Anthony, you haven’t factored the cost of a doctor’s appointment in the mix along with the cost of the PAP smear and the cost of the pathological evaluation. Additionally, planned parenthood is not readily available in all areas. Birth control pills are not just used for contraception. Dysmennoria, ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and dysfunctional uterine bleeding are just a few of the additional uses. Lastly, you are right there are a few days of a placebo in that 28 day pack. It’s there so people who need to be reminded to take a pill every day can do so.
Great post M&H!
LikeLike
By: Dawn on March 7, 2012
at 10:19 PM
delurker………
there’s other reasons to take Viagra….cold feet being one………the Air Force wants to give it to fighter pilots to heighten responses is another(do fighter pilots REALLLLLLLY need Viagra) …..
So I’m going to call BULLSHIT on Fluke………YES there might be other reasons but 99% of the time it’s so she(someone) doesn’t get knocked up……Pay for your own sex…….or be ready to pay for my Viagra……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 9:59 PM
Sorry, that was me.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 7, 2012
at 8:44 PM
HoneyJo, you have such a way of making things real. Thank you. It’s nice to see you.
Mageen, I hope things are well with you and your husband.
I wonder how many Republicans REALLY KNOW what Ms. Fluke REALLY said. She wasn’t asking for a handout. She was saying that health insurance should cover contraception and gave several non-slutty reasons why. I don’t understand why the truth doesn’t matter, particularly to Republican women. It’s baffling, really.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 7, 2012
at 8:43 PM
MARCH 7, 2012
Overjoyed Romney Celebrates Voters Hating Him Marginally Less Than Santorum
Mitt: ‘Voters Want the Lesser of Two Evils, and I am Lesser’
BOSTON (The Borowitz Report) – Moments after squeaking out a razor-thin victory in Super Tuesday’s crucial Ohio primary, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was in an exuberant mood, telling supporters in Boston, “I stand before you tonight as the man people hate slightly less than Rick Santorum.”
Mr. Romney said that he hoped to take the momentum of being marginally less despised than Mr. Santorum all the way to the Republican convention in Tampa.
“The voters of Ohio have said that they want the lesser of two evils,” he told the crowd, “and I am lesser.”
…And former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin hinted that she might have a role to play if the GOP contest becomes deadlocked: “Remember, it was my historic lowering of the bar that made this Republican race possible.”
Get a free subscription to the Borowitz Report
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 7, 2012
at 8:14 PM
Anti- Catholic attack? Bullshit. I’m Catholic, and a 47 year old virgin. About 15 years ago, I was considering marriage to a staunchly, pre-Vatican II Catholic man. We disagreed about the whole no artificial birth control thing. I have diabetes, epilepsy and schizophrenia in my family history. I read that natural family planning has a higher instance of birth defects because when when you are having sex and not using any protection, you are not focused on that small window of ovulation and a pregnancy results from an old egg or sperm. Sounded plausible to me, and I wanted to give any children I might have the very best shot in life possible. So we talked to a priest about it. The priest basically told me I needed to at least consider natural family planning, and by boyfriend needed to lighten up (he took a very hard line, said he couldn’t bring himself to have sex with me if we used birth control even after marriage) and asked him “what if she needs it for other reasons, llike cysts or some other female issue?” and my boyfriend says he could accept that. My Catholic priest was not against the pill if used in the manner Ms. Fluke testified about, to avoid ovarian cysts. To my mind, that puts the religious freedom argument to bed. My boyfriend eventually decided I wasn’t Catholic enough, then shacked up with then married a fresh out of court divorcee with three kids who will always call another man daddy and, my favorite part, tied tubes. That puts the “we feel so persecuted” nonsense to rest to my mind as well. In my state, Catholic affiliated organizations do provide health care plans that include birth control/hormonal treatment and they pay for it, not the insurance companies, so under Obama’s plan, the Church would have more freedom than it already does. This is not about religious freedom. This is not about some big, controversial policy. This is one bill that the repubs thought they could seize on and make political hay out of. But as we are seeing, it has backfired on them horribly. Conservatives can argue all they want. They can slut shame all they want. Rush can yammer on all he wants. I don’t really care. The damage has been done. Women are the majority of voters and the majority of them no longer trust Romney or Santorum. Stick a fork in both of them, they’re done.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 7, 2012
at 7:56 PM
PERFECTION!!!!!!!
What a fitting representative, it’s pathetic. I too am a slut, it’s beginning to feel like the majority.Someone please explain why the Republican party who constantly harps on “big government” wants control of women’s personal reproductive choices. Strange, very strange.
LikeLike
By: Phoebe on March 7, 2012
at 7:46 PM
😆 That’s great Whirled Peas! That puts a new twist on talking shit. 😀
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 7, 2012
at 5:27 PM
Here’s Rush’s apology without the EIB filter on:
😉
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 7, 2012
at 4:12 PM
Bill Maher: Accept Rush Limbaugh’s apology
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-57392383-10391698/bill-maher-accept-rush-limbaughs-apology/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 3:07 PM
still LMAO…..
http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/06/investors-flee-carbonite-after-limbaugh-announcement/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 2:38 PM
yes kitti….where is the council….if they want to yank on my crank they’ve got a half hour to quit that…where’s my FREE Viagra……..LMFAO
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 2:31 PM
Proud to be a “slut” by these standards.
What I want to know is, where is the council on men’s health, run by and containing only women? Hey, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right?
LikeLike
By: kitti on March 7, 2012
at 1:51 PM
I wonder if the conservatives in favor of banning Birth Control want all women join the “19 and Counting club”!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 7, 2012
at 1:36 PM
One mo’ thang….
Here’s another good read that hits a few points about the GOP presidential nominee clown car before settling in on Santorum’s failure to do the rudimentary Politics 101 procedures that would actually deliver votes or delegates needed for him to gain the party’s nomination…
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on March 7, 2012
at 12:13 PM
If you’re, not if you. My bad.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 7, 2012
at 12:03 PM
I love “Juanita Jean” and her take on the new advertisers rushing in to fill the void left by old sponsors who no longer want any connection to Limpballs’ bullying diatribes:
http://juanitajean.com/2012/03/07/a-whole-truckload-of-oh-my-god-this-is-fun/
“This entry is brought to you by the letters W,T, and F…”
Enjoy.
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on March 7, 2012
at 12:03 PM
Anthony opined:
“Republicans treat women as intelligent. Democrats don’t.”
If you allergic to irony, you are a dead man.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 7, 2012
at 11:58 AM
Let’s raise the level of this conversation. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/07/david-axelrod-mitt-romney-rush-limbaugh_n_1326916.html
What do you think?
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 7, 2012
at 11:56 AM
But the liberals have a more fatal problem here:
If you are going to lie, never lie about things that the hearer can SEE to be a LIE.
For the next 8 months, women will be buying their birth control pills every single month, if that is their chosen approach. They can SEE that the liberals are lying.
For the next 8 months, voters will walk through the aisles of grocery stores and then can SEE how little condoms cost. They can see that birth control is all over the place. In every grocery store in America, you can see them right there.
So the lie by the Democrats is obvious for all to see. The looming fiasco for liberals is that anyone can see the facts for themselves that the liberals are lying about.
Democrats and free agent liberals are doubling down on THE LIBERAL WAR ON WOMEN:
LIBERALS ARE PUBLICLY ARGUING THAT (liberals instinctively believe) WOMEN VOTERS ARE DUMB. That is, liberals hope and imagine that women voters aren’t smart enough to see through the liberal scams and hogwash.
Republicans are betting that women voters are smart. Liberals are desperately hoping they’re not. Obama’s re-election strategy is to bet everything on the hope that voters are easily-fooled, gullible, and naive. Republican election hopes rest on believing the best about the American people.
So the only way the liberal scam can work is if women voters are really, really dumb.
Republicans treat women as intelligent. Democrats don’t.
LikeLike
By: Anthony on March 7, 2012
at 10:49 AM
FAILED ARGUMENT:
The crucial lynchpin of the argument for attacking Georgetown’s Catholic religious beliefs is the hypothesis that birth control is too expensive for a student to afford without health insurance paying for it. YET, THAT IS A FLAT-OUT, TOTAL LIE.
Sandra Fluke committed perjury (lying under oath) by claiming that “AS YOU KNOW” birth control costs a student “OVER $3,000″ over the three years of law school.
Note: Some have tried to cover for Fluke by changing this to “UP TO.” No. She said “OVER $3,000.”
To expose this perjury, we need look no farther than Planned Parenthood’s own website.
Of course Sandra Fluke did not identify which type of birth control she had in mind. But it doesn’t matter:
COSTS: (1) Birth Control pills, every single day (with placebos often in the plan for 2 or 3 days): $15 per month, says Planned Parenthood. $540 over 3 years. (2) the PATCH: $15 per month says Planned Parenthood. $540 over 3 years. (3) IUD: Good for 12 years, $500 to $1000 up-front, says PP. (4) condoms: 40 cents each in economy packages.
Top name brand, Trojan, condoms cost $13.99 in a 36 count economy pack. That’s 40 cents a condom. So the only way that a Georgetown student could be spending $3,000 over three years is to have sex 7,500 times over three years. That’s 6.84 times a day, every single day, without any days off, for three years.
Could one spend MORE than $15 per month, which Planned Parenthood says is a likely price? Who cares? The discussion is about a student on a limited budget. So we are talking about how little she might spend, not how much she could go on the up side.
It is Sandra Fluke’s claim that a student *MUST* spend “OVER $3,000″ during 3 years. She is claiming that it is NECESSARY (unavoidable) for a woman at Georgetown Law School to spend “OVER $3,000″ a year for birth control.
So, sure — you could pay more than $15 per month. But we are talking about students who are short on money. So obviously we are talking about students paying the minimum, because they are on a limited budget. The argument is that these students cannot afford birth control, so we have to look at the minimum price, not the premium price you could pay if you don’t care about the cost.
But if Georgetown’s students — who are supposed to be studying some of the time — had sex 3 times a week, taking 2 weeks out being with their families for holidays and taking 2 weeks out for exam weeks, that would be 432 times over three years.
COST FOR CONDOMS: $172.80 plus tax over three years. (432 times 40 cents each.)
With contraceptives, there is NO PROBLEM. They are cheap. Easily available. Nothing to worry about. Anyone who wants contraceptives can get them, often FREE.
To buy condoms 5 days a week, every single week without a break, costs only $104 a year if you buy top-brand quality (Trojans) in 36 count economy packs.
LikeLike
By: Anthony on March 7, 2012
at 10:48 AM
This is not about Sandra Fluke.
Sandra Fluke exposed (almost) AN ANTI-CATHOLIC ATTACK BY LIBERALS AND DEMOCRATS.
What is being missed in Fluke’s testimony is that she is only the spokesperson for a project to attack Catholic Georgetown University — for being Catholic. Notice what Fluke actually testified:
“We, as Georgetown LSRJ, are here today …”“One told us about how …”
“In 65% of the cases at our school, our female students were interrogated ..”
“For my friend and 20% of the women in her situation, …”
“One woman told us doctors …”
“One woman told us that she knew birth control wasn’t covered …”
This was unmistakably a PROJECT to attack Catholic Georgetown University — for being Catholic — by “Law Students for Reproductive Justice” http://lsrj.org/
Sandra Fluke and “Law Students for Reproductive Justice” deliberately set out to attack and smear Catholics and the Catholic Church. This was a deliberate assualt on the religious beliefs of the Catholic Church.
This was the latest battle in the liberals’ war on religion. (However, Limbaugh managed to totally obscure the real issues.)
It was also a complete pack of lies.
Perhaps Sandra Fluke will make a very talented liar, er, sorry LAWYER, one day.
Sandra Fluke may prove skilled at convincing juries of things that just aren’t true.
But here, she got caught red-handed.
Because her testimony was perjury — lying under oath — her fitness to be admitted to the Bar ought to be questioned. The Bar makes a big distinction between dishonesty NOT under oath (not good) and a lawyer committing an actual crime, such as perjury. A candidate for bar admission faces a much higher burden to get admitted the first time.
LikeLike
By: Anthony on March 7, 2012
at 10:46 AM
The right seem to consider the employer the owner of health insurance policy and those of us to the left or in the middle consider the policy holder the owner of the insurance, which in fact they are. Here is the thing, if I theoretically am “paying for your healthcare”, don’t I have a say in what you eat, because there is a proven connection between obesity and some major diseases? I don’t think conservatives would stand for such interference in their lives or their healthcare, but when it is about the sexy bits they just go nuts. As PFesser said, it is that old American Puritanical streak….
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 7, 2012
at 10:24 AM
So watching TV , you would never know that yesterday RFK Jr. compared U.S. Senator Inhofe to a “prostitute” and called him a “call girl.” Where’s the media outrage? Where are all the stories calling for his head?
LikeLike
By: Anthony on March 7, 2012
at 10:22 AM
UAW; In the article, the girl. who had been a virgin, was 6 weeks along when she took the pregnancy test. SHOULD SHE KEEP GOD’S CHILD or not? It has nothing to do with the last tri-mester.
The girl who was denied birth control by Georgetown ended up with an operation to take a tube. That operation cost $20,000.00 or more. That would buy a lot of contraception and it would have solved a medical condition which would have allowed the young lady be whole.
I still think you should apologize for sticking up for Rush. Even Rush says he was wrong.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 7, 2012
at 9:43 AM
reminds me of Nancy Pelosi…..
http://www.cagle.com/2012/03/war-against-women/
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 9:06 AM
OK JJ….I’m calling horseshit again….I read the post and….”In your world, Joe Conservative, the fact that your daughter is pregnant is much more important than the fact that your daughter was raped.”
I’d have to say it’s more important that the scum (rapist) is KILLED than the baby…….I don’t have any problem with 60-70-80 (or more) trimester abortions……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 8:46 AM
HoneyJoRumples …….
thanks for explaining the $3000 ……..I thought Fluke was spending that much per year herself and I thought bill control pills were $25-$30 per month…….things didn’t add up…..
Still don’t have a problem with birth control (other than paying for someone else’s)………Hope Fluke continues using birth control and never has a litter of little liberals…….
Sandi…..
horseshit…..
just like birth control pills some insurance policies cover Viagra and others don’t……
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 7, 2012
at 8:36 AM
Joe Conservative’s 22 year old daughter is dancing at a bar with friends. A man slips something in her drink – she ends up raped and pregnant. What should Joe Conservative recommend for his college aged daughter? Interesting article.
http://madmikesamerica.com/2012/03/joe-conservative-your-daughter-walks-into-a-bar/#comments
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 7, 2012
at 8:30 AM
Glenn Beck fear mongering with LIES is disgusting. His readers and listeners keep right on spreading the lies for him! Even after they have been shown they have been repeatedly lied to! Shouldn’t they be offended? Instead they just keep proving how dumb they are. Even when you show them video of him rubbing vapo rub in his eyes to make his crocodile rears look real they believe he is sincere. Disturbing.
LikeLike
By: Josie B. on March 7, 2012
at 7:09 AM
Jon, insurance covers Viagra. Why should I pay if you can’t get it up? And what good is that hard on going to do you if your wife refuses to have sex because she doesn’t want to get pregnant (since you seem to think that’s all BC pills are used for, idiot). Maybe unmarried men that don’t want children should be chemically rendered sterile. That would remove a lot of need for BC. Or maybe we should just tattoo across your foreheads, ‘I am a selfish pig who thinks I am entitled to screw any woman I can talk into it, because any woman willing to stoop to screwing me must be a slut.’.
LikeLike
By: Sandi on March 7, 2012
at 5:39 AM
Murkowsi is feeling the heat from her dumb vote for the Blunt Amendment. Alaska women let her know they were upset when she visited.
http://community.adn.com/?q=adn/node/160093
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 7, 2012
at 3:58 AM
Your blog is great. Please keep up the good work.
LikeLike
By: John Jackson on March 7, 2012
at 1:33 AM
Elsie09,
Thanks for the link to stonkettle. Jim is amazing. Would I could write with such ability and passion!
LikeLike
By: farsight Δ on March 6, 2012
at 11:03 PM
Donna, I certainly agree with your statement, “So basically powerless and lonely people trying to make themselves feel like they are o.k., rather than a true expression of ideology.”
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 6, 2012
at 10:50 PM
How are local ordinances enacted by local governments Obama’s fault? I thought the right likes to spout the drivel about local and state goverments getting more autonomy from the federal government? Every town and city in the US does exercise the right to enact ordinances, some crazier than others, without the federal government’s interference. People can’t always be pleased can they? Thanks Donna, for stating the actual facts.
LikeLike
By: Easier on March 6, 2012
at 10:26 PM
Delurker: Aren’t facts a wonderful thing? I oppose NDAA, certainly. But this sudden outrage from people who were happy as clams about the Patriot Act is laughable.
And NOP: who knows? I don’t think it’s a conservative thing. We don’t get a representative sample here of conservatives, any more than freerepublic gets a representative sample of liberals. Certainly, I’d welcome the thoughts of courteous, engaged, informed conservatives.
I think that the supposed conservatism is simply an excuse for a few people with little else in their life, who are desperate for attention and who like to feel that they have the power to stir things up. So basically powerless and lonely people trying to make themselves feel like they are o.k., rather than a true expression of ideology.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 10:00 PM
“I wish November would get here already so Obama can go back to fixing what’s wrong with this country.”
Yeah, that. 😉
LikeLike
By: Debra Lynn Lazar on March 6, 2012
at 9:44 PM
Also, three Republican sponsors begged him not to waive it.(Graham, Ayotte and McCain)
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 6, 2012
at 9:41 PM
“Funny how Obama is the one who signed into law Americans being able to be detained without representation for being considered disruptive.”
A) You have misrepresented the provision. The provision was for detention of suspected terrorists, not for being disruptive.
B) Obama waived that provision last month.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 6, 2012
at 9:39 PM
Donna, I feel bad just for giving the troll the time of day. Almost to a man, the conservatives that show up here are here for one reason only, attention. Why are there so many lonely right wing antisocial types I wonder? And why do they look to us to validate them?
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 6, 2012
at 9:37 PM
Donna
Good to see you back. Like you. I don’t bother with most of the garbage tossed onto this site. It’s not worth the time to make a comment. I only come to see Helen’s take on the issue of the day.
LikeLike
By: jsri on March 6, 2012
at 9:15 PM
And for those who actually care about facts (rather than parroting Drudge, Free Republic, and Blaze), the ordinance in question was enacted in February 1980. It was recently enforced against particular people (i.e., requiring them to obtain a permit) based on a complaint by a neighbor. Hardly about the President and it’s unfortunate that there are those who are willing to spread lies for the sake of it.
Again, this story has been a laughing stock on legal blogs. Tin foil hat time.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 8:55 PM
UAW, Ms. Fluke did not say she spends $3,000 a year on birth control. She said it WOULD cost $3,000 over a three year period, the time it takes to get a law degree, which is her major. Her main testimony was about her friend who was on hormonal control to stop ovarian cysts. The insurance didn’t cover it, and being a starving college student, she could no longer afford it so she stopped taking it, grew a cyst and had to have her ovary removed. Here’s the idiocy of the argument on the right – I myself had my ovary taken out last year. The operation cost $40,000. So you would rather have private insurance pay for a $40,000 operation, plus all the follow up care, progesterone and/or estrogen treatments as a result of being down one ovary, you’d rather pay for all that than $3,000 for a medical necessary, doctor prescribed medicine. That’s pretty stupid.
LikeLike
By: HoneyJoRumples on March 6, 2012
at 8:54 PM
Matthew: You did the blog and all of us a huge favor banning Noah before. In addition to his constant disruption, he did refer to women posters by gynecological terms. Now that he has actually referred to me in the manner in which he has, I believe it would be appropriate to again bar him.
Please don’t think that I give a rip what he believes about me–his opinion is not of interest. But that is precisely the sort of behavior that shouldn’t be countenanced. To tolerate it is to condone it.
Your grandmother is posting often, which is absolutely fantastic. I, who left here for months because of Noah, returned. I see many old names that also left who, in his absence and with the increased posts from Margaret and Helen, have reappeared. Despite the vast tolerance that they and you have shown to this astoundingly unpleasant person, I hope his continued presence won’t be tolerated. Many thanks.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 8:51 PM
NOP: Ironically, the resident source of misinformation spouted a story that has provoked hilarity around the country on legal blogs because it’s so ludicrous. It is right up (down?) there with Orly Taitz-quality legal work.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 8:38 PM
Nice try, Noah. But, again, you are lying. This has nothing to do with the President. You pulled an article off the Blaze that claims a religious group was prosecuted for Bible study. The ordinance was put into place because neighbors complained about the constant traffic. And it is not that even these people cannot do what they want. They simply need a permit.
This is no different from municipal restrictions around the country. It is simply the latest that low information people such as yourself seize on. Isn’t it embarassing to be so easily manipulated? And isn’t it sad to spend your time spreading lies.
Neither NOP nor I are cowards. We both believe in telling the truth. You are a pathetic, sniveling fool who, as you admitted to Matthew, has nothing but “empty time” on your hands.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 8:17 PM
Note both the ignorant responders dared not answer to the actions of Obama. They dare not, the cowards.
municipal code 9-3.301 This city ordinance prohibits “religious, fraternal or non-profit” organizations in residential neighborhoods without a permit. A gathering being defined as 3 or more people getting together on a regular basis.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 6, 2012
at 8:08 PM
NOP: This level of dumbness is difficult to fathom, isn’t it? The genesis of this latest burst of “news” from such masterpieces as The Blaze is that, under a number of ordinances, it is unlawful for 3 or more people to assemble FOR AN UNLAWFUL PURPOSE. Many municipalities around the country have always had such restrictions and, of course, anyone with a high school knowledge of constitutional law understands that they can’t be enforced in an unconstitutional manner–i.e., to prohibit an otherwise lawful congregation. If you look at the history of ordinances around the country, you’ll find that the unconstitutional enforcement has not been “California Liberals” but racist southerners before we had national civil rights legislation.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 6, 2012
at 7:01 PM
Oh bullsh*t, I have been to California and I congregated with a lot more than three people. Watch the news once in awhile, such ignorance is unbelievable.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 6, 2012
at 6:48 PM
Funny how Obama is the one who signed into law Americans being able to be detained without representation for being considered disruptive. How California Liberals made it illegal to congregate in groups of 3 or more people, and you all consider the GOP the ones limiting our freedoms.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 6, 2012
at 6:32 PM
You’re husband is right troutay. It’s (GOP) becoming the American Taliban.
It would be funny if it weren’t true!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 6, 2012
at 6:08 PM
My husband says Republicans must think a burka is the best form of birth control. Next thing you know, they will want to take away our driving privileges.
LikeLike
By: troutay on March 6, 2012
at 6:04 PM
M & H, thanks again for taking the time to clarify and testify re the Rupugs’ stand against women. I can’t add anything to the commentary- you’ve all covered all the sordid details and implications. I hope that the women in this country are paying attention (good point Marlene) and that our outrage will send a clear message in November.
LikeLike
By: Roz on March 6, 2012
at 5:26 PM
Thank you M & H! I have been steaming over this issue for quite sometime.
It seems too close to “A Hand Maid’s Tale” by Margaret Attwood.
LikeLike
By: troutay on March 6, 2012
at 4:38 PM
Great comment on another blog. If the Catholic church wants to get into the healthcare business, they have to abide by the same rules as everybody else. If everyone else must provide contraceptives, they do too.
and —— “If the Catholic Church doesn’t like the rules, they can just go back to being a church. Of course, where’s the fun in that.”
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 6, 2012
at 3:29 PM
Jon (at 5/5-752am) thinks RL raised a ‘valid’ point wanting to ‘know’ WHY insurance or as tapayers SHOULD pay for birth control”…Have NOT finished ALL the ensueing comments and perhaps others have already addressed the absurdity as Jon presented…First off, ‘insurance’ is for HEALTHCARE and perhaps Joon is NOt informed as to the HEALTH BENEFITS that birth control/contraceptives involve/etc OTHER than being BUT narrowly define as ‘contraception’ which seems to ‘offend’ and elsewise disrupt the realities involved in stream of narrowed ‘information’ that gets tossed as IF but the ONLY criteria /etc of contraceptive utilization/etc.
WHY are ANY OTHERS paying for ANY OTHER medical need or assistance of ANY OTHER in ANY circumstance/etc/etc/etc for it seems one of the definements is that EACH ‘should ‘ be responsible for THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL NEEDS/etc so perhaps the answer is to just outlaw ALL forms of ‘insurance’ no matter what/who it covers and etc/etc/etc.
Difficult to understand the rational used to find that males viagra IS covered for male sexual ‘needs/experience enhancement but female health needs or sexual etc’s is deemed NOT ELGIBIBLE/etc/etc/etc and thensome !!
Oh. have glanced forward ,just lines below Sara put it quite more succinctly….
as well PFessor and so very many others hereabouts…Gives heart/hope that we DO still have rational minds functioning and alert in this nation who WILL prevail come the high hellish repugnant waters thrashed and sashaying around and about as the grand old party continues its decendency. Anonymous…not so sure that ‘complete’ retro’ing is NOT beyond their effortings for they somehow envision that just about ANY yesteryear is better than what IS today especially as they attempt to claw and grasp at any straw they even vaguely consider able to put them all back holding THE reins of power/empowerment/WH/etc….For such a TRUE minority party, will give the gops credit for being as discombobulating obstructionists and HVE delayed our NATIONAL recovery that serves the greater common good of ALL rather than just their selective select few and fewer –all without due conscience or care to the devastation THEY have festered at OUR expense for we remain THEIR acceptable collateral damagees evermore and thensome as they play out and about and etc !!
Good idea latesummer…’renaming’….Got to give Gop sorts like Frank Lutz/Rove/etc who have taken ‘linguistics/psychology/marketing/etc to such grandiose heights and all the utilization for ‘framing’ various matters to eek out particular responses on cue. Keep wondering when perhaps the dems are going to do some REAL catch-up in such regard–presently come off perhaps as just NOt wanting to sink to such levels/etc but ALL do it such NOt with such expertisements as the gopheads and their minions.
And Delurkergirl…”The Catholic church is actually making a great case that employers shouldn’t have to pay for people’s health care at all. In that respect I agree with them. Access to health care shouldn’t be based on who you work for or who you marry. Healthcare should be available and affordable for all, and no middleman should determine what healthcare you can or can’t have.” ABSOLUTLY AGREE and THENSOME !!!!
To ALl the VERY worthwhile sluts/whores/and their pimps, THANKS for restoring heartfelt faith that indeed we WILL indeed make progress for the REAL greater common good for ALL not just selective few !!!
LikeLike
By: buttons844 on March 6, 2012
at 3:03 PM
” There are so many republicans up in my hoo-haa it hurts”
I think there’s a fetish for that. Or was it an app… All you darned sluts have me confused.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 6, 2012
at 3:00 PM
There are so many republicans up in my hoo-haa it hurts
LikeLike
By: SpaceGirl on March 6, 2012
at 1:52 PM
Obvious question, but… Where is there no “SLUTS FOR OBAMA ’12” tee?
My snobby, slutty ass would be ALL over that.
LikeLike
By: Txtingmrdarcy on March 6, 2012
at 1:35 PM
Debbie, you stated, “. . . ironically they’d pay for the doctor’s nurse to give me the hormone injection but not for the medication itself (go figure…) . . .”
25+ years ago I had a Synchromed computerized pump implanted in my stomach with leads placed in my spine to deliver Dilaudid narcotic for chronic back pain [after 18 surgeries] only to be told by my physician last year that my insurance companies pay him to administer the procedure, but NOT for the Dilaudid itself. This is a $1,200+ procedure every other month, and fortunately I have Medicare and BC/BS, but when I had to pay a good portion of the amount because BC/BS only paid a portion, the cost was prohibitive. Last year, my anesthesiologist dropped all of us patients requiring this type procedure and provided the name of a home care nurse so he would stop losing money. We all understood, but hated leaving his expert care although we still have to visit every three months for checkups and oral meds. I can’t believe insurance companies will pay for everything BUT the medications – the procedures are worthless without the medicines. How much sense does that make?
PFesser, if we’d met in college, none of us would have done anything but live in our beds with nothing else in life having been accomplished. After all there is more to life – or is there? Being as age and body betrayal have slowed me more than I preferred, I just try to take every day as though it’s my last so I can enjoy all to the fullest – even though I’m still a slut.
tomgnh, you said a mouthful and are spot on being as the RCC is an all male enclave and apparently hates women as much as the republicans do. There’s no question they have serious issues that’s why I left it years ago. When one looks at the way they feel about women, and their feelings on divorce with women being forced to stay in an abusive marriage until they are either dead or no longer a viable, independent person told me I really didn’t need, nor want, to continue being a part of that. Until those old men can come to the realization that women matter [without us they would not be] and need to treat us with respect, they can keep their hateful all male club.
LikeLike
By: Disparaged on March 6, 2012
at 12:56 PM
A “real job!” Pfesser, what in your mind qualifies as a real job? A statement like that makes you sound like a lunatic.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 6, 2012
at 12:18 PM
Well, I pulled the lever for my Man Paul. Probably won’t make an iota of difference THIS time, but maybe eventually.
Romney……god what a choice. At least he’s had a job real job.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 6, 2012
at 11:45 AM
Excellent commentary, as usual, from this fine source,
dealing this time with “The Absurdity of Rush Limbaugh”
http://www.stonekettle.com/2012/03/absurdity-of-rush-limbaugh.html
Enjoy.
LikeLike
By: elsie09 on March 6, 2012
at 11:42 AM
Just when you think the Republican Party cannot get any weirder about sex http://www.huffingtonpost.com/corey-hutchins/new-sc-purity-pledge-for-_b_1320174.html
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 6, 2012
at 11:41 AM
The sad fact is Rush has served his purpose very well. He has deflected attention from Issa who refused to let Ms. Fluke testify before Congress while MEN did. With his personal attack he has deflected attention from the real attack which began several years ago and continues to take power from middle class men and women and push women’s rights back to the 50’s. It is all being done under the guise of religion and the fear of a President who doesn’t resemble them when they look in a mirror. Republicans might have accepted they will lose the general election but they must deflect attention from their anti-union, anti-women, anti-education and anti-middle class in case their base starts to scratch a convenient area and realize voting for them in a Congressional race might be a stupid thing to do. That electing someone like Walker in Wisconsin isn’t such a good idea.
When I get depressed I start creating a new version of Escape from New York in my mind. In my version all crazy Republicans are moved to Manhattan, they are forced to live without all the assistance the government provides and their only entertainment is Fox and Rush.
LikeLike
By: Marlene on March 6, 2012
at 11:26 AM
Amen!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 6, 2012
at 9:23 AM
AH…..two women after my own little heart. Margaret and Helen…..it gets worse. Bristol Palin is getting her own Lifetime TV show and I completely lost it when I heard about it. I went on my own tirade on my blog today if you want to check it out at MisfitWisdom. Thanks for the great one you two wrote today….biggggg thumbs up.
LikeLike
By: misfit120 on March 6, 2012
at 9:15 AM
You two are breath of fresh air in the commentariat blogosphere. Should you care to sample something more bitterly ironic, try chancedagger.com. You all and Chance are basically simpatico.
LikeLike
By: chancedagger on March 6, 2012
at 8:05 AM
Here’s a city with a great answer to the attempt to control (only) women’s reproductive rights. It somewhat addresses Limpballs’ possible motive for demanding Ms. Fluke make sex tapes. The comments are equally hilarious/distasteful.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/03/1070510/–egg-person-and-each-sperm-person-should-be-deemed-equal-in-the-eyes-of-the-government?via=recent
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 6, 2012
at 7:50 AM
Why is the Pill a more serious moral issue than war, or poverty?
A Church that would ban contraception, yet endorse Viagra, and is male dominated, has some serious issues.
No IVF- just fix the boner.
LikeLike
By: tomgnh on March 6, 2012
at 7:31 AM
Only six weeks of stupidity? You’re optimistic sluts, aren’t you, my dears?
LikeLike
By: MichaelEdits on March 6, 2012
at 7:14 AM
So we’re back to anonymous now?
a) Whose pawn is Ms. Fluke? Is Rush operating on behalf of the left now? He was the one who attacked her. He could have kept his greasy lips shut but instead he used her. None of this outrage would have happened without his outrageous remarks.
b) Can you show me where you expressed YOUR outrage over Ms. Fluke’s treatment that makes you better than the “cackle” of sluts here?
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 6, 2012
at 6:32 AM
Oh, hear! Hear!
LikeLike
By: June on March 6, 2012
at 6:26 AM
The Catholic church is actually making a great case that employers shouldn’t have to pay for people’s health care at all. In that respect I agree with them. Access to health care shouldn’t be based on who you work for or who you marry. Healthcare should be available and affordable for all, and no middleman should determine what healthcare you can or can’t have.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 6, 2012
at 6:15 AM
disparaged –
re: “Where were all you sluts when I was a horny…etc”
I have told my wife that it’s a shame we didn’t meet when we were in college instead of much later. Her immediate reply was, “I don’t.” We’d have spent so much time in bed that we would be living in a cardboard box now.” LOL
God, I was talking to an old college buddy last night and we both agreed that, with the chances we took back then it’s a wonder we are still alive. Oh well, I guess there are worse ways to die than a bullet in the back of the head from a young jealous husband…
Before the sanctimonious nutcases jump on that, that’s a joke…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 6, 2012
at 6:00 AM
Keep ’em comin’ Helen. ;}
‘Mush’ is a knuckle draggin’ caveman…
…Remember to VOTE UGG!!!
PEACE ~ Δ
LikeLike
By: Whirled Peas Δ on March 6, 2012
at 2:43 AM
[…] https://margaretandhelen.com/2012/03/05/rush-saw-his-shawdow-today-six-more-weeks-of-stupidity/ […]
LikeLike
By: I’m a slutty snob | Embrace Life. Be Inspired. In Finland. on March 6, 2012
at 2:19 AM
Thank you, Helen, once again. You and Margaret are the best.
LikeLike
By: That Other Jean on March 6, 2012
at 2:09 AM
Have to say I am with UAW on this one. The vile filth Joe and others have called people on the right gives them zero ground to object to this. I remember when Andrew Breitbart died, Joe and many others were particularly nasty. The fact that there was zero outrage at how Andrew Breitbart was treated proves that these people are Hypocrites one and all.
This woman was a fraud and the media misrepresented the facts of this with purposeful intent. This cackle of sluts have always hated Rush, and this is just an excuse to push a decades long agenda of trying to get rid of him. Dont let them fool you for a second that they have any real moral outrage. Sandra Fluke is a pawn, a tool to be used, nothing more.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 6, 2012
at 1:48 AM
I’ve been waiting eagerly for a post regarding this Rush Limbaugh outrage and was so pleased to see one today. You all made my day with this.
I don’t know about the rest of you ladies out there but I’m darn sick and tired of men and religious authorities, etc. trying to tell me what I can and cannot do with my reproductive organs, and if I can or cannot ingest a hormone type medications. Also, I wish people would get a teensy bit educated and read up the Basics of how birth control pills work – you don’t use them like you do a condom. They must be taken every day, regularly, in order to suppress the ovarian function and keep the hormones leveled out. It’s not a use-as-you-need-it device! People are just so gullible in believing whatever other people say without Checking The Facts.
Last I knew, it was my body – my choice – and to have judgmental, insulting and downright nasty comments leveled at us women is utterly disgusting. If that’s how those particular men feel about us, then us gals just ought to cross our legs and tell them to go to hell.
For the rest of my life – I’ll never, ever vote Republican; you can count on that.
I’m 51 and in earlier years I did use the pill for contraception and it aggravated the hell out of my migraines. Years later when diagnosed with endometriosis and whole lot of pain, I next used other hormone treatments to control that condition and at that time had already undergone a tubal ligation. Had to fight with the insurance company on that one; ironically they’d pay for the doctor’s nurse to give me the hormone injection but not for the medication itself (go figure…) I had to ask my doctor to write a letter to the insurance company on that one, I guess my word wasn’t good enough.
I’m just so sick and tired of women being treated like second class citizens, like we can’t make our own decisions, especially regarding medical decisions, and the size of our families.
Until men can get pregnant and go through what we do as women, they can just shut up because they don’t have a say in it.
Thanks to Helen for speaking the truth for us all and sharing your wisdom. Now, can’t you please run for office somewhere and show these stupid men a thing or two?
LikeLike
By: Debbie on March 6, 2012
at 12:41 AM
Say it like it is! I have never liked Rush Limbaugh and his recent actions just reminded me, once again, why! The man is a JERK!
I can’t begin to tell you how badly I want President Obama to make into the presidency one more time. I do not want a Republican in office.
Thanks for you wonderful insight and wit.
LikeLike
By: Peg Blevins on March 6, 2012
at 12:35 AM
UAW: Here is the Don Imus link. Don Imus says that Rush Limbaugh is a pill popping pinhead coward. Just listen to Imus, he makes his case against the cowardly Rush quite well.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/imus-calls-limbaugh-insincere-pig-after-slut
UAW: Shame on you for trying to justify the stupidity of Rush against a young law student who wanted to talk to a senate panel on Birth Control!
Shame on you UAW!!!
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 6, 2012
at 12:14 AM
If you are educated and independent, what is wrong with being a whore? It works for men.
LikeLike
By: Vee Ess on March 5, 2012
at 11:32 PM
Katharine @11:23 said-
“The Catholic Church does not provide insurance that includes birth control, abortion, etc. that go against Catholic beliefs to people that work in Catholic institutions. This is already in place; the issue now is that the Government is trying now to make the Church provide birth control to those working in Catholic institutions. No-one is forced to work in a Catholic institution. This is a first amendment issue, not a birth control issue. The First Amendment prohibits the making of any law “… impeding the free exercise of religion…” ”
————————————
The Catholic Church would like this to be a 1st amendment issue. Catholic institutions like hospitals are secular institutions run by the church, they are not the church.
The line is fine here as to whether there is any piece of the religious umbrella which can be said to exist to cover employees of non-church function businesses in relation to their salaries, of which their insurance is a portion.
Also, nobody is forced to work in any number of bars in states, like mine, where that was the idea tooted up as a reason to ignore not making indoor spaces people have to work in that the public can come into smoke free, so that one has some problems too.
If the church is so against birth control , let it get out of the medical business, eh? And quit having businesses which have secular employees?
UAW-
Agh.
agh.
Agh.
Thank you Helen and Margaret for having us all in, even UAW when he gets on a AGH!-roll.
LikeLike
By: alaskapi on March 5, 2012
at 10:30 PM
GAG!
LikeLike
By: twobits on March 5, 2012
at 10:26 PM
GAG!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 10:25 PM
UAW, Rush, and men like them are the reason Republican women, in the latest poll, are favoring a Democratic controlled Congress, so I guess they serve some purpose. They, as we all know, aren’t good for anything else.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 5, 2012
at 9:54 PM
Jon-
Insurance paying for birth control…hmmmm, prevents a lot of unwanted pregnancies, abortions, teenage marriage then teenage divorce, it’s trickle down affect. Most people who have insurance, we still pay for a portion of the birth control. Why set us back ? Seriously. I bet if you had to pay for it at full price you’d think about it a little differently.
Helen & Margaret,
Can’t wait for the cookbook!!!
LikeLike
By: Kim Campbell on March 5, 2012
at 9:47 PM
Thanks Helen! I thouroughly enjoyed your post and I am still giggling. You cannot make this stuff up. Karma sure is a bitch and Rush is going to get his just dessert. I remember his TV show in from way back. He seemed to have something going on against Hillary Clinton. I never could understand what he had against her. I summarized then that he was just totally anti-woman. His vendetta did not make sense. Well, call me slut Rush. Proud to belong to the club.
I know my post will show as anonymous because my email is not being accepted on this computer.
Signed, Easier
LikeLike
By: Easier on March 5, 2012
at 9:40 PM
Great post! I think the questions really get to the root of the issue- the double standards and control men place on women.
LikeLike
By: Teri on March 5, 2012
at 9:33 PM
WAY out of line, UAW. Ms. Fluke was not speaking about herself. Even Limbaugh admits that. If you read the transcript of her testimony or watch it, it’s very clear. You are spreading the same lie that Limbaugh now rationalizes as having been “satire.” And one of the dangers of Limbaugh is that people listen to him and believe he is offering facts–then repeat them.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 5, 2012
at 9:30 PM
I love you, Margaret and Helen. Like you, I’m taking my slutty self to the polls to vote for my President again. Hurry November.
LikeLike
By: Julie Hooker on March 5, 2012
at 9:28 PM
via Huffpost:
Judge Lee H. Sarokin muses that there was nothing wrong with having an all male panel at the Congressional hearings on contraception. He thinks they were simply asked the wrong questions. Here’s what they should have been asked:
If a woman who has sexual relations before marriage uses a contraceptive to avoid having a baby is a “slut,” what do you call the man who has relations with her?
Have you ever had sexual relations with anyone before marriage for purposes other than having a baby? If so, did you or your partner take precautions not to have a baby?
Have you ever had sexual relations during marriage for purposes other than having a baby? If so, what did you do to accomplish that purpose?
Have you ever had extra-marital relations (like Newt) for purposes other than having a baby?
Do you use Viagra? If so, has it been paid for in whole or in part by anyone else, such as your employer or insurance carrier? If so, does that make you a prostitute?
Have you ever used a condom? If so, for what purpose?
Finally, have you ever had sex just for the joy of having sex without any intention of having a baby, and if so, should there be a law against it?
LikeLike
By: cryptoclearance on March 5, 2012
at 9:23 PM
UAW, go rest for a bit, sweet heart. You’ve either over did it today or missed some of your meds. Call it a day and you will feel much better tomorrow.
LikeLike
By: Rachel T. on March 5, 2012
at 9:19 PM
Grow up UAW. Calling the girl a slut, Prostitute, etc CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED IN ANY WAY!!!!! Rush gave the lamest apology possible and he waited until advertisers pulled their ads.
Rush, with his 3 wives and former girlfriends and NO CHILDREN actually makes it look as though all the women Rush has been with are sluts and prostitutes – where are the children to prove otherwise.
BTW: When I was in college – I had sex. I think it is a pretty normal American College Student thing to do. I also studied a lot.
Even Don Imus called Rush a Pill Popping Slut and an insincere Pig. At least Imus quit (or got fired) when he said 3 stupid words. Rush spent 3 days making horrible comments and then making it worse every day.
Sandra Fluke is an amazing woman at a very young age. There is NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THE VENOM AND STUPIDITY WHICH RUSH PUT OUT LAST WEEK!!
UAW: YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF FOR TRYING TO JUSTIFY THE INEXCUSABLE!!!! Shame on YOU!!!
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 5, 2012
at 9:16 PM
what was she going to college for again……Master’s in?????????
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 5, 2012
at 9:03 PM
oops…that’s 10/day
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 5, 2012
at 9:01 PM
hey JJ….
talk about a friggin dickhead…..your the one……..slam Rush for calling someone who spends $3000/yr on birth control a slut……at a $/condom thats only 3/day minus downtime …..WTF…is she buying Viagra for her customers???????
and I didn’t know we had this many sluts on this blog…..I’ve been widowed for 2+yrs….I’ve got a cheap bottle of something around……..bring Viagra….my insurance won’t pay for it……..
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/will-obama-super-pac-return-misogynist-bill-mahers-million-dollar-donation_633200.html
LikeLike
By: uawtradesman on March 5, 2012
at 8:48 PM
May I just tell you how refreshing your thoughts are? You ladies are my kind of women though we may be decades apart. Thank you for your candor and humor. And calling the bull to the sh-t!!! Long may you roll! Be well and keep giving them hell!
LikeLike
By: bramble on March 5, 2012
at 8:48 PM
Helen, just when i think you’ve written your best post, you add another gem !
LikeLike
By: SarahT on March 5, 2012
at 8:33 PM
Sandra Fluke is amazing. She was the TV today and boy she was impressive.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/scarce/sandra-fluke-dismisses-limbaughs-apology
I called Life Lock and told them I will cancel my service in one week unless they stop advertising on the Rush Limbaugh show. The girl on the phone was not surprised – they have been getting a lot of calls.
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 5, 2012
at 8:21 PM
Lori Hamrick Bean – THAT was funny!
Saw this on facebook today. Perfect:
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 5, 2012
at 8:08 PM
Love your wisdom Helen & Margaret! It is good to find sisters at any age.
LikeLike
By: Noreen on March 5, 2012
at 8:07 PM
Let’s face it ladies, Rush calling a woman a slut is like the pot calling the fine Limoeges china dirty.
Rush has more than one slutty habit. In addition to being at total attention whore, Rush has been through several girlfriends and wives (he’s on wife 4) and has been caught with a Viagra prescription that wasn’t his own.
Look in the mirror when you say “slut” Rush. Because that is the picture of you.
LikeLike
By: seanna on March 5, 2012
at 8:00 PM
Very true, but I was referencing his Viagra…..
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 7:59 PM
Sara: When he was illegally obtaining Oxy, he used his housekeeper.
LikeLike
By: Donna on March 5, 2012
at 7:57 PM
Aww man, Sara. You totally burst my bubble. I sort of like him better as thief. Now he’s just an ordinary slut like the rest of us.
LikeLike
By: Wendy on March 5, 2012
at 7:37 PM
I’ve been joking that I wish Rush’s dad had pulled out as quickly as his advertisers.
Thanks for summing up my opinion perfectly!
LikeLike
By: Lori Hamrick Bean on March 5, 2012
at 7:07 PM
That IS good news, lori. I think the gap was 11 percent before and now with Obama’s numbers coming up, a 7.5 percent gap means he’s doing very well. Of course, those are just polls and many of us indies don’t play along. 😉
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 5, 2012
at 6:52 PM
Wendy, I hate to say anything in support of that fat bastard, but the prescription was in the name of his physician, which is apparently legal in the state of Florida…..
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 6:33 PM
Ha, ha, ha! Thank you CNN. I didn’t know this.
“He also was detained by drug enforcement agents in 2006 after returning from the Dominican Republic. The agents confiscated a supply of Viagra; the prescription was not in Limbaugh’s name.”
I guess Rush isn’t a slut since the insurance company didn’t pay for his Viagra. He’s just thief for stealing someone elses.
LikeLike
By: Wendy on March 5, 2012
at 6:25 PM
I love reading your blog:) It always makes my day to see a new post, you tell a lot of truth with a nice sense of humor:) Thank you!!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 5:57 PM
It is advantageous to include preventative care, including contraception, in insurance packages because it saves us ALL MONEY on our collective health insurance costs. A 2006 study showed every $1 spent on birth control saves $3.74 of prenatal/delivery costs for the resulting unintended pregnancies – and this doesn’t even include the costs for kids who might be born with birth defects, etc. The more people in your insurance POOL who take them up on preventative care, the more money we all save. Example: Person A goes in for an annual physical, her cancer is caught early, and is treatable without invasive measures. Person B waits to see a doctor until his cancer has spread, and requires expensive surgery and hospitalization, followed by months of radiation and/or chemo treatments. It’s pretty obvious our costs would be lower and we’d all be healthier if everyone was encouraged to use the preventative approach and could afford to do so.
The Insurance companies know preventative care and birth control is a good deal. If you force them to exclude contraception coverage in their packages of pooled expenses, they will raise YOUR rates to help pay for the extra costs THEY will incur. Then of course you can also add the extra tax dollars that will need to be collected for public education of the extra kids, and subsidized child care, plus, plus, plus. The bottom line is healthier people with fewer babies = lower costs for all of us. There are very good reasons that you don’t see the insurance companies testifying against the President’s accommodation proposal.
LikeLike
By: susanwastate on March 5, 2012
at 5:24 PM
Good news for Obama! Up in all new polls ….. Best numbers yet.
3-4-12
Obama v Paul 49.5 – 42.0
Obama V Romney 49.0- 44.0
Obama V Santorum 49.9 – 43.4
Obama V Gingrich 50.2 – 39.3
Fired up and ready to go!
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 4:59 PM
Jon, the reason that insurance companies WANT to pay for birth control is because they darn sure must cover pre-natal, delivery, and well baby care. That is about ten times the cost of a year of birth control.
Decisions about use of birth control should lie with the patient and physician, as should the most appropriate form of birth control. Just for your information, condoms do absolutely nothing about ovarian cysts or dysmenorea.
LikeLike
By: TexasEllen on March 5, 2012
at 4:58 PM
AND, I’ll take a dozen of your cook books!!!
LikeLike
By: Sandra in FL on March 5, 2012
at 4:44 PM
HELEN NAILS IT AGAIN!
LikeLike
By: Hope Swann on March 5, 2012
at 4:44 PM
LOVE YOU LADIES!!!!!
Will share this with all my friends!!!
LikeLike
By: Sandra in FL on March 5, 2012
at 4:44 PM
I started it? You’re the one who just dissed Ron Paul. A couple weeks ago you were telling me he didn’t matter and his popularity was waning. My guess is you took a look at more recent polls. 😀
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 5, 2012
at 4:42 PM
I guess it is your job to spin it, right lori?
u started it… stay away from me and I’ll return the favor.
if not.. game on…
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 4:34 PM
Owwww…. low blow. Does it pay?
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 5, 2012
at 4:31 PM
Helen, I just adore you! I wish you were MY BFF. Margaret is a lucky, lucky woman!
LikeLike
By: Deborah Dawson on March 5, 2012
at 4:23 PM
at least I have a job Poolman.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 4:16 PM
I guess it is your job to spin it, right lori? I agree with what he actually said. Others can decide for themselves.
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 5, 2012
at 4:02 PM
NOP – I doubt that we will ever hear the republican party come down hard on that fat pig. . . they’d never stand hard on any other member regardless of what that person did or said. Even if they believed that person said or did something wrong, they would always find excuses for that behavior despite it being despicable. and he’s a fat pig that’s not even wearing lipstick like his ignorant buddy Sarah.
lorii – OMG it makes me so angry when I hear the Ron Paul and his minions [with Santorum and Romney, before we know it, both trying to move even more to the right than RP] applaud these type statements. If it were any of them though, I have a feeling they would get pissed to think there was no help available from our government. Furthermore, RP and the others can well afford to pay for all the tornado insurance in the world as it would not cut their bottom lines one bit. Ugh . . . it just makes me livid.
LikeLike
By: Disparaged on March 5, 2012
at 3:58 PM
Ohhh you just can’t make this stuff up. #thingsnottosay: when you want to become President.
Ron Paul: Ron Paul has a message for victims of the tornadoes that killed dozens of people in the South and Midwest: buy insurance.
“There is no such thing as federal money,” he said Sunday on CNN’s ‘State of the Union.’ “Federal money is just what they steal from the states and steal from you and me.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 3:17 PM
Helen you make me smile. Thank you for this marvelous post.
You can count me in also, too…Snobs and Sluts for Obama 2012.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 2:59 PM
Love you ladies, and you are so right on!
LikeLike
By: Lisa Meszaros on March 5, 2012
at 2:42 PM
I feel the need to do more than talk about Rush. http://www.change.org/petitions/rush-limbaugh-s-sponsors-stop-advertising-on-rush-limbaugh-s-show
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 5, 2012
at 2:29 PM
I don’t usually say anything but this time I’m driven to it by JON who commented way above about “why should insurance companies pay for birth control. If they want to use it they should pay for it.” To him I say “why should they pay for Viagra for men? If they need it, they should pay for it!” Honestly, the foolishness of some people!
LikeLike
By: hearmywintersong@comcast.net on March 5, 2012
at 2:24 PM
I am the worst of all sluts as I have been on birth control pills since I was 18 and never wanted children. Which means one thing: I have been and continue to be on the pill, which is covered by me health insurance as it should be, to have sex for pleasure ONLY!!! Sue me!
LikeLike
By: ChrisB on March 5, 2012
at 2:20 PM
Katharine – the original intent was to allow prescription birth control that was already covered under people’s medical insurance policies to have no Co-Pay – NOT that it was to be free completely, but to be NO CO-PAY.
The Catholic Church decided that, even though it already was granted a waiver to not have to supply this type of coverage to people working IN THE CHURCH, that they were going to throw a collective hissy-fit and say that Hospitals and Universities and other Catholic Institutions, that are NOT CHURCHES, should also be allowed to discriminate against their employees and patrons. Churches currently fall under tax-exempt status under the onus that they stay politically neutral. And yet they still find the time to meddle in our government trying to force people to adhere to their religious doctrines even if those people aren’t Catholics. Plus they receive federal funding through Medicare & other programs to help run those very same hospitals and institutions and in turn they discriminate against non-Catholics who work or use those facilities. They also want to be able to dictate what type of insurance coverage their employees, including non-Catholics, can get even though the employee pays a portion of that insurance themselves, what type of medical care they provide to their patients, and they don’t even want their employees to be able to use their own money to buy the extra coverage themselves because they think women are not bright enough to figure out when, where, how, and, even, if they want children or even if they need it for a different reason.
Insurance companies cover all sorts of prescription medications, some which you use & some you don’t, but you collectively pay for all of them through your premiums. Which is the very reason why you have health insurance, to save you money on your needs by pooling the costs with others. It doesn’t matter what the prescription is for or why because that is a private matter between you & your doctor. Insurance companies cover prescription contreceptives because, well, they cover prescription medicines. They got called on the carpet @ a decade ago for immediately covering Viagra, but not covering BC at all.
Why do people think it is ok to force their religious convictions on others, but get all up in arms when others push back? Freedom of AND from religion is the way it works in this country to protect all.
LikeLike
By: Christina MM on March 5, 2012
at 2:12 PM
Love your posts! When will any of them learn that bc is not just about preventing conception? My daughter has been on the pill since she was 14, no, not so she could go out and have sex with all the boys, but because she develops ovarian cysts. I would love to see Rushy boy go through the pain of one of those damn things. Even so, who are they to tell us we can’t prevent becoming pregnant? Oh, I am a proud member of the slut club too! Had three girls spaced out enough so I didn’t have to have more than one in diapers at any given time!
LikeLike
By: Steph on March 5, 2012
at 2:07 PM
NOP – that’s great news. I hope all the rest of them come to the same realization and make the same decision soon too.
Pfesser – you go guy! You’re terrific. I love reading everything you post because it’s quite apparent that you’re brilliant. “Geez – where were all you sluts when I was a horny twenty year-old?” I was just a toddler [ha, ha] and didn’t then know I would even be fortunate enough to become a slut.
LikeLike
By: Disparaged on March 5, 2012
at 1:46 PM
I just had a smoothie come out my nose! You ladies never fail to make me laugh uproariously out loud.
LikeLike
By: PelaPela on March 5, 2012
at 1:29 PM
Pffer… to quote Helen…
I have always said that well-behaved women rarely make history. I have also said that Rush Limbaugh is a big fat pig. Pigs and sluts. Sadly, that’s what this has all boiled down to.
😉
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 1:26 PM
“Bless your heart” – That’s good. See, child, you might learn some manners yet.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 1:24 PM
ahhh I know, Pfferrr. bless your heart… but I guess you will just have to survive the day without it.
sniff sniff.
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 1:21 PM
lori – I am deeply wounded. You know that I live for your approbation…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 1:18 PM
And still we wait to hear from the Republican Party come down hard against Rush’s comments!
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 5, 2012
at 1:16 PM
have a sense of humor Pfffer.. remember its just the internet.. data.. bytes.. ect..
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 1:16 PM
Helen,
You are a treasure. I’m in my 70’s and I think my girls are going to have a rougher time of it than I do in retirement. I think we may be the lucky ones, not having to hang around while the wingnuts despoil this great land with their unctious, pompous, mean-spirited idiocy.
LikeLike
By: Bev on March 5, 2012
at 1:15 PM
Two more sponsors have left Rush this morning, that 9 so far.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 5, 2012
at 1:14 PM
LORI! What brought that on?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 1:13 PM
Helen, I have one objection to your post. Please don’t insult pigs by comparing them with Rush Limbaugh?
Love to you and Margaret! 🙂
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 1:10 PM
Geez – where were all you sluts when I was a horny twenty year-old?
Not dating assholes….
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 1:10 PM
Geez – where were all you sluts when I was a horny twenty year-old?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 1:06 PM
Atta Gril Helen, I’m sure you have long since stopped reading the comments… Butttttt JIC… Thanks so much for taking the time to chime in..
RL.. is toast…
and on we go..
keep em coming girl! ❤
LikeLike
By: lori on March 5, 2012
at 1:04 PM
From one slut to another…you go girl!
LikeLike
By: anon on March 5, 2012
at 12:49 PM
Am I a slut? You betcha!!!!
LikeLike
By: personalizing pilates on March 5, 2012
at 12:32 PM
Herb, I don’t want to clog up the blog with a personal conversation between you and me, so I’m going to wind this down.
“Again Liberals have positioned your mind. IT is a dishonest question and you know it. I am a villain for sending my daughter up the river or a hypocrite for making an exception.”
I think you meant “poisoned” rather than positioned, so I’ll go from that POV. There is nothing dishonest there at all. Your position was extreme: the law is the law and there are no exceptions or mitigating circumstances. Lock ’em up and never let them vote. It only took about ten seconds to find an equally extreme circumstance demonstrating that being absolutely, unshakably dogmatic is a dangerous thing.
I had hoped you would say, “Well, I see what you mean; yes of course you can’t be 100% rigid all the time.” Instead you doubled down and doubled down until you painted yourself in a very uncomfortable corner, crawfishing and squirming and refusing to answer until you IMHO really looked pretty bad.
Like I said, no hard feelings; it’s not personal. But just as an aside, a lawyer friend of mine told me that the very best thing you can do in front of a jury to raise your credibility is to concede a point well made by the other side. Just say, “No, you’re right; I never though of it that way.” Stonewalling, crawfishing, wriggling and avoiding the question will lose the case for you every time, because they now don’t trust you to be honest.
I’ll give you the last word.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 12:05 PM
I’m a math and puzzle geek. Technically, the hypothetical boy and girl need only be a year and a day apart in age – one has their 19th birthday today, while the other turns 18 tomorrow. One is a 19 year old adult today, the other is a 17 year old minor (TODAY). Not much of a difference for one to be labeled a sex offender!
LikeLike
By: Mary from MA on March 5, 2012
at 11:54 AM
Hello all. . . love the post Helen and had to laugh since I have tried to be a member in good standing of the ‘snobby sluts’ [when younger, just a slut as I didn’t get ‘snobby’ until later in life]. I know one thing for certain, without the ‘hormone pills’ [I and many other women now take and have taken a goodly portion of my life], I’d be totally dried up [as I was when I stopped taking them for almost a two-year time frame] because when you are way over the hill in age and had a total hysterectomy when very young due to severe endometriosis and grapefruit sized fibroids], no lubricant in any drug store is available to turn ‘dried up prunes’ into ‘moist raisins.’ Sorry for the graphic honesty, but true history.
So Rush Limpballs can go to hell, but before he goes, he wants to ‘watch’ all sexual acts engaged in by sluts and prostitutes because he feels entitled since he believes he’s paying the costs for all women. Before he gave his half-assed, raisin-heart-sized, non-apology, as ‘a convent girl’ and others have stated, it was only the loss of advertisers [money] that prompted him to backtrack because we all know it’s money for the extremely greedy that causes any republican to begin seeing the light of their errant ways. Many organizations, especially CREDO, have sent around petitions and continue sending them around in hopes that his advertisers realize their mistake in support of this piggish man. I suppose they have all forgotten that their mothers, sisters, and daughters might actually be sluts too and need hormones at some point in their lives.
Besides if we had ‘universal health coverage’ none of this would even be an issue or subject of discussion as everything associated with health care would be covered and no one’s business but the patient and physician [as well it should be]. Why can’t they understand that lack of birth control means more abortions? Is it really that difficult?? It must be in their world of insanity.
LikeLike
By: Disparaged on March 5, 2012
at 11:53 AM
Us too Helen, us too!! Really – we mean it! Love you.
LikeLike
By: Linda and Clyde Keith, Poteet Tx on March 5, 2012
at 11:47 AM
I love the way you think! I have never wanted a summer to pass so quickly!
LikeLike
By: Kat on March 5, 2012
at 11:40 AM
Funny stuff, Helen. Are we the dumbest people ever, or is that yet to come?
LikeLike
By: poolman on March 5, 2012
at 11:29 AM
Why are republican women putting up with this crap?
Why do they allow their menfolk to abuse them and us?
The men get their sex stuff paid for, but women cannot? Why, because men say so?
Why doesn’t the Catholic church have something to say about Viagra? or is it about power, about women controlling when and if they do become pregnant.
And I want to know how this discussion is helping the economy? What have republicans done to help us? nothing. They are more interested in supervising women in the Dr’s office and in the bedroom.
LikeLike
By: mgardener on March 5, 2012
at 11:25 AM
The issue is not birth control. Nor are the Republicans making this an issue. It’s the Catholic Church that is making this an issue. The Catholic Church does not provide insurance that includes birth control, abortion, etc. that go against Catholic beliefs to people that work in Catholic institutions. This is already in place; the issue now is that the Government is trying now to make the Church provide birth control to those working in Catholic institutions. No-one is forced to work in a Catholic institution. This is a first amendment issue, not a birth control issue. The First Amendment prohibits the making of any law “… impeding the free exercise of religion…” BTW, the majority of Catholics voted for President Obama.
LikeLike
By: Katharine on March 5, 2012
at 11:23 AM
[…] is never a bad post when it comes to Margaret and Helen. Do stop […]
LikeLike
By: EXCUSE ME: I’m Changing My Aspirin! | A Feather Adrift on March 5, 2012
at 11:19 AM
I guess it depends on your angle of attack. Like the poster on the previous thread, a Donna variation, if you are using this example as to why all felons should get to vote, I think you are mixing two different arguments together. My understanding is there are difference classifications of felonies. IF you feel there needs to be more of a distinction then fight to get that changed.
What I suspect is more the case here is you need to have some daddy daughter conversation. Again Liberals have positioned your mind. IT is a dishonest question and you know it. I am a villain for sending my daughter up the river or a hypocrite for making an exception. You used to be better than this.
IF my child were to commit a crime, I would have them pay their dues like anyone else. My nephew broke into an insurance agency’s office next dor to where he lived when it was 15. More out of boredom living out in the country than any malice intent. Of all things he stole about 400 pens. When we discovered what he did, we walked him down to the agency, had him fess up to what he did, then went down to the police station. He got a years probation and 20 hours of community service.
LikeLike
By: Herb on March 5, 2012
at 11:18 AM
you two get a room….
LikeLike
By: Barbara W. on March 5, 2012
at 11:14 AM
Thanks Herb. That is all I need to tell me all I need to know.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 11:10 AM
Don’t crawfish, Herb. How do you really feel?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 11:09 AM
Im sorry what part of that you didnt make yourself clear to me didnt you understand? I am not turning anything around. I am just baffled at (A) what point you are trying to make and (B) your inability to argue honestly and (C) your failure to respond in kind when I went out of my way to answer you.
You seem to have caught the Liberal disease of looking for the gottcha. Ask a direct question, I will give a direct answer, Try and trap me into something by being coy or disingenuous and we wont get anywhere. If you did answer my question, try and muster up enough energy to copy and paste your response,,or just put the date and time and I will go back and read it.
LikeLike
By: Herb on March 5, 2012
at 11:09 AM
OK, I’ll do it one more time: Your daughter, nineteen, is caught having sex with a seventeen year-old boy. That is technically statutory rape in many places, since she is an adult (19), he is technically a minor (17) and there is two years or more difference in their ages (the usual requirement of most statutory rape laws).
You are the local judge they come before. Will you sentence this girl to jail time, a lifetime of registering as a sex offender, fine, and loss of her vote for life?
That’s pretty simple. Take your time; think about it. How do you feel about it now?
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 11:08 AM
Nice try at turning it around, though…changing the premise from the boy’s being technically of-age and the girl not, to the other way ’round.
I’m not picking on you, Herb. You got yourself caught in that ever-present tar-pit that awaits the rigid mind. The world is not black and white; by the time you are my age it will either be apparent to you or, alternatively, you will become a ridge-backed bigot like my older brother. That is why the law has some flexibility in it; one size does not fit all and sometimes you have to show a little judgement.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 11:04 AM
No, you didnt but that is on your to step up and be honest or not. I still dont understand the distinction you are looking for. If you are able make yourself more clear, if not never mind.
LikeLike
By: Herb on March 5, 2012
at 11:03 AM
Herb –
I did. Your turn.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 11:00 AM
PFesser
How about you just come out with it and tell me the distinction you are trying to make. I wont ask again but still waiting for you to answer my questions.
LikeLike
By: Herb on March 5, 2012
at 10:59 AM
Fabulous Post, ladies! You two are rocking…and not in chairs!!!!
Can’t wait for your Cook Book!!!!
I need 8 of them….please!!!!
Big Hugs to you both!!!
LikeLike
By: Barbara W. on March 5, 2012
at 10:45 AM
Been waiting all weekend for a post from you. I always read your articles aloud to my husband. It helps us savor the moment longer. Thanks
LikeLike
By: Kathleen McGee on March 5, 2012
at 10:37 AM
I’ll bet that most of you never saw Rush’s TV show. As a would-be entertainer, he was a total bomb.
Attempts at humor were pathetic but its greatest message was visual. I still have an ingrained image of his audience of trained seals flipping their flippers, as if on command, every time he tried to say something intelligible.
Those trained seals are still out there, older but not wiser, and still voting. I see them each time there’s a picture of a Tea Party event.
Thanks a bunch Helen. As usual, you made my day.
LikeLike
By: jsri on March 5, 2012
at 10:34 AM
Our US Dept of Defense contracts with Limbaugh to air his show on Armed Forces America! This is the type of vile drivel that could stir up disrespect for and even violence against our female soldiers. Please consider signing this petition asking Defense Secretary Panetta to stop broadcasting Rush’s show. This is NOT how we should be spending our tax dollars! https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/sec-panetta-get-rush-limbaugh-armed-forces-radio-now-no-tax-money-abusive-divisive-insulting/p439GWMm
LikeLike
By: susanwastate on March 5, 2012
at 10:32 AM
Anonymous, you may think you are a recovering slut but there is no redemption for sluts or felons. 😉
What are the slut rules? My daughter takes birth control pills but isn’t sexually active yet. Is she a slut? My husband had a vasectomy after our children were born. Is he a slut? Or just a gigolo? (Go ahead, hum the song…)
Pass the pumpkin pie! (I’m increasing my vegetable intake)
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 5, 2012
at 10:22 AM
Charter member of the sluts/snobs society here. At least I am alive to see my grandchildren and to be a real part of my family. Here’s a real teeth-grinder: Bain Capital owns a portion of the syndication company for Lim-paw’s program. Yes, its a good idea to sign all those petitions to the sponsors so they pull the plug, but it looks as if we will have to go a step and a half beyond that. Yup, he sure is an addict and a lunatic which all too often goes hand in hand. Another teeth-grinder: where were the Republican men who stood up to Rushie in defense of their own wives and family members? They do realize that this “slut” thing was broad brush, don’t they? Maybe their insurance plans don’t cover backbones.
LikeLike
By: Mageen in Old Virginny on March 5, 2012
at 10:18 AM
Bravo, Helen! The point is, we’re all better off when we’re all better off! Insurance costs are POOLED, and fewer unwanted pregnancies in the POOL save us all save us all money. Every $1 spent on family planning/contraception saves $3.74 on what would otherwise have to be spent on prenatal/delivery care costs. Insurance companies know this is a good deal so you don’t see them fighting this. Plus it’s good for women, and I really think most men would rather support 1, 2 or 3 (or even zero) kids instead of 10. So it’s really hard to see what the GOP is in a tizzy about.
As for this freedom of religion stuff, each individual has the absolute right to religious freedom. Attend any church, temple, or synagogue you like. Donate as you feel obligated. Worship as you please. Place on yourself any restriction in diet, activity or anything else that you feel is in keeping with your beliefs … but only on yourself. You don’t get to impose these restrictions on your fellow citizens.
LikeLike
By: susanwastate on March 5, 2012
at 10:18 AM
sorry not viewers, but listeners.
It was good to read that.
I wonder what the real number is.
LikeLike
By: lilly lily on March 5, 2012
at 9:56 AM
Never used it, never needed to, but that doesn’t mean I didn’t appreciate that it was out there.
Rush is a big fat mass of hot air.
The Young Turk has challenged him to prove he has 20 million viewers as is their claim.
His organization plucked that number out of the thin air in the 1990’s, and it has never been proved by any stats.
He also sends out the show free, so the radio stations advertising is pure gravey for them. An incentive to be one of his outlets.
He is going to be squished and will be a blubbering pig before this is over.
LikeLike
By: lilly lily on March 5, 2012
at 9:55 AM
Been thinking about your post, Helen. There is a lot of personal freedom in being labelled ‘a slut’ and hey, according to Rush’s definition, we’re in the majority…….a slut nation!
LikeLike
By: aconventgirl on March 5, 2012
at 9:54 AM
saaalute Alan, Christine, Alison, Linda, oh all you wonderful wonderful sluts n snobs. I’m having more fun than a barrel full of prostitutes!
LikeLike
By: Silver on March 5, 2012
at 9:54 AM
Just a wonderful morning, new polls out and a new post from Helen! Love the title Helen and I think along with the laughs you’ve provided us, you’ll set even more people thinking and reasoning.
Why should insurance companies pay for birth control? Because your insurance policy belongs to you, not the insurance company. If your employer provides health insurance as one of your benefits remember it is actually part of your salary. Does your employer prohibit you from buying strawberries with your salary, even though them give him hives? Didn’t think so.
LikeLike
By: No One's Puppet on March 5, 2012
at 9:51 AM
Great Post!!! Thank you Helen and Margaret.
I ran across this on the internets:
There is a HUGE difference between Rush Limbaugh calling Ms. Fluke a slut and prostitute AND some on the other side calling Sarah Palin ALMOST as bad names. Ms Fluke is a PRIVATE CITIZEN, Sarah Palin is a PUBLIC FIGURE. And then there is the LIE of it. Calling a women who is an ignorant bitch an ignorant bitch, is not in the same ballpark as calling a woman who is not a slut and a prostitute, a slut and prostitute.
Any person, group or religious organization who works to reduce access to contraception is MORE PRO ABORTION than Planned Parenthood. You Betcha!
http://rackjite.com/archives/9364-Fox-News-employees-receive-contraception-insurance,-Chris-Wallace.html
LikeLike
By: juneaujoe on March 5, 2012
at 9:46 AM
latesummer, that is MY idea, too! The problem here (with the church, too), is the name and the packaging and the marketing of those things, calling them “birth control” which is apparently a phrase fraught with such EMOTION in the church (if you believe them that say so!) Everyone recognizes that round pink package, (or not-round, but highly recognizable, “girl stuff” packaging) and everyone is going around saying things like “birth control is used for medical conditions other than birth control.” This makes about as much sense to people who don’t understand how it works as…. well, let’s just say even a lot of women who I know WHO ARE TAKING IT do not understand the absolute importance of taking your pill every day, and not being late to take it, because of how the hormones work. So yes, we need to call these with a different name and package them differently. And that would avoid horrible stories like this one from happening, too: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/03/04/1070800/-I-ve-spent-the-past-2-days-trying-to-convince-my-16-y-o-she-is-not-a-slut-?via=search
LikeLike
By: Norma on March 5, 2012
at 9:43 AM
I will proudly stand with all you “Sluts and Snobs”. Now let’s show them what happens when you call a Lady….. a slut or a snob.
“But either way we will profoundly change the definition of just how stupid is stupid.”
Sad that this country with all it’s potential to be a world leader is reduced to this truthful statement.
Peace.
LikeLike
By: Cynthia on March 5, 2012
at 9:43 AM
I’ve been a recovering slut for 15 years…ever since menopause set in.
Helen and Margaret, you are a national treasure.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 9:37 AM
OH! My husband and I were just talking about this week. So let me get this straight, we won’t give those slutty, sex hungry girls access to birth control because they’re prostitutes, then when they get pregnant they can’t have an abortion because that’d make them baby killers, then when the baby is born and they need government assistance we’ll make them jump through a dozen hoops to qualify. When they do, we’ll whine about those government moochers. Meanwhile, when Rush can’t get his willy up we’ll pay for him so that he can sow his wild oats leading a prolific life creating more babies because those damn sluts dared to ask for birth control and were denied. This makes a TON of sense to me! I feel totally enlightened today.
By the way, my husband has declared himself a slut since he had the insurance pay for his vasectomy. Whew! At least I’m not the little tart in my house.
LikeLike
By: Wendy on March 5, 2012
at 9:37 AM
Why don’t we just give Birth Control pills another nam? Given the IQ of the GOP, it would take years for them to figure it out. We could simply call them hormone pills. Then it would really be between you and the Dr for the use of the prescription. Sorta like aspirin – you could take them for headaches, backaches, oh yeah, put them between your knees for birth control.
Another card carrying member of the slut and snob society! membership does have it previledges! Thanks Helen and Margaret – always love your view of the world, the landscape is better.
LikeLike
By: latesummer1954 on March 5, 2012
at 9:35 AM
Yes, delurkergurl – I understand you *completely*.
My thoughts exactly.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 9:33 AM
PFessor, I don’t think you’ll get a response from Herb right away. I suspect that it will take him a little while to catch on that there’s a new post. Just a hunch that he’s a lot like Noah in that respect. 😉
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 5, 2012
at 9:28 AM
I guess since my taxes are paying for highways in Nevada which I will never see those who do use them should post videos of them enjoying said highways. The National Weather Service is posting tornado warnings which do not apply to me – where is my tornado footage?
LikeLike
By: cinderellen (@cinderellen) on March 5, 2012
at 9:23 AM
Bravo Helen, I was originally prescribed the pill, back when it was new, for endometriosis. And boy did it ever have some great side effects. It allowed me to become a happy, happy slut. I hope this issue sinks the Republicans for a long time so they can do some real soul searching about the insanity of their party. In the meantime, as a Canadian, I am enjoying the train wreck spectacle.
LikeLike
By: Alison S on March 5, 2012
at 9:18 AM
I, too, thank you for sharing your thoughts infused with humor and barbs!
Crazy world we’re living in these days. If we all have to go backward in time, then we need to go back ALL the way – – – sans technology updates. No internet, cell phones, 24 hour news cycle . . . . I don’t think that’s quite what they have in mind.
LikeLike
By: Anonymous1253 on March 5, 2012
at 9:11 AM
Well said Helen…You & Margaret RAWK… Love the Rush /Jenny Craig comment…that about sums it up…LOL
Was a proud member of the slut club for many years as well….
I agree with Leah…Rush only “apoligised” because too many sponsors were jumping that sinking ship….
LOVE how you tell it like it is Girls…Keep on speaking out!!
LikeLike
By: Linda on March 5, 2012
at 9:07 AM
Wow. I’m a slut and a snob. My daughter and daughter-in-law (who has two lovely children, but gets terrible varicose veins and is on bed rest when pregnant, so decided two were enough!) are both sluts and snobs. And by the way, all are employed and paying taxes. God, the GOP is dumber than a brick these days. Where are the jobs? And Boehner, don’t tell me your ‘jobs bills’ are stalled in the Senate. Not one of those bills created jobs; they were just covers for your demonization of various groups in this country.
Well, we have the answer. Vote out every blessed Republican from now until doomsday. And let the Democrats right the ship, as we always do.
LikeLike
By: sallyinmially in MI on March 5, 2012
at 9:02 AM
Rush saw the Dollar Signs in the form of advertisers jumping ship, thus the apology, well sorta.
LikeLike
By: Leah on March 5, 2012
at 8:52 AM
Oops, that Christine person up there was me.
LikeLike
By: Tine on March 5, 2012
at 8:51 AM
Proud member of the Snobby Slut Society here. Married and Catholic too. Cue Santorum’s head exploding.
LikeLike
By: ChristineZW@comcast.net on March 5, 2012
at 8:50 AM
What you don’t understand is that Rush Limbo was complimenting women with the slut word. He loves sluts. He’s had four wives and none of them produced a child. Obviously they are all sluts because they used birth control. (Although, just seeing Limbo naked would be contraceptive enough for most people.)
LikeLike
By: Alan on March 5, 2012
at 8:41 AM
Thank you for speaking up on this issue Helen! We all need to stand tall and strong in the face of the ignorance which is today’s Republican Party. We can all play a part by doing something meaningful. Ideas include sending acorns instead of flowers in memoriam for Andrew Breitbart, donating to Planned Parenthood, getting out to help register new voters, writing letters to our Senators and Representatives, boycotting anyone who still advertises during the Rush Limbaugh show. That’s just a sampling, but rest assured there’s no end to the good we can accomplish in a grass roots kind of way. Just stand up for what is true and correct and say, “Enougn is enough!”
LikeLike
By: Mariah on March 5, 2012
at 8:32 AM
Been called a lot of things during my 72 years, but never a slut before. But if Rush thinks anyone one who uses/used birth control pills is a slut, it’s going to take some getting used to. I had two kids 13 months a part before they even had the pill. Trust me, a slut is the last thing my husband would have called me when I went on the pill! We had 4 kids before he got his vasectomy after I had a blood clot from using the pill. Then I was blessed with endometriosis and had to go on a different dosage to stop the bleeding so I didn’t hemorrhage every month or have anymore ovarian cysts. Not once did my doctor warn me I was a slut for doing this. Yes, this is going to take some getting used to. Will we have to sign our names with a “SL” behind it to warm the young ladies we have won our “A” and they too will have to wear it in shame for being responsible. Do men really want us to have a Quiver-full so he can look manly? Broke, but manly? Really?
LikeLike
By: MrsGunka on March 5, 2012
at 8:26 AM
Rush has some serious mental health problems. We all need to contact the advertisers to his radio show and tell them we won’t be buying their products in the future. He has been referred to as an entertainer………..his hateful rants are hardly ‘entertaining.’
Helen, you make my day! Thank you for taking the time to post your timely and insightful thoughts.
LikeLike
By: aconventgirl on March 5, 2012
at 8:18 AM
Rush & Jenny Craig – LMAO! Had to v e r y carefully swallow my coffee. I should know better!
I’m eager for November but for now will remain content with the Republican “popcorn primaries.” It is providing PLENTY to talk about, and very little of it is good for their party.
LikeLike
By: delurkergurl on March 5, 2012
at 8:17 AM
Thank you so much for the down to earth, honest post. If we all had the courage and gift for writing as you do, the world would be a better place.
Keep telling it like it is, glad to be a fan.
LikeLike
By: LilliBess Chris on March 5, 2012
at 8:12 AM
Dear P,
You said it better than I did!
And I do DANCE. Guess I am going straight to hell…..
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 8:09 AM
Jon –
Why should Medicare pay for my coronary bypass? My meds, my artifcial hip? Shouldn’t that be paid for by me?
(I have none of those, but probably will one day…)
Why should insurance companies pay for broken legs? Well, because you paid your premium, that’s why. Ditto birth control. The govt regulates the insurance industry heavily already; this is just another regulation requiring them to cover certain things.
The true Libertarian (me) doesn’t believe the govt should mandate ANY particular coverage, but since they already do, this mandate is nothing special, except it flouts the ReBiblicans’ delicate sensibilities about all things vagina.
Maybe if the ReBiblicans would loosen up a little they would get laid more and they wouldn’t have such a pimple-faced teenaged boy’s fascination with women’s reproductive apparatus. (Reminds me of something I saw on the stairwell wall at my dorm in the ‘seventies: “Rednecks get f**ked!” Under it someone had scrawled, “Yeah, but not very often.” LOL
The ReBiblicans are cruising at flank speed to throw away the few remaining votes of the distaff side of humanity – you know, that one that now votes about 90% Democrat…
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 8:06 AM
Jon, nothing Rush says ever makes a valid point.
1) Insurers pay for Viagra.
2) Birth control pills, which are basically hormone bills, are used for many other medical reasons other than contraception.
3) Contraception saves insurers money.
Think about it instead of being a troll.
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 7:57 AM
In the tragicomedy of this election season, I can always count on a laugh and a smile from you two and Gail Collins. Thanks for telling it like it is with humor.
LikeLike
By: brenda on March 5, 2012
at 7:56 AM
Helen, as usual you are right on. Rush was out of line with the slut comment but he does raise a valid point. Why should insurance companies pay for birth control? Or, why should we as taxpayers? Shouldn’t birth control be paid for by those who use it?
LikeLike
By: Jon on March 5, 2012
at 7:52 AM
Once again, are right on. Tell it like it! Ever consider running for Prez?
LikeLike
By: Eve on March 5, 2012
at 7:51 AM
I think Limbaugh and Santorum have sealed the ReBiblicans’ fates, and that is not a good thing. We need real horse races to keep people honest.
Jesus. What a bunch of maroons. I wouldn’t dare run for dogcatcher as a Republican this election.
Sara – a slutty snob: my kind of girl. Watch out, though. Sex could lead to dancing.
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 7:51 AM
Helen, you and Margaret are awesome! I love it when you tell us what’s on your mind, because it’s on our minds too. I guess I’m a Slut too! Oh well, it’s better than being a freakin’ Pig!
LikeLike
By: Dee on March 5, 2012
at 7:50 AM
Just realized that having a child in graduate school makes me a “snob”.
I will live with it……….
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 7:44 AM
Well, as long as it is confession time, I too, was a slut, but I don’t need birth control anymore! Had a tubal ligation after my second child was born….. gasp!! I am sure that makes me additionally slutty in the eyes of Rush and his minions. Used birth control pills for family planning, have two wonderful children, one happily married, one in graduate school.
You ladies are my idols!!
LikeLike
By: Sara on March 5, 2012
at 7:43 AM
I know this is a bit OT, but I want to bust Herb’s chops a little.
Herb, you need to read more carefully. I SAID, the girl is YOUR DAUGHTER and she is the one of legal age – nineteen – not the boy, who is seventeen.
Now, do you want to revisit that? Do you think your daughter, the NINETEEN year-old, should go to jail, pay a fine, register as a lifelong sex offender and forever lose her ability to vote, because SHE had sex with a SEVENTEEN year-old boy?
Now, try again. LOL.
This is fun!
LikeLike
By: PFesser on March 5, 2012
at 7:41 AM
Yep – I guess I fall into the slut catogorey as well. Using birth control had 2 planned pregnancies. My husband and I raised them, supported them financially and emotionally while tucking away money for their college education. One is ready to graduate, the other is in college. I thought I was doing a good thing – funny to find out the Republicans think I am a slut. But I guess it doesn’t matter – I would never vote for one of the sleezeballs anyway….
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 7:36 AM
You two said exactly what I think, thank you for putting it in writing!
LikeLike
By: Anonymous on March 5, 2012
at 7:32 AM
Amen!
LikeLike
By: Norma on March 5, 2012
at 7:31 AM